Eating clean and butter

124»

Replies

  • Are you just trying to make fitness more challenging by creating handicaps for yourself?
    This is what I was wondering too!! What's the big deal. I think when you have to start asking of foods are "allowed" on some diet plan, you are going down an OCD path that has nothing to do with weight loss and fitness.

    We all pretty much can use our common sense to know what is whole minimally process foods and what is not. The whole "eating clean" thing gets ridiculous as everyone has their own interpretation and then starts building in restrictions. Just eat mostly whole nutrient dense foods and stop worrying about what's considered clean and what's not.

    I actually think it's a great idea to embrace clean eating and think it's imperative that you research what is going into your body. We eat organic and gmo free (primarily) and it takes a lot of time to avoid GMO's. However, it's safer for my family. It can be overwhelming when you first start.
  • M______
    M______ Posts: 288 Member
    I know the bulletproofexec (he runs a paleo/self improvement site) loves his grass fed butter. I tried his coffee recipe with butter and mct oil and it was really something. It gave me great energy and focus for over 6 hours with no spikes, it took my next meal to bring me down. If anything that was a little too strong, for me at least.

    But I know he eats butter like I would a bar of chocolate. Strange to see, but if it works for him..
  • XXXMinnieXXX
    XXXMinnieXXX Posts: 3,459 Member
    I think you can take eating clean too far. Good to eat a lot of clean foods, but if. You want this to be a lifestyle change you need to eat things that you love too. It's all about balance and decisions that you can keep to long term!

    Zara
  • MicroHez
    MicroHez Posts: 125 Member
    I'm just gonna get this off my chest because it's driving me up the wall...

    Just because it's natural and hasn't any sort of "process" applied, doesn't mean you SHOULD be consuming it. Case in point: RAW milk. You'll lose weight quickly... by having persisent Campylobacter, Listeria, Salmonella and possible E. coli O157/non-O157 STEC infections. You can STILL get unhomongenized, gently pasturized milks (like Snowville Creamery here in Ohio, which is grass-fed stock and pasturized at 170F for 18 seconds). Most states prohibit/ban/discourage the sale of raw milk. I'm not saying ALL raw milks are the devil, but I wouldn't trust it to be safe...

    I'm a microbiologist for a State lab... Raw milks are filthy, usually. If you wouldn't eat raw ground meat, why would you want to drink a raw product that is like 6" away from the poop-chute AND swaying close to the ground to get splattered with... err, stuff.
  • neanderthin
    neanderthin Posts: 10,223 Member
    I'm just gonna get this off my chest because it's driving me up the wall...

    Just because it's natural and hasn't any sort of "process" applied, doesn't mean you SHOULD be consuming it. Case in point: RAW milk. You'll lose weight quickly... by having persisent Campylobacter, Listeria, Salmonella and possible E. coli O157/non-O157 STEC infections. You can STILL get unhomongenized, gently pasturized milks (like Snowville Creamery here in Ohio, which is grass-fed stock and pasturized at 170F for 18 seconds). Most states prohibit/ban/discourage the sale of raw milk. I'm not saying ALL raw milks are the devil, but I wouldn't trust it to be safe...

    I'm a microbiologist for a State lab... Raw milks are filthy, usually. If you wouldn't eat raw ground meat, why would you want to drink a raw product that is like 6" away from the poop-chute AND swaying close to the ground to get splattered with... err, stuff.
    Good thing your a clean human as opposed to every other fithy creature on the planet, eh! Close call. :smile:
  • sunnyskys2013
    sunnyskys2013 Posts: 159 Member
    I'm just gonna get this off my chest because it's driving me up the wall...

    Just because it's natural and hasn't any sort of "process" applied, doesn't mean you SHOULD be consuming it. Case in point: RAW milk. You'll lose weight quickly... by having persisent Campylobacter, Listeria, Salmonella and possible E. coli O157/non-O157 STEC infections. You can STILL get unhomongenized, gently pasturized milks (like Snowville Creamery here in Ohio, which is grass-fed stock and pasturized at 170F for 18 seconds). Most states prohibit/ban/discourage the sale of raw milk. I'm not saying ALL raw milks are the devil, but I wouldn't trust it to be safe...

    I'm a microbiologist for a State lab... Raw milks are filthy, usually. If you wouldn't eat raw ground meat, why would you want to drink a raw product that is like 6" away from the poop-chute AND swaying close to the ground to get splattered with... err, stuff.

    So have you ever lived on a farm or milked anything ? because if you are a clean person and know how to do it right milk is not unclean. So do you ever go out to eat ? Because i can tell you having worked in food service that anything you eat out is much nastier then what you eat farm fresh.
  • SanteMulberry
    SanteMulberry Posts: 3,202 Member
    I'm just gonna get this off my chest because it's driving me up the wall...

    Just because it's natural and hasn't any sort of "process" applied, doesn't mean you SHOULD be consuming it. Case in point: RAW milk. You'll lose weight quickly... by having persisent Campylobacter, Listeria, Salmonella and possible E. coli O157/non-O157 STEC infections. You can STILL get unhomongenized, gently pasturized milks (like Snowville Creamery here in Ohio, which is grass-fed stock and pasturized at 170F for 18 seconds). Most states prohibit/ban/discourage the sale of raw milk. I'm not saying ALL raw milks are the devil, but I wouldn't trust it to be safe...

    I'm a microbiologist for a State lab... Raw milks are filthy, usually. If you wouldn't eat raw ground meat, why would you want to drink a raw product that is like 6" away from the poop-chute AND swaying close to the ground to get splattered with... err, stuff.

    Um...wouldn't it be better to have cleanliness standards in the dairy industry, ensuring healthy dairy products, rather than letting the dairy producers muck them up and then cooking all of it (read denaturing it) so that it becomes less healthy to consume? The only reason why pasteurization was forced on the industry was because SOME producers were not sanitary.
  • Carnivor0us
    Carnivor0us Posts: 1,752 Member
    I'm just gonna get this off my chest because it's driving me up the wall...

    Just because it's natural and hasn't any sort of "process" applied, doesn't mean you SHOULD be consuming it. Case in point: RAW milk. You'll lose weight quickly... by having persisent Campylobacter, Listeria, Salmonella and possible E. coli O157/non-O157 STEC infections. You can STILL get unhomongenized, gently pasturized milks (like Snowville Creamery here in Ohio, which is grass-fed stock and pasturized at 170F for 18 seconds). Most states prohibit/ban/discourage the sale of raw milk. I'm not saying ALL raw milks are the devil, but I wouldn't trust it to be safe...

    I'm a microbiologist for a State lab... Raw milks are filthy, usually. If you wouldn't eat raw ground meat, why would you want to drink a raw product that is like 6" away from the poop-chute AND swaying close to the ground to get splattered with... err, stuff.

    I've gotten sick from raw milk before. I still drink it. I'm an adult and I feel as though I have that prerogative to drink whatever I want. The reason I still drink it and not have been ill since my initial illness is because I found a dairy farmer with cleaner practices.

    I eat raw/undercooked meat on a regular basis and have never gotten sick.

    I have no reason to doubt your credentials and your facts on the things present in raw milk, and I even appreciate the information. It allows me to make an informed decision to exercise a choice. A choice that the state unfortunately discourages.
  • EmmaKarney
    EmmaKarney Posts: 690 Member
    I'm just gonna get this off my chest because it's driving me up the wall...

    Just because it's natural and hasn't any sort of "process" applied, doesn't mean you SHOULD be consuming it. Case in point: RAW milk. You'll lose weight quickly... by having persisent Campylobacter, Listeria, Salmonella and possible E. coli O157/non-O157 STEC infections. You can STILL get unhomongenized, gently pasturized milks (like Snowville Creamery here in Ohio, which is grass-fed stock and pasturized at 170F for 18 seconds). Most states prohibit/ban/discourage the sale of raw milk. I'm not saying ALL raw milks are the devil, but I wouldn't trust it to be safe...

    I wouldn't eat raw pork either because I would get sick.

    I don't really understand this example.
  • mmapags
    mmapags Posts: 8,934 Member
    Are you just trying to make fitness more challenging by creating handicaps for yourself?
    This is what I was wondering too!! What's the big deal. I think when you have to start asking of foods are "allowed" on some diet plan, you are going down an OCD path that has nothing to do with weight loss and fitness.

    We all pretty much can use our common sense to know what is whole minimally process foods and what is not. The whole "eating clean" thing gets ridiculous as everyone has their own interpretation and then starts building in restrictions. Just eat mostly whole nutrient dense foods and stop worrying about what's considered clean and what's not.

    I actually think it's a great idea to embrace clean eating and think it's imperative that you research what is going into your body. We eat organic and gmo free (primarily) and it takes a lot of time to avoid GMO's. However, it's safer for my family. It can be overwhelming when you first start.

    I don't think it is overwhelming really. It doesn't have to be that complicated. Whole foods close to the source about does it. The whole GMO thing and it's negative effects has yet to be proven by any study. If you want to eat non GMO, that's your choice. Organic can be important on some thing and not on others. For example, what difference does it make if your banana was grown organically and there is no proven nutritional difference and you throw away the skin which may contain any pesticide residue. A leafy green vegetable or an apple would be more of a concern.

    But, your question wasn't about this kind of issue. It was about whether a food that is defined by law as only having 2 ingredients at most is OK for eating clean. My first question would be, define eating clean. Ask 100 people. get 100 definitions. There is no universal standard. Then throw in the question of dairy products, legumes and grains. To some, healthy, to some poison.

    Again, I'm going to reiterate that when you start to worry about a simple, close to the source, whole food, it is unnecessary at best and bordering on OCD at worst. It's majoring in the minor.
  • CoachReddy
    CoachReddy Posts: 3,949 Member
    Are you just trying to make fitness more challenging by creating handicaps for yourself?
    This is what I was wondering too!! What's the big deal. I think when you have to start asking of foods are "allowed" on some diet plan, you are going down an OCD path that has nothing to do with weight loss and fitness.

    We all pretty much can use our common sense to know what is whole minimally process foods and what is not. The whole "eating clean" thing gets ridiculous as everyone has their own interpretation and then starts building in restrictions. Just eat mostly whole nutrient dense foods and stop worrying about what's considered clean and what's not.

    I actually think it's a great idea to embrace clean eating and think it's imperative that you research what is going into your body. We eat organic and gmo free (primarily) and it takes a lot of time to avoid GMO's. However, it's safer for my family. It can be overwhelming when you first start.

    I don't think it is overwhelming really. It doesn't have to be that complicated. Whole foods close to the source about does it. The whole GMO thing and it's negative effects has yet to be proven by any study. If you want to eat non GMO, that's your choice. Organic can be important on some thing and not on others. For example, what difference does it make if your banana was grown organically and there is no proven nutritional difference and you throw away the skin which may contain any pesticide residue. A leafy green vegetable or an apple would be more of a concern.

    But, your question wasn't about this kind of issue. It was about whether a food that is defined by law as only having 2 ingredients at most is OK for eating clean. My first question would be, define eating clean. Ask 100 people. get 100 definitions. There is no universal standard. Then throw in the question of dairy products, legumes and grains. To some, healthy, to some poison.

    Again, I'm going to reiterate that when you start to worry about a simple, close to the source, whole food, it is unnecessary at best and bordering on OCD at worst. It's majoring in the minor.

    this is a great response.