Why such a big difference in calories burned?

LindseyC87
LindseyC87 Posts: 178 Member
edited September 26 in Fitness and Exercise
I would also like to know how some people are buring 500 calories walking 3 mph for 60 minutes when I walk 3 mph for 60 minutes and MFP says I burned 210.. I know the more weight you have, the more you burn... But that big of difference? I just dont get it. Here I work my *kitten* off dancing, kicking, lifting weights, and running for over a hour and burn like 500 calories but then someone burns 900 calories from gardening for 1.5 hours. Am I just logging in my fittness wrong or something? It just sucks honestly beating myself into the ground for 300 calories a day and some people are throwing out 1200 calorie burns a day. How do you do it?

***Kudos for you that are burning that much-- I just need to know if im logging mine wrong or something!
«1

Replies

  • almarsala
    almarsala Posts: 168 Member
    Honestly I think a lot of what others are logging are exaggerated somehow...
  • Tomhusker
    Tomhusker Posts: 346 Member
    If they are using the MFP numbers they are ridiculously high. That is probably what you are seeing. Some things I use MFP data for (I don't have a HRM) others I use what the machine says I burned.
  • merrillfoster
    merrillfoster Posts: 855 Member
    They may be logging based on an HRM or machine at the gym, which could give different numbers. My HRM, for example, is so different from MFP's estimate that I almost don't even believe it at all, lol.
  • cdthom
    cdthom Posts: 108 Member
    it is just the extra weight we are carrying if you put on a 100 pound fat suit and went for that 60 min walk you would put out big numbers also
  • JMuzzy
    JMuzzy Posts: 63
    lindsey--- i think it is much better to under-estimate your calorie burn than over-estimate... dont worry about what other people are burning (even though i know how you feel!) because in the end this journey is about you and your weight loss.
    hope this helps!! :heart:
    jennie
  • CuteAndCurvy83
    CuteAndCurvy83 Posts: 570 Member
    Honestly I think a lot of what others are logging are exaggerated somehow...

    I thought that for a while, and even if they are, they are only hurting themselves by lying to themselves...
  • Why don't you just log it in through my fitness pal and take the calories burned from what they give.. You walk 2 miles at a brisk pace and burn 359 calories. I am just curious. That is accurate enough, I would think
  • kappyblu
    kappyblu Posts: 654 Member
    I agree with cdthom. A larger person will burn more calories doing the same activity because it requires more effort. Unfortunately, that is just the science of our bodies. The smaller you get, the harder it is to burn those calories. :sad:
  • Elzecat
    Elzecat Posts: 2,916 Member
    I wish I had a heart rate monitor so I knew exactly what I was burning...I usually underestimate on calories burned just in case. Unfortunately, I have no idea how some people get such huge calorie burns...
  • ciendras
    ciendras Posts: 5
    Look, you can't pay attention to that. Someone who claims they burn 500 cals walking an hour or 1.5 hours is deluding themselves, and you shouldn't buy into that. Set your standard, and work with that.
    I run at a 10 minute mile clip for 3 miles and I burn 400 cals, and I weigh 205 pounds. That, and your own data, should give you an idea of what is really happening. Don't get frustrated.
    One thing you can use is mapmyrun app on iPhone or other phones, it averages the burn rate via GPS and weight pretty accurately.
  • Right! That is exactly correct!
    :smile:
  • MissingMinnesota
    MissingMinnesota Posts: 7,486 Member
    When I started I could have easily burned 500 calories an hour walking at 3mph now I have to going at least 5mph to do it. There are 2 reasons why one I am carrying a lot less weight on my body and 2 my actual fitness level has increased so my resting heart rate is lower so it takes more effort to get it into the higher ranges to be able to do it.

    Really just don't concentrate on what others are doing and just do your own thing.
  • WOW, so happy for your loss and I love your positive attitude, gimme some of that. KIM:smile:
  • cjmariani
    cjmariani Posts: 12
    Sorry to say, this is one area where MFP and the machines at the gym just plain old get it wrong. The only way to be sure of how many calories you burn excercising is with a Heart Rate Monitor. MFP's numbers tend to run high, and the machines at the gym tend to either run very high, or very low.

    If you don't have a heart rate monitor, the next best thing is to take you pulse at various times during your excercise and take an average. You can then find calculators online that will tell you what the estimated calories are you burned. Less accurate than wearing a Heart Rate Monitor, but still more accurate than what MFP or the machines will tell you.

    If you are working out on a machine getting your heart rate is easy! Just don't believe the calories burned number.

    Here's a link to one of the calculators I mentioned:

    http://www.braydenwm.com/calburn.htm
  • setaylor86080
    setaylor86080 Posts: 210 Member
    I have a HRM and at first I could not believe it. The more I use it however the more I am understanding that every body is different. My husband can do the exact same work out but because he is so much more in shape it takes much more longer and more intense workout for him to get the same calories burn . We can walk the dog for an hour and I am huffing and puffing and burn 600 and he is fine andd it is a slow pace for him and he burns like 200. I think it is all in your body and what you carrier around. I have 100 pounds over extra weight so it doesn't take me long to get my heart rate up. I hope that helps. I would recommend you looking into a HRM. It is nice to know what you are personally doing. It makes me want to workout harder and longer seeing my number!
  • ktc33
    ktc33 Posts: 249 Member
    I agree, I think people grossly over estimate their activity. There's no point in lying about what you do or don't do because ultimately the scale will reveal the truth. If people post that they are burning over 1000 calories cleaning their house then I think they either have a really dirty house or they are really exaggerating.
  • iplayoutside19
    iplayoutside19 Posts: 2,304 Member
    Calories is not a scoreboard.

    MFP is a tool. But like any tool you have to use it properly. If you're honest with yourself, you will be successful and it shouldn't matter what other people burn. What people burn is as unique as the individual.
  • tobitude
    tobitude Posts: 89 Member
    Why does it have to come down to saying people are not telling the truth? Are we not all here for the same thing? I am here to get support not to see people downing other people for what they are logging. You also need to remember that some of these people are logging more than one activity and all that shows up is the one you did the longest. If I swim, walk, clean and ride my bike all in the same day I will definately burn 1000 calories but it will show only one activity.

    So instead of knocking people for what they are logging take a moment and get to know them, you never know if you might get a friend out of the conversation you have with them.

    The best way to succeed is the support you have in the side lines.
  • emariec78
    emariec78 Posts: 530 Member
    One of my friends asked me about this just yesterday after I posted my run-what was I doing to burn so much. I use an HRM when I run, and the numbers I get from my HRM are reasonably higher than what MFPestimates for my running. The best I can figure is that I'm keeping my heart rate higher than whatever the rate is that MFP uses in their calculations-I'd actually be curious to know what their number is. When I've tested it on a workout DVD I usually find the numbers are considerably lower so I've tried to adjust those nubmers down. Like someone already said, everyone is going to be different and probably with every activity too.
  • A lot of stuff goes into it. Like I do videos. MFP says to use circuit training and 25 minutes was like 190 calories. I used my HRM and it was 358. Crazy I know, but I'm out of shape so it takes more work for my body and my heart rate is faster. I'm doing the video everyday though, so as i get more in shape that number is going to go down a lot and it will probably fall right around mfp's estimates
  • darrcn5
    darrcn5 Posts: 495 Member
    I don't how big some of your friends are, but a person who is 250 pounds can burn 495 calories an hour walking at a pace of 3 MPH for an hour. Size definitely will increase what you burn.
    And honestly, I don't understand why people would lie about their activity level. People are here to lose weight and get support-not to see who can post the highest numbers.
  • savannahgro
    savannahgro Posts: 113 Member
    Something to also take into consideration is someone may be logging it as 3mph but they may be walking faster.
    I'm a fast walker, but before I had a HRM I just logged it as moderate, because I didn't want to overestimate.
    Also, I tried running the other day and could hardly do it (my heart rate was almost 200!!) so I still logged it as my normal walking, even though I was walking and running.
  • k2d4p
    k2d4p Posts: 441 Member
    When I was 250lb, it was nothing for me to burn 700 - 800 calories in a 45 minute workout. I worked really hard and believed it when the machines told me I burned those big numbers.

    Now at 147lbs, I can bust my butt for an hour on the treadmill doing my run/powerwalk intervals and I burn 500 - 600. I know it is because I am smaller now and I don't expect the big numbers that I use to get.

    I also believe that some people exagerate when they log their exercise. I don't let it bug me too much because they aren't hurting me, they are only kidding themselves.
  • velvetkat
    velvetkat Posts: 454 Member
    When I started with MFP I was 42 lbs heavier and I used a HRM and would burn a lot more calories than I do now. One thing when you use a HRM you have to remember is to change your weight as you lose. If you leave it alwaysas your highest number it will think you still are that weight and you will burn more.The HRM is only as good as the person who uses it. People who "cheat" on their calorie burn are just hurting themselves but I don't think one should assume everyone that burns a lot is cheating! I do burn a lot of calories.. I am still fat... I burn less than I did but a heck of a lot more than someone that is 25, 50 or 75 lbs lighter than me. The scale and measurements will tell if someone is not honest just as it will if you don't log correctly what you eat.

    4925355.png
    Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter
  • elliecolorado
    elliecolorado Posts: 1,040
    Just because someone is burning a lot of calories doesn't mean that they are lying or overestimating. A lot of what you burn depends on your size. If someone who doesn't have a lot of weight to lose did their workout while carrying 50, 75, 100 lbs they would burn a lot more calories. As you lose weight the number of calories you burn goes down and you have to work a lot harder to burn calories. It's just the way it is. Also a lot of people don't have heart rate monitors and just go off of the estimates here which are IMO high for some things and low for other things.
  • chevy88grl
    chevy88grl Posts: 3,937 Member
    You know what? I was JUST telling my boyfriend the same thing. Went to the gym tonight and did cardio for 60 mins. Treadmill said I burned 450 calories (I was moving kinda slow tonight since I'm still a bit sore from Tae Bo yesterday). I went to enter it into MFP and it was totally different. I will say that I trust the treadmill more since I enter my weight and such (plus it knows how much incline I'm using). But, why is it that I see someone walking at a "slow pace 3.0mph" for 45 mins and burning 600 calories and I'm only burning 450 and I'm up around 5.0? I mean.. I warm up at more than that and I don't burn anything with my speed that low! I'm confused.
  • chevy88grl
    chevy88grl Posts: 3,937 Member
    Why does it have to come down to saying people are not telling the truth? Are we not all here for the same thing? I am here to get support not to see people downing other people for what they are logging. You also need to remember that some of these people are logging more than one activity and all that shows up is the one you did the longest. If I swim, walk, clean and ride my bike all in the same day I will definately burn 1000 calories but it will show only one activity.

    So instead of knocking people for what they are logging take a moment and get to know them, you never know if you might get a friend out of the conversation you have with them.

    The best way to succeed is the support you have in the side lines.

    I don't think we are accusing people of lying. We are confused as to why we're doing more activity and our numbers are lower. It isn't a matter of saying "Well, so and so is lying about that!". I'm just trying to understand why I jog for a long stretch and don't burn what someone else is burning at my warm up speed. That's all.
  • Mamoonie
    Mamoonie Posts: 328
    It's because there's such a big difference in our bodies.

    Just this example... and I'm really jealous about it!!

    Went on a walk with my daughter: we did the same time (2 hours), the same way, barefoot on the beach, both wore a HRM.
    Now the numbers:
    I'm 40 years old and weigh 97 kgs, she's 20 and weighs 80 kgs.
    I burnt 345 cals, she burnt 730.

    We have similar differences using the elliptical or bike... or training with our personal trainer ( she burns 490, I burn 265...)

    I'm jealous because she's burning a lot more calories to do exactly the same thing than me.
    Or should I be proud that I am so much more fit than she is?

    You cannot even say people who weigh more burn more, because in this case it's not true.

    It all lies in the differences of each body.

    MM
  • foodforfuel
    foodforfuel Posts: 569 Member
    Why does it have to come down to saying people are not telling the truth? Are we not all here for the same thing? I am here to get support not to see people downing other people for what they are logging. You also need to remember that some of these people are logging more than one activity and all that shows up is the one you did the longest. If I swim, walk, clean and ride my bike all in the same day I will definately burn 1000 calories but it will show only one activity.

    So instead of knocking people for what they are logging take a moment and get to know them, you never know if you might get a friend out of the conversation you have with them.

    The best way to succeed is the support you have in the side lines.

    I don't think we are accusing people of lying. We are confused as to why we're doing more activity and our numbers are lower. It isn't a matter of saying "Well, so and so is lying about that!". I'm just trying to understand why I jog for a long stretch and don't burn what someone else is burning at my warm up speed. That's all.

    I don't think the OP was accusing people of lying. But a good deal of the responses were littered with the words:
    -lying, over estimating, kidding yourself, cheating, claims, deluding themselves....-
    I just don't get why people think in such a negative way about other people and their journeys. (Me thinks thou dost protest too much?)
    I use the MFP database as a gross ballpark figure for a very rough estimate of my exercise calories. I also track my calories to the best of my ability. Do I think I burned 1200 calories during my 60 minutes of circuit training? Heck no! It's just a number put out there for me to log. That is also why I don't eat back a lot or most of my exercise calories. I'm not a fool. But I do know my body, and how long I work it, and how hard I push it. I am much more apt to listen to my body, pay attention to my macro's and nutrition levels, and fuel myself from there. I work out until I feel that my body has had enough. I have light workout days and heavy workout days. I don't expect a website to put forth an 'absolute' number that is 100% correct- nor would I totally rely on a HRM to be perfect either.
    I guess I'm old school when it comes to that. I don't feel that the latest gaget or gizmo is going to whiz bang me into thin city any faster or more accurately than I can do it myself. My body, my brain, and I have known each other intimately all my life. I know what works for me, and armed with a scale and some iron we are coming along nicely.
    In regard to the lying, cheating, and deluding comments, please. Worry about yourself. That is why my diary is closed to all but the few friends I allow to see it. And that's because to me, they seem smarter than the average bear and can fiqure things out accordingly or ask a question without thinking I'm lying or other haughty things.
    I log my food from midnight to midnight. I log my exercise from the time I get up til the time I go to bed. My diary looks crazy. But it works for me.
  • AngelsKisses75
    AngelsKisses75 Posts: 595 Member
    It's because there's such a big difference in our bodies.

    Just this example... and I'm really jealous about it!!

    Went on a walk with my daughter: we did the same time (2 hours), the same way, barefoot on the beach, both wore a HRM.
    Now the numbers:
    I'm 40 years old and weigh 97 kgs, she's 20 and weighs 80 kgs.
    I burnt 345 cals, she burnt 730.

    We have similar differences using the elliptical or bike... or training with our personal trainer ( she burns 490, I burn 265...)

    I'm jealous because she's burning a lot more calories to do exactly the same thing than me.
    Or should I be proud that I am so much more fit than she is?

    You cannot even say people who weigh more burn more, because in this case it's not true.

    It all lies in the differences of each body.

    MM

    I like this reply, and agree whole heartedly! :drinker:
This discussion has been closed.