Sugar is the new "Devil"

1235

Replies

  • MityMax96
    MityMax96 Posts: 5,778 Member
    I'm opposed to making humanity more vicious rather than more civilized by rewarding people with power for wealth accumulation. I see no reason why a Bush should have more decision making power in policies that affect my life than I do just because many great-great-grandaddy Bush's ago the family made a killing in the slave trade. I'd rather take my chances on direct democracy for anything that absolutely has to be decided on to maintain society together.

    Thank you for the civil and intelligent discussion, though, hope you have a nice day! :flowerforyou:

    well let's be fair (i am no fan of the Bush family)
    But there are wealthy on both sides of the political spectrum.
    Clinton's are doing just fine
    Gore is doing just fine
    Obama is worth millons
    Nancy Pelosi is worth a TON
    Harry Reid, ditto

    So let's just say politicians......not just direct it at one family.

    I see no reason why 535 ppl have the ability to determine and make choices for my life in general....outside of what is in the constitution.

    Yep, been a great discussion
  • Derpes
    Derpes Posts: 2,033 Member
    I'm opposed to making humanity more vicious rather than more civilized by rewarding people with power for wealth accumulation. I see no reason why a Bush should have more decision making power in policies that affect my life than I do just because many great-great-grandaddy Bush's ago the family made a killing in the slave trade. I'd rather take my chances on direct democracy for anything that absolutely has to be decided on to maintain society together.

    Thank you for the civil and intelligent discussion, though, hope you have a nice day! :flowerforyou:

    well let's be fair (i am no fan of the Bush family)
    But there are wealthy on both sides of the political spectrum.
    Clinton's are doing just fine
    Gore is doing just fine
    Obama is worth millons
    Nancy Pelosi is worth a TON
    Harry Reid, ditto

    So let's just say politicians......not just direct it at one family.

    I see no reason why 535 ppl have the ability to determine and make choices for my life in general....outside of what is in the constitution.

    Yep, been a great discussion

    We could just strive for a dictatorship.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    I don't agree with the tax.

    But one day I would like to see soda or sweet sugary drinks be more price wise than water. But that's more me wanting to see the price of bottled water go down because it's redic. I hardly ever drink it - but live in a town that has some horrible water so if I'm somewhere that dosn't have a filter I'll go buy a bottle. I find my self wanting water sometimes but getting soda because in the end it's cheaper.

    That is just crazy!!!! I'm so lucky here in South Africa because the water on tap is pretty good by most standards. I rarely have to buy bottled water.

    Now that's really one for the books - WHY IS WATER MORE EXPENSIVE THAN SODA? Does not make sense.

    Seems odd. I will say that the tap water is perfectly good where I live, and yet people commonly buy bottled water, so clearly price isn't the only factor. I even buy bottled myself for convenience when out and about, but I don't understand people using it rather than tap in their homes.
  • JoyeII
    JoyeII Posts: 240 Member
    And I hate the idea of "sin" taxes....

    Me too. Because there's no such thing as "sin." I don't think the government should be using that term anyway. It's a subtle violation of separation of church and state.
  • MityMax96
    MityMax96 Posts: 5,778 Member
    I'm opposed to making humanity more vicious rather than more civilized by rewarding people with power for wealth accumulation. I see no reason why a Bush should have more decision making power in policies that affect my life than I do just because many great-great-grandaddy Bush's ago the family made a killing in the slave trade. I'd rather take my chances on direct democracy for anything that absolutely has to be decided on to maintain society together.

    Thank you for the civil and intelligent discussion, though, hope you have a nice day! :flowerforyou:

    well let's be fair (i am no fan of the Bush family)
    But there are wealthy on both sides of the political spectrum.
    Clinton's are doing just fine
    Gore is doing just fine
    Obama is worth millons
    Nancy Pelosi is worth a TON
    Harry Reid, ditto

    So let's just say politicians......not just direct it at one family.

    I see no reason why 535 ppl have the ability to determine and make choices for my life in general....outside of what is in the constitution.

    Yep, been a great discussion

    We could just strive for a dictatorship.
    Seems we are heading that way....sadly
  • bugaboo_sue
    bugaboo_sue Posts: 552 Member
    I don't agree with the tax.

    But one day I would like to see soda or sweet sugary drinks be more price wise than water. But that's more me wanting to see the price of bottled water go down because it's redic. I hardly ever drink it - but live in a town that has some horrible water so if I'm somewhere that dosn't have a filter I'll go buy a bottle. I find my self wanting water sometimes but getting soda because in the end it's cheaper.

    That is just crazy!!!! I'm so lucky here in South Africa because the water on tap is pretty good by most standards. I rarely have to buy bottled water.

    Now that's really one for the books - WHY IS WATER MORE EXPENSIVE THAN SODA? Does not make sense.

    Seems odd. I will say that the tap water is perfectly good where I live, and yet people commonly buy bottled water, so clearly price isn't the only factor. I even buy bottled myself for convenience when out and about, but I don't understand people using it rather than tap in their homes.

    Perfectly good in that it's drinkable? If that's the case then how does it actually taste? There are plenty of places where I live where the city water is drinkable but it tastes horrible. I have well water and if I drink the tap water at my mom's house I can taste the chlorine in it so while here water is perfectly fine it's not palatable.
  • This content has been removed.
  • DaveMurphy6
    DaveMurphy6 Posts: 130 Member
    Not really "new"..Sugar,White Flour, and Salt have always been known as the "Three White Deaths" Reduce or get rid of these and you will be a long way on the journey to health
  • Bry_Fitness70
    Bry_Fitness70 Posts: 2,480 Member
    Sugary drinks are not a necessity, similar to alcohol and tobacco. They are luxury items. Candy is also a luxury item. I could see a day where more things are taxed as such. It's not going to stop anyone because it's pennies on the dollar. It's a non-issue.

    Every individual economic burden that the government has inflicted upon us began humbly as “pennies on the dollar”. The federal income tax didn’t start out at 30-40% (the top rate was 7%), or else there would have been an immediate Bastille Day type of revolt in DC. You start small and then ratchet it up little by little, so people don’t realize what is happening until it is too late
  • sljohnson1207
    sljohnson1207 Posts: 818 Member
    It's off topic, but did come up in discussion regarding payment plans and doctors, labs, etc.

    You can also bargain with some of these service providers. After all, they are in business. Businesses exist to make a profit.

    Some of these businesses will allow you a major discount paying in full up front. Some will make payment plans and reduce it gradually if you pay on time. Some will charge zero interest if you pay it off within a certain time frame.

    Ask. What is the worst that can happen?
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    I don't think the government should be using that term anyway. It's a subtle violation of separation of church and state.

    "Sin tax" is just a colloquialism. The actual taxes aren't called that. They have more specific names.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    I don't agree with the tax.

    But one day I would like to see soda or sweet sugary drinks be more price wise than water. But that's more me wanting to see the price of bottled water go down because it's redic. I hardly ever drink it - but live in a town that has some horrible water so if I'm somewhere that dosn't have a filter I'll go buy a bottle. I find my self wanting water sometimes but getting soda because in the end it's cheaper.

    That is just crazy!!!! I'm so lucky here in South Africa because the water on tap is pretty good by most standards. I rarely have to buy bottled water.

    Now that's really one for the books - WHY IS WATER MORE EXPENSIVE THAN SODA? Does not make sense.

    Seems odd. I will say that the tap water is perfectly good where I live, and yet people commonly buy bottled water, so clearly price isn't the only factor. I even buy bottled myself for convenience when out and about, but I don't understand people using it rather than tap in their homes.

    Perfectly good in that it's drinkable? If that's the case then how does it actually taste? There are plenty of places where I live where the city water is drinkable but it tastes horrible. I have well water and if I drink the tap water at my mom's house I can taste the chlorine in it so while here water is perfectly fine it's not palatable.

    Tastes just as good as bottled water. Like water.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Not really "new"..Sugar,White Flour, and Salt have always been known as the "Three White Deaths" Reduce or get rid of these and you will be a long way on the journey to health

    Eh, three doesn't really work. You need 4, so you can have the Four White Horsemen of the Apocalypse: sugar, white flour, salt, and, hmm, what? Potatoes would probably be the popular choice within the "white foods kill!" movement, but how about good old white cauliflower? It seems kind of evil and even if not I understand it's a wonderful mimic so could probably pass well enough!
  • CarynMacD
    CarynMacD Posts: 230
    For my reference:

    Bottled water in South Africa 1.358 cents/ml
    Soda 1.664 cents/ml
  • Kevalicious99
    Kevalicious99 Posts: 1,131 Member
    Don't forget carbs ... they are in the devils bed together.
  • This content has been removed.
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    I'm sure there's an argument to be made that neither butter nor flour are necessities either.
  • bunnylion
    bunnylion Posts: 265 Member
    Hahaha. I remember a few years back, when they wanted to raise taxes on beer in Germany. It almost started a revolution.
    In 2014 out of the 28 states in the EU Germany has the second lowest beer tax. The only country with a lower tax on beer is Bulgaria....

    Maybe beer is a necessity in Germany... At least I don't think the government has any plans to try raising taxes on that any time soon...
  • CarynMacD
    CarynMacD Posts: 230
    Hahaha. I remember a few years back, when they wanted to raise taxes on beer in Germany. It almost started a revolution.
    In 2014 out of the 28 states in the EU Germany has the second lowest beer tax. The only country with a lower tax on beer is Bulgaria....

    Maybe beer is a necessity in Germany... At least I don't think the government has any plans to try raising taxes on that any time soon...

    I'm moving to Bulgaria! :drinker: :drinker: :drinker: :smokin: :smokin: :smokin:
  • bunnylion
    bunnylion Posts: 265 Member
    Oh, and I would be fine with a tax on anything that is supposedly 'bad' for you as long as I could earn a tax relief by exercising or eating healthily most of the time. This way I could 'earn' the bad bad bad stuff much like I already do now: I have done all my exercises and met my macros? Great, than it's ok to have a piece of devil chocolate cake ;-)
  • Meerataila
    Meerataila Posts: 1,885 Member
    People want to work and have nice things

    Are you sure about that?

    Can you say it with 100% certainty that people want to work and have nice things because I have known plenty of people who lost jobs and sat back collecting unemployment -- and kept getting it extended when it ran out -- because they made more collecting than they did if they got another job. There are plenty of people who are capable of getting a job but they choose to sit back and stay on welfare because it's easier to hold your hand out and get money than it is to get off your butt and get a job.

    I suppose I should have said 'most people'. I defy you to make the argument that we'll have less people working hard for long hours at dirty and dangerous jobs if they're actually paid well for those jobs.

    The reason many choose welfare (aside from the fact that outsourcing has made it so we don't have enough jobs) is because working doesn't lift many out of poverty at all, so why work if you aren't getting anywhere for it?

    Let me ask you a question. I work in 911 here in NYC. I've had days, where in one day I responded to a guy stabbed 16 times who we didn't let die, a guy shot in the leg, a drunk who's friend hit him in the head with a beer bottle and cut hit artery and a young boy playing football who broke his tibula in half, how much doe you think my job is worth doing? I wake up at 430am to go to work. Snowing a foot, my office doesn't close, because my office is the street, people will still need us.

    How much should I demand before I accept going to work?

    One thing I can guarantee to is i don't make anywhere near what I'm worth. What I deserve, for the role I play. Have you ever know what it's like to actually have someone's life in your hands? Like really, live or die if you get flustered?

    Meerata,

    Bumping my question because I'd like to hear what you think.

    You would be one of the richest people in America under Participatory Economics.

    Your job is dangerous, dirty, and unpleasant. What stumps me (because I'm just learning about parecon and it's an evolving idea anyway) is how your work would be divided or whether it would be.

    In Parecon, %80 of work is skilled work, %20 is grunt work, and everyone must do that mix of both. So if I were a professor %80 of the time (a low paying job under Parecon) %20 of the time I might be responsible for cleaning the university toilets (higher paying but not as high as your job, because it's not dangerous, just gross).

    But you are already working a mix of dirty grunt work and skilled work, so why have you switch your roles? Although you could do %20 training of other people and/or %20 of time in classes getting even more skilled, I guess. That would make sense even though it's a reversal of the 80/20.

    Edit: I realize I misread this. I claim sun blindness (I just came in from the pool). I thought you were an EMT/first responder. A dispatcher wouldn't be quite as well paid, but still, the hours sound like they suck and the job sounds more onerous than professor (I personally think stress is a killer and stressful jobs should pay quite well). Now the people you send out, they'd be making big bucks, due to the danger.
  • bunnylion
    bunnylion Posts: 265 Member
    For my reference:

    Bottled water in South Africa 1.358 cents/ml
    Soda 1.664 cents/ml

    Are those US dollar cents? A small bottle of water is really around 6 bucks?
    Good beer in Germany 0.17 cents/ml. Cheap beer is around 0.06 cents /ml around the same price as bottled water. That is Euro cents.
  • Meerataila
    Meerataila Posts: 1,885 Member
    I'm not mixing anything. If you don't want to subsidize food so the poor can eat, I don't want to subsidize your military, police force, or National Guard. Hire protection or defend yourself.

    You are mixing things

    It is in constitutions both state and federal for those things....it is a government role...
    It is not in those constitutions to influence the market place...
    Or to take money from one group and give to another

    And I do protect myself, I take advantage of the 2nd Amendment

    Either you want taxation for society or not. If you don't, you're an old fashioned, all out anarchist. If you do, you're for government intervention. It's just a matter of your opinion on what government should be involved in vs mine. If we actually had real democracy we could find out what the majority of Americans really want. We don't. We have an oligarchy dressed as a Republic with a constitution that is conveniently ignored every time the real decision makers want something different.

    IT IS NOT A MATTER OF OPINION
    It is written down in black ink on parchment, that government has a role in those areas.....
    You live in this country, it is what our law states

    Exactly
    WE ARE A REPUBLIC, not a Democracy...
    Democracy is mob rule....
    it is 2 wolves and a sheep sitting and deciding what is for dinner

    A Republic is
    Two wolves and a sheep deciding what is for dinner, but the sheep has a gun

    I'd rather mob rule than rich rule, which is, if you know your history (and I suspect you're intelligent enough to know it) is what we've always had.

    Oh boy. Really? The only reason you can say that is because of how far we have come as a society. If we were a mob rule government, minorities would never have a fair shot. Women's suffrage would have never happened. And people would still find a way to gain the system for their benefit.

    I disagree. Bigotry arises from societies that take advantage of minority groups or groups lacking power in order to benefit the those in power. This is rampant in capitalist and fascist societies and can't exist at all without the ability to make a profit from the labor of another, which will not exist under a better system. You can make money off your own labor, never the labor of another.

    But safeguards would be good to vote into place and I respect our society enough to believe that is immediately what would happen. First and foremost, no disenfranchisement of any group or person would be permitted, economically or politically. Everyone would have their voting power for their lifetime and under participatory economics everyone would have the greatest say in whatever working conditions affect them most.
  • Meerataila
    Meerataila Posts: 1,885 Member
    I'm opposed to making humanity more vicious rather than more civilized by rewarding people with power for wealth accumulation. I see no reason why a Bush should have more decision making power in policies that affect my life than I do just because many great-great-grandaddy Bush's ago the family made a killing in the slave trade. I'd rather take my chances on direct democracy for anything that absolutely has to be decided on to maintain society together.

    Thank you for the civil and intelligent discussion, though, hope you have a nice day! :flowerforyou:

    well let's be fair (i am no fan of the Bush family)
    But there are wealthy on both sides of the political spectrum.
    Clinton's are doing just fine
    Gore is doing just fine
    Obama is worth millons
    Nancy Pelosi is worth a TON
    Harry Reid, ditto

    So let's just say politicians......not just direct it at one family.

    I see no reason why 535 ppl have the ability to determine and make choices for my life in general....outside of what is in the constitution.

    Yep, been a great discussion

    You just named a whole crop of politicians I despise every bit as much as I despised Bush. I'm done with representative democracy unless we can recall them and bring them up on criminal charges when they fail to do what they promise (impractical). I'd rather we create the laws and vote on them together. And the technology will now allow us to do that. Is it perfect? Heck no! It could be really chancy at times. But it beats what we have now.
  • extra_medium
    extra_medium Posts: 1,525 Member
    Joining the "Weepy, left wing commie 'murica-hating sissy government sheep " in the pro "sin" taxes corner.

    Where I'm from (not 'merica) the taxes are pretty darn high, on most thing actually, but the benefits are substantial. We have FREE health care and free education for everyone so there is nothing stopping anyone from getting the help they need or the education they desire. Just sayin

    It ain't "Free", you are paying for it in many ways....and not just taxes.

    and here in "merica", no one is turned down for health care.
    Hospitals cannot turn a person away it is against the law, so they are forced to treat people.
    Regardless if the person can or cannot pay

    What you are referring to only applies to emergency situations or women in labor. Many people cannot afford the maintenance treatments they need for chronic diseases or other diseases like certain kinds of cancer. Those aren't considered emergencies - until the person is about to keel over for it. And even then, they are given the basic treatment that will prevent death - not necessarily the maintenance treatment they need. And they are still billed for it.

    I was talking to my Mom's oncologist, who we trust and have a good relationship with. He says that the unregulated pharmaceutical companies and biotech manufacturers are driving up the costs of healthcare. By comparison the doctors are cheap. My Mom's ONE medication of the ten she takes costs $100,000+ a year. We are lucky that insurance covers it. Others are not so fortunate.

    One of the most disturbing trends I've seen (not saying you feel this way, just what I've seen in the media) is the blatant disregard for the lives of people who can't afford basic healthcare. Can't afford it? Too bad, you're poor so you don't really deserve to live anyway. And if you get the treatment you need? Be prepared to be hurdled into even more debt if you don't have insurance.

    What's happened to us?!

    I'm not an economist, so I can't tell you if sin taxes or socialized medicine are the right answer. I know that SOMETHING needs to change - both on the healthcare end and on the personal responsibility end. People need to start taking personal responsibility for their health (read: obesity) but the healthcare system needs some sort of change too.
    Before you offer an opinion on health care please be sure you really know how it works. I, work in health care, live in america, and let me tell you something, people are not stupid and they know how to get around things. So you say it has to be an emergency situation where someone is Keeling over? Have you ever considered going to the ER for the flu, a headache, a toothache? No? Well I have picked up hundreds of patients that dial 911 that want to be driven to the ER due to those issues. And I'm told plenty of times that they do that because they can't pay for a doctor. Guess who pays that bill? Us, who work and pay for insurance.

    I didn't say that ALL people in the emergency room are ready to keel over. Many people wait to get treatment because they weren't able to go to a regular's doctor's office. They wait until things get bad.

    You're absolutely right - people do go the ER for little things too because they can't go see a regular doctor. What does that tell you about how screwey the system is, if people can't afford to go to the doctor? The hospitals do end up covering the cost. That's not right - because the system is not right in the first place.

    That doesn't mean people who can't afford it don't deserve healthcare, in my opinion.

    I'm sorry but I do not agree with the whole 'people can't afford to go to the doctor' argument.

    So you don't have insurance. Big deal. Guess what? Doctors take CASH and it's NOT as expensive as one would think for a simple visit. Don't have a doctor? Go to a clinic. My husband sprained his ankle really bad several months back. We don't have a GP so we waited until the after hours clinic opened up. We have insurance but we have a $10,000 deductible because our insurance is for a catastrophic emergency only so we always say we don't have insurance. His exam including the 6 x-rays they took was around $250.

    Oh, and you know what else? Doctors and hospitals will put you on a payment plan if you can't afford to pay the bill up front. A friend of mine had to go to the hospital and she had no insurance and was put on a payment plan and they worked with her and asked her what could she afford every month and that's what she paid.

    So not being able to afford a doctor/not having insurance is a weak excuse. And since Obamacare came into play more doctors are going to be only accepting cash.

    and if someone walks into a clinic and requires surgery or an extended hospital stay, they will likely be on a payment plan for the rest of their lives without insurance. heaven forbid they get a serious illness, or their kids might be on that payment plan too.
  • CarynMacD
    CarynMacD Posts: 230
    For my reference:

    Bottled water in South Africa 1.358 cents/ml
    Soda 1.664 cents/ml

    Are those US dollar cents? A small bottle of water is really around 6 bucks?
    Good beer in Germany 0.17 cents/ml. Cheap beer is around 0.06 cents /ml around the same price as bottled water. That is Euro cents.

    No... South African cents. Our Rand trades at roughly R20 to the British Pound and around R12 to the US Dollar.

    So 6 bucks in ZAR (South African Rands) is around R72

    A 500ml bottle of water here costs roughly R6.79 (I think) which in US $ is 57c

    A beer is around (depending where you buy it from) R12 per bottle which equates to approx US $ 1
  • bunnylion
    bunnylion Posts: 265 Member
    Suggestion: Shorten your quotes to the part you are actually answering to, to keep the thread readable. Just an idea...

    Very entertaining debate... very entertaining...
  • PatsyFitzpatrick
    PatsyFitzpatrick Posts: 335 Member
    Wild eyed, gun-toting, tea party, flag waving Jeebus lovers... step to the right.

    Weepy, left wing commie 'murica-hating sissy government sheep... to the left.

    Get it on!!

    LOL Amen
  • CarynMacD
    CarynMacD Posts: 230
    Suggestion: Shorten your quotes to the part you are actually answering to, to keep the thread readable. Just an idea...

    Very entertaining debate... very entertaining...

    ^^^Like :flowerforyou:
  • bunnylion
    bunnylion Posts: 265 Member
    No... South African cents. Our Rand trades at roughly R20 to the British Pound and around R12 to the US Dollar.

    So 6 bucks in ZAR (South African Rands) is around R72

    A 500ml bottle of water here costs roughly R6.79 (I think) which in US $ is 57c

    A beer is around (depending where you buy it from) R12 per bottle which equates to approx US $ 1

    Ok. That is acceptable I guess. Then again, I have no idea how much people earn in SA. Putting prices into perspective is not an easy thing to do ^^