Went and saw a nutritionist... uh what?
Replies
-
i think following this advise would do you more harm than good IMHO0
-
I've been seeing a nutritionist for a few months and he told me to eat more warm, nourishing cooked food - more fats, more protein (in particular red meat, which I hardly touched) and to hold back on the refined carbs.
It has really changed my life since I stopped eating processed and "diet" food and started eating real, organic, in season, locally sourced food, cooked from scratch.
There is no need to starve yourself.0 -
Did you tell the nutritionist how much you work out? There is no way you could do heavy workouts on a plan like this. You will be glycogen depleted and your strength will be drastically reduced. Is this a nutritionist that you pay to go to, could it be a case of them wanting you to lose a stack of weight very fast so that you think, wow they were really great?
This type of eating is not realistic for someone that exercises a lot(not actually suitable for someone who doesn't exercise). Yes you may lose a lot of weight fast, it will be mostly water and muscle not fat, but you will not be able to maintain this kind of eating and have good workouts. You're 5ft 8, working out a lot, strong, I really just don't get how a qualified person came up with this plan for you!0 -
I took a look at your diary and you seem to be very low on protein. You can try meals similar to what the nutritionist gave you, just bigger and add snacks in between, like fruit with nuts or nut butter. You should also keep your calories above 1300. Put olive or coconut oil on your veggies if your calories still come out low.0
-
This is sensibleI've been seeing a nutritionist for a few months and he told me to eat more warm, nourishing cooked food - more fats, more protein (in particular red meat, which I hardly touched) and to hold back on the refined carbs.
It has really changed my life since I stopped eating processed and "diet" food and started eating real, organic, in season, locally sourced food, cooked from scratch.
There is no need to starve yourself.0 -
Why the hell are you asking a forum of unqualified nobodies?
Basically you're wanting us to tell you something different to the person you paid to give expert advice. Sure, OK, sounds like rubbish, eat a load more.
By the way I have no idea what I'm talking about. Happy?
woah. angry person alert!!
here have a flower :flowerforyou:
LOL :laugh:0 -
That person who advised you is an idiot.0
-
I'm no nutritionist but I learned more about nutrition in 2 semesters than this so called "nutritionist" apparently learned while getting a degree.
It sounds to me that they're completely full of it. Ditching pasta isn't a bad call, but eating 900 cals a day is ridiculous.0 -
I'm 5'8" and 85 kg at the moment and my TDEE is roughly 2500 with me working out 4-5 times a week for an hour. I never eat anything less than 1900 cal a day and I'm losing weight!
Eating 800 or 1000 cal a day is a third of what I eat, and you're a little bigger than me, so at the same activity level you should be eating at least your BMR! (should be around 1600-1700)
(And no, I'm not an unqualified nobody, I'm in school to become a dietician)0 -
This is sensibleI've been seeing a nutritionist for a few months and he told me to eat more warm, nourishing cooked food - more fats, more protein (in particular red meat, which I hardly touched) and to hold back on the refined carbs.
It has really changed my life since I stopped eating processed and "diet" food and started eating real, organic, in season, locally sourced food, cooked from scratch.
There is no need to starve yourself.
agreed. i've taken the same approach and dropped about 20 pounds in 4 months, without counting calories, andstill enjoying the occasional beer.
eat real food. that you cook yourself. not food from a box0 -
that sounds sort of ridiculous, but i'm not a nutritionist..?
Stick a sign on your door that says you are and then BAM you become one.
Nutritionist is a very loosely guarded term. Dietitians on the other hand need qualifications that take a considerable amount of effort.
I was trying to remember which way round it was as I knew one had qualifications and the other is good old Jillian McKieth, if your USA and unsure she was a UK TV icon who was debunked as her "nutrition" and advice were harmful! I don't know what the US version of GP is but I'd go and see them for some better advice, 900 sounds very under!0 -
Well It could be good basis, but you'd need to eat way more. Do have to point out anyone can call themselves a nutritionist. (while im sure there are good nurtritionists out there, you may be more likely to come across bad than good) dietician is the protected term if you want help with your diet see a dietician good luck0
-
Get a second opinion. Yeah. Limit pasta. But at your height/weight, that's not near enough to fuel your body. Especially if youare working out.0
-
when I first came here I ate between 900-1000 calories not knowing i was so hungry I would eat everything in sight. my body was starving. I upped my calories to 1600. I started out at 250 pounds and am currently at 175 pounds. had to access my new calories. I eat 1477 calories with a 15% cut of my tdee
scoobysnetwork.com
I agree with the other posters get a 2nd opionon that doesn't sound right at all.0 -
you should be eating so much more than that!0
-
Why the hell are you asking a forum of unqualified nobodies?
Basically you're wanting us to tell you something different to the person you paid to give expert advice. Sure, OK, sounds like rubbish, eat a load more.
By the way I have no idea what I'm talking about. Happy?
Couldn't resist :laugh:0 -
See a dietician not a nutritionist. Their quals are ++++ more than a nutritionist.
Best of luck! Xx0 -
I'm no nutritionist but I learned more about nutrition in 2 semesters than this so called "nutritionist" apparently learned while getting a degree.
It sounds to me that they're completely full of it. Ditching pasta isn't a bad call, but eating 900 cals a day is ridiculous.
Haha I agree with this. I've been working with people to lose weight as a CPT. I don't devise diets for people but steer them in the right direction. I just started studying nutrition OFFICIALLY. I will say that I have found that I know a great deal more than people with so called degrees...even dieticians, some of them have no clue.
That being said, if you have some sort of medical issue...that could be the reason for the suggestions. You really haven't provided enough information for us to know if these suggestions are warranted.0 -
Is she a certified nutritionist or one of those 'nutritionists' who are just peddling 'supplements'. As with everything, if it doesn't feel right don't do it. If you were a sedentary 5' 0" person I would still think that under 1000 calories a day was not enough.0
-
Why the hell are you asking a forum of unqualified nobodies?
Basically you're wanting us to tell you something different to the person you paid to give expert advice. Sure, OK, sounds like rubbish, eat a load more.
By the way I have no idea what I'm talking about. Happy?
Couldn't resist :laugh:
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:0 -
Why the hell are you asking a forum of unqualified nobodies?
Basically you're wanting us to tell you something different to the person you paid to give expert advice. Sure, OK, sounds like rubbish, eat a load more.
By the way I have no idea what I'm talking about. Happy?
Time of month?0 -
In every field, there's always a bunch of people who - despite their education - give the wrong advice. I would get a second opinion, this just doesn't seem right.0
-
This totals MAXIMUM 900 calories, if that. At the moment in the last three months or so I've been averaging approx 1300 cals, which I thought was about right. I voiced this concern to her, and she said it was okay, that eating this amount of calories was RIGHT for me, and should be around 1000 or less.
I'm female, 5'8, approx 120kgs at the start now around 110kg. I workout approx 3 - 6 times a week, with a PT so cardio/weights, pretty intense exercise as I am pretty strong, e.g. I leg press 3 sets 10 reps 130kg... 30mins cardio each session.
Seriousely though, 900 is way too low. I've been there. Lost weight quick (8kg in 8 weeks) but I was dizzy, REALLY cranky, have enourmous cravings at the end that led me to eat someone else's entire jar of peanutbutter ot the office. You won't be able to keep it up.
900 calories is not a lifestyle change. It's an insane diet that will leave you saggy. It did for me; lost all lean musclemass. So, I was succesfully 55kg but looked like a mess. I'd ask for a second opinion or just make up your own mind based on common sense!0 -
that sounds sort of ridiculous, but i'm not a nutritionist..?
Stick a sign on your door that says you are and then BAM you become one.
Nutritionist is a very loosely guarded term. Dietitians on the other hand need qualifications that take a considerable amount of effort.
Exactly. A dietitian has specific training and at least in Canada it's regulated. A nutritionist, not so much.0 -
I would find a dietitian for a second opinion. I don't know where you live, but in many places, almost anyone can call themselves a nutritionist.Hi guys,
So I went and saw a nutritionist today, my exercise is pretty good and wanted help on the diet side of things.
I know I eat way too much pasta but did not expect the news she gave me!
Essentially my diet would be: (similarish to what I eat now except for the dinners)
Breakfast:
Greek yoghurt
Museli
Fruit
Lunch: Salad with protein
Dinner; Protein with unlimited veg
No pasta except once or twice a week with half a cup of brown rice, some wholewheat pasta
This totals MAXIMUM 900 calories, if that. At the moment in the last three months or so I've been averaging approx 1300 cals, which I thought was about right. I voiced this concern to her, and she said it was okay, that eating this amount of calories was RIGHT for me, and should be around 1000 or less.
I'm female, 5'8, approx 120kgs at the start now around 110kg. I workout approx 3 - 6 times a week, with a PT so cardio/weights, pretty intense exercise as I am pretty strong, e.g. I leg press 3 sets 10 reps 130kg... 30mins cardio each session.
I know I have a fair amount of weight to lose but I'm not 300kg, I mean really... Does this sound right?
**Edit: I have another appointment in three weeks, was just going to try it out and see how things go but at that rate I'll have lost maybe 12kg in three weeks0 -
It's hard for nutritionists NOT to advise based on their personal point of views, so they may THINK this is ok. But the Mayo Clinic's obesity clinic, as well as the American Heart Association, and most other experts say that NO ONE should go below 1200 calories a day. Maybe too this nutritionist got her degree a long time ago when they thought this was ok & hasn't stayed up on current recommendations. I'd see another nutritionist if I were you, preferably one that has a recent degree. If that's not possible, then I personally would up the calories to 1200 & you'd still lose, but that's between you & your medical advisors. But the best course would be to talk to your doctor about it...although they say most doctors only get about 9 hours of nutritional instruction in med school.0
-
I am a Registered Dietitian and I would never, never tell someone to eat less than 1000 kcal unless they were 98 years old and bedridden. And then, I would liberalize their diet and tell them to eat as much or little as they wanted. You need to save your money and cancel your next appointment. The diet that she is suggesting does not give you the calories, vitamins and minerals that you need. I don't know your age, but with your current height/weight, and exercise regimen, I would estimate that you need anywhere from 1400-1700 kcal/day. You will not maintain 900 kcal/day, and if you do, you will eventually get sick from being malnourished. Not to mention you'll lose some serious muscle mass.0
-
Breakfast:
Greek yoghurt
Museli
Fruit
Lunch: Salad with protein
Dinner; Protein with unlimited veg
No pasta except once or twice a week with half a cup of brown rice, some wholewheat pasta
This totals MAXIMUM 900 calories, if that. At the moment in the last three months or so I've been averaging approx 1300 cals, which I thought was about right. I voiced this concern to her, and she said it was okay, that eating this amount of calories was RIGHT for me, and should be around 1000 or less.
Did the nutritionist actually say restrict to 900 calories? Because I could eat that menu quite happily and make it way more than 900. I'm 5'3 and eating an average 1300 a day and losing weight at a nice pace - my diary is open if you need ideas, I eat pretty well.0 -
Bump0
-
I have no personal experience, but I've met a lady that was put on a 800cal diet by a nutritionist. She was shorter than you and a bit overweight. I'm not a fan of the starvation myth people preach on this forum. In my non specialist opinion you can go for it, but only for a short period of time. If you feel hungry or light headed just listen to your body and eat more.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions