Strength Testing, Bench Press.

123457

Replies

  • civilizedworm
    civilizedworm Posts: 796 Member
    Nolan1009 wrote: »
    Hit 3 sets of 5 @ 90 comfortably without a spotter this morning, that's definitely an all time best for me. Going to attempt 100 w/ a spotter this wknd.
    Nice job! And good luck on attempting a hondo this weekend too!
  • TFaustino67
    TFaustino67 Posts: 551 Member
    Sam_I_Am77 wrote: »
    DopeItUp wrote: »
    Sam_I_Am77 wrote: »
    Thanks Nate and good point - I'm on the same boat with Db and am still reading through. I'm currently on Cycle 2 week 1 - behind the curve but its the holidays..what are you gonna do

    So you were on 5's week and you missed 4 reps? If you're only on your 2nd cycle and you're missing reps then I'm going to say that you set your Training Max too high.

    Agreed. Although I'm thinking something else is wrong. If this is only cycle two, that means he got at least 5 reps last cycle but then only got 1 rep with just 5lbs added to the bar? Something's wrong there.

    FWIW, when I can't make my required minimum reps for 5/3/1, I deload my training max about 10% and keep going.


    It is possible, many variables with lifting. To me though a 2nd cycle failure usually represents the TM.

    Honestly one of the best things I've read from Jim is his 5/3 Periodization and Programming. Basically you go ahead 5 cycles and then start back on the 3rd. Say your TM for the Press is 135 it would look like this

    - Macro-cycle 1
    meso-cycle 1: 135
    meso-cycle 2: 140
    meso-cycle 3: 145
    meso-cycle 4: 150
    meso-cycle 5: 155

    - Macro-cycle 2
    - meso-cycle 1: 145
    - 2: 150
    - 3: 155
    - 4: 160
    - 5: 165

    It really does work and work well. I've had some good rep PR's and 1-rep PR off of this method. I know people criticize the slow addition of weight to the TM, and yes it is slow and gradual, but what people fail to realize is that your TM really has little to do with your 1-RM or absolute strength. It's more of a way to regulate your training and set yourself up for success.

    Really interesting; yes, it certainly would be slower progression but still progression - I'll see what this looks like when incorporating. I'm afraid it might be too slow for my twentysomethingitis problem though but I may have to face the fact that I upped my TM a bit more than I care to admit - pride is a b@tch
  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    I'm going to have to get a copy of the 531 second edition, but wow that looks like really slow progress.
  • BR1986FB
    BR1986FB Posts: 1,515 Member
    BW- 270 lbs
    1RM BP- 450 lbs

    And I have long arms. All about the leverage and decreasing distance to push.
  • redfisher1974
    redfisher1974 Posts: 614 Member
    BR1986FB wrote: »
    BW- 270 lbs
    1RM BP- 450 lbs

    And I have long arms. All about the leverage and decreasing distance to push.

    Thats 1.66 BW... Beast!
  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    BR1986FB wrote: »
    BW- 270 lbs
    1RM BP- 450 lbs

    And I have long arms. All about the leverage and decreasing distance to push.

    It may seem strange to many to hear that it's not about who is strongest but who can lift the most. Technique counts for a lot. Very nice lifts!
  • JaelenSnow
    JaelenSnow Posts: 4 Member
    I'm going to have to get a copy of the 531 second edition, but wow that looks like really slow progress.

    The five forward, three back progression isn't in 5/3/1 second edition. I've heard that Wendler does advocate it, but not first hand. I'm not sure where it came from. It may be some article other online. 2nd edition says to refigure your 1 rep max and do a new training max of 90 percent of that when you stall on a lift.

    I haven't read Beyond 5/3/1 yet, so it's possible it's in there.

  • civilizedworm
    civilizedworm Posts: 796 Member
    BR1986FB wrote: »
    BW- 270 lbs
    1RM BP- 450 lbs

    And I have long arms. All about the leverage and decreasing distance to push.

    Get that chest up!

    Nice lift!
  • Sam_I_Am77
    Sam_I_Am77 Posts: 2,093 Member
    JaelenSnow wrote: »
    I'm going to have to get a copy of the 531 second edition, but wow that looks like really slow progress.

    The five forward, three back progression isn't in 5/3/1 second edition. I've heard that Wendler does advocate it, but not first hand. I'm not sure where it came from. It may be some article other online. 2nd edition says to refigure your 1 rep max and do a new training max of 90 percent of that when you stall on a lift.

    I haven't read Beyond 5/3/1 yet, so it's possible it's in there.

    I know it's posted on his web-site, but I'm not sure if he posted it elsewhere.
  • Sam_I_Am77
    Sam_I_Am77 Posts: 2,093 Member

    Really interesting; yes, it certainly would be slower progression but still progression - I'll see what this looks like when incorporating. I'm afraid it might be too slow for my twentysomethingitis problem though but I may have to face the fact that I upped my TM a bit more than I care to admit - pride is a b@tch

    Don't confuse slow progression of the TM with slow strength improvement. I recently hit 1-rep PR's that are all 30lbs+ better than my TM, one PR was actually 40lbs better than my TM. The TM has little to do with overall strength. The TM is a way to govern your training and set you up for success.
  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    JaelenSnow wrote: »
    I'm going to have to get a copy of the 531 second edition, but wow that looks like really slow progress.

    The five forward, three back progression isn't in 5/3/1 second edition. I've heard that Wendler does advocate it, but not first hand. I'm not sure where it came from. It may be some article other online. 2nd edition says to refigure your 1 rep max and do a new training max of 90 percent of that when you stall on a lift.

    I haven't read Beyond 5/3/1 yet, so it's possible it's in there.

    Thanks for the clarification.
  • redfisher1974
    redfisher1974 Posts: 614 Member
    Great info.
  • Willbenchforcupcakes
    Willbenchforcupcakes Posts: 4,955 Member
    Tested max in team training today. Hit 72.5kg touch and go. Slowly closing the gap to body weight, 9.5kg left to go.
  • ForecasterJason
    ForecasterJason Posts: 2,577 Member
    Alright, most of my lifts are stalling out, but I'm wondering what to do for specifically my bench press. Here's the thing. On my machine, I can only increase the weight in 10 pound increments (which results in a 19 pound difference in weight resistance), so it would be hard to follow a typical beginner program where I could add weight almost every workout. The last 4 workouts I've done I'm stalled at 10 reps for a particular weight. I think this is roughly 75% of my 1 rep max. My goal is strength and mass gain. I know fewer reps are generally recommended for strength, but I don't want to move up to the next weight and do 5 reps (which would be closer to 85% of my max). Should I just decrease the reps on this current weight down to like 6-8, even though I can do a little more?
  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    edited December 2014
    nm
  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    Alright, most of my lifts are stalling out, but I'm wondering what to do for specifically my bench press. Here's the thing. On my machine, I can only increase the weight in 10 pound increments (which results in a 19 pound difference in weight resistance), so it would be hard to follow a typical beginner program where I could add weight almost every workout. The last 4 workouts I've done I'm stalled at 10 reps for a particular weight. I think this is roughly 75% of my 1 rep max. My goal is strength and mass gain. I know fewer reps are generally recommended for strength, but I don't want to move up to the next weight and do 5 reps (which would be closer to 85% of my max). Should I just decrease the reps on this current weight down to like 6-8, even though I can do a little more?

    I recommend that you get to you college gym where you have more variety of weights and you should go to places like BodyBuilding.com and find a solid beginner workout. You are spinning your wheels and making all of the typical newbie mistakes. This isn't a knock against you since we've all been there, but if you really want those gains you mention and you want to stop making mistakes that are going to cost you in time and potential injury then you need to look at the resources that are out there. Get on a good novice program and then you can ask those questions and we will be better able to help you.
  • Lofteren
    Lofteren Posts: 960 Member
    1.5x bodyweight is 455lbs for me. I'm close but it'll take some time to get there. My bench press gains are pretty slow lately.
  • DopeItUp
    DopeItUp Posts: 18,771 Member
    Alright, most of my lifts are stalling out, but I'm wondering what to do for specifically my bench press. Here's the thing. On my machine, I can only increase the weight in 10 pound increments (which results in a 19 pound difference in weight resistance), so it would be hard to follow a typical beginner program where I could add weight almost every workout. The last 4 workouts I've done I'm stalled at 10 reps for a particular weight. I think this is roughly 75% of my 1 rep max. My goal is strength and mass gain. I know fewer reps are generally recommended for strength, but I don't want to move up to the next weight and do 5 reps (which would be closer to 85% of my max). Should I just decrease the reps on this current weight down to like 6-8, even though I can do a little more?

    So you can do 10 reps at this weight, and you want to reduce to 6-8 reps at the same weight? Why? What purpose could that possibly serve? Increase reps or increase weight. Better yet, don't use a machine if at all possible. Even just incremental loading will be so much easier. 10lbs per jump is pretty high.
  • uconnwinsnc1
    uconnwinsnc1 Posts: 902 Member
    Alright, most of my lifts are stalling out, but I'm wondering what to do for specifically my bench press. Here's the thing. On my machine, I can only increase the weight in 10 pound increments (which results in a 19 pound difference in weight resistance), so it would be hard to follow a typical beginner program where I could add weight almost every workout. The last 4 workouts I've done I'm stalled at 10 reps for a particular weight. I think this is roughly 75% of my 1 rep max. My goal is strength and mass gain. I know fewer reps are generally recommended for strength, but I don't want to move up to the next weight and do 5 reps (which would be closer to 85% of my max). Should I just decrease the reps on this current weight down to like 6-8, even though I can do a little more?

    If you can do 10 reps of a weight then bump the weight up and do 6-8. Anything more than 8 reps and the weight is probably too light for you to be getting strength gains.
  • ForecasterJason
    ForecasterJason Posts: 2,577 Member
    I'm doubtful that I can do 6-8 reps at the next weight. That's the issue with 10 pound increments. As it is, 10 reps is a struggle at the weight I'm using (I can't push the bar with the same amount of speed as my first few reps). And even if I can do 6-8 reps at the next weight, I'm concerned about the safety of doing so given how much closer it would put me to my max.
  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    edited December 2014
    I'm doubtful that I can do 6-8 reps at the next weight. That's the issue with 10 pound increments. As it is, 10 reps is a struggle at the weight I'm using (I can't push the bar with the same amount of speed as my first few reps). And even if I can do 6-8 reps at the next weight, I'm concerned about the safety of doing so given how much closer it would put me to my max.

    You have a mental block.
    Believe me way I say I have been there. Putting the weight on the bar that previously tore my pec. I know that feeling. Until you use progressive overload and change something you might be stalled for even longer.
  • ForecasterJason
    ForecasterJason Posts: 2,577 Member
    I think it was explained to me in some other thread that beginner programs that focus on 5 reps per set have the lifter starting at a much lower percent of 1 rep max. Although I've done a total of 18 workouts in 10-11 weeks in which I've benched pressed on my machine, I'm clearly still in a beginner stage. I didn't think I was ready to be benching consistently at 85-88% of my max. Using a 1 rep calculator, based on the 10 reps I can do at a particular weight, at the next weight I would barely get to 5 reps, and perhaps just 4.


  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    I think it was explained to me in some other thread that beginner programs that focus on 5 reps per set have the lifter starting at a much lower percent of 1 rep max. Although I've done a total of 18 workouts in 10-11 weeks in which I've benched pressed on my machine, I'm clearly still in a beginner stage. I didn't think I was ready to be benching consistently at 85-88% of my max. Using a 1 rep calculator, based on the 10 reps I can do at a particular weight, at the next weight I would barely get to 5 reps, and perhaps just 4.


    There are a lot of beginner programs and you will be on one for several months, not just weeks, so find one that is geared towards your goals. First you need to figure out what you want to accomplish then find something that fits those goals. 3 sets of 10 reps could be a good workout if it meets your goals if you want to a beginner builder program, but it could be a horrible workout if you are looking for strength. So you need to first look at what you want then you can find a program that fits that.

    I also think that you need to get off of you machine and get to your gym. Just benching on a machine isn't doing you much good and if you are doing nothing but benching this is just wrong on so many levels. You need to start looking at assistance exercises for your chest plus, shoulder, back, arm, and leg exercises as well. Not sure if bench is all you are doing but it's all I've heard you mention and that is just a very bad way to go unless you want to give yourself a huge muscle imbalance.
  • ForecasterJason
    ForecasterJason Posts: 2,577 Member
    I was aiming for strength and mass, so I was thinking 8-14 reps for most of my lifts would be good. I'm also doing lat pulldowns, leg presses, and leg curls on my machine. With the set of free weights I have (which are too light for doing most compound lifts), I do bicep curls after doing my upper body lifts.
    The other issue with doing a program using my machine is that there are a limited number of compound exercises I can do. There are a few other exercises for chest and arms, but there's not much more than that. I think I actually "discovered" that I can do standing rows for my back/rear shoulders, which I don't think is actually considered an exercise on the machine.
  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    I was aiming for strength and mass, so I was thinking 8-14 reps for most of my lifts would be good. I'm also doing lat pulldowns, leg presses, and leg curls on my machine. With the set of free weights I have (which are too light for doing most compound lifts), I do bicep curls after doing my upper body lifts.
    The other issue with doing a program using my machine is that there are a limited number of compound exercises I can do. There are a few other exercises for chest and arms, but there's not much more than that. I think I actually "discovered" that I can do standing rows for my back/rear shoulders, which I don't think is actually considered an exercise on the machine.

    If you want strength then lower your reps and raise your weight. Mass will take longer but building a good strength foundation will help when you look to improve that in the future. I would certainly re-evaluate your program since you aren't getting the gains you would expect from a novice.
  • ForecasterJason
    ForecasterJason Posts: 2,577 Member
    Ok. One thing I'm wondering about is my calorie intake. While I am trying to gain, it looks like over the past several weeks I've basically been maintaining. Am I correct that building muscle automatically means an increase in strength? I know muscle and strength are not always correlated, but it was my understanding that if one is building muscle, strength is also increasing. So if I can get my calorie intake into a surplus, training in the rep range I'm doing should then increase my strength, right?
  • ItIsTJ
    ItIsTJ Posts: 116 Member
    Some of the numbers in this group are crazy!! Impressive stuff.

  • jlclabo
    jlclabo Posts: 588 Member
    bw: 300
    1RM: 405
    still a little to go to hit 1.5 on bench.... now squat and deadlift.. thats another story. both are over 2.0x+
  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    Ok. One thing I'm wondering about is my calorie intake. While I am trying to gain, it looks like over the past several weeks I've basically been maintaining. Am I correct that building muscle automatically means an increase in strength? I know muscle and strength are not always correlated, but it was my understanding that if one is building muscle, strength is also increasing. So if I can get my calorie intake into a surplus, training in the rep range I'm doing should then increase my strength, right?

    Muscle size and strength are related, yes. The larger the muscle the better the mechanical advantage plus you have more contractile power so you have more potential to move heavier objects. Neural coordination is also important and you will not be able to max your muscle gains until you've maximized your neural gains -- this is why novices to gain so much strength so quickly.

    Eating in a surplus will allow you to gain muscle, and some fat, and will improve strength and building strength will help build muscle, and so it goes. The keys are that you need to train hard enough to force your muscles to grow (stimulus), you need to eat sufficient calories with enough protein and micros to allow for protein synthesis (fuel), and you need to get sufficient rest (recovery).
  • Serah87
    Serah87 Posts: 5,481 Member
    I am 20 pounds away from bench pressing my BW. :smiley:
This discussion has been closed.