Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Food Addiction - A Different Perspective

1101113151621

Replies

  • snickerscharlie
    snickerscharlie Posts: 8,578 Member
    Yes, I completely agree that the key to changing this 'addiction' is to realize that it's not an addiction, but rather a preference or a habit. Delicious food is delicious! Making this simple shift in terminology also gives you the power to make sustainable choices for change since it also allows you to no longer be a helpless victim, but rather an active participant in forming healthier habits surrounding food consumption.
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    I'd like to reiterate a point I made in the first post regarding restriction.

    We're coming up on the New Year. A lot of people are going to want to resolve to give up sugar.

    The symposium on food addiction and the research on eating addiction point to the underpinnings of behavioral addiction in the subset of people who have true addiction being based in binge/restrict cycles.

    If someone is resolving to give up sugar or carbs or pizza or whatever because they think they're addicted, it might not be the best approach since it could be feeding the whole cycle it seeks to eliminate.

    The underlying cause of the behavior will still be there. It was for me. In my earlier post, I told how I started overeating different foods when I restricted one group of foods.

    There were also times in my past where I resolved to never eat brownies, chips, cookies... again. They all led to eating pans of brownies, bags of chips, boxes of cookies. I am not unfamiliar with binge (colloquial use of the term)/restrict.

    It wasn't until getting at using food as a soother, a comforter, a companion, a crutch -- that I was able to deal with it properly.

    I am not saying that there are not people out there who don't have very real and serious issues beyond the self-help I experienced. Some people genuinely have eating addiction. They, I believe, are a small subset of all the people who struggle with food, though.

    That's not to say that each person's struggle isn't daunting to them. I know how hard it can be. It's taken me 40 years to get this right!

    I'm just hoping to provide food for thought to those resolving to "give up xyz" because they're "addicted". Maybe think about digging a little deeper while you're giving up the food. Because it's really not about the food. And restriction could be perpetuating an addiction cycle if you're in that small subset of people with a true eating addiction.
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    Thanks for post this! @PeachyCarol
  • This content has been removed.
  • Aisle4
    Aisle4 Posts: 24 Member
    So it's not an addiction but a habit but people with drug addictions have to "break the habit" smoking is not an addiction to nicotine, it's habit; according to many on this post? I read some saying BED/FA is a lack of willpower? What if too much control led someone to an ED? Don't most EDs start with diets or weight loss? What about the people who get "high" from consumption of certain foods? It's a habit, but smoking crock is a habit that's not really physically addictive. Can people be addicted to marijuana because there isn't really a physical component? I'm trying to understand what is going on here
  • This content has been removed.
  • blankiefinder
    blankiefinder Posts: 3,599 Member
    Aisle4 wrote: »
    So it's not an addiction but a habit but people with drug addictions have to "break the habit" smoking is not an addiction to nicotine, it's habit; according to many on this post? I read some saying BED/FA is a lack of willpower? What if too much control led someone to an ED? Don't most EDs start with diets or weight loss? What about the people who get "high" from consumption of certain foods? It's a habit, but smoking crock is a habit that's not really physically addictive. Can people be addicted to marijuana because there isn't really a physical component? I'm trying to understand what is going on here

    I believe you've done a grave injustice to the OP's post, to take what she has said, and basically throw it in a blender with various replies, and present that as if that is what she is saying. Perhaps going back to read the OP would add some clarity.

    Also, are you seriously trying to say people get 'high' off foods like they would off of crack??
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    Aisle4 wrote: »
    So it's not an addiction but a habit but people with drug addictions have to "break the habit" smoking is not an addiction to nicotine, it's habit; according to many on this post? I read some saying BED/FA is a lack of willpower? What if too much control led someone to an ED? Don't most EDs start with diets or weight loss? What about the people who get "high" from consumption of certain foods? It's a habit, but smoking crock is a habit that's not really physically addictive. Can people be addicted to marijuana because there isn't really a physical component? I'm trying to understand what is going on here

    Some addictions have both a behavioral and a substance component. My personal experience with smoking bears this out. Nicotine is an addictive substance, but breaking the habits of lighting up at certain times and having something to do with your hands is just as hard. Others are just about behaviors like gambling or sex.

    Some things aren't addictions at all, but using similar strategies (behavioral modification techniques, for example) can be helpful in overcoming them.

    People don't get "high" in a traditional sense from food.

    It should be noted that in the research, only a small subset of people truly meet the criteria for true eating addiction. There are others who definitely have problematic relationships with food, but that does not mean they are "addicts". A parallel can be seen with alcohol users. There are some people who have highly problematic relationships with alcohol who are able to stop themselves without becoming full blown alcoholics. Then there are... full blown alcoholics.

    Both alcoholics and the problem users might use similar strategies in dealing with their problems, but only one group of individuals is truly comprised of addicts.

    When it comes to food, right now, there is no science showing any food substance as being addictive. Instead, as I noted in my initial post, for a small subset of people, the entrenched process of binge/restrict can lead to a pattern of behavior with food that just about as close to addiction that some are comfortable enough calling it eating addiction.

    I hope this clears things up.



  • zoeysasha37
    zoeysasha37 Posts: 7,088 Member
    I believe that some use the " food addict" card as an excuse. Its easier for those people to claim they are addicted to candy then to admit they just aren't ready to change . that's not saying every person is just making up excuses, but many are. I know this because I used to be the person with 455443 excuses on why I couldn't lose weight.
    When I was ready, I put in the work needed for change. Until someone is truly ready, they won't change. When I was ready, I learned that I had the power to change my behavior. I learned portion control and moderation and learned how to deal with my emotions properly rather then use food as comfort.
    It is indeed a smack in the face to addicts when they hear someone comparing wanting to eat a candy bar to a person who is opioid dependent and going through opiate withdraw. Those two are not comparable. So I see exactly why so many addiction threads here turn into chaos.
    There are also a lot of people here who just don't know any better, they are new and hear someone talk about being a food addict so they repeat it without really understanding what they are talking about. Those people are usually the ones who make the " halp I'm an addict ,I love candy " threads and within minutes, its clear they have no idea what's going on and are clueless. I don't think they mean any harm, they are just ignorant.
    So there is several reasons some will say they are a food addict and either way, they can change and they can lose weight. They just have to work for it. It might not be easy, but it can be done.
  • Aisle4
    Aisle4 Posts: 24 Member
    edited December 2015
    Well I have been addicted to opiates, crack and food. I'm still addicted to food be quite frank with you. I wrote my first response as a mixture of anger sarcasm and real curiosity to what general posters are thinking. The OP did mention it being open to discussion? I have myself began to think food is possibly more dangerous than any illegal drug I have been addicted to, if that shocks you I'm sorry but that's how I feel..there are nights I have spent way too much on food I've lost jobs and opportunities due to binge cycles...sounds absurd you many of you, I read...no I'm not having diet issues either I'll diet all the way down to a weight and safely binge myself back...kinda sounds like when I would try to lower my tolerance to other things to deal w less consequences but still get what I want..I would like to believe people understand that there isn't ONE idea of food abuse..minds..
  • Unknown
    edited December 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • Aisle4
    Aisle4 Posts: 24 Member
    Also just for the record in rooms I have been to for other addictions bringing up food addiction is not insulting and many of us suffer from it...I think there's a difference between addict brain and behaviors and someone giving excuses...I think I have a mix of addiction and behavioral perfectionism with food...perfectionism is also a common symptom in people with "hardcore" addictions to opiates/cocaine/meth/alcohol etc
  • 100df
    100df Posts: 668 Member
    thorsmom01 wrote: »
    I believe that some use the " food addict" card as an excuse. Its easier for those people to claim they are addicted to candy then to admit they just aren't ready to change . rather then use food as comfort.

    I see many posts like this on MFP regarding addiction to food and/or sugar. It puzzles me because I assume that if someone has bothered to make an account on MFP and post on a forum, they are looking for help to change. I don't think people are looking for "oh poor you, just eat thousands of calories of candy since you can't help it". Maybe some want to be told to have at it but not most. Not if they are on a calorie counting site.

    I think they are looking to talk about how others have overcome bad issues around food. Those discussions are difficult to have on this forum. For some their "help me" post might be the very first time they have ever talked about it. To have the thread go crazy is a disservice to all that have issues around food.

  • Aisle4
    Aisle4 Posts: 24 Member
    shell1005 wrote: »
    Aisle4 wrote: »
    Well I have been addicted to opiates, crack and food. I'm still addicted to food be quite frank with you. I wrote my first response as a mixture of anger sarcasm and real curiosity to what general posters are thinking. The OP did mention it being open to discussion? I have myself began to think food is possibly more dangerous than any illegal drug I have been addicted to, if that shocks you I'm sorry but that's how I feel..there are nights I have spent way too much on food I've lost jobs and opportunities due to binge cycles...sounds absurd you many of you, I read...no I'm not having diet issues either I'll diet all the way down to a weight and safely binge myself back...kinda sounds like when I would try to lower my tolerance to other things to deal w less consequences but still get what I want..I would like to believe people understand that there isn't ONE idea of food abuse..minds..

    As someone who has been in treatment for the behavioral issues I have with food (which to be honest are not as severe as the ones you have described), I would highly encourage you to do the same. It still doesn't make food meet the diagnostic criteria for addiction, but it doesn't diminish that you are not functioning. My life was made significantly better when I met with a professional to deal with my destructive binge patterns.

    As for the anger and sarcasm, I have no interest in engaging in that....that is my boundary. Best of luck to you and I hope you find the peace and treatment you seem to be in need of.

    Thanks. 'Seem to be in need of' hope you still are workin on that passive aggressive behavior in therapy.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Aisle4
    Aisle4 Posts: 24 Member
    susan100df wrote: »
    thorsmom01 wrote: »
    I believe that some use the " food addict" card as an excuse. Its easier for those people to claim they are addicted to candy then to admit they just aren't ready to change . rather then use food as comfort.

    I see many posts like this on MFP regarding addiction to food and/or sugar. It puzzles me because I assume that if someone has bothered to make an account on MFP and post on a forum, they are looking for help to change. I don't think people are looking for "oh poor you, just eat thousands of calories of candy since you can't help it". Maybe some want to be told to have at it but not most. Not if they are on a calorie counting site.

    I think they are looking to talk about how others have overcome bad issues around food. Those discussions are difficult to have on this forum. For some their "help me" post might be the very first time they have ever talked about it. To have the thread go crazy is a disservice to all that have issues around food.

    I was floored and disgusted by many of the posts on this thread, what I disliked even more was some posters had this way of talking like all food abusers are morbidly obese lazy slobs..many sufferers wouldn't even qualify as obese..many not even reaching overweight..therefore these ideas keep people hidden in denial or ashamed of themselves...

    Some sound like a substance abuser has thrown in their face they have no idea? This upsets me that other addicts in recovery would be so cold to another human being and downplay a habit/addiction they have just all around a very disappointing read

  • snikkins
    snikkins Posts: 1,282 Member
    I really hope this thread doesn't get closed now. It's so important to discuss, especially with the indication that no one food is physically addictive but rather a behavioral type of addiction. It just makes so much sense and it makes me sad that it makes people so angry.
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    snikkins wrote: »
    I really hope this thread doesn't get closed now. It's so important to discuss, especially with the indication that no one food is physically addictive but rather a behavioral type of addiction. It just makes so much sense and it makes me sad that it makes people so angry.

    I agree. The discussion on this thread, albeit cleansed, was one of the most rational debates of counter opinions on such a sensitive topic that I've ever seen on these boards. It would be a shame, now that it is bumped and getting some new eyes on it, if it gets closed down because people are misinterpreting frank discussion of behavioral vs physical addiction as people being insulting toward or dismissive of anyone suffering from either a true physical addiction, or the compulsive behavioral habits which can feel very much like an addiction when you are in the throes of them.
  • senecarr
    senecarr Posts: 5,377 Member
    Aisle4 wrote: »
    susan100df wrote: »
    thorsmom01 wrote: »
    I believe that some use the " food addict" card as an excuse. Its easier for those people to claim they are addicted to candy then to admit they just aren't ready to change . rather then use food as comfort.

    I see many posts like this on MFP regarding addiction to food and/or sugar. It puzzles me because I assume that if someone has bothered to make an account on MFP and post on a forum, they are looking for help to change. I don't think people are looking for "oh poor you, just eat thousands of calories of candy since you can't help it". Maybe some want to be told to have at it but not most. Not if they are on a calorie counting site.

    I think they are looking to talk about how others have overcome bad issues around food. Those discussions are difficult to have on this forum. For some their "help me" post might be the very first time they have ever talked about it. To have the thread go crazy is a disservice to all that have issues around food.

    I was floored and disgusted by many of the posts on this thread, what I disliked even more was some posters had this way of talking like all food abusers are morbidly obese lazy slobs..many sufferers wouldn't even qualify as obese..many not even reaching overweight..therefore these ideas keep people hidden in denial or ashamed of themselves...

    Some sound like a substance abuser has thrown in their face they have no idea? This upsets me that other addicts in recovery would be so cold to another human being and downplay a habit/addiction they have just all around a very disappointing read

    Actually, I'm quite floored and disgusted that you're disgusted by the possibility of people who have eating disorders being described as possibly or probably overweight like that's the worst thing in the world.

    Many of the points you missed about addiction is addiction is usually used to describe things that are not just a habit, but also create a physical dependency with painful, sometimes deadly, withdrawal symptoms. Food does not have that, the closest thing you have to food withdrawal is hunger and starvation - symptoms that exist because you are supposed to actually get food in your system to keep yourself alive. You're even inverting the idea of who is downplaying whom.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,426 MFP Moderator
    edited December 2015
    Aisle4 wrote: »
    Well I have been addicted to opiates, crack and food. I'm still addicted to food be quite frank with you. I wrote my first response as a mixture of anger sarcasm and real curiosity to what general posters are thinking. The OP did mention it being open to discussion? I have myself began to think food is possibly more dangerous than any illegal drug I have been addicted to, if that shocks you I'm sorry but that's how I feel..there are nights I have spent way too much on food I've lost jobs and opportunities due to binge cycles...sounds absurd you many of you, I read...no I'm not having diet issues either I'll diet all the way down to a weight and safely binge myself back...kinda sounds like when I would try to lower my tolerance to other things to deal w less consequences but still get what I want..I would like to believe people understand that there isn't ONE idea of food abuse..minds..

    Based on the information i have seen, i would not suggest that food is physically addiction. At the moment, it hasnt been demonstrated in humans. That isnt to discredit that fact that there is a wide variety of binge/esting disorders that can have just as devastating effects. Its also not to say that treatment would be any different either as from what i have seen, parallels exist.

    Can i ask, is there a group of foods or specific foods that you find addictive or have addictive like similarities?
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    @snikkins, I agree. This thread is one of the priceless golden nuggets in this community. I think the subject matter is fascinating.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,426 MFP Moderator
    edited December 2015
    All, keep on topic of addiction. We don't need the comments about potential shut downs and thread cleaning as its just going to cause drama. If there are issues report and thr mods will evaluate.

    Thanks
  • robertw486
    robertw486 Posts: 2,399 Member
    edited December 2015
    I must have missed this the first time around, so I'm glad it got bumped.

    Overall a great thread with the cleaned up stuff gone, so great job on the overall content of discussion and for starting the thread @PeachyCarol There should be more threads like this were people can at least for the most part remain civil and discuss issues and how they related to them without all the absolutes involved.

    And on that note, though there were a number of posts and posters that made great points, the below stuck out to me above all others.

    @Caitwn - just tagging it since it's your post
    Caitwn wrote: »
    I was going to post this separately, but maybe it belongs here. It probably won't interest anyone but me, but I needed to collect my thoughts after reading the research cited below and thought I might as well post it.

    So this food addiction debate is something I struggle with. One reason is that I'm 30 years clean from a drug addiction, and while being a former addict isn't central to my identity, it informs my reaction to people claiming to be addicted to food (I am not talking here about people with diagnosed eating disorders). In a purely emotional way, it bothers me that someone would try to say that their food 'addiction' represents the same sort of hell myself and others went through. I know that's irrational on my part, and it's something I have to be careful about when listening to others' experiences.

    As a mental health professional and researcher in health-related behavior change, it's clear to me that definitive evidence for addiction to foods simply doesn't exist. And the web of behaviors and thoughts that my clients with eating disorders struggle with is far more complex than "omg I'm addicted to sugar".

    BUT...and here's the place where I've struggled...in a small subset of friends and clients, not all of whom are obese/overweight, and none of whom have eating disorders, there is no question that there are what I'd consider to be "markers" of addiction in their food-related behaviors and thought patterns. So I've followed the research, trying to find a way to categorize what I've observed in a way that makes sense, is respectful of their experiences, and allows me to offer meaningful help.

    It seemed to me that food "addiction" was more about the compulsive aspect of eating than about specific foods, but the overlap with Binge Eating Disorder made this murky territory. The research on cyclic restriction/binge patterns that Carol references above came closer to describing what food addiction may be, but for me it misses the larger picture (and frankly, a lot of the rodent-based studies haven't translated well to human modeling in this particular area of research).

    I may have found a concept that works, though - at least for me. It's summarized in this 2014 research review by scientists in the Integrated Neurobiology of Food Intake, Addiction, and Stress consortium and published in the November 2014 edition of Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews: “Eating addiction", rather than “food addiction”, better captures addictive-like eating behavior.

    Link here: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763414002140

    Personally and professionally, I can accept the label of "eating addiction" rather than "food addiction". I still believe far too many people (frankly, the majority of those claiming to be food "addicts") apply the "addiction" label to themselves when they're really just talking about the fact that they eat too much and need to stop it. But within that larger group is the much smaller subset of folks who have always left me feeling concerned, because when they are able to articulate their experiences, it sure as hell sounds like addiction to me.

    Highlights from the article:
    • Evidence for addiction to specific macronutrients is lacking in humans.
    • “Eating addiction” describes a behavioral addiction.
    • An “eating addiction” is not necessarily associated with obesity.
    • Obesity prevention strategies should focus on “eating addiction”.
    • Consider “eating addiction” as a disorder in DSM-5 “Non-Substance-Related Disorders”.


    First, I thought this was a great post and insight, and as such would gladly invalidate your feelings on the entire first paragraph. I hope you don't find any offense in that.

    Based on the above I'd venture to say that quite a few people here on the forums may have been diagnosed with various eating disorders if they hadn't tackled the issues themselves and instead gone to seek professional help. Maybe they were never diagnosed, but got help with ending the behaviors that were unhealthy in regards to eating, maybe they struggle to maintain but found a way to at least cope or control their behaviors and/or disordered relationships with food if such a thing existed. Maybe they continue to just fool themselves and should seek professional help.

    But at the end of the day, for the people that are affected, what difference does a dictionary definition, a clinical diagnosis, or just a personal wake up make regarding the changes that a person needs to make? Especially when the person making changes has a whole host of options and/or assistance levels in making that change? The world certainly wouldn't become devoid of issues if nobody was around to diagnose them, and as we know in many areas of medical sciences the diagnosis and suggested treatments may vary even within a group of trained professionals.

    I'm all for the truth when it comes to helping people, and if or when in a situation where I know someone well enough that I can get through to them I have no problem giving them the "tough love" truth approach. But only within my knowledge base and understanding, not beyond. And to be honest, I see a lot of people on these forums that are overstepping bounds of that, often suggesting things that even a well trained professional would not diagnose without a much better and more in depth interview of a person first. To suggest things such as eating disorders, behavioral issues involving denial, lack of willpower, lack of self love, etc.... I think that is much better left to the professionals to hash out. And it's tricky for a lot of them too.

    I've been through enough of my own crap that if I feel a person really needs professional help, I'm going to gently suggest it as an option, and I'm certainly not going to try to shove a non professional online diagnosis down their throat, especially if it attaches a stigma of mental health related disorder. And even though most posts here regarding say sugar probably fall within lesser diagnosis, we would have no idea who just has a minor issue they can resolve themselves, and who might fall into the category Caitwn describes above and have much more serious issues.


    I think it's great that so many people could express their personal struggles with food or other behavioral and addiction issues here. It's great cleansing for the person and helps others overcome the stigma often attached to some of those things. During my time accepting and dealing with my PTSD, I've spent a decent bit of time in groups that include a lot of addicts and people dealing with various disorders. And one important lesson that I've learned is that I can only look in my own mirror and pass judgement. I can't look in the mirror of another and understand their struggles. I must accept that they are different than my own, and let those people make their own decisions on how to deal with them.
  • Psychgrrl
    Psychgrrl Posts: 3,177 Member
    edited December 2015
    I just had this discussion with my sister about my nephew over the Christmas holiday, whom she feels has an internet addiction. Like food addiction, it is not a clinically diagnosable disorder. It is not in the DSM V. The APA has recommended further research on internet addiction to see if it needs to be added in a future edition of the DSM. Though adding to the "Non-Substance Related Disorders list will be a bit more difficult now, I think, as the criteria for diagnosis is now a combined list for abuse and dependency--they were previously two separate lists.
    • In all honesty, I think part of her perception is due to comparisons to how she was as a child (we didn't hole up in our rooms--there was no internet, and no cable when she was a kid) as well as how she is now. She is a huge extrovert and loves being around people all the time and has a hard time understanding why everyone's not like her. My nephew has a lovely gaming system and friends all over the world, his own TV and a mini-fridge in his room. He doesn't need to leave. :smiley: We can get caught up how we think things should be because of our own frame of reference for who we are or who we want to be. Or what we want for other people.

    That doesn't mean there aren't some unhealthy habits around my nephew's internet use. Just like there are some problematic ways people use food. There are scales developed to assess the behaviors around both of those things.

    Working with people who have been or are suffering from clinical substance abuse/dependency, I do get concerned with the casual way we toss around the word "addicted." It changes the way we societally perceive those conditions and I think referring to cupcakes, Doritos Swedish Fish and other foods as an addiction minimizes the seriousness and tenacity of the substances that are clinical addictions including BED (please note, gambling has been added to the DSM V). But it doesn't appear as though people are talking about addiction through the lens of BED.

    Someone earlier in the thread asked (I think--it was quite a few pages back and i was reading this thread when it began and when it was resurrected. :smile:) what the difference is between something like alcohol dependency and food addiction. One of the things making the addictions, well, addictions, is the lengths people go to fulfill/maintain them. Someone may eat a lot of Junior Mints. But are they not paying rent so they can buy their Junior Mints? Are they going into debt to buy Junior Mints? Are they stealing to buy Junior Mints? Or stealing Junior Mints? Are they not seeing friends and family so they don't have to risk people asking them why they're always eating Junior Mints? Are they in danger of losing their job because they spend their time at work eating Junior Mints? Probably not. (And please note I'm leaving out the entire chemical dependency issue--just focusing on behaviors.) That doesn't mean they shouldn't cut down on their Junior Mint eating. Eating a lot of Junior Mints may be happening because of one or more other problems.

    People in this thread have already said it, there are reasons we have unhealthy behaviors, especially around food. Learning why we are acting the way we are and changing those patterns only happens when we're ready and willing. Some people need help changing their behavior. Some don't. One method's not better than the other--it's the destination, not the journey that matters. :blush:

    Edited to fix typos. :grimace:
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Aisle4 wrote: »
    Well I have been addicted to opiates, crack and food. I'm still addicted to food be quite frank with you.


    Sorry, no such thing as being addicted to food. What substance do you think you are addicted to?

    You may well have an ED, that doesn't require addiction and is a serious problem.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    I'd like to reiterate a point I made in the first post regarding restriction.

    We're coming up on the New Year. A lot of people are going to want to resolve to give up sugar.

    The symposium on food addiction and the research on eating addiction point to the underpinnings of behavioral addiction in the subset of people who have true addiction being based in binge/restrict cycles.

    If someone is resolving to give up sugar or carbs or pizza or whatever because they think they're addicted, it might not be the best approach since it could be feeding the whole cycle it seeks to eliminate.

    The underlying cause of the behavior will still be there. It was for me. In my earlier post, I told how I started overeating different foods when I restricted one group of foods.

    There were also times in my past where I resolved to never eat brownies, chips, cookies... again. They all led to eating pans of brownies, bags of chips, boxes of cookies. I am not unfamiliar with binge (colloquial use of the term)/restrict.

    It wasn't until getting at using food as a soother, a comforter, a companion, a crutch -- that I was able to deal with it properly.

    I am not saying that there are not people out there who don't have very real and serious issues beyond the self-help I experienced. Some people genuinely have eating addiction. They, I believe, are a small subset of all the people who struggle with food, though.

    That's not to say that each person's struggle isn't daunting to them. I know how hard it can be. It's taken me 40 years to get this right!

    I'm just hoping to provide food for thought to those resolving to "give up xyz" because they're "addicted". Maybe think about digging a little deeper while you're giving up the food. Because it's really not about the food. And restriction could be perpetuating an addiction cycle if you're in that small subset of people with a true eating addiction.

    Smart post. I have benefitted from Jan resolutions and challenges, but only because I knew it was a temporary thing and didn't buy into the good/bad dichotomy.
  • gothomson
    gothomson Posts: 215 Member
    Great article ! I cant say I was addicted to food but I certainly used food / drink to get through difficulties I had in my life; I would just binge eat or drink.

    When I started getting healthy, watching my weight, logging food and drink and exercise regularly I felt different.

    I started to noticed that when I was down and angry about something that happened, I'd eat or drink. Now I go to the gym and have a really hard work out. I didn't catch on to the change till one time it occurred to me that - jokingly that "I should get upset more, that was a great work out!" After a while I noticed how I'd changed my mind set, I realised what I do different now; if I'm upset I go exercise, before it was 5 - 6 pints and a curry, or mope in front of the TV.

    I realised then that I used food and drink as a comfort, and I don't now. So I don't think its the food that addictive but the mind-set plays a part.

    Anyway that's just my personal view, based on my experience, so I'm not claiming authority on this but just giving an example of how one can get in a funk and it's hard to get out of it. One on the side effect I have found with a healthy lifestyle is a more positive feeling about myself, and as side effects go that's a pretty good one!
  • Therealobi1
    Therealobi1 Posts: 3,262 Member
    Caitwn wrote: »
    I think this thread can be tremendously useful as a way to think through all of our viewpoints and experiences, whether we ultimately agree or not.

    Speaking just for myself, I finally sorted out a way to be comfortable with the "addiction" terminology, as I just didn't want to spend time here in the endless cycle of (a) seeing someone label themselves a food addict, (b) informing them that they aren't addicted to food, (c) dealing with the fact that they understandably get defensive about that, and (d) seeing yet another thread moderated into oblivion along with the distribution of pointless warnings.

    I still don't believe food is addictive because to date there is simply no evidence pointing to that fact. BUT - there IS good evidence indicating that people can get trapped in a behavioral addiction to the act of eating itself.

    That works for me conceptually, because it removes the need to debate whether any specific food group is the supposed culprit, it acknowledges the fact that people can and do use eating behaviors for some of the very same reasons that addicts use drugs, and it also acknowledges the fact that breaking those patterns of dependence on the behavior is challenging as hell.

    So yes, I still twitch when I see someone say they're "addicted" to sugar or carbs or M&Ms or cheddar popcorn or...whatever. But when I keep the "eating addiction" concept in my mind, I can be a lot more gentle when I engage that person in discussion - because the challenges and possible solutions to the issue are all congruent with what we know about addiction. And I can focus on that rather than confronting the person about their choice of words and ending up in a derailed conversation that doesn't end up being helpful.

    I think that's a good approach. Hopefully after time the person will realise they weren't addicted to sugar etc
    Telling them in a post they are being silly etc isn't useful
  • Aisle4
    Aisle4 Posts: 24 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    Aisle4 wrote: »
    Well I have been addicted to opiates, crack and food. I'm still addicted to food be quite frank with you.


    Sorry, no such thing as being addicted to food. What substance do you think you are addicted to?

    You may well have an ED, that doesn't require addiction and is a serious problem.

    Yeah, it's a controversial issue and Yale has a scale for food addiction. You cannot just sit there and type to strangers online 'sorry you do not have a food addiction'

    http://fastlab.psych.lsa.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/MeuleGearhardt_FiveYearsoftheYaleFoodAddictionScale-TakingStockMovingForward_2014.pdf
  • Aisle4
    Aisle4 Posts: 24 Member
    edited December 2015
    senecarr wrote: »
    Aisle4 wrote: »
    susan100df wrote: »
    thorsmom01 wrote: »
    I believe that some use the " food addict" card as an excuse. Its easier for those people to claim they are addicted to candy then to admit they just aren't ready to change . rather then use food as comfort.

    I see many posts like this on MFP regarding addiction to food and/or sugar. It puzzles me because I assume that if someone has bothered to make an account on MFP and post on a forum, they are looking for help to change. I don't think people are looking for "oh poor you, just eat thousands of calories of candy since you can't help it". Maybe some want to be told to have at it but not most. Not if they are on a calorie counting site.

    I think they are looking to talk about how others have overcome bad issues around food. Those discussions are difficult to have on this forum. For some their "help me" post might be the very first time they have ever talked about it. To have the thread go crazy is a disservice to all that have issues around food.

    I was floored and disgusted by many of the posts on this thread, what I disliked even more was some posters had this way of talking like all food abusers are morbidly obese lazy slobs..many sufferers wouldn't even qualify as obese..many not even reaching overweight..therefore these ideas keep people hidden in denial or ashamed of themselves...

    Some sound like a substance abuser has thrown in their face they have no idea? This upsets me that other addicts in recovery would be so cold to another human being and downplay a habit/addiction they have just all around a very disappointing read

    Actually, I'm quite floored and disgusted that you're disgusted by the possibility of people who have eating disorders being described as possibly or probably overweight like that's the worst thing in the world.

    Many of the points you missed about addiction is addiction is usually used to describe things that are not just a habit, but also create a physical dependency with painful, sometimes deadly, withdrawal symptoms. Food does not have that, the closest thing you have to food withdrawal is hunger and starvation - symptoms that exist because you are supposed to actually get food in your system to keep yourself alive. You're even inverting the idea of who is downplaying whom.

    HA you're funny! Food addiction causes diabetes, slow colons, constipation (to a point of becoming septic), acid reflux, ulcers, dental problems, and a myriad of other life threatening issues.