Anyone heard of the blood type diet? What's your take?

Raybug0903

Good topic. I have never tried it personally, but my grandmother who is 80 years old has been on it since October of 2012 and has has great success. She has lost 7 pounds (even though she really didn't need to lose any weight), reports feeling much better with no indigestion, no bloating, and tons more energy. She's had breast cancer, sarcoma cancer, and neurofibromyalgia in her lifetime, and she is the healthiest elderly person I have ever seen.

She is using the book "Eat Right for Your Type." I recently gave her "Cook Right for Your Type" and she is having fun trying all of the new recipes.

Good luck!

EDIT: On the flip side, I have *heard* that this diet is a load of crap, but typically from people who haven't ever tried it or done any research. I say give it a go, as the foods prescribed for each type are very healthy and the diet as a whole is not unsafe or harmful. Why not try it and see what works for you? Just my 2 cents

Admiral_Derp

No, but I did go as a sexy dracula for Halloween one year.

a_stronger_steph

EDIT: On the flip side, I have *heard* that this diet is a load of crap, but typically from people who haven't ever tried it or done any research. I say give it a go, as the foods prescribed for each type are very healthy and the diet as a whole is not unsafe or harmful. Why not try it and see what works for you? Just my 2 cents

It really doesn't take much research to see that it's bunk.
http://www.skepdic.com/bloodtypediet.html

Lleldiranne

I've heard about it. My brother mentions it a lot. Apparently, type O does best on plenty of red meat … which is good for me because I love my red meat.

But then I hear that type O should avoid wheat. I eat a lot of wheat. And I've never had a problem with it, either affecting me weight or my digestive health.

I think those that have had success with it, as far as weight loss, are probably cutting out calories as they remove the "no-no" foods. And those who feel better are probably often looking at it through a selective filter: the attribute the feeling better to eating right for their blood type, but in reality it's probably overall better food choices (I don't imagine there's a type that is supposed to eat lots of junk food and refined sugar … cut back on those and you'll probably feel better regardless of blood type).


Ah, and another anecdotal counterexample from this thread and what I've heard: Native Americans supposedly tend towards lactose intolerance, I'm hearing, as do Northern Europeans (especially Scandanavian). But I'm 1/8 Norwegian and 1/16 Mohawk and I have never had problems with milk. Again, I think we're seeing "evidence" from selective reporting.

tigersword

EDIT: On the flip side, I have *heard* that this diet is a load of crap, but typically from people who haven't ever tried it or done any research. I say give it a go, as the foods prescribed for each type are very healthy and the diet as a whole is not unsafe or harmful. Why not try it and see what works for you? Just my 2 cents

Uh huh, right. Yes, the success of this plan is purely from people eating specifically for their blood type, and has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that they are eating healthier in general. I guarantee, that any person can pick any diet from that book, regardless of blood type, and if that diet improves the quality of the food they are eating (by having them make healthier choices,) their health will improve.

See, it has absolutely nothing to do with blood type, and everything to do with eating better, reducing calories, balancing macros, getting enough vitamins and minerals, etc.

MacMadame

It's like a horoscope for nutrition.

Oh my, that's it exactly! :laugh:

Sarauk2sf

I've heard about it. My brother mentions it a lot. Apparently, type O does best on plenty of red meat … which is good for me because I love my red meat.

But then I hear that type O should avoid wheat. I eat a lot of wheat. And I've never had a problem with it, either affecting me weight or my digestive health.

I think those that have had success with it, as far as weight loss, are probably cutting out calories as they remove the "no-no" foods. And those who feel better are probably often looking at it through a selective filter: the attribute the feeling better to eating right for their blood type, but in reality it's probably overall better food choices (I don't imagine there's a type that is supposed to eat lots of junk food and refined sugar … cut back on those and you'll probably feel better regardless of blood type).


Ah, and another anecdotal counterexample from this thread and what I've heard: Native Americans supposedly tend towards lactose intolerance, I'm hearing, as do Northern Europeans (especially Scandanavian). But I'm 1/8 Norwegian and 1/16 Mohawk and I have never had problems with milk. Again, I think we're seeing "evidence" from selective reporting.

Northern Europeans have a very low incidence of lactose intolerance (2% off the top of my head).

runs4zen

That it's balderdash. Yes, I said balderdash. I don't even know what that means, but blood-type diets sound silly. If they were true, we'd all be on them.

agree. pure balderdash

Agreed!

Lleldiranne

I've heard about it. My brother mentions it a lot. Apparently, type O does best on plenty of red meat … which is good for me because I love my red meat.

But then I hear that type O should avoid wheat. I eat a lot of wheat. And I've never had a problem with it, either affecting me weight or my digestive health.

I think those that have had success with it, as far as weight loss, are probably cutting out calories as they remove the "no-no" foods. And those who feel better are probably often looking at it through a selective filter: the attribute the feeling better to eating right for their blood type, but in reality it's probably overall better food choices (I don't imagine there's a type that is supposed to eat lots of junk food and refined sugar … cut back on those and you'll probably feel better regardless of blood type).


Ah, and another anecdotal counterexample from this thread and what I've heard: Native Americans supposedly tend towards lactose intolerance, I'm hearing, as do Northern Europeans (especially Scandanavian). But I'm 1/8 Norwegian and 1/16 Mohawk and I have never had problems with milk. Again, I think we're seeing "evidence" from selective reporting.

Northern Europeans have a very low incidence of lactose intolerance (2% off the top of my head).

Wow, the misinformation we get from listening to others' opinions! Thanks for the correction!

tigersword

Southern Europeans, Africans, and Asians tend toward lactose intolerance (Native American Indians came over from Asia, hence their predisposition to lactose intolerance.) And even then, it can vary widely from place to place, due to immigration.

cmriverside

finger print analysis

MacMadame

Ah, and another anecdotal counterexample from this thread and what I've heard: Native Americans supposedly tend towards lactose intolerance, I'm hearing, as do Northern Europeans (especially Scandanavian). But I'm 1/8 Norwegian and 1/16 Mohawk and I have never had problems with milk. Again, I think we're seeing "evidence" from selective reporting.

It is well documented that lactose intolerance among Scandinavians is almost zero. So you "heard" wrong.

abrahamsitososa

Yes John Robbins mentioned it and exposes it in his book "The Food Revolution".

Lleldiranne

Ah, and another anecdotal counterexample from this thread and what I've heard: Native Americans supposedly tend towards lactose intolerance, I'm hearing, as do Northern Europeans (especially Scandanavian). But I'm 1/8 Norwegian and 1/16 Mohawk and I have never had problems with milk. Again, I think we're seeing "evidence" from selective reporting.

It is well documented that lactose intolerance among Scandinavians is almost zero. So you "heard" wrong.

Like I said, this is what happens when one goes off of "heard" rather than looking it up for oneself! I do feel a bit dumb now :ohwell:

But then it was only anecdotal anyway.

assilembob

The Blood type diet tells me I should eat lots of red meat and dairy.
I am SEVERELY allergic to Dairy, Eggs, Poultry, Shellfish and Beef.
Full of crap that diet is.

med2017

i started using it now and its amazing. and not everything has to have a scientific background, there is barely any funds going into the naturopathic field, i also drink bottled herbs(which also there is not a lot of research on) but do have true effects, even better then the pharmacy drugs. i think his diet is good because its clean, healthy and strict and all natural/organic. its not really a diet its just a life style. all natural is the best way to go, there is too much of preservatives and chemicals in the things we eat.

firstsip

i started using it now and its amazing. and not everything has to have a scientific background, there is barely any funds going into the naturopathic field, i also drink bottled herbs(which also there is not a lot of research on) but do have true effects, even better then the pharmacy drugs. i think his diet is good because its clean, healthy and strict and all natural/organic. its not really a diet its just a life style. all natural is the best way to go, there is too much of preservatives and chemicals in the things we eat.

Thanks for resurrecting this thread, William Jennings Bryan.

staceycanada

I read about this diet first on Dr. Mercola's website. He followed it when he was younger and developed diabetes. Stopped the diet no longer had diabetes. Weight loss is not a good trade off for health.