Spiderman or Superman

khara2012
khara2012 Posts: 1,051 Member
The other day at work, some of the guys were having a discussion about who was better...Spiderman or Superman, and why. I want to know what everyone else thinks. Who's better, Spiderman or Superman, and why?
«1345

Replies

  • Keepcalmanddontblink
    Keepcalmanddontblink Posts: 718 Member
    Spiderman for sure! Cause a wise cracking, snarky sense of humor beats out a square pants personality any day. (no offense to Superman fans.)
  • LoneWolf_70
    LoneWolf_70 Posts: 1,151 Member
    as superheroes they are both pretty lame. Avengers all the way.
  • romach79
    romach79 Posts: 277 Member
    I'll have to go with the son of Jor-El. He is a legitimate super hero - spidey got his powers from juicing. :wink:
  • This content has been removed.
  • _HeartsOnFire_
    _HeartsOnFire_ Posts: 5,304 Member
    *cracks knuckles*

    Spider-Man. Hands down.

    Spider-Man was a revolutionary character because he broke the mold. Before then all the heroes were adults with kid sidekicks. Peter Parker was a teenager. Even Stan Lee's editor thought he was crazy making a kid the main character. But that just made it easier for young readers to relate to the problems Peter Parker was going through. He didn't get the cute girl. He wasn't a billionaire playboy. He didn't even have a mother and father, plus his uncle dies because of his own actions. There was nothing like that in the world of comics. A character with real problems that people could relate to.

    Superman? He's well regarded for being the first real superhero. Other than that I'm hard pressed to say much good about him. He's the embodiement of what's right and what's good, but every character was back then. He has every power, he never has to struggle at anything. His alter ego is ridiculous. They haven't been able to make a decent movie out of the character since Christopher Reeves and even those are questionable, (1 & 2 you can argue are good, 3 & 4 are a joke).

    Peter Parker, the Amazing Spider-Man, wins by virtue of being more interesting and relateable.

    QFT...yup...all of this.
  • sheenarama
    sheenarama Posts: 733 Member
    *cracks knuckles*

    Spider-Man. Hands down.

    Spider-Man was a revolutionary character because he broke the mold. Before then all the heroes were adults with kid sidekicks. Peter Parker was a teenager. Even Stan Lee's editor thought he was crazy making a kid the main character. But that just made it easier for young readers to relate to the problems Peter Parker was going through. He didn't get the cute girl. He wasn't a billionaire playboy. He didn't even have a mother and father, plus his uncle dies because of his own actions. There was nothing like that in the world of comics. A character with real problems that people could relate to.

    Superman? He's well regarded for being the first real superhero. Other than that I'm hard pressed to say much good about him. He's the embodiement of what's right and what's good, but every character was back then. He has every power, he never has to struggle at anything. His alter ego is ridiculous. They haven't been able to make a decent movie out of the character since Christopher Reeves and even those are questionable, (1 & 2 you can argue are good, 3 & 4 are a joke).

    Peter Parker, the Amazing Spider-Man, wins by virtue of being more interesting and relateable.

    Nerd
  • This content has been removed.
  • Escloflowne
    Escloflowne Posts: 2,038 Member
    What Brett said

    as superheroes they are both pretty lame. Avengers all the way.

    Spider-Man is one of the Avengers....
  • capnrus789
    capnrus789 Posts: 2,736 Member

    They haven't been able to make a decent movie out of the character since Christopher Reeves and even those are questionable, (1 & 2 you can argue are good, 3 & 4 are a joke).

    WHAT WHAT WHAT?!?!? But Richard Pryor is in 3! Richard friggin' Pryor! And the half pennies! I think you're wrong, good sir. Dead wrong.
  • Galatea_Stone
    Galatea_Stone Posts: 2,037 Member
    What Brett said

    as superheroes they are both pretty lame. Avengers all the way.

    Spider-Man is one of the Avengers....

    Yeah, that made me twitchy for a second.
  • Escloflowne
    Escloflowne Posts: 2,038 Member

    They haven't been able to make a decent movie out of the character since Christopher Reeves and even those are questionable, (1 & 2 you can argue are good, 3 & 4 are a joke).

    WHAT WHAT WHAT?!?!? But Richard Pryor is in 3! Richard friggin' Pryor! And the half pennies! I think you're wrong, good sir. Dead wrong.

    I think those movies suck because it's really hard to enjoy a movie where the main character is practically invulnerable. I mean even Thor get's his *kitten* kicked in his movies and he can take a punch from the Hulk and the Cursed. In the new Superman movie, he took a beating but was completely unscathed, felt like a waste of beating on each other for 30 minutes!
  • Keepcalmanddontblink
    Keepcalmanddontblink Posts: 718 Member
    What Brett said

    as superheroes they are both pretty lame. Avengers all the way.

    Spider-Man is one of the Avengers....
    One of the New Avengers plus he worked with the original Avengers, so by your own argument, Spiderman is the better choice. :bigsmile:
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    I hate when people bash people for others for their choice to be a "conformist".

    Usually coming from the same people who would say "you are just close minded" when they themselves are being close minded.

    One can like superman and not be lame. Few other superheroes are so awesome that their biggest obstacle is controlling their awesome either...
  • This content has been removed.
  • LoneWolf_70
    LoneWolf_70 Posts: 1,151 Member
    What Brett said

    as superheroes they are both pretty lame. Avengers all the way.

    Spider-Man is one of the Avengers....

    Movie Avengers. Sorry comic nerds lol. Spiderman is still lame.
  • Escloflowne
    Escloflowne Posts: 2,038 Member
    I hate when people bash people for others for their choice to be a "conformist".

    Usually coming from the same people who would say "you are just close minded" when they themselves are being close minded.

    One can like superman and not be lame. Few other superheroes are so awesome that their biggest obstacle is controlling their awesome either...

    I disagree with the bold part, you can't be cool and like Superman, it's just not possible...
  • Escloflowne
    Escloflowne Posts: 2,038 Member
    What Brett said

    as superheroes they are both pretty lame. Avengers all the way.

    Spider-Man is one of the Avengers....

    Movie Avengers. Sorry comic nerds lol. Spiderman is still lame.

    ahhh you're one of those people....
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    What Brett said

    as superheroes they are both pretty lame. Avengers all the way.

    Spider-Man is one of the Avengers....

    Movie Avengers. Sorry comic nerds lol. Spiderman is still lame.

    the spiderman reboot has tainted that whole movie legacy...
  • This content has been removed.
  • LoneWolf_70
    LoneWolf_70 Posts: 1,151 Member
    What Brett said

    as superheroes they are both pretty lame. Avengers all the way.

    Spider-Man is one of the Avengers....

    Movie Avengers. Sorry comic nerds lol. Spiderman is still lame.

    ahhh you're one of those people....
    yes, I have a life lol JK
  • RINat612
    RINat612 Posts: 251 Member
    I'm not understanding the question. Who is better? Like, who would win in a fight? Which super hero's artistic style was better? Who's story was better? There are so many ways to approach this question it hurts the brain. Which one was made into a better movie? Who had the better emo strut?
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    I hate when people bash people for others for their choice to be a "conformist".

    Usually coming from the same people who would say "you are just close minded" when they themselves are being close minded.

    One can like superman and not be lame. Few other superheroes are so awesome that their biggest obstacle is controlling their awesome either...

    I get what you're saying, but it doesn't do much to help him be relateable, or add to any dramatic moments in a conflict. If the character's only concern is not beating up the bad guy TOO much...

    It's kind of like a guy who's so rich he's not sure what to spend his money on. No one really roots for that guy or can relate in any way.

    well, the new movie kinda screwed up my statement anyway, as superman killed probably in the 6 digits, but to keep the PG13 rating, they could show any of the collateral damage.

    I'm anxious to see how the world doesn't HATE him to start the next movie. I would if I lived in that world...
  • Escloflowne
    Escloflowne Posts: 2,038 Member
    I'm not understanding the question. Who is better? Like, who would win in a fight? Which super hero's artistic style was better? Who's story was better? There are so many ways to approach this question it hurts the brain. Which one was made into a better movie? Who had the better emo strut?

    Spider-Man 3 never happened...
  • This content has been removed.
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    I'm not understanding the question. Who is better? Like, who would win in a fight? Which super hero's artistic style was better? Who's story was better? There are so many ways to approach this question it hurts the brain. Which one was made into a better movie? Who had the better emo strut?

    Spider-Man 3 never happened...

    still better made movies than the reboot.
  • Escloflowne
    Escloflowne Posts: 2,038 Member
    I hate when people bash people for others for their choice to be a "conformist".

    Usually coming from the same people who would say "you are just close minded" when they themselves are being close minded.

    One can like superman and not be lame. Few other superheroes are so awesome that their biggest obstacle is controlling their awesome either...

    I get what you're saying, but it doesn't do much to help him be relateable, or add to any dramatic moments in a conflict. If the character's only concern is not beating up the bad guy TOO much...

    It's kind of like a guy who's so rich he's not sure what to spend his money on. No one really roots for that guy or can relate in any way.

    well, the new movie kinda screwed up my statement anyway, as superman killed probably in the 6 digits, but to keep the PG13 rating, they could show any of the collateral damage.

    I'm anxious to see how the world doesn't HATE him to start the next movie. I would if I lived in that world...

    It's not his fault!!! He's pretty much Godzilla in the new movie lol

    Also a super hero that can't kill is really lame, Marvel does that so much better, look at Captain America, he's a goody two shoes but seriously "expletive deleted" up some "expletive deleted" in the first 5 minutes of Winter Soldier
  • Keepcalmanddontblink
    Keepcalmanddontblink Posts: 718 Member

    the spiderman reboot has tainted that whole movie legacy...

    I'll agree with you there. You see how much of a comic nerd I am and I couldn't even watch those.
    The only thing I like about the reboot is that they don't ignore the whole Gwen Stacy character. That was the one thing in the original set of movies that irked me to no end.
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    I hate when people bash people for others for their choice to be a "conformist".

    Usually coming from the same people who would say "you are just close minded" when they themselves are being close minded.

    One can like superman and not be lame. Few other superheroes are so awesome that their biggest obstacle is controlling their awesome either...

    I get what you're saying, but it doesn't do much to help him be relateable, or add to any dramatic moments in a conflict. If the character's only concern is not beating up the bad guy TOO much...

    It's kind of like a guy who's so rich he's not sure what to spend his money on. No one really roots for that guy or can relate in any way.

    well, the new movie kinda screwed up my statement anyway, as superman killed probably in the 6 digits, but to keep the PG13 rating, they could show any of the collateral damage.

    I'm anxious to see how the world doesn't HATE him to start the next movie. I would if I lived in that world...

    It's not his fault!!! He's pretty much Godzilla in the new movie lol

    Also a super hero that can't kill is really lame, Marvel does that so much better, look at Captain America, he's a goody two shoes but seriously "expletive deleted" up some "expletive deleted" in the first 5 minutes of Winter Soldier

    yeah, but he's so lame he can't even carry his own movie post Avengers awesome. We gotta have sidecharacters in tight leather and cool outfits to help him in his own movie.
  • Escloflowne
    Escloflowne Posts: 2,038 Member

    the spiderman reboot has tainted that whole movie legacy...

    I'll agree with you there. You see how much of a comic nerd I am and I couldn't even watch those.
    The only thing I like about the reboot is that they don't ignore the whole Gwen Stacy character. That was the one thing in the original set of movies that irked me to no end.

    I prefer the new ones, Parker and the story line is more accurate when compared to the comics and the web shooters(although I didn't mind them being part of his powers in the first movies) are cooler. Also the introduced Black cat...
  • RINat612
    RINat612 Posts: 251 Member

    the spiderman reboot has tainted that whole movie legacy...

    I'll agree with you there. You see how much of a comic nerd I am and I couldn't even watch those.

    Dude. Emma Stone. :huh: