Frustrated? Carb in , Carb out?

Okay so I am going to rant about something for a moment.

When I started weight loss I was 195 pounds. I was an emotional eater and i LOVED carbs. I mean who doesn't? I love bread. I love oatmeal. I love fruit. I love rice. I love a lot of things that revolve around carbs. But then again back in those days I ate the wrong things during my emotional binges.

I cut out most bad carbs at first and switched to complex carbs. I ate high carb, plus the right amount of protein & fat (I am a peanut butter addict and it won't ever change,) and I lost my weight. I don't think carbs are the true enemy here so why do they get such a bad rep? I literally don't get it.

I've tried for the past few days to go lower carb to see the big hype on it and ended up eating more. Lol. Well that and I haven't been able to workout as much... and I am scared (demons are evil) of gaining weight back. But I think Carbs can be you best friend, if you eat them in the right sense. I mean I used to eat 3 bowls of cereal a day and some where at like 3am. I still lost weight and at that time I only did 20 situps every time I ate. Plus I walked for 30 minutes. Thats all. Literally.

Cutting carbs is weird and unnatural. I don't know.

Any thoughts?
«13

Replies

  • lilcassers
    lilcassers Posts: 163
    You are exactly like me. I am a carb-a-holic and today I actually went on a carb binge from emotions. Although it is ezekiel sprouted bread, it doesn't help when I had 6 slices and I normally stop at 2 a day. I too, am obsessed with oatmeal and cereals.

    The best policy is to moderate, moderate, moderate.

    One bowl of (non-instant) oatmeal. A couple pieces of breads a day. ONE potato a day. If you completely cut, you will go CRAZY. But don't ever go back to cereal... lol. Boxed and processed foods are bad. Fruits and veggies are wonderful cards and don't count.

    My policy is this: if you are eating whole, natural foods, I don't necessarily "count" calories as much.

    Makes sense?
  • "Cutting carbs is weird and unnatural."

    We are all different and it depends on many factors personal to the individual. Weird and unnatural for you can be an absolute MUST for another, so please don't be so hasty to judge a situation that is not yours.

    The key is that carbs = glucose = sugar = insulin response. Some carbs undergo this change quicker than other but it's an absolute, chemical fact that ALL carbs end up as glucose. This results in an insulin response to knock down the level of glucose that gets dumped into the bloodstream as the carbs are digested. Any glucose that, for whatever reason, the body's insulin can't handle gets stored as fat, and also can be indicative of a host of other health issues.

    So for us, carbs (even what you might consider a ridiculously small amount) can equal excess fat and weight gain. Thus...low carb. I am one of the many whose body seems to not utilize insulin properly. I won't bore you with the details but I *must* watch my carb intake.

    If you've not seen it, go to Youtube and look up the documentary called FAT HEAD. It explains why low-carb is a must for some people, and does so in very friendly terms.

    PS Since you say a carb-heavy diet (compared to mine, anyway) lost your weight, how much of the 195 have you lost, and how long has it taken?

    46083831.png
    Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter
  • thesophierose
    thesophierose Posts: 754 Member
    "Cutting carbs is weird and unnatural."

    We are all different and it depends on many factors personal to the individual. Weird and unnatural for you can be an absolute MUST for another, so please don't be so hasty to judge a situation that is not yours.

    The key is that carbs = glucose = sugar = insulin response. Some carbs undergo this change quicker than other but it's an absolute, chemical fact that ALL carbs end up as glucose. This results in an insulin response to knock down the level of glucose that gets dumped into the bloodstream as the carbs are digested. Any glucose that, for whatever reason, the body's insulin can't handle gets stored as fat, and also can be indicative of a host of other health issues.

    So for us, carbs (even what you might consider a ridiculously small amount) can equal excess fat and weight gain. Thus...low carb. I am one of the many whose body seems to not utilize insulin properly. I won't bore you with the details but I *must* watch my carb intake.

    If you've not seen it, go to Youtube and look up the documentary called FAT HEAD. It explains why low-carb is a must for some people, and does so in very friendly terms.

    PS Since you say a carb-heavy diet (compared to mine, anyway) lost your weight, how much of the 195 have you lost, and how long has it taken?

    46083831.png
    Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter

    Well I mean I am not saying going lower on carbs is a bad thing... but trying to cut them out completely like many do these days seems odd to me. I know that carbs can aid in weight loss and it depends on the person and their tolerance.

    I am 112 pounds now. I lost my initial 70 in 6 months by this high carb lifestyle.
  • Crochetluvr
    Crochetluvr Posts: 3,259 Member
    Low carb has always worked for me. But I suspect I was insulin resistant for many years before I developed T2 diabetes so lowering the carbs makes sense. If a person has no medical issue with carbs, enjoy them.
  • Well I mean I am not saying going lower on carbs is a bad thing... but trying to cut them out completely like many do these days seems odd to me. I know that carbs can aid in weight loss and it depends on the person and their tolerance.

    I am 112 pounds now. I lost my initial 70 in 6 months by this high carb lifestyle.

    Be thankful you don't have insulin issues, then, since you apparently don't. If carbs can actually help you lose weight, great. You're very fortunate. There are many whose body has the exact opposite response.

    If I may share this bit of advice:

    I graduated H.S. weighing 117, could run for miles and couldn't put on fat or muscle if you put a gun to my head. I'm now in my 40s and have once reached 184. I've got some muscle and there wasn't THAT much fat, but for my slim frame that still was far too much to be lugging around. Part of the reason is an insulin problem that runs in my family. My dad has adult onset diabetes; I don't yet but every year my fasting blood sugar creeps up a little bit more...so I know it's only a matter of time. I do low carb not for weight issues as much as to delay diabetes as long as possible. Most hard-core low carb dieters also have some insulin problem so we're not just doing it to get into a small size of pants. We take it seriously because we HAVE to.

    I say this to remind you, again, to be thankful and to be aware that however old you are, the body changes over time for most people. What you're able to do today with no ill effects...well...in 10 years or 20, could be a whole different story.

    Just food for thought.
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member
    Okay so I am going to rant about something for a moment.

    When I started weight loss I was 195 pounds. I was an emotional eater and i LOVED carbs. I mean who doesn't? I love bread. I love oatmeal. I love fruit. I love rice. I love a lot of things that revolve around carbs. But then again back in those days I ate the wrong things during my emotional binges.

    I cut out most bad carbs at first and switched to complex carbs. I ate high carb, plus the right amount of protein & fat (I am a peanut butter addict and it won't ever change,) and I lost my weight. I don't think carbs are the true enemy here so why do they get such a bad rep? I literally don't get it.

    I've tried for the past few days to go lower carb to see the big hype on it and ended up eating more. Lol. Well that and I haven't been able to workout as much... and I am scared (demons are evil) of gaining weight back. But I think Carbs can be you best friend, if you eat them in the right sense. I mean I used to eat 3 bowls of cereal a day and some where at like 3am. I still lost weight and at that time I only did 20 situps every time I ate. Plus I walked for 30 minutes. Thats all. Literally.

    Cutting carbs is weird and unnatural. I don't know.

    Any thoughts?

    cutting carbs is just the latest get-thin-quick deprivation diet fad. unless you have diabetes or something like that, there is nothing wrong with eating carbs. none are good and none are bad. they are just carbs. if certain carbs trigger your appetite, then naturally i think scaling back your intake on those is prudent. for me, breads and pasta just make me hungry again faster. i still eat those, but i try not to eat too many. i also don't consider them bad at all. in fact, i don't even worry about my carb intake. i focus on proteins and fats and then let the rest of the calories be whatever combination of protein/fat/carbs i want them to be that particular day. to this point, i've not paid real close attention to my macros, but i customized my settings (the MFP default settings are silly) and this month i'll be tracking them closely to see how i'm doing with my protein and carbs. i think if you did that too (i.e., focusing on fats and protein, both of which are MINIMUMS) and ignored your carbs, i think you'll be fine. if you meet your protein and fat goals and don't exceed your calorie goal, i think the carbs will take care of themselves.

    1g carbs = 1g protein = 4 calories
    1g fats = 9 calories

    set yourself up using a 40/30/30 or similar c/p/f split and see how you do.
  • cutting carbs is just the latest get-thin-quick deprivation diet fad.

    It's been around as a medically proven approach since at least 1797. The Atkins version dates to the early '70s but there were versions before that. If one wants to extend it to pre-agrarian or non-agrarian societies, it's been around for several thousand years.

    BTW...I'm quite satiated, thanks, not feeling deprived at all.
  • StephanieE3456
    StephanieE3456 Posts: 80 Member
    For the last year, I've stuck with a low carb diet. Most of that year I was at around 20 carbs or less a day. It works for me. I am a carb addict and it's best if I limit them completely out of my diet. When I eat carbs, even sugar-free chocolate, I start to get cravings. Those cravings lead to binges. I have PCOS and used to be insulin resistant. I have normal blood sugar now. For me, I need to stay in ketosis to keep on losing and staying the course. It's what works for my body. I no longer have those dips in energy in the late afternoon. I have plenty of energy for exercise and work out 6 days a week on average 1 1/2 hours a day. Some days it's 2 hours, other days it's an hour depending on whether it's a cardio day or a strength day.
  • erikkmcvay
    erikkmcvay Posts: 238 Member
    Many people who tell me they don't eat carbs don't actually mean they don't eat carbs! lol

    Real conversation:
    Them: "I don't eat carbs"
    Me: "so how do you get your fiber?"
    Them: "Well I eat Whole Grains."

    Me: DOH!

    I think a lot of people think 'carbs' are only sugars and white bread and don't realize that there are simple and complex carbs.

    For me, I eat 50-55% of my daily calories in carbs most of which (vast majority) are whole grains (rolled oats, whole grain rice, quinoa, wheat berries, chia, bran) and it's made a big difference in my weight loss :) I don't starve to death either! lol
  • StephanieE3456
    StephanieE3456 Posts: 80 Member
    I get my carbs from vegetables, berries, nuts and seeds. I don't eat any whole grains.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    where are the bad carbs from...Iran?
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member
    cutting carbs is just the latest get-thin-quick deprivation diet fad.

    It's been around as a medically proven approach since at least 1797. The Atkins version dates to the early '70s but there were versions before that. If one wants to extend it to pre-agrarian or non-agrarian societies, it's been around for several thousand years.

    BTW...I'm quite satiated, thanks, not feeling deprived at all.

    ...and your response is still irrelevant to my point. the low-carb diet FAD is recent.
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member
    Many people who tell me they don't eat carbs don't actually mean they don't eat carbs! lol

    Real conversation:
    Them: "I don't eat carbs"
    Me: "so how do you get your fiber?"
    Them: "Well I eat Whole Grains."

    Me: DOH!

    I think a lot of people think 'carbs' are only sugars and white bread and don't realize that there are simple and complex carbs.

    For me, I eat 50-55% of my daily calories in carbs most of which (vast majority) are whole grains (rolled oats, whole grain rice, quinoa, wheat berries, chia, bran) and it's made a big difference in my weight loss :) I don't starve to death either! lol

    if you're eating 50-55% carbs, you are most probably not getting enough protein and/or fats.

    as a general rule, you should be getting 0.85g/lb of LBM in protein each day, and 0.35g/lb of bodyweight in fat each day. you need the protein for muscle repair/retention/growth. you need the fat for all sorts of things. FWIW.
  • thesophierose
    thesophierose Posts: 754 Member
    My macros are set up like 40/40/20

    So, 160g carbs. 160g protein. 31g fat.

    Sometimes I go over on carbs, I have days were I eat 200g and it's those weeks where I actually fluctuate lower in weight. I don't know.. Sometimes I am under. Sometimes I am over on protein, and full. And I am normally good with fat portions staying within 25g-31g.
  • erikkmcvay
    erikkmcvay Posts: 238 Member
    Many people who tell me they don't eat carbs don't actually mean they don't eat carbs! lol

    Real conversation:
    Them: "I don't eat carbs"
    Me: "so how do you get your fiber?"
    Them: "Well I eat Whole Grains."

    Me: DOH!

    I think a lot of people think 'carbs' are only sugars and white bread and don't realize that there are simple and complex carbs.

    For me, I eat 50-55% of my daily calories in carbs most of which (vast majority) are whole grains (rolled oats, whole grain rice, quinoa, wheat berries, chia, bran) and it's made a big difference in my weight loss :) I don't starve to death either! lol

    if you're eating 50-55% carbs, you are most probably not getting enough protein and/or fats.

    as a general rule, you should be getting 0.85g/lb of LBM in protein each day, and 0.35g/lb of bodyweight in fat each day. you need the protein for muscle repair/retention/growth. you need the fat for all sorts of things. FWIW.

    Nonsense.

    The rules I see people posting on proteins are all biased and based on one fad or another. Fact is you can live quite well on 25% protein and 20% fat with the rest remaining as carbs. It ALL depends on what you are trying to achieve.

    When I wanted to bulk up (you're typing to a guy who was cramming down protein long before it became the hip thing to do) I cranked up my protein intake to levels even paleo eaters (which aren't I might add) would be surprised by and I had no problems associated with the high levels I was cramming down (try 3g/lbs of LBM and more). I pushed myself to bench 350lbs with a body fat in the single digits. However, If I only wanted to maintain that mass I could cut that down dramatically based on my work out routine and daily activity levels.

    On the other hand when I want more endurance and am willing to sacrifice the bulk I'm quite happy cutting my protein to levels below your numbers. At an LBM of 184 (roughly using online calculators based on various measurements) I'd need about 160g of protein a day based on your post however I can assure you that as long as I'm not out exercising the 93 I'm eating today will be just fine.

    After over 900 miles of walking and cycling I can tell you that the muscle I have retained would argue with you! lol Sure I've lost some size but most of that I'm quite certain is fat (note: I quit working out over a decade ago and lost the muscle bulk I'd gained in the years following -- replaced by fat of course or I wouldn't be here). For a comparison the largest my arms ever got was 19" (1999) and today they are 16" and I'm only now starting to work out again. My thighs are 25" and well defined, calves are 17.5" and chiseled and I do not suffer from muscle pain or the inability to recover from a workout (15.74 miles riding on Sunday at 12.5mph and I recovered easily).

    The thing is I ate 160 grams of protein on Sunday (the day of that ride) and when I workout I eat up the burned calories in protein. That I think is the key.

    Anyway, I don't agree with the blanket statement above and I think many people in various other countries would easily disprove it. Doesn't mean it isn't good to retain more muscle but you can certainly eat less protein and more complex carbs -- heck, MFP sets your carbs higher then I eat for that matter and sets protein at 15%.

    As for fat, you need 20% of your diet (min) to be fat and I won't raise it above that when I'm carrying plenty! lol
  • yarwell
    yarwell Posts: 10,477 Member
    ...and your response is still irrelevant to my point. the low-carb diet FAD is recent.
    your use of an undefined emotive term adds nothing to the debate, even if you had to shout it.
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member
    ...and your response is still irrelevant to my point. the low-carb diet FAD is recent.
    your use of an undefined emotive term adds nothing to the debate, even if you had to shout it.

    it's not shouting, it's emphasis.

    there is no debate. what i said was factually correct. it may not be what the low-carbers want to hear, but it's factually correct.
  • simplyciera
    simplyciera Posts: 168 Member
    I love carbs, but they hate me. If I eat too much, I get headaches that make me feel like my eyes are about to pop out & I bloat to kingdom come. I cut most carbs out of my life because they just didn't set well in my system. I don't think someone HAS to cut them out, but you really don't need them either. That is, if you don't want them. I'm happily steadily in ketosis & I'll never stop eating low-carb. It's changed my life. Seriously.

    Ehhh who cares. I eat low-carb & am happy. There are people that are high-carb and are happy. I could care less as long as everyone is happy. I just hate those people that are like "I eat a million slices of bread with peanut butter, cereal, rice and pop-tarts, don't exercise and I'm not losing weight! HELP!"
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member
    Many people who tell me they don't eat carbs don't actually mean they don't eat carbs! lol

    Real conversation:
    Them: "I don't eat carbs"
    Me: "so how do you get your fiber?"
    Them: "Well I eat Whole Grains."

    Me: DOH!

    I think a lot of people think 'carbs' are only sugars and white bread and don't realize that there are simple and complex carbs.

    For me, I eat 50-55% of my daily calories in carbs most of which (vast majority) are whole grains (rolled oats, whole grain rice, quinoa, wheat berries, chia, bran) and it's made a big difference in my weight loss :) I don't starve to death either! lol

    if you're eating 50-55% carbs, you are most probably not getting enough protein and/or fats.

    as a general rule, you should be getting 0.85g/lb of LBM in protein each day, and 0.35g/lb of bodyweight in fat each day. you need the protein for muscle repair/retention/growth. you need the fat for all sorts of things. FWIW.

    Nonsense.

    The rules I see people posting on proteins are all biased and based on one fad or another. Fact is you can live quite well on 25% protein and 20% fat with the rest remaining as carbs. It ALL depends on what you are trying to achieve.

    When I wanted to bulk up (you're typing to a guy who was cramming down protein long before it became the hip thing to do) I cranked up my protein intake to levels even paleo eaters (which aren't I might add) would be surprised by and I had no problems associated with the high levels I was cramming down (try 3g/lbs of LBM and more). I pushed myself to bench 350lbs with a body fat in the single digits. However, If I only wanted to maintain that mass I could cut that down dramatically based on my work out routine and daily activity levels.

    On the other hand when I want more endurance and am willing to sacrifice the bulk I'm quite happy cutting my protein to levels below your numbers. At an LBM of 184 (roughly using online calculators based on various measurements) I'd need about 160g of protein a day based on your post however I can assure you that as long as I'm not out exercising the 93 I'm eating today will be just fine.

    After over 900 miles of walking and cycling I can tell you that the muscle I have retained would argue with you! lol Sure I've lost some size but most of that I'm quite certain is fat (note: I quit working out over a decade ago and lost the muscle bulk I'd gained in the years following -- replaced by fat of course or I wouldn't be here). For a comparison the largest my arms ever got was 19" (1999) and today they are 16" and I'm only now starting to work out again. My thighs are 25" and well defined, calves are 17.5" and chiseled and I do not suffer from muscle pain or the inability to recover from a workout (15.74 miles riding on Sunday at 12.5mph and I recovered easily).

    The thing is I ate 160 grams of protein on Sunday (the day of that ride) and when I workout I eat up the burned calories in protein. That I think is the key.

    Anyway, I don't agree with the blanket statement above and I think many people in various other countries would easily disprove it. Doesn't mean it isn't good to retain more muscle but you can certainly eat less protein and more complex carbs -- heck, MFP sets your carbs higher then I eat for that matter and sets protein at 15%.

    As for fat, you need 20% of your diet (min) to be fat and I won't raise it above that when I'm carrying plenty! lol

    suit yourself. i was simply alerting you to something you may or may not have known. whether the 0.85g/lb of LBM is necessary or not is still under investigating by scientists. some think it's higher, some think it's lower. 0.85 seems a safe number to me.

    you'll notice that i used the terms "most probably" and "FWIW".
  • erikkmcvay
    erikkmcvay Posts: 238 Member
    I might add that it is difficult to get enough dietary fiber while eating as much protein as many seem to think they need today, all the while keeping calories down. 1g of protein = 4 cals 1g of fat = 9 cals so let's do the math:

    184LBM * .85 * 4 = 625.6
    184LBM * .35 * 9 = 579.6
    That's 1205.2 calories and I haven't had a single carb....

    Somehow, without eating too much I have to now get close to 38g of fiber....225 calories of Rice and Quinoa gets me about 5g of fiber...

    Exactly where do I get the rest?
    http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/fiber/NU00033

    My advice, for what it's worth, is to learn about complex carbs and dietary fiber and to get plenty of it unless you spend a lot of time weight training or doing a lot of cardio and then only increase the protein cals on those days.
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member
    I might add that it is difficult to get enough dietary fiber while eating as much protein as many seem to think they need today, all the while keeping calories down. 1g of protein = 4 cals 1g of fat = 9 cals so let's do the math:

    184LBM * .85 * 4 = 625.6
    184LBM * .35 * 9 = 579.6
    That's 1205.2 calories and I haven't had a single carb....

    Somehow, without eating too much I have to now get close to 38g of fiber....225 calories of Rice and Quinoa gets me about 5g of fiber...

    Exactly where do I get the rest?
    http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/fiber/NU00033

    My advice, for what it's worth, is to learn about complex carbs and dietary fiber and to get plenty of it unless you spend a lot of time weight training or doing a lot of cardio and then only increase the protein cals on those days.

    are you suggesting that an adult man should be eating 1200-1500 calories at maintenance?

    you can get plenty more fiber eating lentils, black beans, and peas.
  • erikkmcvay
    erikkmcvay Posts: 238 Member

    suit yourself. i was simply alerting you to something you may or may not have known. whether the 0.85g/lb of LBM is necessary or not is still under investigating by scientists. some think it's higher, some think it's lower. 0.85 seems a safe number to me.

    you'll notice that i used the terms "most probably" and "FWIW".

    Fair enough ;)

    For the record (and your info if interested) I started working out in 1982 (before that I wasn't serious) and by spring of 1983 I was 220lbs with a 30inch waist -- and I'm a guy. I wanted to be a body builder and could eat 7500 calories a day!

    At times I ate EVERYTHING in sight.

    Back then I don't think many, if any, understood that there is only so much energy you can have in reserve and 2 hour heavy lifting sessions weren't the best but we did it and got amazing results.

    Later I spent more time and research and tailored my diet more carefully while lifting more weight for less time and achieved much greater strength while maintaining excellent cardio health. At that time I was eating 500+ grams of protein a day. I was a Sgt in the Army (Marines first, Army second) and running 3 days a week, ruck marching 2-3 and working out 5 days a week....wanna guess what my food bill was like?

    I left the military and rode a desk and got fat -- which is why I'm here.

    So, the point? I have a pretty good idea of what it takes to cut the fat out of the body (doesn't mean I used it much for the last dozen years) and have worked out to the very extremes and as such have learned to use protein to maintain and heal muscle in the real world. Hence big increases in protein on days I really push myself. I also know the signs of too little protein and don't have that issue unless I don't increase my protein on the days I push myself.

    However, if a person is not working out in anyway and is only using diet to lose body fat then they won't have the issues many fear with lowered protein levels -- which is why I think MFP sets them so low.
  • erikkmcvay
    erikkmcvay Posts: 238 Member

    are you suggesting that an adult man should be eating 1200-1500 calories at maintenance?

    you can get plenty more fiber eating lentils, black beans, and peas.

    Not at all. For me to maintain without losing weight I'd have to eat 2450 cals a day assuming I did not work out....working out changes that to possibly well beyond 3000-3500
  • suelegal
    suelegal Posts: 1,282 Member

    cutting carbs is just the latest get-thin-quick deprivation diet fad. unless you have diabetes or something like that, there is nothing wrong with eating carbs. none are good and none are bad. they are just carbs. if certain carbs trigger your appetite, then naturally i think scaling back your intake on those is prudent. for me, breads and pasta just make me hungry again faster. i still eat those, but i try not to eat too many. i also don't consider them bad at all. in fact, i don't even worry about my carb intake. i focus on proteins and fats and then let the rest of the calories be whatever combination of protein/fat/carbs i want them to be that particular day. to this point, i've not paid real close attention to my macros, but i customized my settings (the MFP default settings are silly) and this month i'll be tracking them closely to see how i'm doing with my protein and carbs. i think if you did that too (i.e., focusing on fats and protein, both of which are MINIMUMS) and ignored your carbs, i think you'll be fine. if you meet your protein and fat goals and don't exceed your calorie goal, i think the carbs will take care of themselves.

    1g carbs = 1g protein = 4 calories
    1g fats = 9 calories

    set yourself up using a 40/30/30 or similar c/p/f split and see how you do.

    Carbs impact insulin load and for some people that's critical. Not just diabetics. Low carb lifestyles are not a fad, although the diet industry makes it seem so. For many people staying low carb is CRITICAL to their health so please stop poo poo-ing it. You are not a doctor and you obviously don't even have a clue about the health ramifications. If you don't know, please don't say anything.
  • erikkmcvay
    erikkmcvay Posts: 238 Member

    you can get plenty more fiber eating lentils, black beans, and peas.

    230 cals only equals 16g of dietary fiber but good point.
  • erikkmcvay
    erikkmcvay Posts: 238 Member
    Carbs impact insulin load and for some people that's critical. Not just diabetics. Low carb lifestyles are not a fad, although the diet industry makes it seem so. For many people staying low carb is CRITICAL to their health so please stop poo poo-ing it. You are not a doctor and you obviously don't even have a clue about the health ramifications. If you don't know, please don't say anything.

    Actually whole grains (complex carbs) have a positive impact. You're talking simple carbs not complex carbs.
  • erikkmcvay
    erikkmcvay Posts: 238 Member
    http://www.battlediabetes.com/insulin-resistance-and-complex-carbohydrates
    One of the biggest mistakes that weight loss failures make is cutting out carbs altogether. An example of this flawed ideology is the Atkins diet. Clinical studies have proven that the low-carb, high fat diet has a negative impact on the health of your heart and blood.
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member

    cutting carbs is just the latest get-thin-quick deprivation diet fad. unless you have diabetes or something like that, there is nothing wrong with eating carbs. none are good and none are bad. they are just carbs. if certain carbs trigger your appetite, then naturally i think scaling back your intake on those is prudent. for me, breads and pasta just make me hungry again faster. i still eat those, but i try not to eat too many. i also don't consider them bad at all. in fact, i don't even worry about my carb intake. i focus on proteins and fats and then let the rest of the calories be whatever combination of protein/fat/carbs i want them to be that particular day. to this point, i've not paid real close attention to my macros, but i customized my settings (the MFP default settings are silly) and this month i'll be tracking them closely to see how i'm doing with my protein and carbs. i think if you did that too (i.e., focusing on fats and protein, both of which are MINIMUMS) and ignored your carbs, i think you'll be fine. if you meet your protein and fat goals and don't exceed your calorie goal, i think the carbs will take care of themselves.

    1g carbs = 1g protein = 4 calories
    1g fats = 9 calories

    set yourself up using a 40/30/30 or similar c/p/f split and see how you do.

    Carbs impact insulin load and for some people that's critical. Not just diabetics. Low carb lifestyles are not a fad, although the diet industry makes it seem so. For many people staying low carb is CRITICAL to their health so please stop poo poo-ing it. You are not a doctor and you obviously don't even have a clue about the health ramifications. If you don't know, please don't say anything.

    i refer you to the boldface in my original post.

    whether you like it or not, low-carbing is currently a diet fad.

    in a couple of years, it will be replaced by something else. that's how the weight loss industry works.
  • erikkmcvay
    erikkmcvay Posts: 238 Member
    At the other end of the spectrum are complex carbohydrates like vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, and nuts. Complex carbohydrates enhance our health in the following ways:

    They are typically rich in both fiber and micronutrients, offering real nutrition that the body needs to function.
    This added nutrition takes longer to digest, and the slower break-down process helps maintain healthier insulin and blood sugar levels, keeping moods on a more even keel and diminishing risk for insulin resistance.
    The slower rate of absorption of the sugars they provide means we have a steadier supply of energy and results in less sugar being converted into storage forms in the liver and as fat.
    Slow-acting, complex carbohydrates also satisfy hunger better and for longer periods, limiting the dramatic peaks and troughs — and the vicious cycle of cravings — we experience with simple carbohydrates.
    http://www.womentowomen.com/insulinresistance/carbohydratefoods.aspx
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    cutting carbs is just the latest get-thin-quick deprivation diet fad.

    It's been around as a medically proven approach since at least 1797. The Atkins version dates to the early '70s but there were versions before that. If one wants to extend it to pre-agrarian or non-agrarian societies, it's been around for several thousand years.

    BTW...I'm quite satiated, thanks, not feeling deprived at all.

    low carb has been around since 1797?