MY SECRET TO GET BIG !!
Replies
-
Playing devils advocate here but OP appears to be FAR bigger than all the people in this thread who are so adamant that he's wrong.
Unless he's lying about his natty status then what gives?
Yes, if we go by that strange picture he has for his profile - his biceps are about twice as big as his head. HOOOGE. Either he's simply at the top of the bell curve and won the genetic lottery - or... well, it's not the first time a juiced hulk monster hit these forums trying to show all us natties what true "hard work" can accomplish.
I'm still waiting to see his stats and for him to figure out how to post some real pics. I know he asked for assistance, not sure if anybody told him how. But you know, there are always outliers in the fitness world that can be successful in spite of doing everything wrong. Maybe he's on gear, maybe he's 100% natty. I think he's 100% entertaining.
2 -
gym4life64 wrote: »Based on research, there's no benefit past .82g/lb and that's with a mark-up.
http://bayesianbodybuilding.com/the-myth-of-1glb-optimal-protein-intake-for-bodybuilders/
Your arms look ginormous though. You on the juicy juice?
Keep reading the "research" or follow what every big guy has done? 1g of protein per pound is a MIN! In part because of the amount you need to eat.
Phd in bro science1 -
The secret to getting big is eating in a calorie surplus with adequate protein while following a progressive lifting routine.
Your macro split is jacked by the way. There is absolutely zero reason to eat that much protein and that little fat. Holy cow. Whoever told you to do that should stop giving out advice.
U see... the difference beetwen u and i is that i try this *kitten* no one told me im not sitting on my chair reading a book or asking people what do i have to do to get big.... i try it and it work 4 me and im giving u what work 4 me xxx
Some people learn from others... others have to pee on the electric fence.6 -
Playing devils advocate here but OP appears to be FAR bigger than all the people in this thread who are so adamant that he's wrong.
Unless he's lying about his natty status then what gives?
So what. The information is terrible!
He may have good genetics but his information is BS.6 -
Playing devils advocate here but OP appears to be FAR bigger than all the people in this thread who are so adamant that he's wrong.
Unless he's lying about his natty status then what gives?
Because some people succeed in spite of what they're doing. Or are doing one (or two) thing(s) that work, but attribute it to something else. In general, they don't actually know what works.
As an aside, I wonder what OP can tell from my profile pic, other than I'm apparently a cat.5 -
Your "secret to getting big" might not be everybody's secret. Everybody's body requires different amounts of everything.1
-
Psshhhht. Bro, you're curling 135. And wearing a belt.
4 -
Psshhhht. Bro, you're curling 135. And wearing a belt.
LOL That was the first thing I noticed... actually... I totally missed the belt.
0 -
stanmann571 wrote: »
Psshhhht. Bro, you're curling 135. And wearing a belt.
LOL That was the first thing I noticed... actually... I totally missed the belt.
At least he's not doing it in the
Squat rack4 -
Playing devils advocate here but OP appears to be FAR bigger than all the people in this thread who are so adamant that he's wrong.
Unless he's lying about his natty status then what gives?
I started it because I take issue with him claiming low dietary fat is important for building muscle and staying lean. Dietary fat is important and consistently not eating enough fat can have long term impacts. Lots of broscience "works", but not for the reasons people claim.
As for him being "far" bigger, I'm a woman, I can only get so big. Someone's size, leanness, prior competition history, and many other factors aren't really proof someone knows what they are doing. The only reason my competition history came into this is his comment about how I obviously spend my time studying instead of lifting.3 -
Playing devils advocate here but OP appears to be FAR bigger than all the people in this thread who are so adamant that he's wrong.
Unless he's lying about his natty status then what gives?
I started it because I take issue with him claiming low dietary fat is important for building muscle and staying lean. Dietary fat is important and consistently not eating enough fat can have long term impacts. Lots of broscience "works", but not for the reasons people claim.
As for him being "far" bigger, I'm a woman, I can only get so big. Someone's size, leanness, prior competition history, and many other factors aren't really proof someone knows what they are doing. The only reason my competition history came into this is his comment about how I obviously spend my time studying instead of lifting.
Yer 2 small. No care wat u say. k?3 -
stanmann571 wrote: »
Psshhhht. Bro, you're curling 135. And wearing a belt.
LOL That was the first thing I noticed... actually... I totally missed the belt.
At least he's not doing it in the
Squat rack
At least he's not wearing gloves.2 -
LolBroScience wrote: »Playing devils advocate here but OP appears to be FAR bigger than all the people in this thread who are so adamant that he's wrong.
Unless he's lying about his natty status then what gives?
I started it because I take issue with him claiming low dietary fat is important for building muscle and staying lean. Dietary fat is important and consistently not eating enough fat can have long term impacts. Lots of broscience "works", but not for the reasons people claim.
As for him being "far" bigger, I'm a woman, I can only get so big. Someone's size, leanness, prior competition history, and many other factors aren't really proof someone knows what they are doing. The only reason my competition history came into this is his comment about how I obviously spend my time studying instead of lifting.
Yer 2 small. No care wat u say. k?
Me IRL:
jk, this is actually me:
7 -
This thread is great!0
-
Verity1111 wrote: »
What? What does that mean ? Do you really need to be on steroids to gain muscle? Help? lol
Nope, you can gain pure muscle on a recomp. i.e. calorie maintenance. Pretty much only newbies can do this.
What they're talking about is the ability to gain total body weight as 100% muscle without gaining fat, while in a calorie surplus.
Normal folks will gain some fat along with the muscle, but plan to lose the fat later during a cut, while keeping most of the muscle gained.0 -
Then keep studing and follow ur book .. u gonna have a good body lol
Seeing as how my last bodybuilding show I placed first in women's heavyweight and I hold a world record for deadlift I'll definitely keep up on the studies, they haven't done me wrong. Go ahead and keep judging by the pictures selected as our forum photos, doesn't mean they are up to date or reflect anything we've done.
Legit want a response to this because MIC DROP. It was fun waiting for this information to be revealed.
I also haven't seen that much TXT speech since oh, 2003? Nokia and snake anyone?10 -
Playing devils advocate here but OP appears to be FAR bigger than all the people in this thread who are so adamant that he's wrong.
Unless he's lying about his natty status then what gives?
Perhaps I've missed it (I'm having a hard time following the OPs stream of thought writing) but I didn't really see any stats. And the profile picture could easily be someone who is not him (a lot of people will post pictures of what they see as ideal/their goal instead of themselves).
1 -
btw, this thread doesn't disappoint
0 -
quiksylver296 wrote: »gym4life64 wrote: »Based on research, there's no benefit past .82g/lb and that's with a mark-up.
http://bayesianbodybuilding.com/the-myth-of-1glb-optimal-protein-intake-for-bodybuilders/
Your arms look ginormous though. You on the juicy juice?
Keep reading the "research" or follow what every big guy has done? 1g of protein per pound is a MIN! In part because of the amount you need to eat.
That works for me!^^ #thosetraps #drooling
That's way too lean for my taste0 -
[/quote]
That works for me!^^ #thosetraps #drooling[/quote]
That's way too lean for my taste[/quote]
Until you're so wide you can't fit through the doorway, you're too scrawny for me 1 -
this thread isnt about peanut butter... how sad... i'm out...2
-
lilolilo920 wrote: »
That works for me!^^ #thosetraps #drooling[/quote]
That's way too lean for my taste[/quote]
Until you're so wide you can't fit through the doorway, you're too scrawny for me[/quote]
Agree.
But I don't like that super lean/dry look.0 -
Playing devils advocate here but OP appears to be FAR bigger than all the people in this thread who are so adamant that he's wrong.
Unless he's lying about his natty status then what gives?
Perhaps I've missed it (I'm having a hard time following the OPs stream of thought writing) but I didn't really see any stats. And the profile picture could easily be someone who is not him (a lot of people will post pictures of what they see as ideal/their goal instead of themselves).
It's because he was trolling from the start.
1 -
Playing devils advocate here but OP appears to be FAR bigger than all the people in this thread who are so adamant that he's wrong.
Unless he's lying about his natty status then what gives?
Perhaps I've missed it (I'm having a hard time following the OPs stream of thought writing) but I didn't really see any stats. And the profile picture could easily be someone who is not him (a lot of people will post pictures of what they see as ideal/their goal instead of themselves).
It's because he was trolling from the start.
Troller!0 -
Ironandwine69 wrote: »Playing devils advocate here but OP appears to be FAR bigger than all the people in this thread who are so adamant that he's wrong.
Unless he's lying about his natty status then what gives?
Perhaps I've missed it (I'm having a hard time following the OPs stream of thought writing) but I didn't really see any stats. And the profile picture could easily be someone who is not him (a lot of people will post pictures of what they see as ideal/their goal instead of themselves).
It's because he was trolling from the start.
Troller!
Hahaha
0 -
-
No muscle unless on steroids? Lol
On a healthy diet you can build up but it is certainly slower than if you cheated and took a cycle
On a heathy diet you can increase calories gradually and most can put on approximately 8lb clean muscle per year
The foods you eat to cut don't have to change when building, just the amounts will3
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions