Level Obstacles: Lose Weight, Target Fat! (EASY!!)
Replies
-
But...but...but... you don't explain how a pound of muscle weighs more than a pound of fat! Won't people just be all confused?
/troll
And then there's the thermic effect of feeding, and also variations in the earth's gravitational pull when weighing oneself at different altitudes . . . . .0 -
I still get none of this :huh: ..so I guess I will sit in the corner and keep doing what I am and hope it works..0
-
Thanks. Very helpful!0
-
Bump to add to 'my topics' Thanks again!0
-
bump0
-
Awesomeness......
0 -
Don't forget about BMR though- in many cases - including mine, TDEE - 20% is lower than my BMR, and you should always try to stay at least at BMR, no lower. As a result, I have to reduce my deficit to TDEE - 15 %.0
-
bump for easy reference.0
-
Don't forget about BMR though- in many cases - including mine, TDEE - 20% is lower than my BMR, and you should always try to stay at least at BMR, no lower. As a result, I have to reduce my deficit to TDEE - 15 %.
This is a good point . . . BMR was one of the things was left on the cutting room floor to make the post simple.0 -
Bump to have in my newsfeed.0
-
mine is 2375 - 30% = 1660, omg i eat too much deficit last past months! only eating 1200kcal max/day *die*0
-
Awesome post, but just a tiny nit-pick with this:There are 3500 calories in a pound of fat, so if you burn 3500 more calories than you eat, you will lose a pound of fat.
If you burn 3500 more calories than you eat, you will burn stored energy then metabolise body tissue, some of which will be fat.
Don;t hate me :blushing:0 -
Awesome post, but just a tiny nit-pick with this:There are 3500 calories in a pound of fat, so if you burn 3500 more calories than you eat, you will lose a pound of fat.
If you burn 3500 more calories than you eat, you will burn stored energy then metabolise body tissue, some of which will be fat.
Don;t hate me :blushing:
I don't hate you, I agree with you :flowerforyou:0 -
Don't forget about BMR though- in many cases - including mine, TDEE - 20% is lower than my BMR, and you should always try to stay at least at BMR, no lower. As a result, I have to reduce my deficit to TDEE - 15 %.0
-
Don't forget about BMR though- in many cases - including mine, TDEE - 20% is lower than my BMR, and you should always try to stay at least at BMR, no lower. As a result, I have to reduce my deficit to TDEE - 15 %.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with eating below BMR if your TDEE-deficit for the day dictates it.
If it happens often, then it should be a cue that you need to exercise more. But that's it.0 -
Don't forget about BMR though- in many cases - including mine, TDEE - 20% is lower than my BMR, and you should always try to stay at least at BMR, no lower. As a result, I have to reduce my deficit to TDEE - 15 %.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with eating below BMR if your TDEE-deficit for the day dictates it.
If it happens often, then it should be a cue that you need to exercise more. But that's it.
Or reduce your deficit. Chances are if your TDEE - deficit cut is lower than your BMR on a regular, you are choosing too high of a weight loss goal.0 -
Don't forget about BMR though- in many cases - including mine, TDEE - 20% is lower than my BMR, and you should always try to stay at least at BMR, no lower. As a result, I have to reduce my deficit to TDEE - 15 %.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with eating below BMR if your TDEE-deficit for the day dictates it.
If it happens often, then it should be a cue that you need to exercise more. But that's it.
Or reduce your deficit. Chances are if your TDEE - deficit cut is lower than your BMR on a regular, you are choosing too high of a weight loss goal.
On the contrary. Mathematically, sedentary TDEE minus 20% is 4% less than BMR.
Sedentary TDEE is BMR*1.2. TDEE - 20% = (BMR * 1.2) * 0.8 = BMR * 0.96
So sedentary TDEE - 20% is a hair below BMR.0 -
In for shenan...er, I mean, in for awesome.0
-
Don't forget about BMR though- in many cases - including mine, TDEE - 20% is lower than my BMR, and you should always try to stay at least at BMR, no lower. As a result, I have to reduce my deficit to TDEE - 15 %.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with eating below BMR if your TDEE-deficit for the day dictates it.
If it happens often, then it should be a cue that you need to exercise more. But that's it.
Or reduce your deficit. Chances are if your TDEE - deficit cut is lower than your BMR on a regular, you are choosing too high of a weight loss goal.
On the contrary. Mathematically, sedentary TDEE minus 20% is 4% less than BMR.
Sedentary TDEE is BMR*1.2. TDEE - 20% = (BMR * 1.2) * 0.8 = BMR * 0.96
So sedentary TDEE - 20% is a hair below BMR.
I thought this was the simple thread.
Not everyone is sedentary.0 -
Don't forget about BMR though- in many cases - including mine, TDEE - 20% is lower than my BMR, and you should always try to stay at least at BMR, no lower. As a result, I have to reduce my deficit to TDEE - 15 %.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with eating below BMR if your TDEE-deficit for the day dictates it.
If it happens often, then it should be a cue that you need to exercise more. But that's it.0 -
:-)0
-
^ BMR?0
-
Eating under BMR should really only be for those who are obese. In that case, it's okay, the body has enough fat to utilize to sustain function.
It's when you get to a lower BF% that eating above BMR is important. The body wants to keep some fat on. Going too low is where you get lean body mass loss.0 -
Eating under BMR should really only be for those who are obese. In that case, it's okay, the body has enough fat to utilize to sustain function.
It's when you get to a lower BF% that eating above BMR is important. The body wants to keep some fat on. Going too low is where you get lean body mass loss.
Very wise.0 -
Eating under BMR should really only be for those who are obese. In that case, it's okay, the body has enough fat to utilize to sustain function.
It's when you get to a lower BF% that eating above BMR is important. The body wants to keep some fat on. Going too low is where you get lean body mass loss.
Very wise.
Concur.0 -
In for shenan...er, I mean, in for awesome.0
-
Bump0
-
Bump
Love all the info - thank you everyone!0 -
In for shenan...er, I mean, in for awesome.
^this0 -
bump0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions