Why running and cardio alone aren't giving you what you want

Options
124

Replies

  • WakkoW
    WakkoW Posts: 567 Member
    Options
    You know, the more I think about this topic, the more I get a bit pissy. Why didn't the author feel more for 'Jessica?'

    She kept doing the same thing and wasn't happy with the result? *kitten*! Just a stupid argument.
  • pinkraynedropjacki
    pinkraynedropjacki Posts: 3,027 Member
    Options
    For 14 months I did nothing but cardio. Now for the last 1 month only I been doing strength as well. Only the last month. Before that it was Zumba, Running. You know.... full on cardio. Not one thing other than that.
    now we're talking. out of curiosity, did you regularly try and push your limits with cardio? As in the lactic acid threshold limits? springing, intervals, zumba movements that were full bodyweight, etc? Because if so, then thats not cardio any longer. And the article is void for you as it's not talking about people who do things other than cardio. only for those who just do steady state.

    Nope. I can maintain a steady heart rate while running no problems. No pushing no nothing. Zumba it would go up & down but that was just the way it is. Trust me, nothing but cardio. Even just my walking was cardio. Nothing else in it.
  • phjorg
    phjorg Posts: 252 Member
    Options
    For 14 months I did nothing but cardio. Now for the last 1 month only I been doing strength as well. Only the last month. Before that it was Zumba, Running. You know.... full on cardio. Not one thing other than that.
    now we're talking. out of curiosity, did you regularly try and push your limits with cardio? As in the lactic acid threshold limits? springing, intervals, zumba movements that were full bodyweight, etc? Because if so, then thats not cardio any longer. And the article is void for you as it's not talking about people who do things other than cardio. only for those who just do steady state.

    Nope. I can maintain a steady heart rate while running no problems. No pushing no nothing. Zumba it would go up & down but that was just the way it is. Trust me, nothing but cardio. Even just my walking was cardio. Nothing else in it.
    then congratulations on being a rarity. what bf% did cardio get you down to if I may ask?
  • pinkraynedropjacki
    pinkraynedropjacki Posts: 3,027 Member
    Options
    For 14 months I did nothing but cardio. Now for the last 1 month only I been doing strength as well. Only the last month. Before that it was Zumba, Running. You know.... full on cardio. Not one thing other than that.
    now we're talking. out of curiosity, did you regularly try and push your limits with cardio? As in the lactic acid threshold limits? springing, intervals, zumba movements that were full bodyweight, etc? Because if so, then thats not cardio any longer. And the article is void for you as it's not talking about people who do things other than cardio. only for those who just do steady state.

    Nope. I can maintain a steady heart rate while running no problems. No pushing no nothing. Zumba it would go up & down but that was just the way it is. Trust me, nothing but cardio. Even just my walking was cardio. Nothing else in it.
    then congratulations on being a rarity. what bf% did cardio get you down to if I may ask?
    About 26% last time I checked. That was before I started doing everything else. So really not bad.
  • mmddwechanged
    mmddwechanged Posts: 1,687 Member
    Options
    I disagree! Although I love muscles and intend to build some, I lost 15 pounds from diet and some cardio and I'm very happy with the results Thank you very much! And calipers and other estimates put me between 22 an 26% body fat.
  • NYCNika
    NYCNika Posts: 611 Member
    Options
    I've been running for almost 3 months now and went from size 12 to size 6. But I also netted 1500-1600 calories a day. Sometimes more, but never less. And a 2lb a week average weight loss for 3 months now.

    I know a lot of people who are runners. They are lean and in good shape. My DH's cholesterol went from his doctor considering putting him on cholesterol meds to getting super prefered life insurance rate.

    I don't know why Jessica is fat, but it may be because you can't outrun your diet.

    One dish at a restaurant can be more calories than 3 hours on a treadmill. My advice to Jessica would be to watch her calories.
  • mmddwechanged
    mmddwechanged Posts: 1,687 Member
    Options
    I've been running for almost 3 months now and went from size 12 to size 6. But I also netted 1500-1600 calories a day. Sometimes more, but never less. And a 2lb a week average weight loss for 3 months now.

    I know a lot of people who are runners. They are lean and in good shape. My DH's cholesterol went from his doctor considering putting him on cholesterol meds to getting super prefered life insurance rate.

    I don't know why Jessica is fat, but it may be because you can't outrun your diet.

    One dish at a restaurant can be more calories than 3 hours on a treadmill. My advice to Jessica would be to watch her calories.

    QFT!
  • Still_Fluffy
    Still_Fluffy Posts: 341 Member
    Options
    bump
  • phjorg
    phjorg Posts: 252 Member
    Options
    About 26% last time I checked. That was before I started doing everything else. So really not bad.
    I take it back then on being a rarity... thats pretty high actually. you do realize you're actually a case study of proving the authors point right???? Like I mean this is exactly what he's trying to say, tons of cardio and you'll end up with lots of bodyfat still.... someone whos long distance running and athletic should be 20% or less. 25% is around your average number of the population. 30% is considered overweight. so 14 months of cardio and diet and your end results was to be a higher bodyfat than your average person...

    http://www.humankinetics.com/excerpts/excerpts/normal-ranges-of-body-weight-and-body-fat
  • mmddwechanged
    mmddwechanged Posts: 1,687 Member
    Options
    Did someone just say that 26% body fat in women is high?????????
  • phjorg
    phjorg Posts: 252 Member
    Options
    Did someone just say that 26% body fat in women is high?????????
    for your average person no it's not. for a person doing exercise for over a year specifically to lose fat and reaching their goal weight, then yes it very much is.

    Which if you read the article, is EXACTLY what he is saying.
  • mmddwechanged
    mmddwechanged Posts: 1,687 Member
    Options
    I'm glad you don't think 26% is high! Phew!

    But you see, I consider myself a fairly average person who reached my goal weight and lost fat only with diet and running. It's really not all bad.
  • phjorg
    phjorg Posts: 252 Member
    Options
    I'm glad you don't think 26% is high! Phew!

    But you see, I consider myself a fairly average person who reached my goal weight and lost fat only with diet and running. It's really not all bad.
    never said you couldn't. Anyone can get from overweight to average with diet and cardio, or diet only. try and get to lower than average body fat levels doing that though. it's not easy. which again is exactly what the author is saying. And is really the only point of reference he is talking from.
  • mmddwechanged
    mmddwechanged Posts: 1,687 Member
    Options
    It is true that I didn't read the article carefully, but I don't recall mention of exact body fat percentages. I also don't agree with the general title of this thread, or the article. It makes the assumption that someone knows what women want.
  • Bounce2
    Bounce2 Posts: 138 Member
    Options
    "So the author of this non-peer reviewed article holds degrees in mathematics and physics... why would I go there for nutrition and fitness advice??? Each to their own however

    did you miss the dozens of peer reviewed research papers he cited???

    sigh, you guys are amazing. the classic ad hominem logic fallacy."

    I don't dispute the fact that he cited peer reviewed articles. His "opinion" on the said cited articles as an individual who is not within the field was what I was questioning, hence the "each to their own".

    Thanks to the OP though for interesting me to do some of my own reading on the topic.
  • michellekicks
    michellekicks Posts: 3,624 Member
    Options
    I just do both.

    Before I found weights, I only ran. I trained for a marathon. I defiantly was not fat, but then again, I did HITT training along with the long runs.

    Now I do Oly lifting and running. Three days a week running HITT style (3-4 miles with 1.5 mile warm up and cool down). I lift on my own twice a week and Oly classes twice a week. On the days I lift, I usually spend an hour or so on the stair machine.

    Anyway, my body loves it. I have tons of energy (but I'm also eating enough to fuel my workouts).

    I was recently told there is no such thing as over training, only under recovery. This was from a coach who trained in both sprinting and Oly lifting.

    Eat enough, sleep enough and do what you like!

    :flowerforyou:
  • sexymuffintop
    Options
    To me this just sounds like someone who hates cardio and wants a valid excuse to never do it again.

    Everything in moderation.

    I like to run, and will continue to do so until the day I die. I've never seen an overweight runner. I don't spend hours every day, running though.

    Really? I see overweight runners in my gym every single day.

    OMG ! I have seen bunches of overweight lifters !

    My post wasn't made in a lifter v runner way. It was in response to the post I quoted about not seeing overweight runners. I don't see what you seeing overweight lifters has anything to do with the fact that I see heavy runners in my gym at all....
  • pinkraynedropjacki
    pinkraynedropjacki Posts: 3,027 Member
    Options
    About 26% last time I checked. That was before I started doing everything else. So really not bad.
    I take it back then on being a rarity... thats pretty high actually. you do realize you're actually a case study of proving the authors point right???? Like I mean this is exactly what he's trying to say, tons of cardio and you'll end up with lots of bodyfat still.... someone whos long distance running and athletic should be 20% or less. 25% is around your average number of the population. 30% is considered overweight. so 14 months of cardio and diet and your end results was to be a higher bodyfat than your average person...

    http://www.humankinetics.com/excerpts/excerpts/normal-ranges-of-body-weight-and-body-fat

    I'm 5'3" and 59kg...... 25% is actually perfectly within my 'range' for height & weight so 26% is not so bad.....1% BF is not tons. remember this was last time I checked & that was around xmas. I don't even bother anymore cause that's not important to me. What's important is my being able to run, eat & be happy. Anything else is secondary
  • nikilis
    nikilis Posts: 2,305 Member
    Options
    I read this article today, and although it's a very important read, I think the title "Why Women Should Not Run" is a bit misleading. However, it does a good job of explaining the dangers of the cycle of over-cardio that many women get in to trying desperately to burn fat. What I get out of this: cardio in moderation, add in some resistance, and pace yourself. Link here, full text pasted below for ease of consumption ;-)

    http://www.dangerouslyhardcore.com/5343/why-women-should-not-run/



    Here’s another article re-edit/rerelease. This one was originally published on EliteFTS.com, and we’re presenting this updated and polished-up version today in case you missed it the first time around.

    I’m not sympathetic.

    When I look at the fat guy in the gym wasting his time doing forearm curls to lose weight, I feel no sympathy. When a big tough meathead gets stapled to the bench by 365 pounds—after trying and failing with 315—I don’t feel any sympathetic pangs there, either. Even when I see a girl spend a half hour bouncing back and forth between the yes-no machines—the adductor and abductor units—only to have trouble walking the next day, I can’t muster even an iota of pathos.

    Nobody told these people to do these things.

    Then, however, I watch my friend Jessica running on the treadmill—day after day, year after year—like a madwoman, and going nowhere. Her body seems to get softer with every mile, and the softer she gets, the more she runs. For her, I feel sympathy, because the world has convinced her that running is the way to stay “slim and toned.”

    There’s a Jessica in every gym. Spotting them is easy. They’re the women who run for an hour or more every day on the treadmill, setting new distance and/or time goals every week and month. Maybe they’re just interested in their treadmill workouts, maybe they’re training for their fifth fund-raising marathon, or maybe they’re even competing against runners in Finland via some Nike device. Doesn’t matter to me, because years of seeing my friend on the treadmill has exposed the results, which I’m not going to sugarcoat:

    She’s still fat. Actually, she’s gotten fatter.

    I’ve tried to rescue her from the clutches of cardio in the past, but my efforts didn’t work until a month ago, when she called to tell me that a blood test had confirmed her doctor’s suspicion: She had hypothyroidism, meaning her body no longer made enough thyroid hormone.

    Her metabolism had slowed to a snail’s pace, and the fat was accumulating. This was her body rebelling. When Jessica asked for my advice, I told her to do two things: To schedule a second test for two weeks later, and to stop all the goddamned running until then.

    I’m not here to pick on women or make fun of them. There are men out there who do the same thing, thinking cardio will wipe away the effects of their regular weekend beer binges. It’s more of a problem with women, though, and I’m targeting them for three very good reasons:

    1. They’re often intensely recruited for fund-raisers like Team-In-Training, lured by the promises of slim, trim bodies and good health resulting from the months of cardio training leading to marathons—in addition to doing something for charity.

    2. Some physique coaches prescribe 20-plus hours per week of pre-contest cardio for women, which essentially amounts to a part-time job.

    3. Steady-state activities like this devastate the female metabolism. This happens with men, too, but in different ways.

    I hate a lot of things about the fitness industry, but over-prescribed cardio would have to be at the very top of my list. I’m not talking about walking here, nor am I referring to appropriate HIIT cardio. This is about running, cycling, stair-climbing, or elliptical cardio done for hours at or above 65 percent of your max heart rate. The anaerobic threshold factors into this, obviously, but I’m painting gym cardio in very broad strokes here so everyone will understand what I’m railing against.

    Trashing steady-state cardio isn’t exactly a novel idea, and the better physique gurus figured at least a portion of this out years ago, when they started applying the no-steady-state-cardio rule to contest preparation. They failed, however, to point out the most detrimental effect of this type of training—one that applies specifically to women:

    Studies—both clinical and observational—make a compelling case that too much cardio can impair the production of the thyroid hormone T3, its effectiveness and metabolism[1-11], particularly when accompanied by caloric restriction, an all too common practice. This is why many first or second-time figure and bikini competitors explode in weight when they return to their normal diets, and it’s why the Jessicas of the world can run for hours every week with negative results.

    T3 is the body’s preeminent regulator of metabolism, by the way it throttles the efficiency of cells[12-19]. It also acts in various ways to increase heat production[20-21]. As I pointed out in previous articles, this is one reason why using static equations to perform calories-in, calories-out weight loss calculations doesn’t work.

    When T3 levels are normal, the body burns enough energy to stay warm, and muscles function at moderate efficiency. When there’s too much thyroid hormone (hyperthyroidism), the body goes into a state where weight gain is almost impossible. Too little T3 (hypothyroidism), and the body accumulates body fat with ease, almost regardless of physical activity level. Women inadvertently put themselves into a hypothyroid condition when they perform so much steady-state cardio.

    In the quest to lose body fat, T3 levels can offer both success and miserable failure because of the way it influences other fat-regulating hormones[22-31]. Women additionally get all the other negative effects of this, which I’ll cover below. Don’t be surprised here. This is a simple, sensible adaptation of a body that’s equipped to bear the full brunt of reproduction.

    Think about it this way: Your body is a responsive, adaptive machine that has evolved for survival. If you’re running on a regular basis, your body senses this excessive energy expenditure, and adjusts to compensate. Remember, no matter which way we hope the body works, its endgame is always survival. If you waste energy running, your body will react by slowing your metabolism to conserve energy. Decreasing energy output is biologically savvy for your body. Your body wants to survive longer while you do what it views as a stressful, useless activity. Decreasing T3 production increases efficiency and adjusts your metabolism to preserve energy immediately.

    Nothing exemplifies this increasing efficiency better than the way the body starts burning fuel. Training consistently at 65 percent or more of your max heart rate adapts your body to save as much body fat as possible. After regular training, fat cells stop releasing fat the way they once did during moderate-intensity activities[32-33]. Energy from body fat stores also decreases by 30 percent[34-35]. To this end, your body sets into motion a series of reactions that make it difficult for muscle to burn fat at all[36-41]. Instead of burning body fat, your body takes extraordinary measures to retain it.

    Still believe cardio is the fast track to fat loss?

    That’s not all. You can still lose muscle mass. Too much steady-state cardio actually triggers the loss of muscle[42-45]. This seems to be a twofold mechanism, with heightened and sustained cortisol levels triggering muscle loss[46-56], which upregulates myostatin, a potent destroyer of muscle tissue[57]. Say goodbye to bone density, too, because it declines with that decreasing muscle mass and strength[58-64].

    And long term health? Out the window, as well. Your percentage of muscle mass is an independent indicator of health[65]. You’ll lose muscle, lose bone, and lose health. Awesome, right?

    When sewn together, these phenomena coordinate a symphony of fat gain for most female competitors after figure contests. After a month—or three—of 20-plus hours of cardio per week, fat burning hits astonishing lows, and fat cells await an onslaught of calories to store[66-72]. The worst thing imaginable in this state would be to eat whatever you wanted, whenever you wanted. The combination of elevated insulin and cortisol would make you fat, and it would also create new fat cells so you could become even fatter[73-80].

    I won’t name names, but I’ve seen amazing displays of gluttony from some small, trim women. Entire pizzas disappear, leaving only the flotsam of toppings that fell during the feeding frenzy. Appetizers, meals, cocktails and desserts—4000 calories worth—vanish at the Cheesecake Factory. There are no leftovers, and there are no crumbs. Some women catch this in time and stop the devastation, but others quickly swell, realizing that this supposed off-season look has become their every-season look.
    And guess what they do to fix it? Double sessions of cardio.

    This “cardio craze” is a form of insanity, and it’s on my hit list. I’m determined to kill it. There are better ways to lose fat, and there are better ways to look good. Your bikini body is not at the end of a marathon, and you won’t find it on a treadmill. In fact, it’s quite the opposite if you’re using steady-state cardio to get there. The show may be over, and the finish line crossed, but the damage to your metabolism has just begun.

    Don’t want to stop running? Fine. Then stop complaining about how the fat won’t come off your hips, thighs, and *kitten*. You’re keeping it there.

    And as for Jessica, my friend whose dilemma sparked this article? She took my suggestion and cut out the cardio. Two weeks later, her T3 count was normal. Go figure.

    imma let you finish but srsly.....

    tumblr_inline_ml3l6ub3Z11qz4rgp.jpg
  • phatguerilla
    phatguerilla Posts: 188 Member
    Options
    I thought it was poorly written. The author lost me in the beginning dissing people bench pressing and doing curls, and also dissing cardio. WTF is he/she talking about? I didn't read the whole thing, because as I said, whatever message they were trying to convey, they failed right from the start, iMO.

    If you had read even another paragraph you'd probably understand. Firstly the author is not writing for this site, but for his own, with a specific audience in mind. More importantly however he sets up the article by comparing the people who lie to themselves about their training (attempting 110% of your max bench, forearm curls for fat loss) with someone who's been giving poor information about how much cardio to do and has been harmed or shortchanged by this poor advice. Its a pretty standard writing technique.