"Starvation mode", exercise calories, dillema?

1246715

Replies

  • pitbullmama
    pitbullmama Posts: 454 Member
    bump
  • nc90
    nc90 Posts: 83 Member
    Thank you for this post! Very easy to understand, and totally lined up with a lot of things I learned in Biochem my junior year in college :)
  • SHBoss1673
    SHBoss1673 Posts: 7,161 Member
    "Quick facts to help you:
    -The more body fat you have, the greater your deficit can be. "



    Makes interesting reading. I still have half my body weight to lose, does that mean a higher than 1000 calorie deficit (from uneaten exercise calories) wouldn't hurt? I ask because I plateau sometimes even when I'm just 500 calories over this for the entire week which strikes me as ridiculous!

    if you're truly above 50% body fat (which, seeing your picture, I question), then your deficit could probably be higher than 1000, although I don't normally recommend that type of diet, as even though it's possible, it's not really going to help. Part of weight loss is allowing your body to adjust to the different eating, creating a giant deficit is also a mental thing, you need to find a deficit that allows you to lose weight while also allows you to live a somewhat normal and healthy life, otherwise it's just a "diet" and not a nutritional program that's meant to gradually ease you into a new lifestyle (which is what you really should be trying to do).
  • joannbrunton
    joannbrunton Posts: 93 Member
    heard part of this before....it was very informative.... am trying to save to "my topics" by replying so that i can re-read when needed. thank you.
  • tmauck4472
    tmauck4472 Posts: 1,785 Member
    So according to you I should be well.....dead by now. Strange, my heart is still beating, I have a ton of energy, I'm still losing at a steady pace, My hair has not fallen out. I may have over estimated my exercise, but I know I have not under estimated my calorie intake because I weigh my food and look on several different places before I decide on which of MFP amounts I use so that I'm pretty damn accurate with that. But the exercise calories burned doesn't matter since I don't eat those back anyways. I've been eating low for 5 months. I know someone who ate low for 9 months and she's fine matter of fact I know several people who have eaten low for over a year and they are just fine, one of which has heart troubles to begin with and she's just fine actually she real good. I don't have a lot of muscle strength, but I didn't have that when I was 112 lbs heavier either and their is no change there. I don't have as many headaches, but I'm assuming thats because I don't eat as much processed foods and don't eat fast food or even eat out much so I'm not getting all that chemical stuff in my system. I don't want people to eat the way I do, I do this for me, You do what you do for you.

    Your post does not convice me to eat higher calories, it does not convince me that Starvation Mode isn't a myth. Yes I know I'm stubborn but you've not shown me anything that I can't counter with things I believe.

    It's all a matter of opinon, I have my own and you have yours..
  • SHBoss1673
    SHBoss1673 Posts: 7,161 Member
    So according to you I should be well.....dead by now. Strange, my heart is still beating, I have a ton of energy, I'm still losing at a steady pace, My hair has not fallen out. I may have over estimated my exercise, but I know I have not under estimated my calorie intake because I weigh my food and look on several different places before I decide on which of MFP amounts I use so that I'm pretty damn accurate with that. But the exercise calories burned doesn't matter since I don't eat those back anyways. I've been eating low for 5 months. I know someone who ate low for 9 months and she's fine matter of fact I know several people who have eaten low for over a year and they are just fine, one of which has heart troubles to begin with and she's just fine actually she real good. I don't have a lot of muscle strength, but I didn't have that when I was 112 lbs heavier either and their is no change there. I don't have as many headaches, but I'm assuming thats because I don't eat as much processed foods and don't eat fast food or even eat out much so I'm not getting all that chemical stuff in my system. I don't want people to eat the way I do, I do this for me, You do what you do for you.

    Your post does not convice me to eat higher calories, it does not convince me that Starvation Mode isn't a myth. Yes I know I'm stubborn but you've not shown me anything that I can't counter with things I believe.

    It's all a matter of opinon, I have my own and you have yours..

    Not sure I ever asked for a counter to the case. But if you feel you must. please post all your numbers, including your starting weight, your current weight, your height, age, activity level, any medical conditions you may have, Your body fat %, and your waist to hip ratio. Because just making a statement like you have is relatively useless. I don't know any of your stats, so not only can I not put any context to it, neither can anyone else.

    And for the record, I'm glad you've found a way to lose the weight, that's fantastic, and you deserve credit for it, which I freely give. But again, without the whole story, it's hard to even carry on a conversation.
  • Lazygal53
    Lazygal53 Posts: 294 Member
    bump
  • bump
  • So according to you I should be well.....dead by now. Strange, my heart is still beating, I have a ton of energy, I'm still losing at a steady pace, My hair has not fallen out. I may have over estimated my exercise, but I know I have not under estimated my calorie intake because I weigh my food and look on several different places before I decide on which of MFP amounts I use so that I'm pretty damn accurate with that. But the exercise calories burned doesn't matter since I don't eat those back anyways. I've been eating low for 5 months. I know someone who ate low for 9 months and she's fine matter of fact I know several people who have eaten low for over a year and they are just fine, one of which has heart troubles to begin with and she's just fine actually she real good. I don't have a lot of muscle strength, but I didn't have that when I was 112 lbs heavier either and their is no change there. I don't have as many headaches, but I'm assuming thats because I don't eat as much processed foods and don't eat fast food or even eat out much so I'm not getting all that chemical stuff in my system. I don't want people to eat the way I do, I do this for me, You do what you do for you.

    Your post does not convice me to eat higher calories, it does not convince me that Starvation Mode isn't a myth. Yes I know I'm stubborn but you've not shown me anything that I can't counter with things I believe.

    It's all a matter of opinon, I have my own and you have yours..
    That's because you STILL have a lot of weight to lose which why you can keep up with a large deficit but as you get smaller, you'll eventually reach your plateau. I supposed you didn't read the whole post because at the bottom part, it does stated there that having more body fat means you can carry on with a larger deficit.

    Don't compare yourself with other people here especially those of us who weigh less than you are.
  • tmauck4472
    tmauck4472 Posts: 1,785 Member
    So according to you I should be well.....dead by now. Strange, my heart is still beating, I have a ton of energy, I'm still losing at a steady pace, My hair has not fallen out. I may have over estimated my exercise, but I know I have not under estimated my calorie intake because I weigh my food and look on several different places before I decide on which of MFP amounts I use so that I'm pretty damn accurate with that. But the exercise calories burned doesn't matter since I don't eat those back anyways. I've been eating low for 5 months. I know someone who ate low for 9 months and she's fine matter of fact I know several people who have eaten low for over a year and they are just fine, one of which has heart troubles to begin with and she's just fine actually she real good. I don't have a lot of muscle strength, but I didn't have that when I was 112 lbs heavier either and their is no change there. I don't have as many headaches, but I'm assuming thats because I don't eat as much processed foods and don't eat fast food or even eat out much so I'm not getting all that chemical stuff in my system. I don't want people to eat the way I do, I do this for me, You do what you do for you.

    Your post does not convice me to eat higher calories, it does not convince me that Starvation Mode isn't a myth. Yes I know I'm stubborn but you've not shown me anything that I can't counter with things I believe.

    It's all a matter of opinon, I have my own and you have yours..

    Not sure I ever asked for a counter to the case. But if you feel you must. please post all your numbers, including your starting weight, your current weight, your height, age, activity level, any medical conditions you may have, Your body fat %, and your waist to hip ratio. Because just making a statement like you have is relatively useless. I don't know any of your stats, so not only can I not put any context to it, neither can anyone else.

    And for the record, I'm glad you've found a way to lose the weight, that's fantastic, and you deserve credit for it, which I freely give. But again, without the whole story, it's hard to even carry on a conversation.

    but you said it doesn't matter, this applies to everyone or did I read that wrong? And you didn't ask for a counter but I'm trying to understand how I'm supposed to have all these problems and I don't. You can take this private if you want. I'm just trying to understand your logic.
  • SHBoss1673
    SHBoss1673 Posts: 7,161 Member
    So according to you I should be well.....dead by now. Strange, my heart is still beating, I have a ton of energy, I'm still losing at a steady pace, My hair has not fallen out. I may have over estimated my exercise, but I know I have not under estimated my calorie intake because I weigh my food and look on several different places before I decide on which of MFP amounts I use so that I'm pretty damn accurate with that. But the exercise calories burned doesn't matter since I don't eat those back anyways. I've been eating low for 5 months. I know someone who ate low for 9 months and she's fine matter of fact I know several people who have eaten low for over a year and they are just fine, one of which has heart troubles to begin with and she's just fine actually she real good. I don't have a lot of muscle strength, but I didn't have that when I was 112 lbs heavier either and their is no change there. I don't have as many headaches, but I'm assuming thats because I don't eat as much processed foods and don't eat fast food or even eat out much so I'm not getting all that chemical stuff in my system. I don't want people to eat the way I do, I do this for me, You do what you do for you.

    Your post does not convice me to eat higher calories, it does not convince me that Starvation Mode isn't a myth. Yes I know I'm stubborn but you've not shown me anything that I can't counter with things I believe.

    It's all a matter of opinon, I have my own and you have yours..

    Not sure I ever asked for a counter to the case. But if you feel you must. please post all your numbers, including your starting weight, your current weight, your height, age, activity level, any medical conditions you may have, Your body fat %, and your waist to hip ratio. Because just making a statement like you have is relatively useless. I don't know any of your stats, so not only can I not put any context to it, neither can anyone else.

    And for the record, I'm glad you've found a way to lose the weight, that's fantastic, and you deserve credit for it, which I freely give. But again, without the whole story, it's hard to even carry on a conversation.

    but you said it doesn't matter, this applies to everyone or did I read that wrong? And you didn't ask for a counter but I'm trying to understand how I'm supposed to have all these problems and I don't. You can take this private if you want. I'm just trying to understand your logic.

    I did not actually say it applies to everyone, if you read carefully, I did state that the larger the amount you have to lose, the larger the deficit can be.
  • tmauck4472
    tmauck4472 Posts: 1,785 Member
    So according to you I should be well.....dead by now. Strange, my heart is still beating, I have a ton of energy, I'm still losing at a steady pace, My hair has not fallen out. I may have over estimated my exercise, but I know I have not under estimated my calorie intake because I weigh my food and look on several different places before I decide on which of MFP amounts I use so that I'm pretty damn accurate with that. But the exercise calories burned doesn't matter since I don't eat those back anyways. I've been eating low for 5 months. I know someone who ate low for 9 months and she's fine matter of fact I know several people who have eaten low for over a year and they are just fine, one of which has heart troubles to begin with and she's just fine actually she real good. I don't have a lot of muscle strength, but I didn't have that when I was 112 lbs heavier either and their is no change there. I don't have as many headaches, but I'm assuming thats because I don't eat as much processed foods and don't eat fast food or even eat out much so I'm not getting all that chemical stuff in my system. I don't want people to eat the way I do, I do this for me, You do what you do for you.

    Your post does not convice me to eat higher calories, it does not convince me that Starvation Mode isn't a myth. Yes I know I'm stubborn but you've not shown me anything that I can't counter with things I believe.

    It's all a matter of opinon, I have my own and you have yours..

    Not sure I ever asked for a counter to the case. But if you feel you must. please post all your numbers, including your starting weight, your current weight, your height, age, activity level, any medical conditions you may have, Your body fat %, and your waist to hip ratio. Because just making a statement like you have is relatively useless. I don't know any of your stats, so not only can I not put any context to it, neither can anyone else.

    And for the record, I'm glad you've found a way to lose the weight, that's fantastic, and you deserve credit for it, which I freely give. But again, without the whole story, it's hard to even carry on a conversation.

    but you said it doesn't matter, this applies to everyone or did I read that wrong? And you didn't ask for a counter but I'm trying to understand how I'm supposed to have all these problems and I don't. You can take this private if you want. I'm just trying to understand your logic.

    I did not actually say it applies to everyone, if you read carefully, I did state that the larger the amount you have to lose, the larger the deficit can be.

    cool then we're all good, I misunderstood

    And for the record while I don't believe in "Starvation Mode" I also know that you can't live on eating low calories. I know it's not good for you but I am countering with things that I know I can do that will help with that. I'm NOT eating 300 calories a day but I'm not eating 1000 either. I've got 50 more lbs to get off before I up my calories.
  • SHBoss1673
    SHBoss1673 Posts: 7,161 Member


    cool then we're all good, I misunderstood

    And for the record while I don't believe in "Starvation Mode" I also know that you can't live on eating low calories. I know it's not good for you but I am countering with things that I know I can do that will help with that. I'm NOT eating 300 calories a day but I'm not eating 1000 either. I've got 50 more lbs to get off before I up my calories.

    very glad we could clear that up. Good luck with your goals. And feel free to ask me if you have any unanswered questions. I am smart enough to know I don't know everything about nutrition and weight loss, but I've done enough research to be able to find out just about anything someone may need to know or at least who to talk to in order to find out.
  • schustc
    schustc Posts: 428 Member
    i LOVE this post...

    I admit I stress over this almost daily. I worry I'm losing too much too fast, but then, I worry that I won't keep up with my average. Internal struggle for sure.

    as someone with about 80 pounds left to lose (44 down so far), how much of a deficit is safe?

    My TDEE is right around 2300-2400 I think (haven't checked it in the last week or 2).. I generally eat on average 1500 for 6 days, then a high/cheat day around 3000-4000 which puts me at around 1785 on average per day. This isn't a hard number, sometimes it's a little more, sometimes a little less.

    I have been doing this for nearly 5 months. I was on a roll for the first 4, losing an average of 10-11 lbs per month or so. Then last month, I hit a plateau or a stall for a few weeks. I had gone on vacation and was in a camping situation where I had very little control over my diet, reading labels, or weighing things, so have no idea what I ate other than trying to do my best. I ended up plateauing for about 4 weeks.

    Then, after reading I needed to do something different to break through it, I cut my average down to 1384 for 5 days, then ate 7000 over 2 days. As crazy as that sounds, it worked. within a few days I was down 3-4 lbs(I had played with one up and down during the stall).

    I am back to my average of 1500 ish/day with a high day, but sometimes cycle that between 1 high day, or 2 maintenance days. Whatever hits me that given week.

    Is doing this for 5 months going to cause me to face inevitable metabolic slow down? I really wish I didn't have to stress about it. If the deficit is ok, then I'll just keep going.

    My BF % (shudder) is 42.3 as of last check (wednesday).. I work with a personal trainer 3 x a week, mostly doing weight machines. I didn't take my BF% when I started at the end of March, but 10 weeks ago it was 45.5 so I know it was initially even higher.

    So my BF % is going down --- will update with a graph shortly.

    Please give me any advice on if I should worry about my progress or doing any damage. I am worried about disappointing my trainer if things stop, and if they do, he's already told me he will change my diet which I am horribly afraid of. I like what I am doing now (freedom to eat what I want - though I choose mostly healthy foods). :( thank you!!


    19992875_7701.jpg


    i can't get it to show any bigger :(

    I don't like giving a lot of specific advice in threads, just cuz people who it wasn't intended for end up reading it and thinking it's for everyone, but in your case, I think you're generally following an acceptable life path. I would gradually try to lower those 3000 to 4000 days to 2500 to 3000 days, which will make it easier for you to stay at a lower average without totally removing the concept of a higher calorie day. I think, generally speaking, with 80 lbs to lose you're probably fine with a 2 lb per week deficit (again this is a very vague assumption to be taken with a grain of salt) but remember, as your body fat goes down, your deficit must shrink as well, which will mean a smaller weight loss, some weeks you still may hit 2 lbs, others you may see no loss, this is the game we play. At the end for me, I had weeks where I lost 2, then weeks where I gained 3 then others where I lost nothing. That's just how our bodies are, if it was linear, it would be easy. But eventually science wins out (all other things being equal) and you'll lose what you need to.

    Just wanted to say THANK you so much!! This is the information I have been looking for for many weeks, maybe months. I have been living in fear that 2 /wk or up to 10/month was doing me damage. and that I should have been focusing on 6-8 (instead of 8-10/month).

    It's not a huge difference, only 2 lbs, and I probably shouldn't have stressed so much about it, but There is just something about setting goals around 10/month. I am increasingly hopeful that I will BREAK the 200 barrier (get into the 190's) by Christmas. I can't imagine a better christmas present! Actually, I guess I might even hit it by THANKSGIVING! ok.. trying not to focus on deadlines and such, as that is never good (in my experience) I don't know what the future brings and I don't have full control of how much I will lose in a time frame. If I put myself in a stringent date goal to be xyz, that plateau last month would have been even more difficult to handle. Goals to eat a certain way, get your water in, and exercise goals - all good. Weight loss timeline deadline goals - maybe fore some people but I'm trying to avoid that.

    Thanks SO MUCH!! I really Appreciate it!
  • KiKi429
    KiKi429 Posts: 19 Member
    bumping for future reference.. thanks.
  • CoderGal
    CoderGal Posts: 6,800 Member
    As to the finer points of recognizing how many calories are "enough" for you. That's easy enough to estimate (with some impressision I admit, but it'll get you in the ballpark). Just find your approximate BMR (there's a ton of sites out there that do this, go to webMD and put metabolism calculator in, you'll find their tool for TDEE) and multiply by 25% and you'll get close to your TDEE.
    I posted this thread on my news feed and someone pointed out that they didn't understand what the 25% thing was for. I kind of glazed passed it under the assumption that (BMR+BMR*.25) was approximately your TDEE (a little more then sedentary?) so yes 25% would be closer to anyones TDEE. But since I'm not positive and since everyone has different activity levels and because I'm half wondering why 25, could you clarify for me? Thanks :)

    Your assumption is correct, 25 is a very generic average. Some people's BMR is closer to 80% of their TDEE, and others (more active folks, for instance a mail man) might have a 65% BMR. It's all about your activity level. Also some people genetically just have a higher body temperature, which can mean the difference between Thermogenesis being 5% of your TDEE and 8% of your TDEE.

    There are a ton of websites out there that tell you how to calculate your activity level, which you multiply times your BMR to find your TDEE.

    here's the first hit from a google search for activity level multiplier.
    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=109911821&page=1

    that seems pretty much accurate to me. So google BMR calculator, get your BMR, then multiply by the number for you in the above website to get your TDEE (then add any out of band exercise to it for that specific day, FYI, MFP already does all this for you).

    But remember, TDEE is TOTAL, so if you do extra exercise outside your activity level, you must add that exercise to your TDEE to get the real number.
    Thanks for replying so quickly :) Bump so more people see this!
  • geekyjock76
    geekyjock76 Posts: 2,720 Member
    If you are at or near "normal" weight and leanness, use Resting Metabolic Rate instead - which is what you burn at rest when awake. I think a lot of people are confused between RMR and BMR, which is what you burn during sleep or in a coma. Thus, BMR will be slightly lower. BMR should be used in place for those greatly underweight or overweight as RMR is generally inaccurate for those in those groups.
  • BUMP
  • Was under calories tonight and MFP gave me a little red warning. Your information was right on time and I appreciate bothe the site for warning me and you for explaining why. I grabbed a Breakstone Cottage Double and met my calorie quota :)
  • Chipmunk222
    Chipmunk222 Posts: 240 Member
    bump for later :)
  • Katahna
    Katahna Posts: 326 Member
    That might be true, untill you eat something.

    Your body is in a CONSTANT state of change, it is built to adapt to what ever it has to.

    You can't just decide that a myth is true.
  • Love it.
  • Chipmunk222
    Chipmunk222 Posts: 240 Member
    bump for later
  • Hey,

    Maybe you could help me here. Just signed up last week and ready to go. A few months ago I took up a challange to get fit. I got a gym membership for 12 months so that I would continue to go and I love it. I am fitter than ever have been. So now I am looking at food to help with my weight loss to help my change to a healther lifestyle.

    I have noticed after using this counter and such that I am falling short of the caleries I need to take in daily, i'm not hungry. I know i can add more vege and such in but would have to eat alot to still make them up.

    Can someone give me suggestions on getting this up?
    I am also Lactose and Frusctose intollerant if people could keep this in mind

    I don't want to fall into the trap i did a number of years ago where my body went in to starvation mode, I came out of it unwill and worse than when i started (didnt kow about it at the time)
  • hippie_spirit
    hippie_spirit Posts: 104 Member
    bump to read later :smile:
  • llstacy
    llstacy Posts: 91 Member
    As far as I can tell it's a bunch of nonsense that doesn't apply to dieters with excess body fat. Perhaps links to the dozens of research papers will clear this up once and for all?
  • Stephanie_Autry
    Stephanie_Autry Posts: 228 Member
    Now that I think about it that explains a lot- the section about under feeding. I started off with 800-1200 calories for 2 months & exercised 500 cals off doing cardio. I barely ate back my calories & was way under my NET goal of 1200. I was losing weight but I don't think it was fat... My fat is still there where it has always been- I think I lost muscle. I plateaued for about 2 months and no weight loss at all. I tryed upping my calories slowly this past month. The weight has finally started falling back off again. I'm trying to incorporate strength training everyday and make sure my NET lies around 1200-1500 /day. Your post made a lot of good points though, thanks for sharing with us!
  • Helloitsdan
    Helloitsdan Posts: 5,564 Member
    As far as I can tell it's a bunch of nonsense that doesn't apply to dieters with excess body fat. Perhaps links to the dozens of research papers will clear this up once and for all?

    Not really.

    Even O3 and O2 dieters have metabolic effects that cause plateaus.
    I blame Leptin!
  • Penelope2Plyr
    Penelope2Plyr Posts: 166 Member
    Bump to continue the reading of this thread
  • yroma
    yroma Posts: 74 Member
    bump