What Other People Think and Say... Why do you care?

135

Replies

  • Unknown
    edited November 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • It's the same with qualifications. Person A can be massively intelligent...person B not so much. But he studies just enough to actually get a diploma. Person A has a higher IQ than person B, but has no diploma.
    Size matters.
    Guess so. But still. You only try to get on "the good side" of the interviewer so you have a higher chance of getting the job. Because you're most likely one of 500 applying. You kind of have to stand out from the crowd.

  • msf74
    msf74 Posts: 3,498 Member

    My point is... stop letting people control you.

    Which is cool and all and I doubt anyone would recommend anything other than that.

    It is not that people do not care. If you are a functioning human being you will care to some degree but the ability to handle those feelings is different from person to person. Emotional resilience and robustness is an essential skill for navigating life so building that like a muscle is a great goal.

    However, constantly placing the emphasis on the people affected by hurtful behaviour or words to change is lame in my view. It does nothing more than preserve the status quo rather than securing real change (although you may disagree that change is necessary.)

    Rather, I think more emphasis should be placed on people who want to air their views with impunity but dodge the cognitive dissonance that exercising this right may be hurting others by saying "ohhh, I don't need to change, nothing wrong with my behaviour but you overly PC, sensitive person, you have issues.Y u no change?"

    If people want to engage in what is in many case nothing other than bad behaviour then fine. However at least have the good grace to take responsibility for what you are doing.

  • This content has been removed.
  • _lyndseybrooke_
    _lyndseybrooke_ Posts: 2,561 Member
    e6u4ok.gif

    In short, I agree completely.
  • It's the same with qualifications. Person A can be massively intelligent...person B not so much. But he studies just enough to actually get a diploma. Person A has a higher IQ than person B, but has no diploma.
    Size matters.
    Guess so. But still. You only try to get on "the good side" of the interviewer so you have a higher chance of getting the job. Because you're most likely one of 500 applying. You kind of have to stand out from the crowd.
    It's the same with qualifications. Person A can be massively intelligent...person B not so much. But he studies just enough to actually get a diploma. Person A has a higher IQ than person B, but has no diploma.
    Size matters.
    Guess so. But still. You only try to get on "the good side" of the interviewer so you have a higher chance of getting the job. Because you're most likely one of 500 applying. You kind of have to stand out from the crowd.
    A little off topic, but true nonetheless... When I ran an ad about 5 months ago for a new paralegal, I received over 300 applications. About 6 of them were from fully-licensed, practicing attorneys begging for $15/hour, so they could pay their rent.

    Our economy is in the crapper.

    I digress..

    My apologies. I replied to a poster above that asked why do you care what interviewers think. My point is, that people really only care about what they think on a professional level, (ex. Wether they will consider giving them a job or nor) not on a personal level. (Ex. I can't hire you coz ur fat!!!) Lol.

  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • msf74
    msf74 Posts: 3,498 Member
    People don't change.

    And your argument propagates a Victim's Mentality.

    If someone robs you, it is not your fault. Fault has nothing to do with preserving your well-being and rights.

    You can either sit around in a support-circle, holding hands, boo-hooing and waiting for the robbers to "change" because "it's the moral thing to do."

    Or...

    You can pull yourself up by the bootstraps, open a giant can of self-esteem, and proceed through life being epically awesome and dashing future wrongs by basking in your own forthright kickassedness.

    Oh, and by the way... "Bad people" love people "waiting for the world to be nicer."
    They're called "targets."

    And this is a terrific example of dichotomous thinking. Rather than approaching a problem from both ends of the spectrum you place the burden only on the affected to change who tend to be the group that lack power or are marginalised. In other words you expect change from one group without expecting compromise from another. Progress v the status quo.

    People do change as does society. Attitudes change. Ideas change the world. You only have to look at how the rights of gay people, women, and minorities have progressed to know that is true.



  • msf74 wrote: »

    My point is... stop letting people control you.

    Which is cool and all and I doubt anyone would recommend anything other than that.

    It is not that people do not care. If you are a functioning human being you will care to some degree but the ability to handle those feelings is different from person to person. Emotional resilience and robustness is an essential skill for navigating life so building that like a muscle is a great goal.

    However, constantly placing the emphasis on the people affected by hurtful behaviour or words to change is lame in my view. It does nothing more than preserve the status quo rather than securing real change (although you may disagree that change is necessary.)

    Rather, I think more emphasis should be placed on people who want to air their views with impunity but dodge the cognitive dissonance that exercising this right may be hurting others by saying "ohhh, I don't need to change, nothing wrong with my behaviour but you overly PC, sensitive person, you have issues.Y u no change?"

    If people want to engage in what is in many case nothing other than bad behaviour then fine. However at least have the good grace to take responsibility for what you are doing.

    Uh yeah...if someone comes in my house holding a knife or something he's pretty much getting peppersprayed. Or worse...come eye to eye with my father and his double barrel shotgun...we don't give a damn about his rights. He came onto OUR property, he came into OUR house, threatening US with a knife. So yeah. Bye bye have a nice life in hell.

    I'm not going to wait for him to fall down and pray for forgiveness for being an *kitten*. It ain't happening. He's not changing his views. He doesn't give a s*** about me. He'll stab me with no remorse. So I'll pepperspray him with no remorse too. Darn it.
  • msf74
    msf74 Posts: 3,498 Member
    msf74 wrote: »

    My point is... stop letting people control you.

    Which is cool and all and I doubt anyone would recommend anything other than that.

    It is not that people do not care. If you are a functioning human being you will care to some degree but the ability to handle those feelings is different from person to person. Emotional resilience and robustness is an essential skill for navigating life so building that like a muscle is a great goal.

    However, constantly placing the emphasis on the people affected by hurtful behaviour or words to change is lame in my view. It does nothing more than preserve the status quo rather than securing real change (although you may disagree that change is necessary.)

    Rather, I think more emphasis should be placed on people who want to air their views with impunity but dodge the cognitive dissonance that exercising this right may be hurting others by saying "ohhh, I don't need to change, nothing wrong with my behaviour but you overly PC, sensitive person, you have issues.Y u no change?"

    If people want to engage in what is in many case nothing other than bad behaviour then fine. However at least have the good grace to take responsibility for what you are doing.

    Uh yeah...if someone comes in my house holding a knife or something he's pretty much getting peppersprayed. Or worse...come eye to eye with my father and his double barrel shotgun...we don't give a damn about his rights. He came onto OUR property, he came into OUR house, threatening US with a knife. So yeah. Bye bye have a nice life in hell.

    I'm not going to wait for him to fall down and pray for forgiveness for being an *kitten*. It ain't happening. He's not changing his views. He doesn't give a s*** about me. He'll stab me with no remorse. So I'll pepperspray him with no remorse too. Darn it.


    Sure I don't disagree with any of that.

    However, my point was specifically about where the acceptable boundaries are when it comes to speech rather than imminent physical harm.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • msf74
    msf74 Posts: 3,498 Member
    Well, you convinced me. I want to come live on whatever planet you live on.
    It's sounds utopian.

    So, you made a number of broad, unsubstantiated assertions and ended off with a thinly veiled ad hominem.

    That's pretty poor form for what has been a reasonably civil debate so far.

    All the best then ;)
  • msf74
    msf74 Posts: 3,498 Member

    You are pushing an idea that I (and others) somehow need your permission to have an opinion.

    No.

    I am saying that not only is asking the question of some people "do you think you could be more emotionally resilient and robust?" is a good idea but by the same token asking some people "do you think your words would be hurtful and harmful and as such could you modify your behaviour?" is a good idea also.

    I welcome yours or anyone else's opinion but If I believe it can cross the boundary to causing psychological harm, which I believe it can, reserve the right to challenge it and try and change attitudes.

    Surely that is what free speech and open debate entails?

  • This content has been removed.
  • msf74
    msf74 Posts: 3,498 Member
    msf74 wrote: »

    You are pushing an idea that I (and others) somehow need your permission to have an opinion.

    No.

    I am saying that not only is asking the question of some people "do you think you could be more emotionally resilient and robust?" is a good idea but by the same token asking some people "do you think your words would be hurtful and harmful and as such could you modify your behaviour?" is a good idea also.

    I welcome yours or anyone else's opinion but If I believe it can cross the boundary to causing psychological harm, which I believe it can, reserve the right to challenge it and try and change attitudes.

    Surely that is what free speech and open debate entails?
    Agreed.
    Thus my statement about "ignore it, or create a better counter-argument."

    I love a good debate. But, I think trying to "change people" is a complete waste of time and energy.

    If you craft a good counter-argument, and those particular people lose enough times, "change" will evolve as a matter of necessity.

    Oi.

    Let's not agree...there's no fun in that.

    Good thread. Nothing wrong with a bit of intellectual sparring.

    Have a good one dude.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Everyone has a need for love & acceptance... Most people look for it in all the wrong places.
  • perhaps people care about what others say because words are often the prelude to, or an indication of, a person's behavior. for example, i am more likely to be a racist - and treat people of color badly - if i use commonly language that insults, shames, or denigrates people of color. our words show a lot about who we are, how we deal with other people, and what we are likely to do in any given situation. that's their power.
  • This content has been removed.
  • trickduffin
    trickduffin Posts: 19 Member
    GorillaEsquire,

    While I realize that the first part of your question is very specific, the final "question" was very generic, so I'll address the 2nd.

    Why would you put all this information about yourself in your profile on a public forum?

    About Me:
    6'3 / 270
    Married / 4 kids
    Attorney
    24 year martial artist
    DOD Certified Combatives & Firearms Instructor
    5th Degree Black Belt in TKD
    Black Belt in Judo
    Black Belt in Jiu Jitsu
    E1 in Krav Maga
    RAD (Rape Aggression Defense) Instructor
    Forum Ninja
    800 Pound Gorilla in the Room

    Could it perhaps be that you "care" what others (strangers) think of you? Why did you pick the picture of yourself, showing only 1/2 of your face, but dressed in a suit, likely because you thought it was "impressive" to others. Why care about impressing others, if you don't "care" what they think.

    The answer to your question is simple: "Human Nature".

    Just my opinion, you're free to disagree!

    Tim
  • refuseresist
    refuseresist Posts: 934 Member
    GorillaEsquire,

    While I realize that the first part of your question is very specific, the final "question" was very generic, so I'll address the 2nd.

    Why would you put all this information about yourself in your profile on a public forum?

    About Me:
    6'3 / 270
    Married / 4 kids
    Attorney
    24 year martial artist
    DOD Certified Combatives & Firearms Instructor
    5th Degree Black Belt in TKD
    Black Belt in Judo
    Black Belt in Jiu Jitsu
    E1 in Krav Maga
    RAD (Rape Aggression Defense) Instructor
    Forum Ninja
    800 Pound Gorilla in the Room

    Could it perhaps be that you "care" what others (strangers) think of you? Why did you pick the picture of yourself, showing only 1/2 of your face, but dressed in a suit, likely because you thought it was "impressive" to others. Why care about impressing others, if you don't "care" what they think.

    The answer to your question is simple: "Human Nature".

    Just my opinion, you're free to disagree!

    Tim

    Because he's actually a 40 year old 90 lb virgin who lives with his mum?
  • Miss_1999
    Miss_1999 Posts: 747 Member
    Seriously, go here:

    community.babycenter.com/groups/a6865/the_debate_team

    If you're honestly wanting to debate and/or discuss. I mean it, no snark. Well, there's gonna be snark there, BUT people really do want to debate and discuss.
  • PurringMyrrh
    PurringMyrrh Posts: 5,276 Member
    Oooooh *squeal* I know what this topic stemmed from!

    Nice debates (and attempts at debates), although I'm not sure this much intellectual stimulation is allowed on MFP forums.

    Very much looking forward to the OP's counter to the last comment regarding his profile info.
  • Unknown
    edited November 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • FabulousFantasticFifty
    FabulousFantasticFifty Posts: 195,832 Member
    I don't know why I care what people think or say, but I always have and I'm quite sensitive. I hate that about me! :(
This discussion has been closed.