Because thigh gaps: clarification
Replies
-
mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
so just to recap:
he will accept an assumption or an opinion that is not based on anything but conjecture, but not accept a sexual orientation that is rooted in biology.0 -
mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
And one of those beautiful children looks like a girl. I hope she doesn't face a 'forcible persuasion' in her future. :frown:0 -
Aww. I feel bad. I missed out on a lot of douchiness, and couldn't come play sooner. I don't think autocorrect is your problem, fella. Autocorrect may change a word or two, but rape advocacy, and body shaming are ideas that are conveyed more than just with a single word replacement.
It's kind of like the girl I dated once who stopped seeing me because I had slept with a black woman, and said, my penis would fall off, and I probably already gave her AIDS. Later, she came back to say that wasn't a racist thing to say.0 -
It is her belief i cant change it. It is not accurate. I have to accept it because she is on the internet 1000 miles away.
But to recap, I still stand on my OP.
My bad for the thigh gaps0 -
mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
And one of those beautiful children looks like a girl. I hope she doesn't face a 'forcible persuasion' in her future. :frown:
I was thinking the same thing... or turn out to be a lesbian and not be accepted by her father... or grow up to have an eating disorder because her father has identified parts of women's bodies that are repulsive.
OP... your opinions about women are going to imprint on your daughter. Have you considered that your opinions are very mysoginistic? Do you really want her to feel like she must live up to your standard of what a woman should be? Shouldn't she have a chance to decide what kind of woman she is?0 -
None of this has anything to do with my OP.0
-
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.0 -
Well for what it's worth wouldn't thigh gap really help with scissoring or do I have my geometry wrong?
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:0 -
This content has been removed.
-
None of this has anything to do with my OP.
Welcome to MFP... you wanted some attention... you got it.0 -
mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
And one of those beautiful children looks like a girl. I hope she doesn't face a 'forcible persuasion' in her future. :frown:
I was thinking the same thing... or turn out to be a lesbian and not be accepted by her father... or grow up to have an eating disorder because her father has identified parts of women's bodies that are repulsive.
OP... your opinions about women are going to imprint on your daughter. Have you considered that your opinions are very mysoginistic? Do you really want her to feel like she must live up to your standard of what a woman should be? Shouldn't she have a chance to decide what kind of woman she is?
That is entirely up to her. She is currently being raised by her mother, who is part of an extremely religious(messianic) family that does not see homosexuality/lesbianism as a way of life.
I am not religious at all, her beliefs are being imprented on them. Shes not even allowed to wear earrings.0 -
STOP POSTING DUDE. Seriously, it's just getting worse.0
-
It is her belief i cant change it. It is not accurate. I have to accept it because she is on the internet 1000 miles away.
But to recap, I still stand on my OP.
My bad for the thigh gaps
And if she weren't? :huh:
That "keep digging" gif is as accurate as they come...
Now youre just trying extremely hard to make something out of what is clearly not there. wow.0 -
STOP POSTING DUDE. Seriously, it's just getting worse.
I can say what I please and I intend on doing so.0 -
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.
In nature, that may be one reason that animals turn to homosexuality. As a means of population control. So no, I don't think you can call it unnatural from a position of procreation.0 -
None of this has anything to do with my OP.
This all has to do with what you have said and admitted you said. It's a little too late to close the barn door, buddy. That darn horse has already bolted.0 -
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.
In nature, that may be one reason that animals turn to homosexuality. As a means of population control. So no, I don't think you can call it unnatural from a position of procreation.
Romans 1:25-27)
25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.0 -
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.
In nature, that may be one reason that animals turn to homosexuality. As a means of population control. So no, I don't think you can call it unnatural from a position of procreation.
Romans 1:25-27)
25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
Shouldnt post the bible in here dude. 3.2.10 -
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.
In nature, that may be one reason that animals turn to homosexuality. As a means of population control. So no, I don't think you can call it unnatural from a position of procreation.
Romans 1:25-27)
25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
I don't see anything in there about procreation.0 -
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.
In nature, that may be one reason that animals turn to homosexuality. As a means of population control. So no, I don't think you can call it unnatural from a position of procreation.
Romans 1:25-27)
25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
I'm sure this will get it shut down.0 -
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.
In nature, that may be one reason that animals turn to homosexuality. As a means of population control. So no, I don't think you can call it unnatural from a position of procreation.
Romans 1:25-27)
25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
Shouldnt post the bible in here dude. 3.2.1
Didn't you just get finished stamping your little feet and declaring that you would continue to post as you like? Pot meet kettle.0 -
That is entirely up to her. She is currently being raised by her mother, who is part of an extremely religious(messianic) family that does not see homosexuality/lesbianism as a way of life.
I am not religious at all, one of those things where her beliefs are being imprented on them. Shes not even allowed to wear earrings.
You see your daughter, though. Believe it or not, fathers and their opinions are very important to little girls, and it can shape who they are. All I'm suggesting is that these opinions that you have shared here are not representative of a positive male role model in a girl's life.
I know I've particpated with the others in razzing you a bit. I get that maybe you didn't communicate your views very well, and haven't really meant harm, but I would suggest you think carefully about the things you say before you say them. Especially around your daughter. Best of luck! No hard feelings, I hope.0 -
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.
In nature, that may be one reason that animals turn to homosexuality. As a means of population control. So no, I don't think you can call it unnatural from a position of procreation.
Romans 1:25-27)
25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
I don't see anything in there about procreation.
Genesis 1:28
And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”0 -
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.
In nature, that may be one reason that animals turn to homosexuality. As a means of population control. So no, I don't think you can call it unnatural from a position of procreation.
Romans 1:25-27)
25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
I'm sure this will get it shut down.
I'm pretty sure that bible verse just told us that if you don't eat clean, God makes you gay. I saw that. In the words.
(Edited for quote fail. Epic, epic quote fail.)0 -
That is entirely up to her. She is currently being raised by her mother, who is part of an extremely religious(messianic) family that does not see homosexuality/lesbianism as a way of life.
I am not religious at all, one of those things where her beliefs are being imprented on them. Shes not even allowed to wear earrings.
You see your daughter, though. Believe it or not, fathers and their opinions are very important to little girls, and it can shape who they are. All I'm suggesting is that these opinions that you have shared here are not representative of a positive male role model in a girl's life.
I know I've particpated with the others in razzing you a bit. I get that maybe you didn't communicate your views very well, and haven't really meant harm, but I would suggest you think carefully about the things you say before you say them. Especially around your daughter. Best of luck! No hard feelings, I hope.
Nicely said.0 -
yeah...you do know your book really doesn't mean anything to a lot of us. right???0
-
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.
In nature, that may be one reason that animals turn to homosexuality. As a means of population control. So no, I don't think you can call it unnatural from a position of procreation.
Romans 1:25-27)
25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
Shouldnt post the bible in here dude. 3.2.1
Didn't you just get finished stamping your little feet and declaring that you would continue to post as you like? Pot meet kettle.
Nope I meant 3.2.1 you and others would jump on the bible as being a giant childrens story book.0 -
and to add some minute validity to your comment, I do not accept lesbianism as a valid sexual orientation, nor will i ever.But thats not what we were talking about here now was it?
Wait, wait. Hold the phone. Just out of morbid curiosity, how can you "not accept" a valid sexual orientation that you yourself are not capable of having?mkay. My position stands as do my statements.
and to the cat lady above, I didnt delete that, the Mods did when they sent me an email about it.
Need I make it clearer that I never meant to imply rape, or beter yet will ever have the need to force anyone to do anything, again?
Well, that is some solid logic you have there.
The only "Logical" explanation I have for all of this.
The mother of those beautiful kids in the background left him for a female (this explain the non acceptance)
Which he attempted to change from liking women (which he totally failed and will not try "again")
JMO
they are right it is a orientation a choice, but it is not natural they cannot procreate.
In nature, that may be one reason that animals turn to homosexuality. As a means of population control. So no, I don't think you can call it unnatural from a position of procreation.
Romans 1:25-27)
25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
are all the bonobos going to the hellfire too?
also, when you get an entire species that happens to be the closest living species to humans, where all individuals within the species regularly engage in homosexual sex (yes male bonobos do as well, just females do it the most) you really can't say that homosexuality is unnatural.
as for procreation, male and female bonobos mate with each other often enough to produce enough little baby bonobos to keep the species going. they just regularly mate with their own gender as well. Very regularly. Some might say constantly.0 -
Wow. Such clusterfuq. A seedy mixture of body shaming, rape promotion, denial of things that are seen in nature as unnatural because of religion (Which is decidedly unnatural), and a partridge in a pair tree.
*popcorn*0 -
Wow. Such clusterfuq. A seedy mixture of body shaming, rape promotion, denial of things that are seen in nature as unnatural because of religion (Which is decidedly unnatural), and a partridge in a pair tree.
*popcorn*
Okay you, I like you. You bring the funny.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions