Sex

Options
245

Replies

  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    Options
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    Personal experience, eh?
  • 3bambi3
    3bambi3 Posts: 1,650 Member
    Options
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    That's why you keep it classy and count in your head while checking your watch over their shoulder. Duh.
  • _Terrapin_
    _Terrapin_ Posts: 4,301 Member
    Options
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    I wonder if the HRM's and fitbits, Garmins, just get in the way?!?
  • motivccess
    motivccess Posts: 201 Member
    Options
    soft/slow Or fast/rough??
  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    Options
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    That's why you keep it classy and count in your head while checking your watch over their shoulder. Duh.

    I'd personally recommend a heart rate monitor.

    Except I don't believe anyone is actually burning a substantial amount of calories having sex.
  • 3bambi3
    3bambi3 Posts: 1,650 Member
    Options
    kkenseth wrote: »
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    That's why you keep it classy and count in your head while checking your watch over their shoulder. Duh.

    I'd personally recommend a heart rate monitor.

    Except I don't believe anyone is actually burning a substantial amount of calories having sex.

    Queue the obligatory "You're not doing it right, hehe" posts.
  • robs_ready
    robs_ready Posts: 1,488 Member
    Options
    motivccess wrote: »
    soft/slow Or fast/rough??

    Dunno mate, experiment and see what works for you.
  • enemyger
    enemyger Posts: 84 Member
    Options
    roblloyd89 wrote: »
    brb2008 wrote: »
    enemyger wrote: »
    Guys guys stop with the pms

    It was a joke!!
    Way to be sexist, bro. Men AND women get cranky over jokes with poor form.
    enemyger wrote: »
    brb2008 wrote: »
    enemyger wrote: »
    Guys guys stop with the pms

    It was a joke!!
    Way to be sexist, bro. Men AND women get cranky over jokes with poor form.

    What even...

    Basically mate, she didn't approve of your joke, now be a good boy

    Really?
    Cause I was siting here and waiting for her approval...

    How was the joke sexist wtf ahahah
  • _Terrapin_
    _Terrapin_ Posts: 4,301 Member
    Options
    kkenseth wrote: »
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    That's why you keep it classy and count in your head while checking your watch over their shoulder. Duh.

    I'd personally recommend a heart rate monitor.

    Except I don't believe anyone is actually burning a substantial amount of calories having sex.

    Substantial...doubtful. Well.....wait. Um........

  • robs_ready
    robs_ready Posts: 1,488 Member
    Options
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    kkenseth wrote: »
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    That's why you keep it classy and count in your head while checking your watch over their shoulder. Duh.

    I'd personally recommend a heart rate monitor.

    Except I don't believe anyone is actually burning a substantial amount of calories having sex.

    Queue the obligatory "You're not doing it right, hehe" posts.

    Damn you
  • jeepinshawn
    jeepinshawn Posts: 642 Member
    Options
    200 calories an hour? Well crap, I guess there are more effective ways to spend the 10mins it takes me then.
  • juggernaut1974
    juggernaut1974 Posts: 6,212 Member
    Options
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    That's why you keep it classy and count in your head while checking your watch over their shoulder. Duh.

    Isn't there a fitness series "you are your own gym?"

    Same could apply here as well
  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    Options
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    kkenseth wrote: »
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    Most partners disapprove of pausing to ensure your heart rate is in you fat burning target zone

    That's why you keep it classy and count in your head while checking your watch over their shoulder. Duh.

    I'd personally recommend a heart rate monitor.

    Except I don't believe anyone is actually burning a substantial amount of calories having sex.

    Queue the obligatory "You're not doing it right, hehe" posts.

    I mean, of course we're all having sex two to three hours every day. Who needs a gym?
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    Options
    It's interesting. The study where the figure that gives the burn closest to the 200 calories an hour cited an average length per session as being six minutes. The figure given for a burn for a 150 pound male was about 3.5 calories a minute.

    Sorrynotsorry for bursting bubbles. I'm too old and jaded to be amused by this thread.

    Not too old to be amused by sex, mind you.
  • juggernaut1974
    juggernaut1974 Posts: 6,212 Member
    Options
    PeachyCarol wrote: »
    It's interesting. The study where the figure that gives the burn closest to the 200 calories an hour cited an average length per session as being six minutes. The figure given for a burn for a 150 pound male was about 3.5 calories a minute.

    Sorrynotsorry for bursting bubbles. I'm too old and jaded to be amused by this thread.

    Not too old to be amused by sex, mind you.

    #Funhater
  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    Options
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    PeachyCarol wrote: »
    It's interesting. The study where the figure that gives the burn closest to the 200 calories an hour cited an average length per session as being six minutes. The figure given for a burn for a 150 pound male was about 3.5 calories a minute.

    Sorrynotsorry for bursting bubbles. I'm too old and jaded to be amused by this thread.

    Not too old to be amused by sex, mind you.

    #Funhater

    You're just mad because you only burn 3.5 calories having sex.

    :wink:
  • juggernaut1974
    juggernaut1974 Posts: 6,212 Member
    Options
    kkenseth wrote: »
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    PeachyCarol wrote: »
    It's interesting. The study where the figure that gives the burn closest to the 200 calories an hour cited an average length per session as being six minutes. The figure given for a burn for a 150 pound male was about 3.5 calories a minute.

    Sorrynotsorry for bursting bubbles. I'm too old and jaded to be amused by this thread.

    Not too old to be amused by sex, mind you.

    #Funhater

    You're just mad because you only burn 3.5 calories having sex.

    :wink:

    #RoundingUp
  • VykkDraygoVPR
    VykkDraygoVPR Posts: 465 Member
    Options
    PeachyCarol wrote: »
    It's interesting. The study where the figure that gives the burn closest to the 200 calories an hour cited an average length per session as being six minutes. The figure given for a burn for a 150 pound male was about 3.5 calories a minute.

    Sorrynotsorry for bursting bubbles. I'm too old and jaded to be amused by this thread.

    Not too old to be amused by sex, mind you.

    So I really didn't earn those extra slices of pizza? :(
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    Options
    juggernaut1974 wrote: »
    PeachyCarol wrote: »
    It's interesting. The study where the figure that gives the burn closest to the 200 calories an hour cited an average length per session as being six minutes. The figure given for a burn for a 150 pound male was about 3.5 calories a minute.

    Sorrynotsorry for bursting bubbles. I'm too old and jaded to be amused by this thread.

    Not too old to be amused by sex, mind you.

    #Funhater

    Not everything that's fun needs to burn calories, man.
  • daniwilford
    daniwilford Posts: 1,030 Member
    Options
    Is that six minutes a rep or a set? How many reps and sets? I never trust a man to do the measuring.

Categories