Kim K's butt

"Everyone I know has a big butt. C'mon, Simone, let's talk about *your* big butt." - Pee Wee Herman

Someone just sent me this...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ2_q86KZRw

Having a big butt has gone from being something freakish to being something that is basically envied, yet people will still find a way to play the victim or put a negative spin on it to sensationalize things. It's not even like the whole fat acceptance issue because that's still promoting being unhealthy. Whether it's a major thing or not, it's a step in the right direction if you let it be one.

That being said, her (completely photoshopped, airbrushed) tookus looks waaaaay better here than it does in her cream coloured jeans. Those make it look like a bag of wet leaves covered in a diaper.

wilsoncl6 wrote: »

Sinistrous wrote: »

wilsoncl6 wrote: »

Sinistrous wrote: »

Kim K's butt is what most Armenian women's butts look like. Google it.

Here we go generalizing. I'm sure no one has seen most Armenian women in the world, so how would they really know? It's like saying all black women have big butts and I know that myth isn't true.

Google it and quit trying to start the generalization battle. Just because you haven't learned more about it doesn't mean others haven't. I'm not about to have e-fights with people that refuse to educate themselves before throwing that generalization card.

Google is your friend.

What is the source for your data and sell me on it.

Why do people point to google searches like it's some kind of scientific resource. Yahoo answers and Wikipedia isn't your friend. I have yet to find one scientific research paper that has studied the posteriors of Armenian women much less come to the conclusion that most Armenian women have big butts. Please read more than blog posts and anecdotal data is worth less than nothing.

Why anyone would look any deeper into it than that is beyond me.

If you are familiar with the artist's work (including some pretty interesting images of his ex-girlfriend Grace Jones, then this isn't a stretch at all. In fact, there is another photo that he took that looks exactly the same except with a different model. I think Kim probably just did it to get attention, but I suspect that Jean Paul Goude had other intentions. In fact, I am going to guess that Kim had no idea about his history with race. After all, this is the woman whose sister seemed totally shocked that her recent KKK joke did not go over as well as she'd hoped.

Regardless, we're talking about it, so they win. I wish we were talking more about how photoshop like that is why we're all in therapy and our daughters are completely and totally doomed, but oh well.

I am not being sarcastic here, I think the lady's original question is a good one.

I think it is art, marketing and attention wh*ring. Everyone on her knows that the rear end photo were digitally manipulated by the way right? Look at her waist line, it looks like it was cropped. Also, the original photographer who was the first to use "modified" photos and use them as art - this was a homage to him and his original work (the champagne glass.) I can't think of his name but his model was completely nude and he has done work with Grace Jones back in the day.

There were several articles on this similar topic. Just "Google" it!

We just landed on a friggen comet and everyone is going on about her butt. When a comet lands on her butt then I'm all for her being in the news constantly.

JeriAnne84 wrote: »

We just landed on a friggen comet and everyone is going on about her butt.

That's probably because most guys don't fantasize about probing a comet.

All about attention. Nothing more. She needs to just go away. Period.

JeriAnne84 wrote: »

We just landed on a friggen comet and everyone is going on about her butt. When a comet lands on her butt then I'm all for her being in the news constantly.

A comet hitting her butt gets exponentially higher the bigger her butt gets. So the odds of that happening are improving. I do get sick and tire of hearing her name but media keeps reporting on her because her name sells. But again, I can care less about the royal family in London too. They have absolutely no role in politics and are just figureheads but I'm constantly hearing about them. They have absolutely not impact on my life as an American, why am I hearing about them?

My asss is bigger than hers.

JeriAnne84 wrote: »

I think the Kardashians need to be thrown in an active volcano. They drive me crazy. Seriously their dad was a crazy awesome lawyer, but that's the only talent anyone in the family had. Unless talent is being able to be dramatic about ANYTHING then they have it coming out the wazoo.

I also agree, I don't think it has anything to do with race or sexual exploitation. I mean Kim sexually exploits herself daily, so this isn't anything new. She's just wanting attention. I'm glad she isn't my mom. I think if I was North and grew up and found out what my mom did to get famous and kept doing to keep in the public eye, I'd be embarassed.

QFT

"I guess we're all just going to pretend that the new Kim Kardashian nudes don't look like an ad for Butterball."

JeriAnne84 wrote: »

CAWFEE_TAWK wrote: »

And for whomever is wishing they would all die in a fiery volcano death, perhaps you should go first. That's an awful lot of energy to waste on people you don't know.

Like typing that sentance was a lot of energy to put out on someone YOU don't know?

Another example of the pot calling the kettle black.