What if 1200 calories is actually my maintenance #?

2

Replies

  • jemhh
    jemhh Posts: 14,261 Member
    edited September 2015
    cnbbnc wrote: »
    elvensnow wrote: »
    I don't get it....maitenance hashtag???? Shouldn't it be #maitenance if you're trying to start a trending twitter topic???

    I honestly can't tell if you're serious or trolling... but the "hashtag" symbol has been around longer than twitter and it can stand for "number". So she was asking about her maintenance number.

    I don't want to hijack the thread, but I feel like I'm getting mighty old when people today are seeing a "number sign" and thinking its a "hashtag".

    I concur!!!!

    Must be a joke. I refuse to believe that a 33 yo actually doesn't recognize the # symbol as meaning number (or pound.)
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,371 Member
    Most people who think that they are maintaining on very little are underestimating their food intake.
  • Abby2205
    Abby2205 Posts: 253 Member
    rnegoro wrote: »
    It could be water weight, the best tell tale sign to check whether you're on burning fat or not is your thirst and acetone breath. Water retention is dependent on sodium intake.

    Best tell tale signs of diabetes, maybe, and might be present if one is on a low-carb diet, but not at all a general indicator or requirement for one to be burning fat.
  • SeanNJ
    SeanNJ Posts: 153 Member
    cnbbnc wrote: »
    elvensnow wrote: »
    I don't get it....maitenance hashtag???? Shouldn't it be #maitenance if you're trying to start a trending twitter topic???

    I honestly can't tell if you're serious or trolling... but the "hashtag" symbol has been around longer than twitter and it can stand for "number". So she was asking about her maintenance number.

    I don't want to hijack the thread, but I feel like I'm getting mighty old when people today are seeing a "number sign" and thinking its a "hashtag".

    I concur!!!!

    Just wait until automated phone trees change their prompts to "Please enter the number and press the hashtag key."
  • hamelle2
    hamelle2 Posts: 297 Member
    I used to always log an apple as 80 calories. Until I weighed my slices......not 80 cals but 150!!! I learned to listen after that! Thank you everyone!
  • MommyL2015
    MommyL2015 Posts: 1,411 Member

    Just wait until automated phone trees change their prompts to "Please enter the number and press the hashtag key."

    Glad I wasn't the only thinking that # also stands for the pound symbol :blush: When twitter first -- whatever it did, appeared, was invented, got popular, I read all hashtag things as "pound symbol" whatever it was.

    #iamnotthatold
  • pondee629
    pondee629 Posts: 2,469 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    I don't get it....maitenance hashtag???? Shouldn't it be #maitenance if you're trying to start a trending twitter topic???

    really???

    Maintenance # is maintenance pounds. (or maintenance number, which is ackbasswords.)

    #= number #3 or
    pounds 30#
  • auddii
    auddii Posts: 15,357 Member
    pondee629 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    I don't get it....maitenance hashtag???? Shouldn't it be #maitenance if you're trying to start a trending twitter topic???

    really???

    Maintenance # is maintenance pounds. (or maintenance number, which is ackbasswords.)

    #= number #3 or
    pounds 30#
    I sure hope she's not planning to maintain at 1200 pounds...
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    pondee629 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    I don't get it....maitenance hashtag???? Shouldn't it be #maitenance if you're trying to start a trending twitter topic???

    really???

    Maintenance # is maintenance pounds. (or maintenance number, which is ackbasswords.)

    #= number #3 or
    pounds 30#

    yea, I know that, but thanks for clarifying.
  • tiffanyschadow
    tiffanyschadow Posts: 20 Member
    I was at a plateau for over 2 weeks and I read that someone suggested eating 500 calories a day 2 days a week just in case she was underreporting her caloric intake so I tried it. Yes you will bite someone's head off from the hangry LOL but I swear I dropped the 2 lbs I needed to in just one week. My food scale is on the way so I tried the 500 calorie suggestion just to be sure I'm not overeating throughout the week. I also workout 5x a week. Do you exercise?
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    I lowered mine to 1000 and started losing

    That is not helpful at all to the OP. 1000 calories a day is unhealthy and I bet you are eating more than you think.
  • MarcyKirkton
    MarcyKirkton Posts: 507 Member
    queenliz99 wrote: »
    I lowered mine to 1000 and started losing

    That is not helpful at all to the OP. 1000 calories a day is unhealthy and I bet you are eating more than you think.

    Says who? 1000 cals is fine according to even this site. When i wasn't losing, i lowered. Now im losing 2 lbs weekly. That's healthy rate of loss.
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    queenliz99 wrote: »
    I lowered mine to 1000 and started losing

    That is not helpful at all to the OP. 1000 calories a day is unhealthy and I bet you are eating more than you think.

    Says who? 1000 cals is fine according to even this site. When i wasn't losing, i lowered. Now im losing 2 lbs weekly. That's healthy rate of loss.

    You must be short then.
  • WBB55
    WBB55 Posts: 4,131 Member
    queenliz99 wrote: »
    I lowered mine to 1000 and started losing

    That is not helpful at all to the OP. 1000 calories a day is unhealthy and I bet you are eating more than you think.

    Says who? 1000 cals is fine according to even this site. When i wasn't losing, i lowered. Now im losing 2 lbs weekly. That's healthy rate of loss.

    There's very few people who are required to eat at 1000 calories to lose weight. Sub 5', post menopausal, sedentary women come to mind. If the OP isn't those three things, it's likely she can lose while eating at a higher level.
  • MarcyKirkton
    MarcyKirkton Posts: 507 Member
    queenliz99 wrote: »
    queenliz99 wrote: »
    I lowered mine to 1000 and started losing

    That is not helpful at all to the OP. 1000 calories a day is unhealthy and I bet you are eating more than you think.

    Says who? 1000 cals is fine according to even this site. When i wasn't losing, i lowered. Now im losing 2 lbs weekly. That's healthy rate of loss.

    You must be short then.

    Not only short but old!! Lol
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    queenliz99 wrote: »
    queenliz99 wrote: »
    I lowered mine to 1000 and started losing

    That is not helpful at all to the OP. 1000 calories a day is unhealthy and I bet you are eating more than you think.

    Says who? 1000 cals is fine according to even this site. When i wasn't losing, i lowered. Now im losing 2 lbs weekly. That's healthy rate of loss.

    You must be short then.

    Not only short but old!! Lol

    Hey me too!! :)
  • This content has been removed.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    queenliz99 wrote: »
    I lowered mine to 1000 and started losing

    That is not helpful at all to the OP. 1000 calories a day is unhealthy and I bet you are eating more than you think.

    Says who? 1000 cals is fine according to even this site. When i wasn't losing, i lowered. Now im losing 2 lbs weekly. That's healthy rate of loss.

    pretty sure it is not...and you are advocating a VLCD which is against MFP TOS....
  • middlehaitch
    middlehaitch Posts: 8,486 Member
    Short and old here too. (62, 5'1, 100-105lb)
    I lost at 1200.
    It is also my sedentary maintenance intake, however activity takes my maintenance to 1400-1450.

    OP, logging everything will really help you lose at a decent intake, and even more important- set you up with a better knowledge of your portion size, and calorie requirements, when you do hit maintenance.

    Cheers, h.
  • cbnorris
    cbnorris Posts: 204 Member
    Short and old here too. (62, 5'1, 100-105lb)
    I lost at 1200.
    It is also my sedentary maintenance intake, however activity takes my maintenance to 1400-1450.

    OP, logging everything will really help you lose at a decent intake, and even more important- set you up with a better knowledge of your portion size, and calorie requirements, when you do hit maintenance.

    Cheers, h.

    There's no way you're 62! you look fantastic! Oh and I don't consider 62 old. 60's are the new 50's!
  • MarcyKirkton
    MarcyKirkton Posts: 507 Member
    cbnorris wrote: »
    Short and old here too. (62, 5'1, 100-105lb)
    I lost at 1200.
    It is also my sedentary maintenance intake, however activity takes my maintenance to 1400-1450.

    OP, logging everything will really help you lose at a decent intake, and even more important- set you up with a better knowledge of your portion size, and calorie requirements, when you do hit maintenance.

    Cheers, h.

    There's no way you're 62! you look fantastic! Oh and I don't consider 62 old. 60's are the new 50's!

    ohhhhh...I like you!!!
  • debrag12
    debrag12 Posts: 1,071 Member
    I'm 5.2 and lose on way more
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    edited September 2015
    queenliz99 wrote: »
    I lowered mine to 1000 and started losing

    That is not helpful at all to the OP. 1000 calories a day is unhealthy and I bet you are eating more than you think.

    Says who? 1000 cals is fine according to even this site. When i wasn't losing, i lowered. Now im losing 2 lbs weekly. That's healthy rate of loss.

    It's not actually fine according to this site. The minimum calories that MFP will set you at is 1200.

    Also 2 lbs/week is a healthy rate of loss if you have significant weight to lose (I believe >50 lbs). This OP has 38 lbs to lose according to her ticker, so 1 lb/week would be more appropriate. Also, your ticker says you have 8 lbs to lose, so 0.5 lb/week is reasonable.
  • middlehaitch
    middlehaitch Posts: 8,486 Member
    MarcyKirkton, I have just read another post of yours saying you log at 1000 expecting a 200 error, as you don't weigh your food.
    In reality your intake could be almost anything that equates to a deficit for you.

    Therefore your input could be counter-productive to the OP who is being encouraged to weigh more accurately.

    Cheers, h.

    MFP will not set a calorie goal below 1200.
  • sunandmoons
    sunandmoons Posts: 415 Member
    edited September 2015
    SeanNJ wrote: »
    cnbbnc wrote: »
    elvensnow wrote: »
    I don't get it....maitenance hashtag???? Shouldn't it be #maitenance if you're trying to start a trending twitter topic???

    I honestly can't tell if you're serious or trolling... but the "hashtag" symbol has been around longer than twitter and it can stand for "number". So she was asking about her maintenance number.

    I don't want to hijack the thread, but I feel like I'm getting mighty old when people today are seeing a "number sign" and thinking its a "hashtag".

    I concur!!!!

    Just wait until automated phone trees change their prompts to "Please enter the number and press the hashtag key."

    Hahahaha!!!!!
  • Unknown
    edited September 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • ilovecereal1982
    ilovecereal1982 Posts: 1,194 Member
    Helloooooo mfp'ers....glad to see the deep discussion on the hashtag Subject :)
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    #cerealisthebomb
  • ilovecereal1982
    ilovecereal1982 Posts: 1,194 Member
    #yougotthatrightsista
  • middlehaitch
    middlehaitch Posts: 8,486 Member
    Cbnorris, thanks for the complement.
    I don't feel or act old; I just know I am relatively old on this site.
    The avatar was taken on my 60th, so a bit of a cheat. Have maintained about 6 yr, so the same now, but pink instead of lilac hair.

    Cheers, h.

    Sorry for the hijack OP, I was just being polite.
This discussion has been closed.