Is your BMI "normal" now?
Options
mommarnurse
Posts: 515 Member
Well, is it?. There's more to being healthy than the BMI number which only takes into account two factors: height and weight. After losing 91 lbs, (5'3 Female) I'm at 144ish and I keep feeling sort of guilty for going to maint and not seeing to it that I get to a "normal" BMI (which would be 140 lbs at the high end) but I know I'm large framed with a good amt of muscle. Was it a normal BMI that told you to stop losing or something else?
0
Replies
-
My BMI is in the middle at 21.5, more important for me was my waist circumference , at an overweight BMI and even in the top end of normal my waist was 80cm , my Dr said this was too much , Also I am much happier being smaller as having a small/medium frame I was still carrying a lot of extra fat with a BMI of 24.
BMI is a good starting point , but where you end up is up to you0 -
Nope, it's actually about 10 pounds into the overweight measurement. However, DXA scans show that my body fat is a couple points below average so I have that going for me, which is nice.0
-
My BMI is 21.6, so yeah I guess so. I still want to lose 2 inches from my waist. It's 28 inches, I want 26 inches. I do have a ton of loose skin though which may be contributing.0
-
What encourages me to lose weight is how I feel, would I like to be leaner at this moment in time? BMI means nothing to me as it was only meant for a general view of populations, not individual people.
My BMI is currently 23.5, it's the leanest I've been in a while and I'm in no way uphappy with it. I'm gaining weight this year which will probably take me over. I've never been in the "overweight" category before (highest being 24.9) It will be interesting to see as I'll be working on building muscle in that time also.0 -
Anyone performing weight training to any decent level will never have normal bmi.
Bmi only measures weight vs height and doesn't take into consideration muscle and other factors.0 -
I'm 14ish pounds under the limit for overweight, but honestly have no intention of getting close to that again. It really depends a lot on your genetics too, I have thin arms and legs but everything is in my midsection, so 14 extra pounds there = NOPE. But I know some women who have more muscle and whose fat is proportioned on their body and they look just fine at 150 pounds.0
-
Mine is, but just barely. I went into maintenance mode when I was still in overweight BMI territory, and I was totally fine with that. It's only because I've dropped a couple more pounds while trying to find my maintenance calorie goal that I'm in normal territory.
I agree that BMI means little to nothing for anyone who does much in the way of lifting weights. Waist to hip ratio is probably a more meaningful measurement for everybody (and especially for those who lift).0 -
Mine is, but just barely. I went into maintenance mode when I was still in overweight BMI territory, and I was totally fine with that. It's only because I've dropped a couple more pounds while trying to find my maintenance calorie goal that I'm in normal territory.
I agree that BMI means little to nothing for anyone who does much in the way of lifting weights. Waist to hip ratio is probably a more meaningful measurement for everybody (and especially for those who lift).
I'm screwed then, considering I have a large ribcage/waist, even though there isn't that much fat left on it...0 -
Just about, I got into "healthy" at 24.8 on Christmas day but it's slipped to 25.1 since.
It was 31 and I was in the "obese" category when I started on here in May. My original goal was to get into the healthy range, I now want to build up a bit of a safety factor and lose a bit more.
91 pounds is a great loss mommanurse well done, I've only lost 44 and the difference that has made is enormous.
0 -
Iroblloyd89 wrote: »Anyone performing weight training to any decent level will never have normal bmi.
Bmi only measures weight vs height and doesn't take into consideration muscle and other factors.
I lift heavy a lot and have a "normal" bmi0 -
Mine's on the high side of normal. I know BMI based on height and weight isn't reliable but it is nice to see the number dropping.
To illustrate what a few people have stated:
0 -
I think that it is just another "piece of data" that gives us a bit of information. Mine is normal, but I lost weight to feel more energetic and to keep up with the teens I teach!!!0
-
Barely. I'm on the top end of the normal side, but I'm very happy. I love my body composition of having some curves and some slight muscle tone. These two will make the scale heavier. I'm okay with that.
However I never went by the scale. I measure myself often to make sure my waist and hips stay in a certain range, I want to be able to walk/jog for at least 4 miles non-stop without being tired or sore and I go by the way I look and feel especially in a bikini.
2016 will be my 3rd year maintaining pretty easily with no major weight fluctuations so I'm going to keep what I am doing.0 -
My BMI is around 22. I also use this site: http://www.scientificpsychic.com/fitness/diet.html which measures percentage of body fat, and waist-height ratio and lean body mass. It takes into account your measurements as well as your weight. Based on this site, while my BMI is 22 - right in the middle of normal, my body fat % is 21 which the low end of fit, and very close to athletic. So, I like more than one measurement to give a clearer picture.0
-
Same position as the op here. I'm 5ft9in and holding steady at 175, still in the overweight relm. Considering getting the dxa scan done so l can figure out if I'm still fat or just large framed /muscled. I lost 100lbs this year and got enough loose skin I can't really tell.0
-
No, mine is still in the over weight range, only by one point but still not "normal"0
-
yea mine is at the top of normal now
im good with that0 -
I really thought BMI was a load of you know what. Thought that for years. Then I got from 210 to 160 and maintained easily. 160 is the very top of my "normal" range, which does go as low as 118. At the lower end of that range I would be a bag of bones! I have issues with jackets as my shoulders can never move in a medium never mind a small even though the rest of me could manage it. End up like a penguin if I purchase smaller than a large. Wide shoulders, wide hips as well and very much an hourglass shape, I am in my normal range now at 150. Goal is 135-140 and then continue to work on muscle mass. I won't much care what my BMI is as long as my body stays within a size or two with the muscle addition.0
-
singingflutelady wrote: »
Iroblloyd89 wrote: »Anyone performing weight training to any decent level will never have normal bmi.
Bmi only measures weight vs height and doesn't take into consideration muscle and other factors.
I lift heavy a lot and have a "normal" bmi
Yeah sorry I should of probably aimed this more towards males0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 397 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 975 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions