Myfitnesspal

Message Boards Food and Nutrition
You are currently viewing the message boards in:

Label food for having DNA

DnarulesDnarules Member Posts: 2,073 Member Member Posts: 2,073 Member
I've never started a thread before, and probably will regret it, but this just makes me truly scared for the state of science education in this country (US).

io9.com/80-of-americans-support-mandatory-labels-on-foods-cont-1680277802
«1

Replies

  • Laurend224Laurend224 Member Posts: 1,781 Member Member Posts: 1,781 Member
  • JruzerJruzer Member Posts: 3,493 Member Member Posts: 3,493 Member
  • DataSevenDataSeven Member Posts: 245 Member Member Posts: 245 Member
    I want a label on all food that doesn't have DNA.
  • Mr_KnightMr_Knight Member Posts: 9,535 Member Member Posts: 9,535 Member
    What's the problem? I absolutely positively want food labels on food with DNA in it.
  • Menix8Menix8 Member Posts: 217 Member Member Posts: 217 Member
    Next they'll want dihydrogen monoxide warning labels on food. Chemicals! Science!
  • chivalryderchivalryder Member Posts: 4,391 Member Member Posts: 4,391 Member
    I would rather see food that doesn't have DNA in it, showing that it's 100% synthetic.
  • Need2Exerc1seNeed2Exerc1se Member Posts: 13,577 Member Member Posts: 13,577 Member
    That's funny, but not really surprising.
  • emdeeseaemdeesea Member Posts: 1,827 Member Member Posts: 1,827 Member
    Okay well when you don't value an educated population, these are bound to be the results.
  • Mr_KnightMr_Knight Member Posts: 9,535 Member Member Posts: 9,535 Member
    Menix8 wrote: »
    Next they'll want dihydrogen monoxide warning labels on food. Chemicals! Science!

    The article didn't say "DNA warning labels".

    It said food labels for food with DNA in it.

    Which is what we already do.
    edited January 2015
  • Menix8Menix8 Member Posts: 217 Member Member Posts: 217 Member
    Mr_Knight wrote: »
    The article didn't say "DNA warning labels".

    It said food labels for food with DNA in it.

    Which is what we already do.

    Pretty sure io9 also interpreted "label" to mean "warning."
  • Mr_KnightMr_Knight Member Posts: 9,535 Member Member Posts: 9,535 Member
    Menix8 wrote: »
    Mr_Knight wrote: »
    The article didn't say "DNA warning labels".

    It said food labels for food with DNA in it.

    Which is what we already do.

    Pretty sure io9 also interpreted "label" to mean "warning."

    They can "interpret" anything they like - but nowhere does it actually say that.

  • Menix8Menix8 Member Posts: 217 Member Member Posts: 217 Member
    Mr_Knight wrote: »
    Menix8 wrote: »
    Mr_Knight wrote: »
    The article didn't say "DNA warning labels".

    It said food labels for food with DNA in it.

    Which is what we already do.

    Pretty sure io9 also interpreted "label" to mean "warning."

    They can "interpret" anything they like - but nowhere does it actually say that.

    Okay...
  • NoelFigart1NoelFigart1 Member, Premium Posts: 1,280 Member Member, Premium Posts: 1,280 Member
    *whimper*

    Please say you're trolling. Please?
  • dbmatadbmata Member Posts: 12,973 Member Member Posts: 12,973 Member
    emdeesea wrote: »
    Okay well when you don't value an educated population, these are bound to be the results.

    Exactly, but with an educated population, you won't have republican dirtbags getting re-elected.
  • nutmegoreonutmegoreo Member Posts: 15,510 Member Member Posts: 15,510 Member
    I am going with 80% of people who were surveyed for this purpose are poorly educated in basic biology.
  • SyzygyXSyzygyX Member Posts: 189 Member Member Posts: 189 Member
    Menix8 wrote: »
    Next they'll want dihydrogen monoxide warning labels on food. Chemicals! Science!

    Hey, now, everyone should know that if you inhale too much dihydrogen monoxide, YOU DIE.

  • mumblemagicmumblemagic Member Posts: 1,098 Member Member Posts: 1,098 Member
    Mr_Knight wrote: »
    Menix8 wrote: »
    Next they'll want dihydrogen monoxide warning labels on food. Chemicals! Science!

    The article didn't say "DNA warning labels".

    It said food labels for food with DNA in it.

    Which is what we already do.

    You do? Why? Is that not a waste of ink on your packaging since all food has DNA in it?

    Or have I missed some sarcasm? :smile:

  • MKEgalMKEgal Member Posts: 3,276 Member Member Posts: 3,276 Member
    Syzygy wrote:
    everyone should know that if you inhale too much dihydrogen monoxide, YOU DIE.
    And if you drink too much of it, you die too.
    My cousin ended up in ICU from drinking too much DHMO.

  • Mr_KnightMr_Knight Member Posts: 9,535 Member Member Posts: 9,535 Member
    Mr_Knight wrote: »
    Menix8 wrote: »
    Next they'll want dihydrogen monoxide warning labels on food. Chemicals! Science!

    The article didn't say "DNA warning labels".

    It said food labels for food with DNA in it.

    Which is what we already do.

    You do? Why? Is that not a waste of ink on your packaging since all food has DNA in it?

    Or have I missed some sarcasm? :smile:

    No sarcasm. Why would there be sarcasm? Virtually everything that has a food label on it has DNA it - what's the problem?

  • Mr_KnightMr_Knight Member Posts: 9,535 Member Member Posts: 9,535 Member
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    I am going with 80% of people who were surveyed for this purpose are poorly educated in basic biology.

    I'm going with 80% of posters will go with an unwarranted interpretation of the facts so they can make fun of people for being dumber than them.
Sign In or Register to comment.