Running with short legs?
Options
Replies
-
I'm 5'2", and have just eased myself into running. I ran my first uninterrupted mile yesterday in 8:58, and finished 3 miles with a 10:20 pace. This would have been inconceivable to me even a few months ago.
So don't worry, it gets easier.0 -
Honestly, your height doesn't matter that much. Desiree Linden, one of the top female long-distance runners in North America, is only 5'2" and she just qualified for the US Olympic marathon team again. I don't know much about the science of it but I do believe the smaller/lighter factor helps offset a possibly shorter stride as you suggested.
I think for sprint-type events it might be different, but not so much for distance.
+1
being shorter is better for distance running!
Being tall is only good for sprinting and the field events of track and field. For example, tall high jumpers are usually more successful!0 -
I used to feel like this too! Before, I thought it was difficult to get up to 4.5 MPH and now I can go for 15 minutes at 7 or 8 MPH. I have a short inseam, I'm only 4' 11" so I feel your pain. It's all about the stride. Focus on taking big strides, it helps a lot and helps you not get exhausted early on.0
-
At 5', I love walking outside or on an indoor track, but hate the treadmill. Walking is a very meditative and relaxing experience. I prefer to space out, so the mental effort required to not fall off of a treadmill (though minimal) makes the experience irritating. It might not be so bad if I could rest my hand on the bar, but it is typically set at about shoulder height for me. I wonder if people with long legs feel constricted by the size of the running area. I also prefer to go whatever speed I please without thinking about it, so coming out of my stupor to fuss with the settings is a turn-off.0
-
Yeah... I am 4 foot 11 inches. I relate. A lot.0
-
-
MeanderingMammal wrote: »
Yeah, Mo was just the first that sprang to my mind because he's a man, so that really is noticeably short. As a woman runner I'm used to practically all my team-mates being my height (5'4) or smaller.0 -
scorpio516 wrote: »Honestly, your height doesn't matter that much. Desiree Linden, one of the top female long-distance runners in North America, is only 5'2" and she just qualified for the US Olympic marathon team again. I don't know much about the science of it but I do believe the smaller/lighter factor helps offset a possibly shorter stride as you suggested.
I think for sprint-type events it might be different, but not so much for distance.
+1
being shorter is better for distance running!
Being tall is only good for sprinting and the field events of track and field. For example, tall high jumpers are usually more successful!
Not sure about that. I went to school with a guy that won a bronze medal in the 100m Olympics and he was my height. He always used to beat taller people. It's about turnover as well not just height.
As for the treadmill, I always feel like I might fall off as well if I go to fast. At least on an elliptical I know that balance is part of it.
0 -
meganridenour wrote: »Gianfranco_R wrote: »Sweet13_Princess wrote: »Wow! Thanks for all of the feedback. Based on what some of you have said, I wonder if shorter people burn more calories then? I mean, if we're having to take more strides to make up for shorter legs, wouldn't the calorie burn be higher? This really makes me curious, but also makes me laugh a little at myself.*LOL*
Shannon
only weight and distance matter.
Here is the formula:
http://www.runnersworld.com/weight-loss/how-many-calories-are-you-really-burning
Out of curiosity, who here has used this formula and been successful eating back those calories while still losing weight? Or maintaining. Depending on goal?
This has been what I've been using lately and yes it seems to be accurate. It's a lot lower/more conservative than a lot of other online calculators/MFP and even my HRM give me. Prior experience seems to indicate the other sources were overestimating, and this seems to be more accurate based on what I would expect to lose.
To the OP - don't worry, you'll get faster the more you train. Also get outside! Dreadmills don't let you use your natural gait and force you to a constant pace. I'm always really slow when I start out, 15 minute-miles, no joke, and I am a little taller than you at 5'4". Speed comes with time/endurance/training.0 -
peaceout_aly wrote: »I used to feel like this too! Before, I thought it was difficult to get up to 4.5 MPH and now I can go for 15 minutes at 7 or 8 MPH. I have a short inseam, I'm only 4' 11" so I feel your pain. It's all about the stride. Focus on taking big strides, it helps a lot and helps you not get exhausted early on.
This may work for you, but I would not recommend over-striding. Your foot should be landing below your hip. I developed a lot of hip problems when I was trying to overcompensate for my short legs this way ( I am 5'1 with a 28in inseam)0 -
Contrary to popular belief, being short makes you more suited to running . Look at the elite runners. Paula Radcliffe is an anomaly at 5'9". Also , height has nothing to do with burning calories0
-
I'm just short enough that most elliptical machines have much to wide a stance for me and I feel like I'm going to fall over... as for running, I always feel like that but never thought it could be my height.
I have the same problem with the elliptical that is why I am now prefer the ARC. I can control the stance much better and get a good workout. I don't run, I never did because I don't like it and now my knees will not allow it, but I am a fast walker for my short legs and my stride is small. I am only 4' 11", so I can't expect much.0 -
catnap1996 wrote: »Contrary to popular belief, being short makes you more suited to running . Look at the elite runners. Paula Radcliffe is an anomaly at 5'9". Also , height has nothing to do with burning calories
Not directly but indirectly if you are focused on the optimum weight for your height.0 -
im 5'1 and on my best day can do a 12 min mile.
but i also dont really consider myself a runner LOLOL0 -
catnap1996 wrote: »Contrary to popular belief, being short makes you more suited to running . Look at the elite runners. Paula Radcliffe is an anomaly at 5'9". Also , height has nothing to do with burning calories
The elite regional runners here top out 5'11"...0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 393 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 937 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions