Natural sugars
10ssmith
Posts: 33 Member
Foods that contain natural sugars such as grapes . Are they okay to eat while staying in your calorie limit? Like how much is a bad thing ? Do I need to watch sugar intake as a whole ?
1
Replies
-
Sugar is sugar, naturally occurring or added. Obviously foods with naturally occurring sugar probably have more nutrients then foods with lots of added sugar but none of that matters as far as weight loss is concerned. To lose weight maintaining your calorie deficit is what matters. It's fine to eat any sugar containing food you want provided it fits your calorie and macronutrient goals and helps you maintain a balanced diet rich in micronutrients. This includes eating minimally nutritious foods with added sugar in moderation providing you still get enough nutritious food as well.6
-
Natural sugars are great, and they're especially needed if you're doing weight training or other rigorous exercise. People tend to look at carbohydrates as bad, but the good carbs such as fruit, brown rice, whole grain bread, etc, are vital for developing muscle. What's truly important is WHEN to eat your carbs. You want to center intake around your workouts so your muscles don't get taxed as much and you'll recover faster. On days that you don't workout, you'll want to keep the carb intake lower, but take in more good fats like avocados, nuts, etc. A good starting point would be 40/40/20: 40% calories from protien, 40% Carbs, 20% good fats. Just keep learning and keep pushing!2
-
Give me all the natural sugars... Mmm! It's totally fine to eat them, I eat them mostly every day.0
-
This content has been removed.
-
Foods that contain natural sugars such as grapes . 1)Are they okay to eat while staying in your calorie limit? 2)Like how much is a bad thing ? 3)Do I need to watch sugar intake as a whole ?
1) Yes, as are all sugars. As long as you are within your calorie goal, sugar intake does not matter.
2) So much that it puts you over your calorie goal.
3) Newp (excluding issues surrounding diabetes).1 -
Why don't grape nuts taste like grapes? I limit my fruit and juices.1
-
With in limit and natural as in fruits, that's fine. Raw or processed sugars always bad no matter what. Not science but my personal guide line.0
-
Natural sugars are great, and they're especially needed if you're doing weight training or other rigorous exercise. People tend to look at carbohydrates as bad, but the good carbs such as fruit, brown rice, whole grain bread, etc, are vital for developing muscle. What's truly important is WHEN to eat your carbs. You want to center intake around your workouts so your muscles don't get taxed as much and you'll recover faster. On days that you don't workout, you'll want to keep the carb intake lower, but take in more good fats like avocados, nuts, etc. A good starting point would be 40/40/20: 40% calories from protien, 40% Carbs, 20% good fats. Just keep learning and keep pushing!
Also macro ratios are very outdated and not optimal for most people. Macros should be based around weight and goals not a cookie cutter ratio. Using ratios you are saying a 300 lb man and a 135 lb women require the same ratio of protein, carbs, and fats. They usually do not. A much better approach is to find your calorie goal based on your TDEE, eat 0.6-0.8 grams of protein per lb you weigh minimum (lower end if overweight/obese, higher end if lean) 0.3-0.5 grams of fat per lb you weigh minimum, and fill the remaining calories as you see fit (usually with carbs). That is more personally tailored than a simple one size fits all ratio.
5 -
With in limit and natural as in fruits, that's fine. Raw or processed sugars always bad no matter what. Not science but my personal guide line.
I bolded the important part.
FYI, the sugar in fruit is sucrose, glucose and fructose. "Raw or processed" sugar is sucrose, glucose and fructose.
They are the exact same substance, even on the molecular level.
Neither are bad for you.5 -
I quit tracking sugar and track fiber instead.6
-
Sure, they are fine. The only thing with sugar is not to eat too much (this is the thing with food as a whole) and not to let it crowd out the other things you need. Foods that naturally contain sugar (like fruits and veg) often contain fiber as well, and that's one of the other things that's good to get, and of course micronutrients. Beyond that, you want a reasonable amount of fat and enough protein, so I'd say just make sure you aren't eating so much you don't go over calories, don't have an overall balanced diet, and are also getting enough protein and healthy fats.0
-
-
As long as it doesn't cause you to 1. go over your calories consistently, or 2. take away from other important nutrients (like protein), then I wouldn't stress it.1
-
In all of the years that I've been training, studying and helping people; I've found that giving out long, exhaustive explanations about how and why certain things shouldn't be done, only serves to intimidate them and does more negative than positive. I'm familiar with the information you've provided, but I can only speak from my own personal experiences. I understand that all experiences are different, and different macro and micro nutrients are going to be required for people depending on goals, weight, gender, body type, genetics, etc. This is the reason I kept the explanation short, and provided a sort-of template information for doing something in the immediate while also answering simply that fruit sugars aren't a negative. This is also the reason I included the qualifier "keep learning," because there many schools of thought on this particular subject, and it's important for everyone to find what works for them.
0 -
In all of the years that I've been training, studying and helping people; I've found that giving out long, exhaustive explanations about how and why certain things shouldn't be done, only serves to intimidate them and does more negative than positive. I'm familiar with the information you've provided, but I can only speak from my own personal experiences. I understand that all experiences are different, and different macro and micro nutrients are going to be required for people depending on goals, weight, gender, body type, genetics, etc. This is the reason I kept the explanation short, and provided a sort-of template information for doing something in the immediate while also answering simply that fruit sugars aren't a negative. This is also the reason I included the qualifier "keep learning," because there many schools of thought on this particular subject, and it's important for everyone to find what works for them.
That's fine except that most of what you posted was either a) unhelpful or b) flat out incorrect.7 -
In all of the years that I've been training, studying and helping people; I've found that giving out long, exhaustive explanations about how and why certain things shouldn't be done, only serves to intimidate them and does more negative than positive. I'm familiar with the information you've provided, but I can only speak from my own personal experiences. I understand that all experiences are different, and different macro and micro nutrients are going to be required for people depending on goals, weight, gender, body type, genetics, etc. This is the reason I kept the explanation short, and provided a sort-of template information for doing something in the immediate while also answering simply that fruit sugars aren't a negative. This is also the reason I included the qualifier "keep learning," because there many schools of thought on this particular subject, and it's important for everyone to find what works for them.6
-
Carlos_421 wrote: »With in limit and natural as in fruits, that's fine. Raw or processed sugars always bad no matter what. Not science but my personal guide line.
I bolded the important part.
FYI, the sugar in fruit is sucrose, glucose and fructose. "Raw or processed" sugar is sucrose, glucose and fructose.
They are the exact same substance, even on the molecular level.
Neither are bad for you.
Sugar is not bad for you, the soft drink companies will be relieved to hear that. (pushing fresh fruit bowl away and pouring a COKE)0 -
Carlos_421 wrote: »With in limit and natural as in fruits, that's fine. Raw or processed sugars always bad no matter what. Not science but my personal guide line.
I bolded the important part.
FYI, the sugar in fruit is sucrose, glucose and fructose. "Raw or processed" sugar is sucrose, glucose and fructose.
They are the exact same substance, even on the molecular level.
Neither are bad for you.
Sugar is not bad for you, the soft drink companies will be relieved to hear that. (pushing fresh fruit bowl away and pouring a COKE)
2 -
This content has been removed.
-
Carlos_421 wrote: »With in limit and natural as in fruits, that's fine. Raw or processed sugars always bad no matter what. Not science but my personal guide line.
I bolded the important part.
FYI, the sugar in fruit is sucrose, glucose and fructose. "Raw or processed" sugar is sucrose, glucose and fructose.
They are the exact same substance, even on the molecular level.
Neither are bad for you.
Sugar is not bad for you, the soft drink companies will be relieved to hear that. (pushing fresh fruit bowl away and pouring a COKE)
As long as you get enough protein, fat and fiber without exceeding calories, there is absolutely nothing unhealthy about having sugar, whether from Coke, Mt Dew, Snickers, apples, gummy bears or plums so drink up.
Now go see if you can actually find a single peer reviewed study that shows sugar to be bad for you (assuming you're not diabetic) beyond "sugar has a lot of calories."
Hint: no such study exists.
Just because a popular opinion has been ingrained into society doesn't make it a fact. (pro tip: picking up a baby bird will not cause the mother to reject it)
Just because you've always thought of sugar as a bad thing doesn't mean it's actually bad for you.2 -
In all of the years that I've been training, studying and helping people; I've found that giving out long, exhaustive explanations about how and why certain things shouldn't be done, only serves to intimidate them and does more negative than positive. I'm familiar with the information you've provided, but I can only speak from my own personal experiences. I understand that all experiences are different, and different macro and micro nutrients are going to be required for people depending on goals, weight, gender, body type, genetics, etc. This is the reason I kept the explanation short, and provided a sort-of template information for doing something in the immediate while also answering simply that fruit sugars aren't a negative. This is also the reason I included the qualifier "keep learning," because there many schools of thought on this particular subject, and it's important for everyone to find what works for them.
I'm quite certain the original person who posted this inquiry didn't see my answer in any way as insulting her intelligence. I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. And yes, I would strongly advise again basing everything someone does on some "study" they see because the information is constantly changing, and what is gospel one day is junk science the next, as you demonstrated by saying the information I gave was "outdated." Everyone is different, and what works for some people may not work for others.1 -
In for teaching @vismal how to help people.
5 -
In all of the years that I've been training, studying and helping people; I've found that giving out long, exhaustive explanations about how and why certain things shouldn't be done, only serves to intimidate them and does more negative than positive. I'm familiar with the information you've provided, but I can only speak from my own personal experiences. I understand that all experiences are different, and different macro and micro nutrients are going to be required for people depending on goals, weight, gender, body type, genetics, etc. This is the reason I kept the explanation short, and provided a sort-of template information for doing something in the immediate while also answering simply that fruit sugars aren't a negative. This is also the reason I included the qualifier "keep learning," because there many schools of thought on this particular subject, and it's important for everyone to find what works for them.
I'm quite certain the original person who posted this inquiry didn't see my answer in any way as insulting her intelligence. I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. And yes, I would strongly advise again basing everything someone does on some "study" they see because the information is constantly changing, and what is gospel one day is junk science the next, as you demonstrated by saying the information I gave was "outdated." Everyone is different, and what works for some people may not work for others.
Studies do not constantly change what is gospel and what is junk as you state. What research does is take things like carbohydrate timing, which was never supported by anything other than expert opinion and anecdote and prove that it actually makes little to no difference on results. The same is true of macronutrient ratios. Those were never supported by research. So the research didn't change what was true and what wasn't, it just proved certain long held beliefs were not supported by evidence.
7 -
If you don't have any problems with sugar (ie. diabetes) then I wouldn't worry about it. I would weigh them and log them and as long as they fit into your calorie goal then it is fine. I never worry about natural sugars and I don't really worry about added sugars either.1
-
I do believe sugar is a problem. Simple or complex carbohydrates turn into sugar in the body. In fact, a slice of whole wheat bread causes higher glycemic reaction than white flour bread.
New, and also old research long buried but now revived strongly suggests that sugar is the culprit in the great increase diabetes, heart and cancer issues, etc., because of the inflammation all carbohydrates cause.
As for fructose, including "natural" raw honey and agave that so many health food places use, is one of the worse sugars.
A quote from Maria Emmerich
"The only organ in your body that can take up fructose is your liver. The first thing that eating fructose does is causing an increase in uric acid. Fructose inhibits nitric oxide, which would otherwise reduce our blood pressure.
This is why fructose is famous for causing hypertension (high blood pressure).
Fructose also initiates what’s known as lipogenesis, excess fat production. And the third thing that fructose does in the liver is it initiates an enzyme that inhibits our insulin receptors. That means your insulin levels all over your body have to rise…causing a whole slew of problems, including weight gain.Between 1970 and 2003 our average consumption of fructose increased from less than half a pound per year to 56 pounds per year. We were never designed to take in so much fructose. Even some natural sweeteners have lots of fructose. From 90 to 97 percent of the sugar in agave nectar is fructose. Up to half of the sugar in some varieties of honey is fructose."
You may want to do your own research on sugar, to get an answer that satisfies your concerns.
1 -
I do believe sugar is a problem. Simple or complex carbohydrates turn into sugar in the body. In fact, a slice of whole wheat bread causes higher glycemic reaction than white flour bread.
New, and also old research long buried but now revived strongly suggests that sugar is the culprit in the great increase diabetes, heart and cancer issues, etc., because of the inflammation all carbohydrates cause.
As for fructose, including "natural" raw honey and agave that so many health food places use, is one of the worse sugars.
A quote from Maria Emmerich
"The only organ in your body that can take up fructose is your liver. The first thing that eating fructose does is causing an increase in uric acid. Fructose inhibits nitric oxide, which would otherwise reduce our blood pressure.
This is why fructose is famous for causing hypertension (high blood pressure).
Fructose also initiates what’s known as lipogenesis, excess fat production. And the third thing that fructose does in the liver is it initiates an enzyme that inhibits our insulin receptors. That means your insulin levels all over your body have to rise…causing a whole slew of problems, including weight gain.Between 1970 and 2003 our average consumption of fructose increased from less than half a pound per year to 56 pounds per year. We were never designed to take in so much fructose. Even some natural sweeteners have lots of fructose. From 90 to 97 percent of the sugar in agave nectar is fructose. Up to half of the sugar in some varieties of honey is fructose."
You may want to do your own research on sugar, to get an answer that satisfies your concerns.
Most of what you are stating is not proven by science. Diabetes is not caused by sugar. In fact, most organizations have accredited the causes of getting diabetes are physical inactivity, genetics and obesity.
Lipogenesis occurs any time after you eat a meals. Insulin is released anytime you eat carbohydrates or protein. So you eat a meal, your body starts to break down food, your pancreas will sense glucose and your body will release insulin to regulate blood sugars. So your body increase enzymes to store fat and inhibit the fat burning hormone (HSL - hormone sensitive lipase). So for a given period, your body will store nutrients and stimulate muscle protein synthesis. So yes, your body creates new fat and builds muscle. At some people, your body will regulate itself and will enter lipolysis (fat burning) as insulin is removed from your system. So overall, your body will cycle between lipogenesis and lipolysis. If your have more time of the later (energy deficit) you will lose weight; as shown below.
So people think, lets minimize insulin since insulin causes the suppression of HSL and induces lipogensis. Well, the bad news is, you have several other hormones/enzymes that can suppress HSL. Dietary fat stimulates Ascylation Stimulating Protein (ASP), which will suppress HSL and stimulate insulin. And if that isn't enough, you have one enzyme that will be stimulated by both carbs and fat and will induce lipogenesis; that is glucose-dependent insulinotrophic peptide (GIP).
The thing is, our bodies are designed to store. You can follow low carb, plant-based, paleo, flexible, or whatever diet you want, at the end of the day, the amount of calories will determine weight status and dietary compliance will determine longevity.5 -
That is a conceptual illustration of diurnal insulin action from a blog, not data. Here's some data :-
1 -
This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions