Muscle Cannibalism

Greytfish

:drinker: But, it's 5 o'clock somewhere.

_Terrapin_

Finally explains why someone said there is a person posting 1.7 grams; probably a good idea if we read pounds or not. Safe to say .7 to 1 gram per pound of LBM; hence my original question of BF for the OP. But the thread didn't derail, so the stats and nutrition part is key on these threads. Enjoying the recognition by Dan, and, you may to clarify for your FL who are following you advice of 1.7; cheers:drinker:

jonnythan

Finally explains why someone said there is a person posting 1.7 grams; probably a good idea if we read pounds or not. Safe to say .7 to 1 gram per pound of LBM; hence my original question of BF for the OP. But the thread didn't derail, so the stats and nutrition part is key on these threads. Enjoying the recognition by Dan, and, you may to clarify for your FL who are following you advice of 1.7; cheers:drinker:

0.7 grams per lb of lbm is not enough if you're on a deficit. 1-1.4 is better.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24092765

ironanimal

Finally explains why someone said there is a person posting 1.7 grams; probably a good idea if we read pounds or not. Safe to say .7 to 1 gram per pound of LBM; hence my original question of BF for the OP. But the thread didn't derail, so the stats and nutrition part is key on these threads. Enjoying the recognition by Dan, and, you may to clarify for your FL who are following you advice of 1.7; cheers:drinker:

0.7 grams per lb of lbm is not enough if you're on a deficit. 1-1.4 is better.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24092765

Wasn't the 0.7g per lb for TOTAL bodyweight originally, rather than LBM only? No bearing on what you posted but that seems to ring a bell.

jonnythan

Finally explains why someone said there is a person posting 1.7 grams; probably a good idea if we read pounds or not. Safe to say .7 to 1 gram per pound of LBM; hence my original question of BF for the OP. But the thread didn't derail, so the stats and nutrition part is key on these threads. Enjoying the recognition by Dan, and, you may to clarify for your FL who are following you advice of 1.7; cheers:drinker:

0.7 grams per lb of lbm is not enough if you're on a deficit. 1-1.4 is better.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24092765

Wasn't the 0.7g per lb for TOTAL bodyweight originally, rather than LBM only? No bearing on what you posted but that seems to ring a bell.

Depending on BF%, 0.7g per lb for total bodyweight is close. But obviously that's not what the poster I was responding to said.

Absolute binimum target for people in a calorie deficit who are training should be 1 gram per pound of lean body mass.

ironanimal

Finally explains why someone said there is a person posting 1.7 grams; probably a good idea if we read pounds or not. Safe to say .7 to 1 gram per pound of LBM; hence my original question of BF for the OP. But the thread didn't derail, so the stats and nutrition part is key on these threads. Enjoying the recognition by Dan, and, you may to clarify for your FL who are following you advice of 1.7; cheers:drinker:

0.7 grams per lb of lbm is not enough if you're on a deficit. 1-1.4 is better.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24092765

Wasn't the 0.7g per lb for TOTAL bodyweight originally, rather than LBM only? No bearing on what you posted but that seems to ring a bell.

Depending on BF%, 0.7g per lb for total bodyweight is close. But obviously that's not what the poster I was responding to said.

Absolute binimum target for people in a calorie deficit who are training should be 1 gram per pound of lean body mass.

Ah yeah, I know. I just remembered that figure being quoted before and wanted to double check the context for it. I shoot for about 200g protein daily and call it even.