"Just" Cardio

fteale

I often read "You won't gain muscle by just doing cardio" but what exercise IS just cardio? Running and cycling build leg muscles, rowing builds them all over, as does swimming, I can't think of any sport where the cardio aspect is balanced with some strengthening effect. So what is "just" cardio? Air punching?

chevy88grl

Cardio WILL build muscle! If it didn't my thighs wouldn't be pure muscle since the only work I really do on my legs is running (and running is cardio).

erickirb

I often read "You won't gain muscle by just doing cardio" but what exercise IS just cardio? Running and cycling build leg muscles, rowing builds them all over, as does swimming, I can't think of any sport where the cardio aspect is balanced with some strengthening effect. So what is "just" cardio? Air punching?

most likely cardio will actually burn muscle and make them smaller (look at marathon runners, no muscle and they run all the time) Cardio breaks muscle down, not build it up.

erickirb

Cardio WILL build muscle! If it didn't my thighs wouldn't be pure muscle since the only work I really do on my legs is running (and running is cardio).

That can also be a function of genetics, not due to the running. I have thin legs and did even when I was dead lifting and squatting double my body weight for multiple reps.

SpaceMarkus

It's not so much building muscle as leaning muscle. You won't get "bigger" doing cardio, and in fact if you're trying to strength train cardio will actually inhibit your muscle growth (from info by the ISSA).

chevy88grl

Cardio WILL build muscle! If it didn't my thighs wouldn't be pure muscle since the only work I really do on my legs is running (and running is cardio).

That can also be a function of genetics, not due to the running. I have thin legs and did even when I was dead lifting and squatting double my body weight for multiple reps.

Perhaps some of it is genetics, but I can tell you that they were NEVER pure muscle until I started running. So, obviously running is what did it. Nothing anyone says will change my mind - sorry. I've watched how they've changed since I started running. They look like completely different thighs.

I don't do any kind of work on my legs because I run every single time I go to the gym. My thighs are still larger, but they are pure muscle. There isn't any fat left to them.

*shrug*

fteale

Cardio WILL build muscle! If it didn't my thighs wouldn't be pure muscle since the only work I really do on my legs is running (and running is cardio).

My point is, running has a cardiovascular effect (which is what people mean by cardio - it causes your heart rate to rise), but it also has a strengthening effect (what people call weights) as your legs are weight bearing. As most people hit the ground with some force, the strengthening effect of running is actually quite a lot (the force going through each of my legs when I land is my weight, 133lbs, at around 3Gs, that is a LOT of force, equivalent to a huge weight).

fteale

I often read "You won't gain muscle by just doing cardio" but what exercise IS just cardio? Running and cycling build leg muscles, rowing builds them all over, as does swimming, I can't think of any sport where the cardio aspect is balanced with some strengthening effect. So what is "just" cardio? Air punching?

most likely cardio will actually burn muscle and make them smaller (look at marathon runners, no muscle and they run all the time) Cardio breaks muscle down, not build it up.

What I am saying is how can there be such a things as pure "cardio"? I can't think of any exercise that raises your heart rate with no muscular force. And muscular force WILL build muscle.

chevy88grl

Cardio WILL build muscle! If it didn't my thighs wouldn't be pure muscle since the only work I really do on my legs is running (and running is cardio).

My point is, running has a cardiovascular effect (which is what people mean by cardio - it causes your heart rate to rise), but it also has a strengthening effect (what people call weights) as your legs are weight bearing. As most people hit the ground with some force, the strengthening effect of running is actually quite a lot (the force going through each of my legs when I land is my weight, 133lbs, at around 3Gs, that is a LOT of force, equivalent to a huge weight).

I was just saying that regardless of what people say - I believe that cardio CAN build muscle. I know people say it won't, but I see how different my thighs are pre-running and post-running. They are pure muscle now. So, yes, I do believe that cardio can build muscle.

Is their "pure" cardio? Well, I highly doubt it. Since everything you'd be doing would be weight bearing.

shassen

cardio tones muscle, and yes you will lose muscle if you don't eat properly. With that being said, you will uncover all the muscle that you already have if you were to only do cardio. If you are trying to burn any amount of fat, you need to do cardio quite a bit. If you want to build your muscles, you would need some sort of lifting routine in order to fatigue those muscles properly.

erickirb

I often read "You won't gain muscle by just doing cardio" but what exercise IS just cardio? Running and cycling build leg muscles, rowing builds them all over, as does swimming, I can't think of any sport where the cardio aspect is balanced with some strengthening effect. So what is "just" cardio? Air punching?

most likely cardio will actually burn muscle and make them smaller (look at marathon runners, no muscle and they run all the time) Cardio breaks muscle down, not build it up.

What I am saying is how can there be such a things as pure "cardio"? I can't think of any exercise that raises your heart rate with no muscular force. And muscular force WILL build muscle.

but running acutally burns muscle, not builds it, so yes there may be a strength element to it but in "real" strength training you can not do 1000's of reps without a rest yet you do with cardio exercises, so it is not really strength training at all and the multiple reps may even make your muscles smaller, not larger.

fteale

I am not disagreeing that running builds muscle. Absolutely it does. No runner would disagree with you. What I am saying is that running ISN'T "just" cardiovascular exercise. It has a weight aspect too. As does almost every sport, so the people who say "Cardio doesn't build muscle" are kind of missing the point, because pure cardio is nigh on impossible.

bcattoes

I often read "You won't gain muscle by just doing cardio" but what exercise IS just cardio? Running and cycling build leg muscles, rowing builds them all over, as does swimming, I can't think of any sport where the cardio aspect is balanced with some strengthening effect. So what is "just" cardio? Air punching?

most likely cardio will actually burn muscle and make them smaller (look at marathon runners, no muscle and they run all the time) Cardio breaks muscle down, not build it up.

When I read the OP I thought, "of course it builds muscle, just look at marathon runners" because their legs are all muscle. Then I read this. I think there is a real big divide on these boards as to just how bulky a muscle has to be before it's considered a muscle.

fteale

I often read "You won't gain muscle by just doing cardio" but what exercise IS just cardio? Running and cycling build leg muscles, rowing builds them all over, as does swimming, I can't think of any sport where the cardio aspect is balanced with some strengthening effect. So what is "just" cardio? Air punching?

most likely cardio will actually burn muscle and make them smaller (look at marathon runners, no muscle and they run all the time) Cardio breaks muscle down, not build it up.

What I am saying is how can there be such a things as pure "cardio"? I can't think of any exercise that raises your heart rate with no muscular force. And muscular force WILL build muscle.

but running acutally burns muscle, so yes there may be a strength element to it but in "real" strength training you can not do 1000's of reps without a rest yet you do with cardio exercises, so it is not really strength training at all.

It may not be strength training by your limited definition, but it does build strength. And increases muscle size.

erickirb

I am not disagreeing that running builds muscle. Absolutely it does. No runner would disagree with you. What I am saying is that running ISN'T "just" cardiovascular exercise. It has a weight aspect too. As does almost every sport, so the people who say "Cardio doesn't build muscle" are kind of missing the point, because pure cardio is nigh on impossible.

I am a runner and I disagree, running for most people (unless you are a genetic abnormality) will not build muscle, and if you are in a caloric deficit will actually burn muscle off of your body.

erickirb

I often read "You won't gain muscle by just doing cardio" but what exercise IS just cardio? Running and cycling build leg muscles, rowing builds them all over, as does swimming, I can't think of any sport where the cardio aspect is balanced with some strengthening effect. So what is "just" cardio? Air punching?

most likely cardio will actually burn muscle and make them smaller (look at marathon runners, no muscle and they run all the time) Cardio breaks muscle down, not build it up.

What I am saying is how can there be such a things as pure "cardio"? I can't think of any exercise that raises your heart rate with no muscular force. And muscular force WILL build muscle.

but running acutally burns muscle, so yes there may be a strength element to it but in "real" strength training you can not do 1000's of reps without a rest yet you do with cardio exercises, so it is not really strength training at all.

It may not be strength training by your limited definition, but it does build strength. And increases muscle size.

running actually decreases muscle size, more so if you are in a caloric deficit (look at long distance runners, thin as rakes) Look at the legs on these distance runners: http://www.bikeswimrun.com/what-to-remember-when-doing-long-distance-running/

bcattoes

Cardio WILL build muscle! If it didn't my thighs wouldn't be pure muscle since the only work I really do on my legs is running (and running is cardio).

My point is, running has a cardiovascular effect (which is what people mean by cardio - it causes your heart rate to rise), but it also has a strengthening effect (what people call weights) as your legs are weight bearing. As most people hit the ground with some force, the strengthening effect of running is actually quite a lot (the force going through each of my legs when I land is my weight, 133lbs, at around 3Gs, that is a LOT of force, equivalent to a huge weight).

I think you are absolutely correct. It's pretty much impossible to work your heart (cardio) without stressing your muscles.

fteale

cardio tones muscle, and yes you will lose muscle if you don't eat properly. With that being said, you will uncover all the muscle that you already have if you were to only do cardio. If you are trying to burn any amount of fat, you need to do cardio quite a bit. If you want to build your muscles, you would need some sort of lifting routine in order to fatigue those muscles properly.

Now that just isn't true. You don't need a specific "lifting routine" to build muscle. You have to have a weight aspect to your exercise regime, but that can be rowing, cycling, press ups, rock climbing, any one of 100s of sports that have a similar effect. Look at olympic swimmers. They have incredible bodies, and not from lifting weights.

erickirb

cardio tones muscle, and yes you will lose muscle if you don't eat properly. With that being said, you will uncover all the muscle that you already have if you were to only do cardio. If you are trying to burn any amount of fat, you need to do cardio quite a bit. If you want to build your muscles, you would need some sort of lifting routine in order to fatigue those muscles properly.

Now that just isn't true. You don't need a specific "lifting routine" to build muscle. You have to have a weight aspect to your exercise regime, but that can be rowing, cycling, press ups, rock climbing, any one of 100s of sports that have a similar effect. Look at olympic swimmers. They have incredible bodies, and not from lifting weights.

Olympic swimmers all lift weights as part of their training program.

bobbybdoe

cardio tones muscle, and yes you will lose muscle if you don't eat properly. With that being said, you will uncover all the muscle that you already have if you were to only do cardio. If you are trying to burn any amount of fat, you need to do cardio quite a bit. If you want to build your muscles, you would need some sort of lifting routine in order to fatigue those muscles properly.

Now that just isn't true. You don't need a specific "lifting routine" to build muscle. You have to have a weight aspect to your exercise regime, but that can be rowing, cycling, press ups, rock climbing, any one of 100s of sports that have a similar effect. Look at olympic swimmers. They have incredible bodies, and not from lifting weights.

I agree with you, but Olympic swimmers do lift weights.

bcattoes

cardio tones muscle, and yes you will lose muscle if you don't eat properly. With that being said, you will uncover all the muscle that you already have if you were to only do cardio. If you are trying to burn any amount of fat, you need to do cardio quite a bit. If you want to build your muscles, you would need some sort of lifting routine in order to fatigue those muscles properly.

Now that just isn't true. You don't need a specific "lifting routine" to build muscle. You have to have a weight aspect to your exercise regime, but that can be rowing, cycling, press ups, rock climbing, any one of 100s of sports that have a similar effect. Look at olympic swimmers. They have incredible bodies, and not from lifting weights.

Or tennis player's legs. I'm sure tennis is probably considered cardio, but D*** those tennis dudes have some fantastic legs.