Losing weight too fast ?

Maybe you are nearing to hit your weight-loss plateau. They said, that's normal. I'm actually stucked for 2 weeks now. But I don't lose hope.

braseyns wrote: »

@scriptedninja I forgot to mention that I had several days where I didn't loose a thing before.
@Gallowmere1984 I had several weeks where progression was really slow but I always managed to hit the 1kg/week goal. Do you really think it could slow down to 0.25kg/week with 1200 kcal/day ?

Eventually, yes, but that would require you to get really low and be sedentary. That's why I included the goal weight stipulation.

braseyns wrote: »

Hi there, I've been using MFP for 71 days now and I've lost 13 kg (28lbs) so far. I try to eat about 1200 kcal / day and I'm feeling pretty fine with that amount. I usually loose between 1 kg (2,2lbs) and 1,5 kg (3,3lbs) / week.
Now the thing is that, for the first time ever, I've lost 1,1 kg in only 3 days. Is that a normal thing ?
Don't get me wrong, I'm still happy that I dropped 1,1 kg but I'm really starting to question the numbers on the scale.

As a male, you should be eating a minimum of 1500 calories a day, and more when you exercise. Especially since you are only 23 years old.

I have some questions for you:
1. How tall are you?
2. What's your current weight?
3. What's your goal weight?
4. How are you measuring your food intake?
5. What's your exercise program?

scriptedninja wrote: »

Maybe you are nearing to hit your weight-loss plateau. They said, that's normal. I'm actually stucked for 2 weeks now. But I don't lose hope.

If he's still losing, and that quickly, then he's nowhere near a plateau. That is generally a month plus with no change in weight.

OP, that does sound very quick. What are your stats?

Eating so few calories, so little protein, and losing weight so fast, you are probably losing a lot of muscle. You need to eat more. The 1500 Cal min for men is a generalization based on how much food you need to eat to get the bare minimum of nutrition your body needs to do the basic things it does every day. Considering you are young and don't have that much more weight to lose, you really should slow it down a little and eat more. 1200 calories isn't enough for me, and I'm a 43 yr old 5'4" woman. Please take care of yourself!

you definitely need more calories and protein. 30-50g of protein is too little for even women. a woman is supposed to have more than 50g a day and your male.1200 is for a woman who is very short,elderly or very sedentary and thats the lowest amount. being male and young you can eat more and still lose weight. when I started at 209 lbs,yes that was my starting weight.(5'6 1/2, 38 yrs old then) I was eating more than 1800 calories and I was losing weight.heck I ate at 2000 calories for awhile and lost weight still. I wasnt that active at the time either.with less than 25lbs to lose you should be trying to lose no more than 1/2 a lb a week(0.22kg).even though you feel fine now,you most likely will end up with issues later,IE- hair loss,fatigue,dizziness,malnutrition, no energy to workout,some people end up with gall stones,stomach issues and so on.

Simplest answer is that you're losing muscle mass at a rate that is unnecessary due to your rapid weight loss/low calorie goal. What happens is people think this is such a wonderful thing to not feel hungry and lose quickly. But you will get to your goal and possibly be skinny fat.

Btw, hunger is a terrible indicator for your body's nutrient needs.

vespiquenn wrote: »

Simplest answer is that you're losing muscle mass at a rate that is unnecessary due to your rapid weight loss/low calorie goal. What happens is people think this is such a wonderful thing to not feel hungry and lose quickly. But you will get to your goal and possibly be skinny fat.

Btw, hunger is a terrible indicator for your body's nutrient needs.

This^

Fast weight loss does NOT equal healthy weight loss. Most people choose to eat more because they want to lower their body fat %.

braseyns wrote: »

kshama2001 wrote: »

I know that 1200 kcal (it more like 1250ich to be honest) sound like really rough but, I don't feel the need to eat more. So... that's that.

braseyns wrote: »

OK then, I'll try to eat more and exercice, thank you for your advices

You asked a question, but seem to be pushing back against the well-founded advice. This last time, you seem to be saying you will only eat more if you can work it back off, which is not what is being suggested. You need to *net* 1500... actually more at your height.

braseyns wrote: »

OK then, I'll try to eat more and exercice, thank you for your advices

I think this is a wise choice..

To add: Bump up your calories and slow the rate of loss down (i.e 1 pound/week), start strength training now and increase your protein intake. Even without the strength training, your protein is quite low.

Faster weight loss is not always better or healthy. No need to be in such a steep calorie deficit and losing weight aggressively with only 20ish more to lose.

You may feel quite fine this first 90 days of eating so low, but it is unhealthy and side effects are bound to happen. Why risk losing valuable muscle as well?

braseyns wrote: »

try2again wrote: »

Sorry- having problems sorting out my quotes. I was specifically referring to your statements where you said you aren't hungry at 1200 so "that's that" and you will eat more AND exercise.

Why would that be a problem If I'm above the daily required nutriment ?

There is a limit to how much fat your body can use for energy each day. If you are under-eating, once your body draws on that amount of stored fat, you will lose muscle and that isn't what most people want. This is why losing weight too quickly can be terrible for your health (and, less importantly, for your body composition). If you're exercising on top of under-eating, you are going to only intensify this process.

Also, it's incredibly challenging to meet all your daily nutritional needs while under 1,200. Sure, some people can do it with planning -- but many will struggle to do so.