why is posting pictures of legs banned

Options
124

Replies

  • TigressPat
    TigressPat Posts: 722
    Options
    Don't think its the legs that the problem. It says 'no underwear' so its probably the boxers LOL

    Really? So how come there's lots of pictures in the success thread of girls in knickers? :laugh:

    agrees

    there are tons in bras and panties, and string bikinis are far more revealing than boxers!
  • lachesissss
    lachesissss Posts: 1,298 Member
    Options
    Dunno. Mine are still here. That and I don't have my underwear on in the photograph. Just sayin'.
  • Puggles04
    Puggles04 Posts: 37
    Options
    Someone was probably jealous.
  • MNTom
    MNTom Posts: 18 Member
    Options
    There are legs....and then there are legs!
  • Bakkasan
    Bakkasan Posts: 1,027 Member
    Options
    There are some asinine applications of that rule here. Plenty of pantie photos, not swimming bikinis, hands covering breasts in profile photos that stay up for a LONG time, yet people complain of a certain mod on a crusade even giving infractions for blog posts that just barely apply.

    I can only say thank goodness nobody will every care about my photos!
  • BeachGingerOnTheRocks
    BeachGingerOnTheRocks Posts: 3,927 Member
    Options
    I'm still trying to figure out what "budgie smugglers" are...

    That's Australianese for banana hammock.
  • sarahmarc
    sarahmarc Posts: 31 Member
    Options
    Was it your third leg?

    LOL
  • lithezebra
    lithezebra Posts: 3,670 Member
    Options
    Just pose in a Speedo, and everything should be fine. If it were up to me, we'd all prance around in our undies any time we felt like showing off our fitness success.
  • BonnieFife
    BonnieFife Posts: 104 Member
    Options
    Put on some swimmers!

    What about budgie smugglers :wink:

    Hahahaha thats funny, wasnt aware that there was a legs issue, ive seen many profile pics of women in bikinis so whats the diff with a guy in boxers !!!!:laugh:
  • mmuzzatti
    mmuzzatti Posts: 706 Member
    Options
    Was it your third leg?

    WINNER!
  • Treadmillmom1st
    Treadmillmom1st Posts: 579 Member
    Options
    We live in a sexist world, girls in their pants and bras (underwear and bikinis) is acceptable but men in underwear is lewd and perverse. Plain ridiculous. There are topless girls on here showing their backs or covering up with their arms, pathetic, sexually biased moderation.
  • Treadmillmom1st
    Treadmillmom1st Posts: 579 Member
    Options
    No one wants to see naked dudes.

    See what I mean?
  • raychulj
    raychulj Posts: 458 Member
    Options
    I got banned from the booty thread and I was wearing shorts.
  • AsrarHussain
    AsrarHussain Posts: 1,424 Member
    Options
    I got banned from the booty thread and I was wearing shorts.

    there should be more freedom
  • carrieous
    carrieous Posts: 1,024 Member
    Options
    hey now. Rules are made to be broken.
  • mockchoc
    mockchoc Posts: 6,573 Member
    Options
    No one wants to see naked dudes.

    Liar!
  • cvillneauve
    Options
    Don't think its the legs that the problem. It says 'no underwear' so its probably the boxers LOL

    Really? So how come there's lots of pictures in the success thread of girls in knickers? :laugh:

    RIGHT?!
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,371 Member
    Options
    Hold on. So we can put bikini /swimsuit pictures but not underwear? Makes sense.
  • KBGirts
    KBGirts Posts: 882 Member
    Options
    Was your junk showing?

    Why don't you send me the picture and I will let you know what was wrong. :wink:
  • raychulj
    raychulj Posts: 458 Member
    Options
    I got banned from the booty thread and I was wearing shorts.

    there should be more freedom
    To be fair, they were really short shorts..