All calories may not be equal
Replies
-
For me, personally, low cab was far more OCD and stress inducing than weighing food. Weighing food is not a compulsive need for me, just something I prefer to do and find easy. When I tried low carb I was obsessively counting every gram of carb, including carbs in eggs and some cheeses, even coffee - I counted coffee as 1 gram of sugar. I even skipped coffee sometimes in order to be able to have an extra 1/4 of a tomato.5
-
Do people not cook from recipes anymore? Is that not basically basically counting calories? Or is just the input of the food into the app the OCD part?6
-
I admit that I have a layman's grasp of the term, but isn't OCD characterized more by the thought processes behind the actions and the degree to which they affect your ability to live your life? I count calories and use a food scale. I have used a food scale even in maintenance (though I wasn't logging) because I found it easier than measuring cups. That doesn't negatively impact my life.
I have also stressed about what's in food and how to log it to the point that it kept me from socializing and caused me to break into tears in restaurants at times. This happened and was treated before I ever bought a food scale. This was not obsessive compulsive disorder, though. I don't have an official diagnosis, but if anything the symptoms fit better with orthorexia than OCD. It too, though, was far more about the mindset than the actual actions being taken.
tl;dr version: can we maybe step back from internet diagnosing people?12 -
-
diannethegeek wrote: »I admit that I have a layman's grasp of the term, but isn't OCD characterized more by the thought processes behind the actions and the degree to which they affect your ability to live your life? I count calories and use a food scale. I have used a food scale even in maintenance (though I wasn't logging) because I found it easier than measuring cups. That doesn't negatively impact my life.
I have also stressed about what's in food and how to log it to the point that it kept me from socializing and caused me to break into tears in restaurants at times. This happened and was treated before I ever bought a food scale. This was not obsessive compulsive disorder, though. I don't have an official diagnosis, but if anything the symptoms fit better with orthorexia than OCD. It too, though, was far more about the mindset than the actual actions being taken.
tl;dr version: can we maybe step back from internet diagnosing people?
Hey there, don't bring the definition of OCD in here and be all logical about how it affects people. MFP doesn't need that sort of thing. You're being sensible.
15 -
stevencloser wrote: »
Weighing ingredients to make a cake is about consistency of a product since the weight of the exact same volume of flour (needed in the precise chemical reaction that is baking) can be different every time due to factors such as the current humidity. But that is an entirely different conversation.13 -
xjessicaxrx wrote: »I think if a "Newbie" was to read this thread it would scare and put them off straight away! So many judgemental, rude, aggressive people getting their back up!!
I also noticed that a lot of people on here may have developed OCD with weighing and numbers, weighing a pre packaged yogurt haha come on REALLY!
I dont take a food scale out of the house and carry it around with with me, that is just sad.
I have and I am still losing weight just fine.
Wow. Judgmental much?
I have to weigh all my food. My deficit is tiny. If I won't weigh everything, I won't lose any weight. Simple.9 -
gonetothedogs19 wrote: »bethannien wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »xjessicaxrx wrote: »I think if a "Newbie" was to read this thread it would scare and put them off straight away! So many judgemental, rude, aggressive people getting their back up!!
I also noticed that a lot of people on here may have developed OCD with weighing and numbers, weighing a pre packaged yogurt haha come on REALLY!
I dont take a food scale out of the house and carry it around with with me, that is just sad.
I have and I am still losing weight just fine.
I was really stunned to learn that people take the yogurt out of the container and weigh it. The container says 120 calories, but that's not good enough. Like I said, if you are that concerned that it is an under-count, just log 135 calories.
And I agree with you. It gets to the point where it is OCD. The OCD response could be, "how can you log 135 calories when it could be 141 calories?"
Nah.......this is plain silly, and a bit on the judgmental side as well. Just because someone uses a certain tool that works for them does not mean OCD is involved.
If I went around and said in a low carb thread they're all OCD with their fear for carbs, I'd be behind bars before I could say "double standard".
You don't know the definition of OCD. They are not counting and agonizing over each little single carb. They are just avoiding them (other than from green veggies). Big difference between that, and obssessing over the fear that the calories on the label could be 10% lower than the actual number of calories.
I'm not sure you know the definition of OCD either. It's not just one behavior that you perceive as obsessive because you personally wouldn't do it.
Literally everyone is going to do something trying to lose weight that someone else will think is a little out there. But throwing around a term used to describe a very real and often debilitating mental health issue for those who actually deal with it isn't exactly making your point for you.
There are plenty of people with OCD who have spouses and children, and successful careers. I know a few who are so pathologically neat that they could be classified as OCD. Other OCD's are much more debilitating.
Counting every single calorie, years after you met your weight goal, is OCD. Not a debilitating OCD. Not an OCD that requires therapy. Just and OCD like the pathological neat-freak who can't leave a crumb on the kitchen counter, or has to make the bed no matter what.
Seriously, you don't understand what OCD means.
Consistently doing something every day because it improves your life is not OCD.
OCD is when you HAVE to do something, even when it makes no sense to do it, even if it adversely affects your life, and you become distressed when you don't do it.
I go out to eat a couple of times a week and don't weigh my food. I don't avoid ever going out and I don't feel panicky or distressed if I eat something I can't be sure of the calories. Please stop throwing around medical terms casually. It belittles the real disorder and devalues your argument.16 -
gonetothedogs19 wrote: »bethannien wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »xjessicaxrx wrote: »I think if a "Newbie" was to read this thread it would scare and put them off straight away! So many judgemental, rude, aggressive people getting their back up!!
I also noticed that a lot of people on here may have developed OCD with weighing and numbers, weighing a pre packaged yogurt haha come on REALLY!
I dont take a food scale out of the house and carry it around with with me, that is just sad.
I have and I am still losing weight just fine.
I was really stunned to learn that people take the yogurt out of the container and weigh it. The container says 120 calories, but that's not good enough. Like I said, if you are that concerned that it is an under-count, just log 135 calories.
And I agree with you. It gets to the point where it is OCD. The OCD response could be, "how can you log 135 calories when it could be 141 calories?"
Nah.......this is plain silly, and a bit on the judgmental side as well. Just because someone uses a certain tool that works for them does not mean OCD is involved.
If I went around and said in a low carb thread they're all OCD with their fear for carbs, I'd be behind bars before I could say "double standard".
You don't know the definition of OCD. They are not counting and agonizing over each little single carb. They are just avoiding them (other than from green veggies). Big difference between that, and obssessing over the fear that the calories on the label could be 10% lower than the actual number of calories.
I'm not sure you know the definition of OCD either. It's not just one behavior that you perceive as obsessive because you personally wouldn't do it.
Literally everyone is going to do something trying to lose weight that someone else will think is a little out there. But throwing around a term used to describe a very real and often debilitating mental health issue for those who actually deal with it isn't exactly making your point for you.
There are plenty of people with OCD who have spouses and children, and successful careers. I know a few who are so pathologically neat that they could be classified as OCD. Other OCD's are much more debilitating.
Counting every single calorie, years after you met your weight goal, is OCD. Not a debilitating OCD. Not an OCD that requires therapy. Just and OCD like the pathological neat-freak who can't leave a crumb on the kitchen counter, or has to make the bed no matter what.gonetothedogs19 wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »xjessicaxrx wrote: »I think if a "Newbie" was to read this thread it would scare and put them off straight away! So many judgemental, rude, aggressive people getting their back up!!
I also noticed that a lot of people on here may have developed OCD with weighing and numbers, weighing a pre packaged yogurt haha come on REALLY!
I dont take a food scale out of the house and carry it around with with me, that is just sad.
I have and I am still losing weight just fine.
I was really stunned to learn that people take the yogurt out of the container and weigh it. The container says 120 calories, but that's not good enough. Like I said, if you are that concerned that it is an under-count, just log 135 calories.
And I agree with you. It gets to the point where it is OCD. The OCD response could be, "how can you log 135 calories when it could be 141 calories?"
Nah.......this is plain silly, and a bit on the judgmental side as well. Just because someone uses a certain tool that works for them does not mean OCD is involved.
If I went around and said in a low carb thread they're all OCD with their fear for carbs, I'd be behind bars before I could say "double standard".
You don't know the definition of OCD. They are not counting and agonizing over each little single carb. They are just avoiding them (other than from green veggies). Big difference between that, and obssessing over the fear that the calories on the label could be 10% lower than the actual number of calories.
So someone who tells others to meticulously look on ingredient lists for "hidden carbs" ranging in the low single digits and avoid them at all costs is not OCD? Good to know only the people you personally disagree with may be accused of mental illness.
There is nothing OCD about removing grains from your diet to reduce your carbohydrate intake. Just like there is nothing OCD about being a vegan.
OCD means you are doing something active, like counting and obsessing over every calorie years after you met your weight goal. Removing something from your diet (grains, or sugar, or animal fats) is not OCD.
Ya know...how you choose to label people's behavior is really within your own perception only. You are just throwing generalizations that make no sense in a world where calorie counting is used as a tool.13 -
I lost over 50 pounds and recomp'd before even calorie counting or joining MFP. Just saying... Honestly, MFP seems to have made it stressful, not gonna lie. Calorie counting + OCD = bad combo.1
-
VividVegan wrote: »I lost over 50 pounds and recomp'd before even calorie counting or joining MFP. Just saying... Honestly, MFP seems to have made it stressful, not gonna lie. Calorie counting + OCD = bad combo.
Congrats on your weight loss. You chose one of the many ways to lose weight and maintain, which is to not count calories. That's wonderful.
How has MFP made calorie counting stressful for you? I ask because calorie counting is not stressful for a whole boatload of people who visit here, including me.9 -
I'd even say it's LESS stressful, as it gives you a data point. Not a guess. Knowledge is power.16
-
gonetothedogs19 wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »bethannien wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »hjlourenshj wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »Bottom line - if you are counting calories, weighing, measuring and logging religiously, and cannot lose weight (a common complaint on this site), try this approach. Why not? And why would you continue doing something that is not working?
Its just impossible to not lose weight when you are in a deficit. So the common complaint on this site is 100% the cause of mistakes in counting. Its that simple. Don't spin it towards something else
How hard is it to count calories? One ounce of cereal with skim milk (the amount is stated on the cereal box) for breakfast. Two cans of tuna fish and whatever the portion of mayonnaise is on the label for lunch. 100-calorie pre-packaged snack. A couple of pre-made burgers on a bun for dinner with a salad and a low-cal dressing.
This is not exactly rocket science.
It's not rocket science but if people are using the 1 cup or 1/4 cup suggestions for the measurement instead of weighing it, they're almost definitely eating more than they think. For example. I have some granola I mix into my Greek yogurt. The Greek yogurt says a serving is 1 cup (227 g) and the granola says a serving is 1/4 cup (27g). That's what the packaging gives as a serving size.
I put my 1/2 cup on my scale to eat half a serving and I filled it about 2/3 full before I reached 113 g. If I had filled it to the top, I'd be eating more than I thought. And when I weighed the granola, 1/4 cup was 1.5 servings.
So it may not be rocket science but if people are using measuring cups and wondering why they aren't losing weight, it's not what they're eating. It's how much.
This is exactly what most newbies SHOULD NOT be doing.
I am eating a Chobani yogurt right now. It contains 140 calories. Not 150 calories and not 130 caloires. There is nothing to weigh and nothing to measure. Forget about weighing granola. It just makes life difficult
And Chobani has some product where you mix in things (one of them may be granola) into the yogurt. That may contain 200 calories. Not 210 calories and not 190 calories.
I say KISS (with affection) to all newbies - Keep It Simple Stupid.
Seriously, have you actually weighed the yogurt before determining it has 140 calories, not 139 or 141?
Are you being serious?gonetothedogs19 wrote: »bethannien wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »hjlourenshj wrote: »gonetothedogs19 wrote: »Bottom line - if you are counting calories, weighing, measuring and logging religiously, and cannot lose weight (a common complaint on this site), try this approach. Why not? And why would you continue doing something that is not working?
Its just impossible to not lose weight when you are in a deficit. So the common complaint on this site is 100% the cause of mistakes in counting. Its that simple. Don't spin it towards something else
How hard is it to count calories? One ounce of cereal with skim milk (the amount is stated on the cereal box) for breakfast. Two cans of tuna fish and whatever the portion of mayonnaise is on the label for lunch. 100-calorie pre-packaged snack. A couple of pre-made burgers on a bun for dinner with a salad and a low-cal dressing.
This is not exactly rocket science.
It's not rocket science but if people are using the 1 cup or 1/4 cup suggestions for the measurement instead of weighing it, they're almost definitely eating more than they think. For example. I have some granola I mix into my Greek yogurt. The Greek yogurt says a serving is 1 cup (227 g) and the granola says a serving is 1/4 cup (27g). That's what the packaging gives as a serving size.
I put my 1/2 cup on my scale to eat half a serving and I filled it about 2/3 full before I reached 113 g. If I had filled it to the top, I'd be eating more than I thought. And when I weighed the granola, 1/4 cup was 1.5 servings.
So it may not be rocket science but if people are using measuring cups and wondering why they aren't losing weight, it's not what they're eating. It's how much.
This is exactly what most newbies SHOULD NOT be doing.
I am eating a Chobani yogurt right now. It contains 140 calories. Not 150 calories and not 130 caloires. There is nothing to weigh and nothing to measure. Forget about weighing granola. It just makes life difficult
And Chobani has some product where you mix in things (one of them may be granola) into the yogurt. That may contain 200 calories. Not 210 calories and not 190 calories.
I say KISS (with affection) to all newbies - Keep It Simple Stupid.
THIS IS NOT TRUE.
Repeat: THIS IS NOT TRUE. Your yogurt is not guaranteed to contain 140 calories. In fact, in the US it can be up to 20% off ("the label is considered to be out of compliance if the nutrient content of a composite of the product is greater than 20% above the value declared on the label", Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 101.9(g))). That yogurt might be 112 calories....or, more likely, that yogurt may be 168 calories. Now expand that to a frozen dinner, one that's, say....600 calories. That could actually be up to 720. If you eat all your calories from prepackaged food, without weighing the portions, and eat up to your deficit, then you will very likely be consuming more calories than you think, cutting into or stalling your weight loss.
Seriously, have you actually weighed the yogurt before determining it has 140 calories, not 139 or 141?
You can't be serious about the calories in the yogurt.
OK, so here's what you do. The label says 140 calories. To be safe, add 10%, and now it's 154 calories. Problem solved. Or, you can make a breakfast with four or five ingredients where you have to weight and measure, weigh and measure. I would advise sticking with the yogurt.
but I don't like yogurt5 -
I lost weight on weight watchers once. About 49lns. I ate McDonald's and drank Starbucks frappuccinos, along with some healthy stuff. Moderation at its finest!
After 3 months I fell off the wagon, slowly regained the 40lbs...and then some. Looking back, I didn't eat enough calories or protein to keep me satisfied. So yes, CICO works. I lost weight. However, there is SO much more to the picture - like eating in a way that you know you'll still be able to maintain in ten years time, or on vacation, or when you're out to dinner! Some people do best with a calorie counting approach, where no food is off limits. Others do best focusing on healthy foods and minimising unhealthy ones. That's how they get their calorie deficit and sustain it over time. It's not questioning the CICO method, it's just taking a different mental approach to get there.3 -
xjessicaxrx wrote: »I think if a "Newbie" was to read this thread it would scare and put them off straight away! So many judgemental, rude, aggressive people getting their back up!!
I also noticed that a lot of people on here may have developed OCD with weighing and numbers, weighing a pre packaged yogurt haha come on REALLY!
I dont take a food scale out of the house and carry it around with with me, that is just sad.
I have and I am still losing weight just fine.
Wait a minute, now......
As to the bold statements: While you are pointing that finger out, there are three more pointing back at you. Rude judgemental and aggressive are all in the perception.
That said....
What is wrong with weighing pre-packaged food? The nutrition information on the package often does not match up with how much a food weighs. Weighing food is just one tool for personal accountability.
What is sad about carrying a scale around in your purse? It is just another tool for personal accountability.
Everybody has to do what works for them. I don't weigh my food when I eat out at a restaurant or at other people's houses, but but I have a scale I keep at work in case I want a small snack not on my plan.
The reason you are losing weight is because whatever you are doing is creating a calorie deficit. In fact, it does not matter what you do to eat less than you bun, what matter is you eat less than you burn because it's the only way to lose weight.
All this does not negate the fact that a calorie is a calorie.
Does anyone actually do this?1 -
VividVegan wrote: »I lost over 50 pounds and recomp'd before even calorie counting or joining MFP. Just saying... Honestly, MFP seems to have made it stressful, not gonna lie. Calorie counting + OCD = bad combo.
Congrats on your weight loss. You chose one of the many ways to lose weight and maintain, which is to not count calories. That's wonderful.
How has MFP made calorie counting stressful for you? I ask because calorie counting is not stressful for a whole boatload of people who visit here, including me.
Exactly. Not to mention that not everyone calorie counts to lose weight. Before I got a food scale, I was actually overestimating my portions and undereating. There is this perception that every person who joins here is morbidly obese and knows nothing about nutrition. My "high" weight before starting here was 139 pounds which is normally the goal weight for most women my height and the only reason my weight got that high was because I went through a period of months where I didn't even get out of bed. I'm 108 pounds now and I use my food scale and calorie count to make sure I maintain my weight. I've been trying intuitive eating and some days I'm spot on, but other days I'm under by several hundred calories and the last thing I need is a deficit. I poured out what I thought a serving of cereal was and it was half a serving. Peanut butter? I assumed around 1 tbsp was 2. If I have tools that let me know I can eat more food, I'm using the crap out of them.2 -
xjessicaxrx wrote: »I think if a "Newbie" was to read this thread it would scare and put them off straight away! So many judgemental, rude, aggressive people getting their back up!!
I also noticed that a lot of people on here may have developed OCD with weighing and numbers, weighing a pre packaged yogurt haha come on REALLY!
I dont take a food scale out of the house and carry it around with with me, that is just sad.
I have and I am still losing weight just fine.
Wait a minute, now......
As to the bold statements: While you are pointing that finger out, there are three more pointing back at you. Rude judgemental and aggressive are all in the perception.
That said....
What is wrong with weighing pre-packaged food? The nutrition information on the package often does not match up with how much a food weighs. Weighing food is just one tool for personal accountability.
What is sad about carrying a scale around in your purse? It is just another tool for personal accountability.
Everybody has to do what works for them. I don't weigh my food when I eat out at a restaurant or at other people's houses, but but I have a scale I keep at work in case I want a small snack not on my plan.
The reason you are losing weight is because whatever you are doing is creating a calorie deficit. In fact, it does not matter what you do to eat less than you bun, what matter is you eat less than you burn because it's the only way to lose weight.
All this does not negate the fact that a calorie is a calorie.
Does anyone actually do this?
inb4 I get called out for having OCD and disordered eating.10 -
Let me be clear, the OCD comment was aimed at those who stress over weighing a pre-packaged, single serving yogurt just incase the calories are off by +/- 5-10kcal. Those who weigh restaurant food and pick apart meals "just incase".
Counting calories is one thing but that is just not normal behaviour.0 -
xjessicaxrx wrote: »Let me be clear, the OCD comment was aimed at those who stress over weighing a pre-packaged, single serving yogurt just incase the calories are off by +/- 5-10kcal. Those who weigh restaurant food and pick apart meals "just incase".
Counting calories is one thing but that is just not normal behaviour.
When something prepackaged labelled as 200 grams can be 250 grams that stuff can wipe out your deficit.19 -
stevencloser wrote: »xjessicaxrx wrote: »Let me be clear, the OCD comment was aimed at those who stress over weighing a pre-packaged, single serving yogurt just incase the calories are off by +/- 5-10kcal. Those who weigh restaurant food and pick apart meals "just incase".
Counting calories is one thing but that is just not normal behaviour.
When something prepackaged labelled as 200 grams can be 250 grams that stuff can wipe out your deficit.
It definitely can, especially if you have a small deficit.8 -
xjessicaxrx wrote: »Let me be clear, the OCD comment was aimed at those who stress over weighing a pre-packaged, single serving yogurt just incase the calories are off by +/- 5-10kcal. Those who weigh restaurant food and pick apart meals "just incase".
Counting calories is one thing but that is just not normal behaviour.
Let me be clear:
You don't get to decide what is normal behaviour, and make up definitions for OCD. I don't do the things you mentioned, because my weight supports a larger deficit and being off on a yogurt won't matter that much.
But when I get down to a tiny 250kcal/day deficit, I may have to. It won't be OCD or disordered eating, it's called being careful. It's called wanting to be accurate in order to lose weight.26 -
Do people really believe that using scales will give someone OCD? I'm trying to follow the logic of using a mental health condition as an insult, is it coming from a fear that you might "catch" it? If someone has been diagnosed with OCD they don't need Internet people to tell them they've got it, and not all of their behaviours will be a manifestation of it. It is perfectly reasonable to have a mental health condition and yet still be comfortable with using tools in a healthy way.
I don't have OCD, although I did check the calendar three times after reading some of these posts - just to check that this is really 2016.
17 -
Do people not cook from recipes anymore? Is that not basically basically counting calories? Or is just the input of the food into the app the OCD part?
The funny thing is that cooking from recipes drives me crazy (this is also why I like to cook and only like to bake on rare occasions). Reading recipes and getting inspired and then doing what feels right with the ingredients I have on hand is fun -- following a recipe is not. But weighing and logging the ingredients I choose to use doesn't feel burdensome at all.
People are different and, of course, I'd never call someone who enjoyed following recipes OCD.2 -
xjessicaxrx wrote: »Let me be clear, the OCD comment was aimed at those who stress over weighing a pre-packaged, single serving yogurt just incase the calories are off by +/- 5-10kcal. Those who weigh restaurant food and pick apart meals "just incase".
Counting calories is one thing but that is just not normal behaviour.
The point about pre-packaged stuff being potentially off was a response to a poster who was claiming that it was better to change one's diet to be all packaged single-serving stuff vs. to have to weigh. IMO, saying you must use pre-packaged to count properly is way more neurotic than weighing one's foods*, and once you weigh it's not much of a hassle to weigh everything you put in a bowl or on a plate or use in cooking.
*If I were going to make such judgments, but I personally think it's wrong to do so.4 -
CurlyCockney wrote: »Do people really believe that using scales will give someone OCD? I'm trying to follow the logic of using a mental health condition as an insult, is it coming from a fear that you might "catch" it? If someone has been diagnosed with OCD they don't need Internet people to tell them they've got it, and not all of their behaviours will be a manifestation of it. It is perfectly reasonable to have a mental health condition and yet still be comfortable with using tools in a healthy way.
I don't have OCD, although I did check the calendar three times after reading some of these posts - just to check that this is really 2016.
Nothing "gives you" OCD. It's not a disease.
I know someone who orders his food at a restaurant and then always go to the bathroom to wash his hands. Nothing gave him OCD. He is OCD.2 -
gonetothedogs19 wrote: »CurlyCockney wrote: »Do people really believe that using scales will give someone OCD? I'm trying to follow the logic of using a mental health condition as an insult, is it coming from a fear that you might "catch" it? If someone has been diagnosed with OCD they don't need Internet people to tell them they've got it, and not all of their behaviours will be a manifestation of it. It is perfectly reasonable to have a mental health condition and yet still be comfortable with using tools in a healthy way.
I don't have OCD, although I did check the calendar three times after reading some of these posts - just to check that this is really 2016.
Nothing "gives you" OCD. It's not a disease.
I know someone who orders his food at a restaurant and then always go to the bathroom to wash his hands. Nothing gave him OCD. He is OCD.
Yes I know that, which is why I can't see the logic of the OMGOCD!!! posts.7 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »xjessicaxrx wrote: »Let me be clear, the OCD comment was aimed at those who stress over weighing a pre-packaged, single serving yogurt just incase the calories are off by +/- 5-10kcal. Those who weigh restaurant food and pick apart meals "just incase".
Counting calories is one thing but that is just not normal behaviour.
The point about pre-packaged stuff being potentially off was a response to a poster who was claiming that it was better to change one's diet to be all packaged single-serving stuff vs. to have to weigh. IMO, saying you must use pre-packaged to count properly is way more neurotic than weighing one's foods*, and once you weigh it's not much of a hassle to weigh everything you put in a bowl or on a plate or use in cooking.
*If I were going to make such judgments, but I personally think it's wrong to do so.
I was that poster.
Bottom line - the vast majority of people fail at diets, whether they count calories or don't count calories.
My suggestion was that in order to make calorie counting easier for newbies, it would be much better to eat pre-packaged foods (including things like single-serve yogurts, cans of tuna fish and soup) or foods where you don't have to weigh or measure anything (like an egg).
It's hard enough to start any diet (which is why most people fail). Making newbies weigh and measure and obsess over calories on Day 1 makes the situation even worse, and will result in more failure.
The people here on this site who say its easy to weigh, measure and count remind me of vegans who say it's easy to be a vegan. Both are not easy.0 -
gonetothedogs19 wrote: »Making newbies weigh and measure and obsess over calories on Day 1 makes the situation even worse, and will result in more failure.
I thought we just agreed that scales don't make people obsessive?
5 -
gonetothedogs19 wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »xjessicaxrx wrote: »Let me be clear, the OCD comment was aimed at those who stress over weighing a pre-packaged, single serving yogurt just incase the calories are off by +/- 5-10kcal. Those who weigh restaurant food and pick apart meals "just incase".
Counting calories is one thing but that is just not normal behaviour.
The point about pre-packaged stuff being potentially off was a response to a poster who was claiming that it was better to change one's diet to be all packaged single-serving stuff vs. to have to weigh. IMO, saying you must use pre-packaged to count properly is way more neurotic than weighing one's foods*, and once you weigh it's not much of a hassle to weigh everything you put in a bowl or on a plate or use in cooking.
*If I were going to make such judgments, but I personally think it's wrong to do so.
I was that poster.
Bottom line - the vast majority of people fail at diets, whether they count calories or don't count calories.
My suggestion was that in order to make calorie counting easier for newbies, it would be much better to eat pre-packaged foods (including things like single-serve yogurts, cans of tuna fish and soup) or foods where you don't have to weigh or measure anything (like an egg).
It's hard enough to start any diet (which is why most people fail). Making newbies weigh and measure and obsess over calories on Day 1 makes the situation even worse, and will result in more failure.
The people here on this site who say its easy to weigh, measure and count remind me of vegans who say it's easy to be a vegan. Both are not easy.
You've revealed one of your hidden assumptions here - that the failure of newbies is disproportionately related to being overwhelmed by weighing of food. I would say it's far more likely that the failure of newbies is disproportionately related to not being able to eat everything they want in the portions that they want, which is not resolved by limiting them to specific foods (that will still be off by hundreds of calories).
In fact, you contradicted your own assumption at the start by saying that most people fail at diets regardless of counting calories. So why would counting calories in a way that severely restricts your eating solve the problem?12 -
gonetothedogs19 wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »xjessicaxrx wrote: »Let me be clear, the OCD comment was aimed at those who stress over weighing a pre-packaged, single serving yogurt just incase the calories are off by +/- 5-10kcal. Those who weigh restaurant food and pick apart meals "just incase".
Counting calories is one thing but that is just not normal behaviour.
The point about pre-packaged stuff being potentially off was a response to a poster who was claiming that it was better to change one's diet to be all packaged single-serving stuff vs. to have to weigh. IMO, saying you must use pre-packaged to count properly is way more neurotic than weighing one's foods*, and once you weigh it's not much of a hassle to weigh everything you put in a bowl or on a plate or use in cooking.
*If I were going to make such judgments, but I personally think it's wrong to do so.
I was that poster.
Bottom line - the vast majority of people fail at diets, whether they count calories or don't count calories.
My suggestion was that in order to make calorie counting easier for newbies, it would be much better to eat pre-packaged foods (including things like single-serve yogurts, cans of tuna fish and soup) or foods where you don't have to weigh or measure anything (like an egg).
It's hard enough to start any diet (which is why most people fail). Making newbies weigh and measure and obsess over calories on Day 1 makes the situation even worse, and will result in more failure.
The people here on this site who say its easy to weigh, measure and count remind me of vegans who say it's easy to be a vegan. Both are not easy.
You've revealed one of your hidden assumptions here - that the failure of newbies is disproportionately related to being overwhelmed by weighing of food. I would say it's far more likely that the failure of newbies is disproportionately related to not being able to eat everything they want in the portions that they want, which is not resolved by limiting them to specific foods (that will still be off by hundreds of calories).
In fact, you contradicted your own assumption at the start by saying that most people fail at diets regardless of counting calories. So why would counting calories in a way that severely restricts your eating solve the problem?
You missed the point. If you want more people to join the fraternity of calories counters, it is suggested that they start out eating pre-packaged food, eggs, etc.
And another thought - You are more likely to get an accurate count that way (add 10% to the label if you want to), than doing it on your own.
And another thought - Weigh and measuring yogurt because it's in a large container? How about keeping an empty single-serve container, and scooping the yogurt from the large container into the single-serve container? No counting necessary.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions