what roll does sugar play in weight loss?
Replies
-
I eat sugar of all sorts every day and am down 20 lbs.
0 -
I only read the first handful of responses, and while I generally agree with them, I will say that if your macros are WAY out of balance, then it can make a difference. It's not nearly as big of a deal as cals in vs cals out (gotta have that in check regardless of everything else).
Macros are generally more important for body comp goals (fat loss vs scale weight loss), but I have seem some people respond better to cutting cals by dialing back sugars vs a more general reduction in calories. Again, this is more apt to be the case for people whose macros are way out of balance and the majority of their calories are coming from sugars/carbs. At least IME.
I actually do agree with this, I just think that for most people it works itself out.
If you cut your calories, but have a diet that's out of whack from a macro or nutrient perspective, the first reason to change that is that anyone reasonable knows it's not healthy and may want to be healthy independent of weight loss. The second reason is that it's going to be really hard to sustain a calorie deficit on 80% carbs and sugary stuff for most people (yes, Freelee and her bananas, who cares). If it's not for you, not problem, if it is most people will go ahead and rearrange their diet without having to be told "you must cut sugar to lose weight!" And the third reason, which varies from person to person, is that you will probably feel worse if you eat a really unhealthy diet and that's another reason to change as you work through it.0 -
Grubworm1943 wrote: »ive always believed weight loss was all in the calories in vs calories out. but someone told me today id probably lose more if i cut out all sugar except natural sugars and the occasional treat. does it really make a difference how much sugar i have as long as im under my calorie goal?
yes it does matter if you are looking to have healthy weight loss. You could eat 100% sugar in a calorie deficit and lose weight, in fact you will probably lose it 3 to 4 times faster than eating a balanced diet. Sounds good, but unfortunately a majority of that weight lose would come from lean mass (muscle, organs, bone, sinew etc).
Your main aim should be to hit your protein goal. One school of thought for this level is 0.7g - 1g per lb of lean mass. The more active you are, older you are or if you are recovering from injury the nearer the top end you would do well to aim for.
Outside of that split your fat and carbs to suit your tastes. You are more likely to lose weight (and sustain your diet) eating the split that best suits you.
If you are eating in a calorie deficit, it is likely you will NOT be eating enough sugar for it to be considered even remotely unhealthy.
If you want to eat some sweets, or general junk food then do it and enjoy it, just be mindful not to eat this in place of healthier foods, which will provide more vitamins and minerals, although if you are eating a good balance of food it is likely you will achieve this.
0 -
-
The less sugar I eat the less hungry I am and the more likely I am to stick to healthier options. The World Health Organization recommends 25g/day. That is a tough number but I try.0
-
This content has been removed.
-
Grubworm1943 wrote: »ive always believed weight loss was all in the calories in vs calories out. but someone told me today id probably lose more if i cut out all sugar except natural sugars and the occasional treat. does it really make a difference how much sugar i have as long as im under my calorie goal?Maintaining blood sugar level is key to sticking to a good eating routine. When your sugar level spikes, then falls, it induces the hunger pangs and we make bad food decisions like munching on food with no nutrition at work. Hence, one should avoid the starchy carbs as well as sugars.
2 reasons - to stabilize blood sugar, and to avoid filling up on food with no nutritional value. Sure you can eat all your calories in MnMs, but your body will break down if you don't feed it the good food.
nice straw man argument about eating M&M's all day. Please tell me how is making that argument, or where OP ever mentioned that. You can eat sugar and in the context of an overall diet not have to word about it.
Protein spikes insulin too, so should that be restricted…???????
OP asks if sugar makes a difference.
Several people responded no, it doesn't make a difference.
Norm adds a touch of context about how blood sugar works.
I'll ask again -- is Norm wrong?
0 -
Grubworm1943 wrote: »ive always believed weight loss was all in the calories in vs calories out. but someone told me today id probably lose more if i cut out all sugar except natural sugars and the occasional treat. does it really make a difference how much sugar i have as long as im under my calorie goal?Maintaining blood sugar level is key to sticking to a good eating routine. When your sugar level spikes, then falls, it induces the hunger pangs and we make bad food decisions like munching on food with no nutrition at work. Hence, one should avoid the starchy carbs as well as sugars.
2 reasons - to stabilize blood sugar, and to avoid filling up on food with no nutritional value. Sure you can eat all your calories in MnMs, but your body will break down if you don't feed it the good food.
nice straw man argument about eating M&M's all day. Please tell me how is making that argument, or where OP ever mentioned that. You can eat sugar and in the context of an overall diet not have to word about it.
Protein spikes insulin too, so should that be restricted…???????
OP asks if sugar makes a difference.
Several people responded no, it doesn't make a difference.
Norm adds a touch of context about how blood sugar works.
I'll ask again -- is Norm wrong?
your moving the goal posts...
you claimed I advocated for a diet of 100% sugar, which I never once did.
0 -
Grubworm1943 wrote: »ive always believed weight loss was all in the calories in vs calories out. but someone told me today id probably lose more if i cut out all sugar except natural sugars and the occasional treat. does it really make a difference how much sugar i have as long as im under my calorie goal?
I think the important thing to remember from all of this is that if added sugar isn't helping you achieve your goals, there's nothing wrong with working to reduce it. However, it isn't a "magic solution." If you're a person who finds sugar to be a trigger for you (like myself), there's a good chance that reducing your sugar intake will help, if only because you're making smarter decisions with your food types and quantities. Personally, I'm the kind of person who can't have just 1 Girl Scout cookie. If I have 1, all the will-power is gone and I have to have another. But if I don't have that first one, I can resist the temptation.
In relation to non-weight loss goals, however, sugar is definitely an interesting thing... look in to some of the studies showing how sugar and cocaine similarly light up the brain. It's definitely interesting, whatever conclusions and decisions you choose to draw from them.0 -
Over all it's calories in vs calories out and a deficit will get you weight loss.
No matter what the calories consist of.
I personally have to be careful with carbs because they make me hungry. I get around that by eating the carbs first and finishing with my fats and proteins.
Cutting carbs will give you an initial big loss because your body will hold on to less water. As soon as you start eating carbs again, the water weight will come back.
Since I don't intend to eat a low carb diet forever, I rather eat my carbs while losing weight and not having to worry about the water weight coming back after I reach my goal and I go into maintenance.0 -
afoust1986 wrote: »Grubworm1943 wrote: »ive always believed weight loss was all in the calories in vs calories out. but someone told me today id probably lose more if i cut out all sugar except natural sugars and the occasional treat. does it really make a difference how much sugar i have as long as im under my calorie goal?
I think the important thing to remember from all of this is that if added sugar isn't helping you achieve your goals, there's nothing wrong with working to reduce it. However, it isn't a "magic solution." If you're a person who finds sugar to be a trigger for you (like myself), there's a good chance that reducing your sugar intake will help, if only because you're making smarter decisions with your food types and quantities. Personally, I'm the kind of person who can't have just 1 Girl Scout cookie. If I have 1, all the will-power is gone and I have to have another. But if I don't have that first one, I can resist the temptation.
In relation to non-weight loss goals, however, sugar is definitely an interesting thing... look in to some of the studies showing how sugar and cocaine similarly light up the brain. It's definitely interesting, whatever conclusions and decisions you choose to draw from them.
I'm with you on the cookies. I don't want to eat just one, and I'd rather not eat them at all than go through my day battling the desire to eat more.
I'm even more interested in sugar's effects on the liver than sugar and the brain. But it's difficult to understand properly, at least for me. Lots of biochemical reactions going on. I'm trying to have at least a rudimentary understanding, though.0 -
No.0
-
Grubworm1943 wrote: »ive always believed weight loss was all in the calories in vs calories out. but someone told me today id probably lose more if i cut out all sugar except natural sugars and the occasional treat. does it really make a difference how much sugar i have as long as im under my calorie goal?
Sugar can make you feel much more hungry. Long term sugar makes you more fat. Sugar raises triglycerides.
It is much more complicated and basically depends on your goals.
Calories in - Calories out works for weight loss, but because sugar blocks leptin you might be starving & eventually cave to eat much more! Not to mention the long term effects too much sugar has on your body.
I've been trying to curb my sugar intake and it is challenging- sugar is in everything! Once you start reading the labels, it is horrifying. I'm not including fruit in this though. Fruit has fiber and is awesome - particularly berries. I do believe in moderation, though, so I would never deprive myself the occasional treat.
Check out Dr. Mark Hyman. He is the director of functional medicine for the Cleveland Clinic and has written some great articles on sugar.
http://drhyman.com/blog/2014/03/06/top-10-big-ideas-detox-sugar/
Here is an article about sugar & leptin:
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/05/26/sugar-affects-leptin-signals.aspx0 -
This content has been removed.
-
-
I assume Norm is referring to thermodynamics, which is science. The body uses more energy to burn certain foods, which is why less energy is used for drinks and simple carbohydrates (such as sugar).
Maybe do some research on thermodynamics, digestion, and sugar?0 -
I assume Norm is referring to thermodynamics, which is science. The body uses more energy to burn certain foods, which is why less energy is used for drinks and simple carbohydrates (such as sugar).
Maybe do some research on thermodynamics, digestion, and sugar?
norm, never came back to clarify..
I guess you can PM and then you would not have to assume...
so you are saying that sugar gets stored as fat regardless of whether one is a calorie surplus or deficit?0 -
We've never had obesity be this much of a problem in our society until recently. Also, as far as I know, we've been eating sugar in our diets for a verrrrryyyy long time as well. I think it goes to show that there must be another factor that is making people fat that isn't just sugar.
0 -
Grubworm1943 wrote: »Maintaining blood sugar level is key to sticking to a good eating routine. When your sugar level spikes, then falls, it induces the hunger pangs and we make bad food decisions like munching on food with no nutrition at work. Hence, one should avoid the starchy carbs as well as sugars.
2 reasons - to stabilize blood sugar, and to avoid filling up on food with no nutritional value. Sure you can eat all your calories in MnMs, but your body will break down if you don't feed it the good food.
i eat food with nutritional value. but i have a treat every night if i have the calories for it. i dont eat all my calories in sweets. haha
OP having a treat every night is fine if you fit it into your day and it's part of an overall well balanced diet.
I've lost 125 lbs and have eaten some kind of dessert almost every day. It helps with the mental health. Good luck to you0 -
I assume Norm is referring to thermodynamics, which is science. The body uses more energy to burn certain foods, which is why less energy is used for drinks and simple carbohydrates (such as sugar).
Maybe do some research on thermodynamics, digestion, and sugar?
Research by trusted quacks like Mercola?0 -
Sugar has calories, that's about it.0
-
-
nope, calorie deficit is all you need.
unless you have a medical condition that makes your sensitive to sugar, but even then it is CICO….you just have to adjust the in side….Maintaining blood sugar level is key to sticking to a good eating routine. When your sugar level spikes, then falls, it induces the hunger pangs and we make bad food decisions like munching on food with no nutrition at work. Hence, one should avoid the starchy carbs as well as sugars.
2 reasons - to stabilize blood sugar, and to avoid filling up on food with no nutritional value. Sure you can eat all your calories in MnMs, but your body will break down if you don't feed it the good food.
nice straw man argument about eating M&M's all day. Please tell me how is making that argument, or where OP ever mentioned that. You can eat sugar and in the context of an overall diet not have to word about it.
Protein spikes insulin too, so should that be restricted…???????
Please clarify for me, ndj -- which of these do you mean?
1. A calorie deficit is all you need to lose weight. It doesn't matter where those calories come from.
2. Your sugar calories should fit within your allotted carbs, and the rest of your calories should be from protein and fat.
0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Grubworm1943 wrote: »ive always believed weight loss was all in the calories in vs calories out. but someone told me today id probably lose more if i cut out all sugar except natural sugars and the occasional treat. does it really make a difference how much sugar i have as long as im under my calorie goal?
Sugar can make you feel much more hungry. Long term sugar makes you more fat. Sugar raises triglycerides.
It is much more complicated and basically depends on your goals.
Calories in - Calories out works for weight loss, but because sugar blocks leptin you might be starving & eventually cave to eat much more! Not to mention the long term effects too much sugar has on your body.
I've been trying to curb my sugar intake and it is challenging- sugar is in everything! Once you start reading the labels, it is horrifying. I'm not including fruit in this though. Fruit has fiber and is awesome - particularly berries. I do believe in moderation, though, so I would never deprive myself the occasional treat.
Check out Dr. Mark Hyman. He is the director of functional medicine for the Cleveland Clinic and has written some great articles on sugar.
http://drhyman.com/blog/2014/03/06/top-10-big-ideas-detox-sugar/
Here is an article about sugar & leptin:
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/05/26/sugar-affects-leptin-signals.aspx
Why did you post junk science as evidence?
Frosted mini wheats have a ton of fiber too, so that must also be good sugar0 -
nope, calorie deficit is all you need.
unless you have a medical condition that makes your sensitive to sugar, but even then it is CICO….you just have to adjust the in side….Maintaining blood sugar level is key to sticking to a good eating routine. When your sugar level spikes, then falls, it induces the hunger pangs and we make bad food decisions like munching on food with no nutrition at work. Hence, one should avoid the starchy carbs as well as sugars.
2 reasons - to stabilize blood sugar, and to avoid filling up on food with no nutritional value. Sure you can eat all your calories in MnMs, but your body will break down if you don't feed it the good food.
nice straw man argument about eating M&M's all day. Please tell me how is making that argument, or where OP ever mentioned that. You can eat sugar and in the context of an overall diet not have to word about it.
Protein spikes insulin too, so should that be restricted…???????
Please clarify for me, ndj -- which of these do you mean?
1. A calorie deficit is all you need to lose weight. It doesn't matter where those calories come from.
2. Your sugar calories should fit within your allotted carbs, and the rest of your calories should be from protein and fat.
Actually they are both accurate statements.
To lose weight all you need is a calorie deficit
But for an overall healthy diet they should fit into your allotted carbs once your protein and fat macros have been hit.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions