What do you burn with your chest strap HRM?

nikki2609

i have the same HRM and i love it. I'm 5'3 and 121lbs, my usual gym day is around 50-60 mins, burn 350-400 on average (sometimes more if i give it some) and usually have my heart rate at 175-185 whilst doing cardio then weights at 140ish . MFP tells me i've burned loads more as do the gym machines.
whatever i burn i only eat half back incase it isn't accurate.


Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Weight Loss Tools

bobie1978

I thought so to when I got mine. But you need to figure out your target heart rate. Mine is in the 170's. I rarely see that with my HRM. You need to work harder to get the best calorie burn. I looked back at my classes I use to do and they are slightly higher than with HRM. Just find your target heart rate I bet you will see that it is closer to MFP.

lik_11

I'm 5'11"- and just under 200 pounds. With my HRM, I find that I burn 7-10 cals/min. When 10 cal/minute- it's very high intensity, no rest.

bobie1978

BTW does anyone know how to transfer workouts to computer for an ft7? I can't figure it out.. is there another part I need? lol probably sounds stupid!

sandyrrt

It's based on your heart rate. The higher your HR the higer the calories burned. I know with the Polor FT7 it has a "Fat " zone and a
"Fitness" zone that is calculated on HR. If you are in the "fat burn" zone, your HR is in the lower range, therefore burning less calories. After strapping on your chest strap and activating the watch, verify the HR displayed by checking your HR manually on your carotid artery or radial artery, using a watch with a second hand. Count your HR for a full 60sec. and see if it matches with the HRM.

sweetheart03622

I have the same HR and don't have this problem. My guess, with the amount of weight your ticker says you have to lose, that these numbers are far too low. Like others have said, make sure it's set up right with your correct age/sex/weight, that it is tight enough and placed right under the girls (on your bra line) and that the sensors are wet.

MariaChele85

Hi
I wear an HRM daily when exercising. I can tell you this. I'm 242 lbs and I burn anywhere from 400 to 580 for 60 minutes of circuit training. Bare with me on this question, but are you wearing it in the right spot?

Im 250, and yup this is about what i burn in 60 min.

RunHardBeStrong

I also have the same HRM and I average 11 cals per minute when pushing myself hard, my heart rate is usually 160-170 at these times. I am 36. 200 lbs. Like others said I would re-check your settings and if you're not wetting the sensors on the strap then do so. Everyone is different and has a different idea of intensity as well so maybe the numbers are correct for you. Good luck!

jmanthei98

I have the same HR and don't have this problem. My guess, with the amount of weight your ticker says you have to lose, that these numbers are far too low. Like others have said, make sure it's set up right with your correct age/sex/weight, that it is tight enough and placed right under the girls (on your bra line) and that the sensors are wet.

I was just about to say something like "under the girls"! If the monitor is too low or too high, it won't read right. And make sure you wet the sensors every time. The directions for the FT7 even tell you to do that. I hope you get it figured out soon. Good luck!

just2liveagain

Basic question: did you set your weight right on the HRM?

Yup, checked it 3 times

Okieace

I got a HRM for valentines day too (how romantic!). My problem was the opposite, I was burning far more calories then I was guesstimating.

just2liveagain

Hi
I wear an HRM daily when exercising. I can tell you this. I'm 242 lbs and I burn anywhere from 400 to 580 for 60 minutes of circuit training. Bare with me on this question, but are you wearing it in the right spot?

Right under my breasts where the bottom of my bra is

jarrettd

My daughter and I had very different results for 30DS, logged under "circuit training, general."

Me: 44 years old, 5'11", 153#.
MFP estimate: 200-ish calories, NB4 HRM: 150-ish.

My daughter: 22 yrs, 5'5" (I think), 298#
MFP estimate: 360 or so, NB4 HRM: 550+.

I can tell you that MFP doesn't know whether you poured it on or "phoned it in". On days I feel good and energized, I smoke some serious calories. If I'm there, but not really into it, the HRM knows. Trust your HRM.

MissMollieD

For walking or running, it's about 100 calories/miles on average (quoting Runner's World Magazine). I'm in pretty good shape and I am right dead on 100 for a mile. You figure, even if you are walking you are doing the same amount of work - just over a longer period of time. So if you are not in as good of shape or carrying some extra weight, you might burn more than 100 calories/mile or visa versa.

As for the HRM, I have a Polar RS300 and my strap drops in and out of picking up my heart rate - it is so frustrating. And it drops the heart rate signal, it stops calculating. I heard there are gels and stuff you can use, but I haven't tried any of these. I've noted for me, the estimates on machines and MFP are always twice as high as my actual caloric burn.

shmunster

I burn around 120 for a 30 min walk and I burn 220 doing 35 min ripped in 30 workout on my ft4 which I reckon is pretty accurate

just2liveagain

I have the same HRM and I would say the calories burned sound about right to me.

Currently I am 148.4 lbs and I generally burn about 170 calories doing 38 minutes of P90 strength and 280 calories doing 45 minutes of cardio. My heart rate is usually in the zone too.

What is your heart rate zone to be while exercising according to your monitor? Mine is between 119 and 175.

for tall 3 of the exercises I was in the zone the whole time, turbo jam I was pretty much right at the top of my THR zone for most of it and over it, with an average HR of 155

RunHardBeStrong

Just another thought. Is the strap tight enough? I know if it's to loose it won't keep track properly.

MissMollieD

BTW does anyone know how to transfer workouts to computer for an ft7? I can't figure it out.. is there another part I need? lol probably sounds stupid!

Yes, it's a little docking station with a USB and some software. Not sure if the FT7 is capable, but the RS300 is and I have it.

lind3400

I use one and I'm abot 180 and I do insanity and for 30 minutes of it I usually burn 350.....and thats hardcore workout for me.....but oyu should be burning more than you are becasue your heavier too and you will burn calories at a faster rate than someone smaller so I htink your HRM isn't measuring properly

Homer3D

I find mine is actually pretty close to what the treadmill says. The chest strap should be snug and put a little water on the flat part that makes contact to your chest.

mzjandiace

I just purchased Polar Ft40F Women's Heart Rate Monitor Watch!

TeaBea

Ah yes, welcome to the more accurate (and often disappointing) world of chest strap HRMs

These are correct. Machines and MFP inflate caloric burn because they're simply not as accurate.

Is it disappointing? Yes.
Is it more truthful? Yes.
Would you rather know what you're *really* burning (and can then eat or not eat, accordingly)? YES.

This is a good thing, even if it sort of sucks (okay, it sucks a lot).

^This !!

Check your settings ....... but I'm guessing it's ^This !

If your friends burn more, that they are NOT as fit as you are.

just2liveagain

What is your heart rate sitting at when you do these exercises? That's going to determine how hard you really are working.

Having said that, I'm male, 6'3" and 245lbs (176lb LBM) and I burn typically 600 in 30 mins on the elliptical (going very hard, heart rate averages 165-170 for the full 30 mins). Typically 300 for a 30 minute walk (2 miles), heart rate only like 125-135.

Obviously for a female it's going to be a lot lower but that doesn't sound right at all. Did you input your height/weight/gender and such into the FT4? Assuming you did, and assuming you're getting your heart rate up, you should be quite a bit higher.

This is what I don't get. I work very hard at Turbo Jam, and before doing some reading on THR zones and needing to stay in them or above for maximum calorie burn, I thought I needed to stay within my THRZ, which the top of it 165, during turbo jam I noticed I was staying right around 170, so I was even over the zone, so I lowered my intensity, and even with lowering my intensity, my HR was still mostly at 155-165 for the whole workout. All my info is correct, I wet the straps good, like I said if this is accurate then it's fine I'll deal with it, but I was always under the assumption the bigger you are the more you burn.

pwillini84

When I started using my HRM (a Sigma PC-15, last yr's model), my time on the eliptical glider typically resulted in a 15% reduction in the calorie burn shown on the machine. Now that my HRM synchs with the machine, the results are the same.

This is why runner's use HRMs, they are EKG accurate if you buy the right one - cheaper is definitely not better. I don't know if your particular model does this but mine let's me know when I go from Health zone, to Fitness zone to Power zone so I can work harder to get me into that Power zone and the biggest burn.

The HRM is indeed the weight loss friend, keep it close to your heart and it'll keep track of how healthy your heart is getting!

irisheyez718

I checked my burn on the last time I did the Leslie Sansone 2 mile DVD and it was 174, so not far off from mine. I have the Polar FT4.

porvenir

I have a Polar FT60. When I do Turbo Jam Cardio Party 1, my heart rate usually stays between 150 and 165 and I burn 400 - 450 calories. I'm 5'6" and about 145 pounds.

courtneymal17

I got an ft7 for myself on Valentines Day (haha well I'm trying to love myself so it works, right?)...I've always thought MFP overcalculated, so so far I'm thinking they cals are much closer...On lvl 1 of 30 day shred I burned about 300calories,etc...the thing you have to remember about MFP is that it doesnt take into account your energy level doing things...so if youre exerting a low effort level (like youre totally not out of breath, sweating, you could sing a song, etc) and if youre busting *kitten*, completely breathless, couldnt even talk, it'll give yout he same amount just based on your weight...I'm thinking my HRM is much more accurate

ruby_red_rose

I was also very unpleasantly surprised when I saw my HRM's calorie burn number for the first time. I used to think I was buring 750 calories in an hour of Zumba. According to the HRM, I only burn somewhere around 350 I trust the HRM number more. It is more consistent with how much weight I lose than MFP estimates, or estimates from any of the machines I use.

CallMeCupcakeDammit

I have the older F4, and I've been doing Turbo Jam for 4 yrs and still burn 400+ depending on which one I'm doing. I have tons more energy now, so I don't do the low impact anymore. I remember when I first got mine I didn't have the strap tight enough and it wasn't making contact 100% of the time. I wear it right under the band of my bra so the band is keeping it in place and in contact.

just2liveagain

Make sure your HRM is set to the correct weight and age. make sure the sensors are wet (to keep the connection going). Are you out of breathe when you do these exercises?

I was suprised at the difference between my HRM and what the machine says...but I remember reading somewhere that you are safe to estimate your burn at about 60% of what the machine says...on the elliptical that holds true for what my HRM tells me....but like another poster here, when I run (and my heart is pumping) I am burning, burning, burning baby!!!

Like I said for the walk dvd no, for the 2 miles I don't breathe all that heavily nor sweat that much, I just wanted to do it to see what my HRM said, as opposed to doing turbo jam. when I do turbo jam I am breathing heavily, and sweating to the max!