Larger sizes: Why is there no fashion in double digits

Really? Really? The person who answers this is a dude?

Then wtf is mine? I didn't think the ruffle mattered and everyone told me it was a pencil skirt.

Cause nothing looks good on fat people anyway.

Totally hideous.



Now, I have to go shower. I feel dirty for feeding the troll.

Behold the powers of Photoshop.

Actually so is basically every image that is published, so this one being shopped is irrelevant. It's pretty absurd to contend that all women beyond a size 12 look terrible in clothes. These women, even if shopped, don't appear to shopped down to below a size 14, which is what the point of the photo. Not where it has been touched.

Women aren't this flawless at that weight. Without photo shop they would likely have visible cellulite and stretch marks.

Ummm, no. Some people are just born with fabulous skin. I have no cellulite even though I'm bigger than the women in that picture but I do have stretch marks. Why do you think they're models? Because they look good in the skin they have. If companies solely relied on Photoshop to do the work, anyone would do, so why'd they choose these models?

Double digits start at 10. That's 2 numbers. Who really wants to look a someone extremely tall with a lrge frame that is not overweight in a 10 ot 12. That is nothing but bones.

whats extremely tall.

I would think anyone 5'10 or above would look terrible that small. I also know that is not extreme height anymore.

I'm 5'10. I wear a size 4 to 6. I don't think I look too terrible.