Does it REALLY matter where calories come from?
Options
Replies
-
No, it can't. To "negate the deficit," sugar would have to have some kind of magical power to produce energy beyond it's caloric value.
Apparently you have never heard of the glycemic index?????
Correct me if I'm wrong but glycemic index refers only to how rapidly the carbohydrate breaks down and releases glucose into the bloodstream (rapidly released simple carbohydrates have a high GI) hence the concept of a sugar crash if you eat nothing but donuts for breakfast. It has nothing to do with the overall caloric value of a particular food.
When we eat, our body converts digestible carbohydrates into blood sugar (glucose), our main source of energy. Our blood sugar level can affect how hungry and how energetic we feel, both important factors when we are watching how we eat and exercise. It also determines whether we burn fat or store it.
Our pancreas creates a hormone called insulin that transports blood sugar into our body's cells where it is used for energy. When we eat refined grains that have had most of their fiber stripped away, sugar, or other carbohydrate-rich foods that are quickly processed into blood sugar, the pancreas goes into overtime to produce the insulin necessary for all this blood sugar to be used for energy. This insulin surge tells our body that plenty of energy is readily available and that it should stop burning fat and start storing it.
However, the greater concern with the insulin surge is not that it tells our body to start storing fat. Whatever we eat and don't burn up eventually gets turned into fat anyway.
The greater concern is that the insulin surge causes too much blood sugar to be transported out of our blood and this results in our blood sugar and insulin levels dropping below normal. This leaves us feeling tired and hungry and wanting to eat more. The unfortunate result of this scenario is that it makes us want to eat something else with a high sugar content. When we do, we start the cycle all over again.
SOURCE OF CALORIES MATTERS.
The end.
Well said. To some of the experts out there, hunger doesn't matter because we all have (or should have) enough willpower to eat whatever we want (in moderation of course), and we will keep our caloric deficits going.
I hear ya.
What a lot of people do not know, either from lack of knowledge or just simple denial, is that protein and fat are converted into glucose, its just converted at a much slower, steady, reliable, and appropriate rate. This eliminates the damaging fat-loss sabotaging insulin surge, while still providing the glucose your cells need for energy and improving the efficiency of your metabolism. Not to mention, your appetite and hunger are better regulated and even supressed. Steady blood sugar is KEY to fat loss.0 -
I can usually get my calories from wherever unless there is a lot of sodium0
-
No, it can't. To "negate the deficit," sugar would have to have some kind of magical power to produce energy beyond it's caloric value.
Apparently you have never heard of the glycemic index?????
Correct me if I'm wrong but glycemic index refers only to how rapidly the carbohydrate breaks down and releases glucose into the bloodstream (rapidly released simple carbohydrates have a high GI) hence the concept of a sugar crash if you eat nothing but donuts for breakfast. It has nothing to do with the overall caloric value of a particular food.
When we eat, our body converts digestible carbohydrates into blood sugar (glucose), our main source of energy. Our blood sugar level can affect how hungry and how energetic we feel, both important factors when we are watching how we eat and exercise. It also determines whether we burn fat or store it.
Our pancreas creates a hormone called insulin that transports blood sugar into our body's cells where it is used for energy. When we eat refined grains that have had most of their fiber stripped away, sugar, or other carbohydrate-rich foods that are quickly processed into blood sugar, the pancreas goes into overtime to produce the insulin necessary for all this blood sugar to be used for energy. This insulin surge tells our body that plenty of energy is readily available and that it should stop burning fat and start storing it.
However, the greater concern with the insulin surge is not that it tells our body to start storing fat. Whatever we eat and don't burn up eventually gets turned into fat anyway.
The greater concern is that the insulin surge causes too much blood sugar to be transported out of our blood and this results in our blood sugar and insulin levels dropping below normal. This leaves us feeling tired and hungry and wanting to eat more. The unfortunate result of this scenario is that it makes us want to eat something else with a high sugar content. When we do, we start the cycle all over again.
SOURCE OF CALORIES MATTERS.
The end.
Here's the thing, this only matters if you ONLY eat quick carbs. Nobody eats only one macro at a time, and as soon as you mix protein and/or fat to quick digesting carbs, it completely changes the way that insulin and blood glucose are affected. So really, in day to day life, it really doesn't have any impact. You aren't going to find people eating bowls of table sugar very often, and life isn't lived in a scientifically controlled laboratory, where one specific macro type can be isolated and fed.
Eat a slice of white bread, and yes, that can go through you, and potentially cause you to crave carbs, because it's relatively quick (although still not that quick, refined or not, it's still a more complex oligosaccharide) carb it could make you crave more. However, put some butter on it, or some peanut butter, or some turkey breast, and you've now completely changed the glycemic impact of that lowly piece of white bread, your blood sugar doesn't spike, and you don't get blood sugar crashes.
Also, if you're paying attention to calories, then why would it matter, anyway? If you eat x number of calories a day, then even if you crave more sugar, you don't eat it. I crave lots of different foods, bacon mostly, doesn't mean I eat it by the pound every day, because it doesn't fit into my caloric needs. So no, it really doesn't matter where the calories come from.
"However, put some butter on it, or some peanut butter, or some turkey breast, and you've now completely changed the glycemic impact of that lowly piece of white bread."
You are correct. Mixed meals do improve the total glycemic index of the meal.
I appreciate your response, but here is where I find argument:
"Nobody eats only one macro at a time"
What do you think a granola bar is? Or spaghetti and marinara? Or a fruit and frozen yogurt smoothie? Pure carbs. No balance. Hello carb crash! So many people don't realize this.
"Also, if you're paying attention to calories, then why would it matter, anyway? "
Because blood sugar is a huge player in successful, steady fat loss. This applies to everyone.0 -
Sheesh, this thread got heated.
Look, its all about moderation, I'm pretty sure we can all agree on that. Seems like this thread has turned into an argument about sugar/carbs... Some people saying sugar should be kept at a minimum, others calling that blasphemous and yelling about how they eat ice cream or cookies every day and are still losing weight. YOU'RE BOTH EFFING RIGHT. Come on, people.
I personally keep my daily net carbs at about 20% or less of my calories. Some people would POUNCE on me in this thread for "preaching low carb". For me, that equates to 70 net carbs a day. And if I happen to want a cookie that has 35g carbs in it, then I'll budget that! If its a celebration, or a special day, or hell, its a weekend getaway and I want a friggin margarita, then so what! I still live my life, and I don't think anyone on here has said that you shouldn't. But IN GENERAL, yes, its smart to watch and be conscious of your sugars and starches and overall carbohydrate consumption.
Ok, you can all come out of time-out now.
And, everyone is different....that's why I dont understand the whole debate. What might work some wont work for all.
What I explained will work for everyone. What you seem to be advocating (quality and source of calories not being of any significance), will not work for everyone, and is not recommended by any standards.
You forget that some ppl cant eat certain things. I for one am sensitive to lactose, wheat, gluten, pineapple, and deathly allergic to shell fish because of the iodine, which mind you is in a lot of other things. I'm also allergic to red dye #4....so now you tell me that your theory works for everyone.0 -
It totally matters where your calories come from, which is why I hate people on here saying eat whatever you want as long as you're under your calorie goal and you'll lose weight. that's simply not true.0
-
It totally matters where your calories come from, which is why I hate people on here saying eat whatever you want as long as you're under your calorie goal and you'll lose weight. that's simply not true.
some ppl can eat whatever they want and lose weight, some can't. Being within calorie goals and exercise WILL cause you to lose weight.0 -
Each person's body is different depending on your age, male or female or what health problems you have.
For an example, I can loose faster by eating less carbs as they turn to sugar. And at my age everything goes to tummy fat.0 -
A deficit in calories is a deficit but... how your body uses those calories; burn vs store does have to do with sugar. If your insulin levels are off your body can actually hold onto fat. Similar to the principal of eating too few calories.
I would limit my sugars with the exception of fruit. With fruit you still have to be careful but at least you are eating nutritious foods and not processed.0 -
as long as you're under your calorie goal and you'll lose weight. that's simply not true.
actually it is true but I agree, those who advocate eating crap are annoying0 -
as long as you're under your calorie goal and you'll lose weight. that's simply not true.
actually it is true but I agree, those who advocate eating crap are annoying
I find people who say "you can't eat x y z or you'll get fat" more annoying. It leads to this all or nothing mentality, where in order to lose weight you MUST cut carbs or fat or not eat bread or pasta. Most people cannot stick to that, and usually just think they are a failure for wanting to eat those "bad" foods and then usually go back to their old excessive ways. There is a middle ground, it's called aiming to meet your macros, portion control and moderation.0 -
Sheesh, this thread got heated.
Look, its all about moderation, I'm pretty sure we can all agree on that. Seems like this thread has turned into an argument about sugar/carbs... Some people saying sugar should be kept at a minimum, others calling that blasphemous and yelling about how they eat ice cream or cookies every day and are still losing weight. YOU'RE BOTH EFFING RIGHT. Come on, people.
I personally keep my daily net carbs at about 20% or less of my calories. Some people would POUNCE on me in this thread for "preaching low carb". For me, that equates to 70 net carbs a day. And if I happen to want a cookie that has 35g carbs in it, then I'll budget that! If its a celebration, or a special day, or hell, its a weekend getaway and I want a friggin margarita, then so what! I still live my life, and I don't think anyone on here has said that you shouldn't. But IN GENERAL, yes, its smart to watch and be conscious of your sugars and starches and overall carbohydrate consumption.
Ok, you can all come out of time-out now.
And, everyone is different....that's why I dont understand the whole debate. What might work some wont work for all.
What I explained will work for everyone. What you seem to be advocating (quality and source of calories not being of any significance), will not work for everyone, and is not recommended by any standards.
You forget that some ppl cant eat certain things. I for one am sensitive to lactose, wheat, gluten, pineapple, and deathly allergic to shell fish because of the iodine, which mind you is in a lot of other things. I'm also allergic to red dye #4....so now you tell me that your theory works for everyone.
So, basically, you're saying that you like to compare apples to oranges for the sake of trying to win a conversation?
fail.0 -
So, basically, you're saying that you like to compare apples to oranges for the sake of trying to win a conversation?
fail.
0 -
No, it can't. To "negate the deficit," sugar would have to have some kind of magical power to produce energy beyond it's caloric value.
Apparently you have never heard of the glycemic index?????
Correct me if I'm wrong but glycemic index refers only to how rapidly the carbohydrate breaks down and releases glucose into the bloodstream (rapidly released simple carbohydrates have a high GI) hence the concept of a sugar crash if you eat nothing but donuts for breakfast. It has nothing to do with the overall caloric value of a particular food.
When we eat, our body converts digestible carbohydrates into blood sugar (glucose), our main source of energy. Our blood sugar level can affect how hungry and how energetic we feel, both important factors when we are watching how we eat and exercise. It also determines whether we burn fat or store it.
Our pancreas creates a hormone called insulin that transports blood sugar into our body's cells where it is used for energy. When we eat refined grains that have had most of their fiber stripped away, sugar, or other carbohydrate-rich foods that are quickly processed into blood sugar, the pancreas goes into overtime to produce the insulin necessary for all this blood sugar to be used for energy. This insulin surge tells our body that plenty of energy is readily available and that it should stop burning fat and start storing it.
However, the greater concern with the insulin surge is not that it tells our body to start storing fat. Whatever we eat and don't burn up eventually gets turned into fat anyway.
The greater concern is that the insulin surge causes too much blood sugar to be transported out of our blood and this results in our blood sugar and insulin levels dropping below normal. This leaves us feeling tired and hungry and wanting to eat more. The unfortunate result of this scenario is that it makes us want to eat something else with a high sugar content. When we do, we start the cycle all over again.
SOURCE OF CALORIES MATTERS.
The end.
Here's the thing, this only matters if you ONLY eat quick carbs. Nobody eats only one macro at a time, and as soon as you mix protein and/or fat to quick digesting carbs, it completely changes the way that insulin and blood glucose are affected. So really, in day to day life, it really doesn't have any impact. You aren't going to find people eating bowls of table sugar very often, and life isn't lived in a scientifically controlled laboratory, where one specific macro type can be isolated and fed.
Eat a slice of white bread, and yes, that can go through you, and potentially cause you to crave carbs, because it's relatively quick (although still not that quick, refined or not, it's still a more complex oligosaccharide) carb it could make you crave more. However, put some butter on it, or some peanut butter, or some turkey breast, and you've now completely changed the glycemic impact of that lowly piece of white bread, your blood sugar doesn't spike, and you don't get blood sugar crashes.
Also, if you're paying attention to calories, then why would it matter, anyway? If you eat x number of calories a day, then even if you crave more sugar, you don't eat it. I crave lots of different foods, bacon mostly, doesn't mean I eat it by the pound every day, because it doesn't fit into my caloric needs. So no, it really doesn't matter where the calories come from.
"However, put some butter on it, or some peanut butter, or some turkey breast, and you've now completely changed the glycemic impact of that lowly piece of white bread."
You are correct. Mixed meals do improve the total glycemic index of the meal.
I appreciate your response, but here is where I find argument:
"Nobody eats only one macro at a time"
What do you think a granola bar is? Or spaghetti and marinara? Or a fruit and frozen yogurt smoothie? Pure carbs. No balance. Hello carb crash! So many people don't realize this.
"Also, if you're paying attention to calories, then why would it matter, anyway? "
Because blood sugar is a huge player in successful, steady fat loss. This applies to everyone.
Might want to check your nutrition labels. Granola has carbs, protein, and fat in it, pasta has both carbs and protein, marinara sauce has carbs and fat, and unless it's fat free frozen yogurt, the smoothie has fat in it as well. There is no single natural food item on Earth that consists of 100% one macro.0 -
well you don't get all the vitamins and minerals and stuff from unhealthy foods also they tend to fill you up quicker; your body can use healthy food alot more productively then junk food so its just generally a better idea to fill it with healthy stuff0
-
A deficit in calories is a deficit but... how your body uses those calories; burn vs store does have to do with sugar. If your insulin levels are off your body can actually hold onto fat. Similar to the principal of eating too few calories.
I would limit my sugars with the exception of fruit. With fruit you still have to be careful but at least you are eating nutritious foods and not processed.
If you are in a calorie deficit, your body will NOT store fat. It is biologically impossible. It might store some fat at the exact moment you are eating, but since you aren't eating enough calories to completely fuel your activities, it will burn that off anyway. That's also how the body functions when you are maintaining weight. Fat storage is not some evil thing to be avoided, it's a natural process that is REQUIRED for you to live. If your body never stored any energy as fat at any time, you would need to be constantly eating calories to fuel your body, 24/7, without stopping. Food doesn't get instantly burned, it gets stored, and used as necessary. Adipose tissue is the body's fuel tank. That's one of its functions.
I really wish people would stop demonizing the way the human body is supposed to normally function. It's ridiculous.0 -
It totally matters where your calories come from, which is why I hate people on here saying eat whatever you want as long as you're under your calorie goal and you'll lose weight. that's simply not true.
I've eaten whatever I wanted and lost nearly 60lbs and kept it off for 18 months.
Just because it may not be true for YOU, doesn't mean it isn't true for someone else.0 -
bump0
-
[/quote]
[/quote
This is the best thing I've seen all day. Maybe its time to head off to bed.....0 -
Umm, yes it does matter. Not all calories are the same. If you want to lose weight you will need to ease off the sugar. And remember sometimes you might not see a drop on the scale right away, it does take time. But again if you are eating bad foods then you will not see any progress.
How was it that I ate ice cream and still lost weight?
You can have a cheat meal and still lose weight. You can't eat ice cream all day everyday and expect to lose weight.
I ate cookies EVERY single day and lost nearly 60lbs.
I still eat cookies EVERY single day and I've been maintaining that loss for the last 18 months.
Eating a serving size of ice cream every day isn't going to make you fat. Calories in/Calories out. Sheesh.
Actually it's not. And how many calories are consuming daily?
I lose weight consuming 2100-2200 NET calories.
I maintain by consuming 2300-2500 (though I can go as high as 2700 or 2800 and still not gain) NET calories.
It's been working quite well for me for nearly 2 years since I started losing weight.
And OMG. I eat cookies EVERY single day with my lunch.
Still lost weight.
Still maintain my weight.0 -
bump0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 403 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 999 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions