Carbs/Protein/Glycogen
Options
Replies
-
I wonder how energy levels are affected by extreme carb restrictions. Sub-par workouts will impact muscle development. So while not a direct cause... still a factor in the conversation.2
-
What AnvilHead said pretty much covers it, but also, ketosis makes your breath smell like a trash can with a dead squirrel in it.1
-
@jjpptt2 Yes, absolutely. Especially for folks who may be new to low carb - it is tough. Probably why it is so highly debated.
Just for me personally, say I didn't get much sleep the night before and am feeling groggy, then when I'm low carb (50-70G per day) a bowl of oatmeal with about 30-35 carbs pre workout seems to be all I need to for that extra kick.
Here's what's crazy to me though: Your body has 4 main sources it can use for energy -
Body Fat
Muscle Glycogen
Liver Glycogen
Muscle/Tissue
All 4 can used for energy by the body.
When we talk about "energy levels".. that really is just referring to glycogen - Muscles can store about 350-400g of glycogen (From what I've read from multiple sources), and since protein will convert to glycogen (although not as easily as carbs) then theoretically you should be able to have the same energy levels without carbs.2 -
ahilton1992 wrote: »Yes, absolutely. Especially for folks who may be new to low carb - it is tough. Probably why it is so highly debated.
Just for me personally, say I didn't get much sleep the night before and am feeling groggy, then when I'm low carb (50-70G per day) a bowl of oatmeal with about 30-35 carbs pre workout seems to be all I need to for that extra kick.
Here's what's crazy to me though: Your body has 4 main sources it can use for energy -
Body Fat
Muscle Glycogen
Liver Glycogen
Muscle/Tissue
All 4 can used for energy by the body.
When we talk about "energy levels".. that really is just referring to glycogen - Muscles can store about 350-400g of glycogen (From what I've read from multiple sources), and since protein will convert to glycogen (although not as easily as carbs) then theoretically you should be able to have the same energy levels without carbs.
Doesn't work that way in practice because the process is slower and doesn't work "on demand" in the same way. Keto is fine for daily energy levels once the person is adapted, and excellent for certain endurance tasks like distance running, not so great for anything requiring quick bursts of energy.0 -
@rheddmobile I'd agree that carbs are practical in that sense.
But I just don't agree with the typical bro science of bulking or that you can't gain muscle while in caloric deficit or caloric maintenance.1 -
ahilton1992 wrote: »@rheddmobile I'd agree that carbs are practical in that sense.
But I just don't agree with the typical bro science of bulking or that you can't gain muscle while in caloric deficit or caloric maintenance.
Well... good luck with that! Not all science is bro science, this is just science. Unless you are using drugs, it's nearly impossible for someone to make substantial gains in a deficit unless that person is obese or a newbie, which from your photo it doesn't look like you are either.1 -
ahilton1992 wrote: »@rheddmobile I'd agree that carbs are practical in that sense.
But I just don't agree with the typical bro science of bulking or that you can't gain muscle while in caloric deficit or caloric maintenance.
I shared this in the recomp thread a week or so ago:
Timely post by Brad Schoenfeld on Facebook today about recomp. Here's the infographic he posted, along with his initial comments on it:
"It absolutely is possible to gain muscle while losing body fat; the extent to which this can be achieved depends on several factors"
A couple of the comments/questions and his responses:Q: How can you lose fat and build muscle at the same time when one thing requires you to be in a calorie deficit and the other requires you to be in a calorie surplus?
Schoenfeld: Because you don’t need to be in a surplus to gain muscle.Q: are you saying here that a proper training stimulus and eating enough protein is enough to build muscle?
Schoenfeld: Yep; sufficient to build, not to maximize gainz.1 -
@rheddmobile Much appreciated. Just a really interesting topic to me - for some reason1
-
And I will leave this right here.
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10611633/gaining-muscle-in-a-deficit/p12 -
@RoxieDawn This is fantastic, thank you!1
-
Conflicting research on protein intake:
Some exercise researchers say more protein is often better—even in amounts well above the 56 grams a day (and 46 grams, for women) recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). It’s filling, beneficial for appetite suppression and weight loss, and also helps prevent loss of muscle mass and strength as people age, says Dr. Stuart Phillips, a professor of kinesiology at Canada’s McMaster University. Animal sources of protein are also loaded with essential nutrients and amino acids—like iron and folate, which many people don’t get enough of, Phillips says.
For all these reasons, he says that adults, whether they’re sedentary or active, should consume a lot more protein than they probably do—up to .75 grams of protein per pound of body weight every day. For a 150-pound person, that works out to roughly the amount you’d find in a chicken breast or like-size cut of meat, a cup of beans, six ounces of Greek yogurt and eight ounces of milk, according to the USDA’s nutrient database.
vs.
But talk to a disease and longevity researcher, and you’ll get a very different answer—one that sure won’t please Paleo dieters.
“Proteins and their amino acids regulate the two major pro-aging pathways,” says Dr. Valter Longo, a professor of biological science at the University of Southern California. By “up-regulating” those pathways, eating lots of protein seems to promote higher rates of both death and disease, he says.
Longo’s research shows cancer rates increase nearly 400% among Americans who get 20% or more of their daily calories from protein, compared to those who restrict their protein intake to 10% of their daily calories. Risk of mortality also jumps 75% among the heavy protein eaters, his data show.
But Phillips and Longo’s recommendations start to converge for older adults. For people over 65, muscle wasting and loss of strength become important concerns—so much so that eating more protein lowers your risk for both death and disease, Longo says. Once you hit 65, he says it’s fine to consume a bit more protein if you notice you’re starting to drop weight, lose strength or shed muscle mass.
http://time.com/4131682/protein-longevity-paleo/5 -
Guess you have to pick between living a long healthy life and looking good naked lol1
-
I think there can be a big difference between eating to get jacked/shredded (whatever you want to call it) vs eating to keep your body as healthy as possible0
-
ahilton1992 wrote: »Guess you have to pick between living a long healthy life and looking good naked lol
More like you have to pick between taking the advice of evidence-based sources or woo peddlers.3 -
@AnvilHead Just saw your last post, and I think that pretty much sums it up.
"Sufficient to build, not to maximize gainz"1 -
@AnvilHead agreed lol0
-
ahilton1992 wrote: »I think there can be a big difference between eating to get jacked/shredded (whatever you want to call it) vs eating to keep your body as healthy as possible
Since you qualified it as "can be" vs. "is", I agree.
If you look at a contest ready bodybuilder, they're far from "as healthy as possible". They're dehydrated (intentionally), starved, bordering on overtrained/exhausted, and pared down to minimum essential bodyfat levels. And if we're talking about professional/non-natty bodybuilders, they're also jacked full of PEDs/cutting agents. There's a reason they can't maintain that condition for more than a week or so at most.
OTOH, there are plenty of men and women who are 'jacked/shredded' (by genpop standards, not competitive bodybuilder standards) who are perfectly healthy, train hard and eat anywhere from ultra-"clean" (albeit often monotonous and bland) to "everything in moderation" diets.0 -
I guess my question is why would you want to use protein to replenish glycogen? If protein is being used for glycogen is not being used to support muscle building.
It is true that the carb support muscle building indirectly. They are anti catabolic and prevent protein breakdown. This in turn allows proteins to be used for muscle building and create new cells.
Additionally carbs have their benefits. Studies have shown that carbohydrates enhance recovery enable you to lift more especially when you're taxing your anaerobic and phosphate systems (explosive power).4
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 393 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 936 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions