DNA Testing for Weight Loss

13

Replies

  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    @ninerbuff so as a trainer you would speak against new scientific tools to help one possibly maximize their weight loss?
    Ain't new. It's actually been thought about for over 20 years. And I'm NEVER against new methodology AS LONG AS it's actually legit. This isn't legit. Why can one twin get fat and the other stay lean if they share the same exact genetics?

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    magic?
  • leanjogreen18
    leanjogreen18 Posts: 2,492 Member
    Livescience has an article about it.

    The study, not peer reviewed, shows out of 101 only 5 obese women lost weight on the DNA recommended diet. There is no information if they kept it off.

  • leanjogreen18
    leanjogreen18 Posts: 2,492 Member
    edited March 2017
    http://www.livescience.com/15137-genetic-test-lose-weight.html


    Seems they are told how much to reduce carbs or fat.

    Personally I'd save my 500 and give this testing several more years and some peer reviewed studies, especially since just eating in a deficit is working nicely.
  • kristielove
    kristielove Posts: 25 Member
    @Tacklewasher actually it is what I wrote. What you or "Joe Schmoe" THINKS isn't insightful, it's strongly subjective. And bc "that's the way things go" doesn't mean that's the way it has to be... Something to ponder on, there was a a lot developed by NASA for astronauts (small percentage compared to us commoners) that we all use daily now. There is much one can learn and lots more to be learned by analyzing DNA
  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    edited March 2017
    jemhh wrote: »
    I didn't think any of the gene mapping done to date was at the level of specificity to identify food intolerances - but I'd have to do some research

    I'm thinking that it probably just indicates generalities. For example, something like 75% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. I'm guessing if the DNA indicated that the person had Native American ancestors, it would say that she may be lactose intolerant.

    I have a percentage of native american blood,from 3 different tribes(not sure of percentages as I havent done DNA but my sister did trace our lineage), and Im not lactose intolerant.so that would throw the study off one would think.
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    jemhh wrote: »
    I didn't think any of the gene mapping done to date was at the level of specificity to identify food intolerances - but I'd have to do some research

    I'm thinking that it probably just indicates generalities. For example, something like 75% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. I'm guessing if the DNA indicated that the person had Native American ancestors, it would say that she may be lactose intolerant.

    I have a percentage of native american blood,from 3 different tribes(not sure of percentages as I havent done DNA but my sister did trace our lineage), and Im not lactose intolerant.so that would throw the study off one would think.

    I'm partially of Native American heritage also, and not lactose intolerant in the least. I consume dairy products on a daily basis with no problems.
  • quiksylver296
    quiksylver296 Posts: 28,439 Member
    edited March 2017
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    I didn't think any of the gene mapping done to date was at the level of specificity to identify food intolerances - but I'd have to do some research

    I'm thinking that it probably just indicates generalities. For example, something like 75% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. I'm guessing if the DNA indicated that the person had Native American ancestors, it would say that she may be lactose intolerant.

    I have a percentage of native american blood,from 3 different tribes(not sure of percentages as I havent done DNA but my sister did trace our lineage), and Im not lactose intolerant.so that would throw the study off one would think.

    I'm partially of Native American heritage also, and not lactose intolerant in the least. I consume dairy products on a daily basis with no problems.

    Interesting. My mother-in-law was full blooded, and my hubby is slightly lactose intolerant. I wonder if it gets diluted enough after a certain percentage that it doesn't matter?
  • leanjogreen18
    leanjogreen18 Posts: 2,492 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    @Tacklewasher actually it is what I wrote. What you or "Joe Schmoe" THINKS isn't insightful, it's strongly subjective. And bc "that's the way things go" doesn't mean that's the way it has to be... Something to ponder on, there was a a lot developed by NASA for astronauts (small percentage compared to us commoners) that we all use daily now. There is much one can learn and lots more to be learned by analyzing DNA

    does not matter...weight loss still comes down to CICO, regardless of DNA..

    not sure why that is so hard to understand...

    Good point even if the testing is helpful, which apparently their own study only shows 5% success, it seems all it recommends is either lowering carbs or fat by a certain amount. Might be helpful knowing that but useless if it's not sustainable in my opinion.

    My luck it would say very low carbs and I wasted 500 bucks because I'm eating plenty of carbs now and losing nicely. I won't restrict again.

    But if you've got the money AND you can live with the results why not, I guess. Personally id still wait until more studies are done.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,031 Member
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    I didn't think any of the gene mapping done to date was at the level of specificity to identify food intolerances - but I'd have to do some research

    I'm thinking that it probably just indicates generalities. For example, something like 75% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. I'm guessing if the DNA indicated that the person had Native American ancestors, it would say that she may be lactose intolerant.

    I have a percentage of native american blood,from 3 different tribes(not sure of percentages as I havent done DNA but my sister did trace our lineage), and Im not lactose intolerant.so that would throw the study off one would think.

    I'm partially of Native American heritage also, and not lactose intolerant in the least. I consume dairy products on a daily basis with no problems.
    Bet you get weird when drinking alcohol though.............. :D

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    @Tacklewasher actually it is what I wrote. What you or "Joe Schmoe" THINKS isn't insightful, it's strongly subjective. And bc "that's the way things go" doesn't mean that's the way it has to be... Something to ponder on, there was a a lot developed by NASA for astronauts (small percentage compared to us commoners) that we all use daily now. There is much one can learn and lots more to be learned by analyzing DNA

    If you want to spend your money on genetic testing and see if you have any genetic defects or markers for any genetic issues(that can cause your weight loss to be harder than normal) that is one thing, but to have a DNA test for weight loss? no,save your money. I have a few genetic defects and one of them causes me to have a metabolic disorder, I still lose weight with CICO,although its slower I still lose. I have to also be more active than most people(resulting in a higher deficit).but that is me.
  • kristielove
    kristielove Posts: 25 Member
    For all, I never said my mind was made up. If that were the case I would have just ordered. I asked to get REAL feedback from REAL tester. I too am skeptical. I was actually considering getting a genetic study for heritage and health and happened to come across it.
  • kristielove
    kristielove Posts: 25 Member
    If I have the time, I will post credible reviews from medical journals via my college database
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    I didn't think any of the gene mapping done to date was at the level of specificity to identify food intolerances - but I'd have to do some research

    I'm thinking that it probably just indicates generalities. For example, something like 75% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. I'm guessing if the DNA indicated that the person had Native American ancestors, it would say that she may be lactose intolerant.

    I have a percentage of native american blood,from 3 different tribes(not sure of percentages as I havent done DNA but my sister did trace our lineage), and Im not lactose intolerant.so that would throw the study off one would think.

    I'm partially of Native American heritage also, and not lactose intolerant in the least. I consume dairy products on a daily basis with no problems.
    Bet you get weird when drinking alcohol though.............. :D

    Firewater!
  • CSARdiver
    CSARdiver Posts: 6,252 Member
    There is so much disinformation out there regarding genetics and what research can and cannot do. People tend to think of genetics as some sort of updated version of astrology and that this somehow determines fate, but this is incorrect.

    Think of DNA as a typewriter - it sets the parameters on what you are most able to do, but you write the story. You can push past the boundaries of these parameters...it simply depends on the amount of effort you want to put into it.
  • jemhh
    jemhh Posts: 14,261 Member
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    I didn't think any of the gene mapping done to date was at the level of specificity to identify food intolerances - but I'd have to do some research

    I'm thinking that it probably just indicates generalities. For example, something like 75% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. I'm guessing if the DNA indicated that the person had Native American ancestors, it would say that she may be lactose intolerant.

    I have a percentage of native american blood,from 3 different tribes(not sure of percentages as I havent done DNA but my sister did trace our lineage), and Im not lactose intolerant.so that would throw the study off one would think.

    I'm partially of Native American heritage also, and not lactose intolerant in the least. I consume dairy products on a daily basis with no problems.
    Bet you get weird when drinking alcohol though.............. :D

    Firewater!

    Right, and I have no Native American heritage, am LI, and yet I drink/eat plenty of dairy and have lost a lot of weight. The test wouldn't provide meaningful information to help with weight loss. (I'm assuming you all know I wasn't saying that the suggestion about somebody may be possibly being lactose intolerant was useful.)

    If I were overweight and had $500 to spare, I'd set it aside to use on new clothes as I shrank out of them.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    I didn't think any of the gene mapping done to date was at the level of specificity to identify food intolerances - but I'd have to do some research

    I'm thinking that it probably just indicates generalities. For example, something like 75% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. I'm guessing if the DNA indicated that the person had Native American ancestors, it would say that she may be lactose intolerant.

    I have a percentage of native american blood,from 3 different tribes(not sure of percentages as I havent done DNA but my sister did trace our lineage), and Im not lactose intolerant.so that would throw the study off one would think.

    I'm partially of Native American heritage also, and not lactose intolerant in the least. I consume dairy products on a daily basis with no problems.

    Interesting. My mother-in-law was full blooded, and my hubby is slightly lactose intolerant. I wonder if it gets diluted enough after a certain percentage that it doesn't matter?

    If you are only partially Native American, you could easily get the portion of the DNA that controls for lactose persistence from the other side. That's especially true if it's only a small percentage. (And of course if 75% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant, the other 25% are not.)

    Random aside as long as we are talking about DNA (not referring to your family, of course)--the ethnic stuff is pretty fun, but a lot of it is still guess-work too. That's very much the case with the tests that say 50% German or Mediterranean or whatever. They really can't tell the difference between various European groups well, especially within the same general region and especially when (as with Americans of European ancestry) they are all mixed up. My dad shows up as 40% Scandinavian (more than my mom who is about a quarter Swedish but shows up as less). So far as we know (and I've done quite a bit of good research, so I am sure), my dad's family all goes back to the British Isles except for a small bit that goes to France. But is a genetic makeup that overlaps a lot with Scandinavia common in the British Isles? Of course.
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    For all, I never said my mind was made up. If that were the case I would have just ordered. I asked to get REAL feedback from REAL tester. I too am skeptical. I was actually considering getting a genetic study for heritage and health and happened to come across it.

    Heritage is a legitimate pursuit and numerous markers have been identified. I actually find this fascinating as our entire concept of race is foolish as we all descend from a common ancestor. I submitted to Ancestry DNA - this is based upon actual evidence which can be repeated with a high degree of accuracy.
    .

    Even there they can be a bit vague. My brother had his DNA tested and the results were pretty much as expected. What was interesting is the 32% "North Western European" (everything else was specific: Irish, British, German, Scandinavian) Those dang Vandals, Saxons, Angles, Jutes, Visigoths and all the rest who kept wandering around Europe mixed up everything.

    If you were looking for a specific health marker, it might be worth it but to tell you how you should be eating? Spend the $500 on a few sessions with a Registered Dietician.

  • estherdragonbat
    estherdragonbat Posts: 5,283 Member
    Yep, the Norman conquest, from Normandy, France was pretty much Norsemen (of Scandinavian ancestry)...
This discussion has been closed.