Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Flu shots? For them or against ?

1…1415171920…63

Replies

  • AutumnDraidean
    AutumnDraidean Posts: 23 Member
    Guillain-barré is pretty rare with standard flu shots although it was a somewhat bigger risk with H1N1 and with the vaccine for swine flu in the 1970s. It was a bigger story then because they were unfamiliar with it, and were not as successful treating people for it. It's also a more significant risk with Zika.

    Getting the flu on the other hand can lead to pneumonia and worse. as others have indicated, the flu is horrible and takes even healthy people weeks to recover from. I've been getting a flu shot every year for most of my adult life. I started getting them when I had no health insurance to reduce my risks whatever way I could. Then I became a nurse and I decided that if the hospital was giving them out free I would get one each year.

    Around the time of H1N1 NYS got serious about hospital nurses and flu shots. First they tried mandating it by law, which went over like a lead balloon. (rightly so) Now they say that you get your flu shot or you can wear a mask while you are at work during flu season. Yeah, no, I'll take the shot, thanks!

    Some people do feel a little crappy with flu shots, that just means the body is reacting properly to it by mounting an immune response. If you catch a cold right around then don't blame the flu shot, it was a coincidence. Lots of people feel like somebody slugged them in the arm, have them put it in your non dominant arm and take some tylenol.




  • obiwankendrobi
    obiwankendrobi Posts: 6 Member
    For it! I have friends who are immunosuppresed (one friend has cystic fibrosis, other friends are diabetic, others have heart problems), as well as my father (Crohn's Disease) and I would hate to be the reason they get severely sick.
  • The__Wolf
    The__Wolf Posts: 92 Member
    tomteboda wrote: »
    After reading this entire thread, and re-reading several portions of it, I'm pretty certain a large percentage of the population simply is awful at risk analysis.

    Humans come by this flaw honestly.

    well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/wrong-about-risk-blame-your-brain/?_r=0
  • Seajolly
    Seajolly Posts: 1,435 Member
    I am 31 years old and I don't believe I've had the flu shot since I was 22 or so. *knock on wood* I have never gotten the flu.
  • comptonelizabeth
    comptonelizabeth Posts: 1,701 Member
    edited December 2016
    I'm immunosuppresed,suffer from a chronic disease and am also asthmatic. So I get the shot each year. It's never actually made me ill (it's not a live vaccine) but I have consistently noticed it makes my chronic condition flare up. I figure this could be because it stimulates my immune system but this could be nonsense and in any case, a dose of flu would be worse.
  • billglitch
    billglitch Posts: 538 Member
    edited December 2016
    tomteboda wrote: »
    After reading this entire thread, and re-reading several portions of it, I'm pretty certain a large percentage of the population simply is awful at risk analysis.

    I just checked and from what i could find between 5 and 20% of americans will get the flu. That means that 80 - 95 % will not get it. Is not getting the flu shot a big risk? depends on how you look at it. Another source says 30,000,000 americans will get the flu. Thats roughly 10%...so 1 out of 10 will get it or 9 out of 10 wont
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »
    billglitch wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    After reading this entire thread, and re-reading several portions of it, I'm pretty certain a large percentage of the population simply is awful at risk analysis.

    I just checked and from what i could find between 5 and 20% of americans will get the flu. That means that 80 - 95 % will not get it. Is not getting the flu shot a big risk? depends on how you look at it. Another source says 30,000,000 americans will get the flu. Thats roughly 10%...so 1 out of 10 will get it or 9 out of 10 wont

    While a relatively small percentage of people actually contract the flu, the risks that come with the flu are higher than the risk of getting the shot. The flu can be deadly, even in young, healthy individuals. The shot is not, unless one were allergic. In that case, the risk of the shot would be vastly greater than the risk of getting the flu.

    For the rest of the population, the risks that come with flu for those who contract it are much less than the risks of getting vaccinated.

    People who don't understand this are bad at risk analysis, which I believe is what @tomteboda was getting at.

    I think you mean that for the rest of the population (if you mean those who aren't allergic), the risks that come with the flu are higher than the risks of getting vaccinated.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    janejellyroll wrote: »
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »
    billglitch wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    After reading this entire thread, and re-reading several portions of it, I'm pretty certain a large percentage of the population simply is awful at risk analysis.

    I just checked and from what i could find between 5 and 20% of americans will get the flu. That means that 80 - 95 % will not get it. Is not getting the flu shot a big risk? depends on how you look at it. Another source says 30,000,000 americans will get the flu. Thats roughly 10%...so 1 out of 10 will get it or 9 out of 10 wont

    While a relatively small percentage of people actually contract the flu, the risks that come with the flu are higher than the risk of getting the shot. The flu can be deadly, even in young, healthy individuals. The shot is not, unless one were allergic. In that case, the risk of the shot would be vastly greater than the risk of getting the flu.

    For the rest of the population, the risks that come with flu for those who contract it are much less than the risks of getting vaccinated.

    People who don't understand this are bad at risk analysis, which I believe is what @tomteboda was getting at.

    I think you mean that for the rest of the population (if you mean those who aren't allergic), the risks that come with the flu are higher than the risks of getting vaccinated.

    Thanks! I fixed it.

    And yes, that's exactly what I meant :smile:
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    Michaelxo444 wrote: »
    Not for me I don't want the toxic heavy metals injected into my body

    If you're referring to thimerosal (which is used as a preservative), you can always request a single-use vial (or pre-filled syringe). They typically don't need preservatives. Or are you referring to something else?
  • gladirader
    gladirader Posts: 2 Member
    Never had the flu.. or the shot.
  • billglitch
    billglitch Posts: 538 Member
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »
    billglitch wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    After reading this entire thread, and re-reading several portions of it, I'm pretty certain a large percentage of the population simply is awful at risk analysis.

    I just checked and from what i could find between 5 and 20% of americans will get the flu. That means that 80 - 95 % will not get it. Is not getting the flu shot a big risk? depends on how you look at it. Another source says 30,000,000 americans will get the flu. Thats roughly 10%...so 1 out of 10 will get it or 9 out of 10 wont

    While a relatively small percentage of people actually contract the flu, the risks that come with the flu are higher than the risk of getting the shot. The flu can be deadly, even in young, healthy individuals. The shot is not, unless one were allergic. In that case, the risk of the shot would be vastly greater than the risk of getting the flu.

    For the rest of the population, the risks that come with flu for those who contract it are much less higher than the risks of getting vaccinated.

    People who don't understand this are bad at risk analysis, which I believe is what @tomteboda was getting at.

    *Edit: I can't words today.

    thats fine, my point was that the risk of getting the flu is fairly low. obviously everyone has to decide for themselves
  • leanjogreen18
    leanjogreen18 Posts: 2,492 Member
    edited December 2016
    Haven't read all the comments but from the CDC itself effectiveness is about 19%...

    http://www.cdc.gov/flu/news/updated-vaccine-effectiveness-2014-15.htm

    Not saying I'm for or against just bringing up some data to discuss.

    ETA - CDC also not recommending the "live" nasal drops for 2017...

    http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/s0622-laiv-flu.html
  • girlwithcurls2
    girlwithcurls2 Posts: 2,281 Member
    I'm in. I work in early childhood and there's always some kind of crud being passed around. I figure I have nothing to lose. Get the poke, swim for an hour, and boom--all fixed up :)
This discussion has been closed.

Categories