Under eating??
Options
Replies
-
So why doesn't anyone see anything wrong with the fact that a 320 pound male is eating ~1500 calories and not losing weight? With exercise? So lets just say he burns 300 calories exercising leaving his body 1200 calories to function on. That's on the low range for a female. I see multiple posts that starvation mode doesn't exist. I dont care what you call it adaptive thermogensis, fat adaptation, metabolic damage but a prolonged period at this extreme of a calorie deficit is forcing muscle loss which will further the cycle of making it more difficult to lose weight. The goal should be to eat as many calories as possible and lose weight not the other way around.
0 -
lisamerrison wrote: »So why doesn't anyone see anything wrong with the fact that a 320 pound male is eating ~1500 calories and not losing weight? With exercise? So lets just say he burns 300 calories exercising leaving his body 1200 calories to function on. That's on the low range for a female. I see multiple posts that starvation mode doesn't exist. I dont care what you call it adaptive thermogensis, fat adaptation, metabolic damage but a prolonged period at this extreme of a calorie deficit is forcing muscle loss which will further the cycle of making it more difficult to lose weight. The goal should be to eat as many calories as possible and lose weight not the other way around.
NO. You are eating too much.
0 -
danieltsmoke wrote: »MamaBirdBoss wrote: »
Yeah I've been losing wieght, about 20ish lbs in the last 3 weeks...gotta keep going tho!
If you're full, DON'T SWEAT IT. You're totally fine. Your weight loss will decrease as you lose weight, and this is normal because your metabolic rate decreases with weight. (My RMR is BARELY over 1300. If I don't go out and do things to be active, I burn less than 1500 cal a day. Really.) Don't sweat that, either.
Do some walking and lifting now to preserve muscle mass. Start with lifting just 2x per week. The most you should ever do is 3x per week--and the most you should do is 45min at a time. 3x per week at 30min each is enough to get a six pack if you do it well (and lose enough weight). Really! So you don't have to be a gym rat to show a lot of improvement. That might make you hungrier. Eat a little more, then!
Add cardio exercise as your joints can handle it for health. (I wince when people tell big guys or gals to start running. The chances of injury for someone really out of shape are high no matter what, and when you add on the weight you're pounding your joints with with every step...um, NO.) You can do WHATEVER cardio works for you. Running is just awful for me, but I like HIIT and circuit training, video-type. Again, that might make you hungrier. Eat a little of it back.
You can be in excellent health--not just decent, but excellent--with just 2.5 hours a week of exercise.0 -
Well I do exercise, 4-5 times a week on a recumbent exercise bike, for about half an hour. Says I burn about 300-400 calories maintaining about 140 heart rate averaged. I like your idea of not sweating it, I can't help but feel like if my body was starving, and I was getting under nourished, I'd probably feel some bad side effects of it.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.5K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 391 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 925 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions