Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Food Supply & Human Future
Options
Replies
-
IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Keto_Vampire wrote: »This is turning into a good old Sean Spicer press conference
People can use their eyes - the articles say exactly what I'm saying. But people want to believe what they want, I guess. This is what the "debate" sounded like on my end:
That's not a fact, you have no sources!
Here are some sources.
Those are from RICH countries!
Here's some sources about the poorer countries.
I don't like your sources!
Here are some other sources.
You conflated the numbers!
I quoted numbers that were stated from these sources.
I don't like those sources either, because politics!
Here's the story from a source from the opposite political spectrum.
I don't like those sources either!
Here are some other sources, straight from the people who study this for world leaders.
Your word choice is off!
I just quoted the words used by the sources.
Woo.
Which I take to mean, they know they've lost the argument and are expressing their displeasure at it. Because you can't say it's false when so many leading health organizations and news outlets are saying the exact same thing.
Geez....you want some cheese to go with all of that whine?
Thank you.
What was that Socrates said about debates and insults?
4 -
Goodness gracious.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/socrates-debate-lost-slander-loser/
I agree that obesity is an emerging issue in Africa, probably tagging along with prosperity and food security.
Check the etymology of quotes. All kinds of words are put in Einstein’s mouth as he is nearly universally believable. It makes sense that Socrates is misquoted too.
Snopes is good.
https://www.etymonline.com
If I see a claim in Wikipedia I also check the quoted sources.
Google scholar is good.
So do I.
5 -
Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Keto_Vampire wrote: »This is turning into a good old Sean Spicer press conference
People can use their eyes - the articles say exactly what I'm saying. But people want to believe what they want, I guess. This is what the "debate" sounded like on my end:
That's not a fact, you have no sources!
Here are some sources.
Those are from RICH countries!
Here's some sources about the poorer countries.
I don't like your sources!
Here are some other sources.
You conflated the numbers!
I quoted numbers that were stated from these sources.
I don't like those sources either, because politics!
Here's the story from a source from the opposite political spectrum.
I don't like those sources either!
Here are some other sources, straight from the people who study this for world leaders.
Your word choice is off!
I just quoted the words used by the sources.
Woo.
Which I take to mean, they know they've lost the argument and are expressing their displeasure at it. Because you can't say it's false when so many leading health organizations and news outlets are saying the exact same thing.
Geez....you want some cheese to go with all of that whine?
Thank you.
What was that Socrates said about debates and insults?
5 -
-
Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Keto_Vampire wrote: »This is turning into a good old Sean Spicer press conference
People can use their eyes - the articles say exactly what I'm saying. But people want to believe what they want, I guess. This is what the "debate" sounded like on my end:
That's not a fact, you have no sources!
Here are some sources.
Those are from RICH countries!
Here's some sources about the poorer countries.
I don't like your sources!
Here are some other sources.
You conflated the numbers!
I quoted numbers that were stated from these sources.
I don't like those sources either, because politics!
Here's the story from a source from the opposite political spectrum.
I don't like those sources either!
Here are some other sources, straight from the people who study this for world leaders.
Your word choice is off!
I just quoted the words used by the sources.
Woo.
Which I take to mean, they know they've lost the argument and are expressing their displeasure at it. Because you can't say it's false when so many leading health organizations and news outlets are saying the exact same thing.
Geez....you want some cheese to go with all of that whine?
Thank you.
What was that Socrates said about debates and insults?
I dont know...did he say that if you are trying to convince an audience of your point of view and they expressed skepticism of your claims that the best thing to do was not to ask them why they were skeptical and then respectfully respond to their concerns by tailoring your communicative style and points to address their points...no, the best thing to do to convince the audience was to baulk at the criticism and blame the audience for simply not understanding how clearly right you are despite your flawless evidence and perfect delivery?
Is that what he said?
Aaron, are you lecturing me about respect when you were the one to ask me if I wanted cheese with the whining?
Sounds like thee ought to take thine own advice, sir.
7 -
IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Keto_Vampire wrote: »This is turning into a good old Sean Spicer press conference
People can use their eyes - the articles say exactly what I'm saying. But people want to believe what they want, I guess. This is what the "debate" sounded like on my end:
That's not a fact, you have no sources!
Here are some sources.
Those are from RICH countries!
Here's some sources about the poorer countries.
I don't like your sources!
Here are some other sources.
You conflated the numbers!
I quoted numbers that were stated from these sources.
I don't like those sources either, because politics!
Here's the story from a source from the opposite political spectrum.
I don't like those sources either!
Here are some other sources, straight from the people who study this for world leaders.
Your word choice is off!
I just quoted the words used by the sources.
Woo.
Which I take to mean, they know they've lost the argument and are expressing their displeasure at it. Because you can't say it's false when so many leading health organizations and news outlets are saying the exact same thing.
Geez....you want some cheese to go with all of that whine?
Thank you.
What was that Socrates said about debates and insults?
I dont know...did he say that if you are trying to convince an audience of your point of view and they expressed skepticism of your claims that the best thing to do was not to ask them why they were skeptical and then respectfully respond to their concerns by tailoring your communicative style and points to address their points...no, the best thing to do to convince the audience was to baulk at the criticism and blame the audience for simply not understanding how clearly right you are despite your flawless evidence and perfect delivery?
Is that what he said?
Aaron, are you lecturing me about respect when you were the one to ask me if I wanted cheese with the whining?
Sounds like thee ought to take thine own advice, sir.
I dont know...I'm pretty sure I am taking into account the audience in the way I phrase my response.
Your intent appears to be convincing the audience of your point of view....my intent was to give the audience a bit of a chuckle and cathartic release. Not sure I am the one failing my goals here.7 -
Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Keto_Vampire wrote: »This is turning into a good old Sean Spicer press conference
People can use their eyes - the articles say exactly what I'm saying. But people want to believe what they want, I guess. This is what the "debate" sounded like on my end:
That's not a fact, you have no sources!
Here are some sources.
Those are from RICH countries!
Here's some sources about the poorer countries.
I don't like your sources!
Here are some other sources.
You conflated the numbers!
I quoted numbers that were stated from these sources.
I don't like those sources either, because politics!
Here's the story from a source from the opposite political spectrum.
I don't like those sources either!
Here are some other sources, straight from the people who study this for world leaders.
Your word choice is off!
I just quoted the words used by the sources.
Woo.
Which I take to mean, they know they've lost the argument and are expressing their displeasure at it. Because you can't say it's false when so many leading health organizations and news outlets are saying the exact same thing.
Geez....you want some cheese to go with all of that whine?
Thank you.
What was that Socrates said about debates and insults?
I dont know...did he say that if you are trying to convince an audience of your point of view and they expressed skepticism of your claims that the best thing to do was not to ask them why they were skeptical and then respectfully respond to their concerns by tailoring your communicative style and points to address their points...no, the best thing to do to convince the audience was to baulk at the criticism and blame the audience for simply not understanding how clearly right you are despite your flawless evidence and perfect delivery?
Is that what he said?
Aaron, are you lecturing me about respect when you were the one to ask me if I wanted cheese with the whining?
Sounds like thee ought to take thine own advice, sir.
I dont know...I'm pretty sure I am taking into account the audience in the way I phrase my response.
Your intent appears to be convincing the audience of your point of view....my intent was to give the audience a bit of a chuckle and cathartic release. Not sure I am the one failing my goals here.
Don't assume on my intent.
You're pretty.
7 -
IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Keto_Vampire wrote: »This is turning into a good old Sean Spicer press conference
People can use their eyes - the articles say exactly what I'm saying. But people want to believe what they want, I guess. This is what the "debate" sounded like on my end:
That's not a fact, you have no sources!
Here are some sources.
Those are from RICH countries!
Here's some sources about the poorer countries.
I don't like your sources!
Here are some other sources.
You conflated the numbers!
I quoted numbers that were stated from these sources.
I don't like those sources either, because politics!
Here's the story from a source from the opposite political spectrum.
I don't like those sources either!
Here are some other sources, straight from the people who study this for world leaders.
Your word choice is off!
I just quoted the words used by the sources.
Woo.
Which I take to mean, they know they've lost the argument and are expressing their displeasure at it. Because you can't say it's false when so many leading health organizations and news outlets are saying the exact same thing.
Geez....you want some cheese to go with all of that whine?
Thank you.
What was that Socrates said about debates and insults?
I dont know...did he say that if you are trying to convince an audience of your point of view and they expressed skepticism of your claims that the best thing to do was not to ask them why they were skeptical and then respectfully respond to their concerns by tailoring your communicative style and points to address their points...no, the best thing to do to convince the audience was to baulk at the criticism and blame the audience for simply not understanding how clearly right you are despite your flawless evidence and perfect delivery?
Is that what he said?
Aaron, are you lecturing me about respect when you were the one to ask me if I wanted cheese with the whining?
Sounds like thee ought to take thine own advice, sir.
I dont know...I'm pretty sure I am taking into account the audience in the way I phrase my response.
Your intent appears to be convincing the audience of your point of view....my intent was to give the audience a bit of a chuckle and cathartic release. Not sure I am the one failing my goals here.
Don't assume on my intent.
You're pretty.
I think he's rather handsome, myself.
Oh, wait, sorry. Thought I was in ChitChat for a sec...
5 -
IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Keto_Vampire wrote: »This is turning into a good old Sean Spicer press conference
People can use their eyes - the articles say exactly what I'm saying. But people want to believe what they want, I guess. This is what the "debate" sounded like on my end:
That's not a fact, you have no sources!
Here are some sources.
Those are from RICH countries!
Here's some sources about the poorer countries.
I don't like your sources!
Here are some other sources.
You conflated the numbers!
I quoted numbers that were stated from these sources.
I don't like those sources either, because politics!
Here's the story from a source from the opposite political spectrum.
I don't like those sources either!
Here are some other sources, straight from the people who study this for world leaders.
Your word choice is off!
I just quoted the words used by the sources.
Woo.
Which I take to mean, they know they've lost the argument and are expressing their displeasure at it. Because you can't say it's false when so many leading health organizations and news outlets are saying the exact same thing.
Geez....you want some cheese to go with all of that whine?
Thank you.
What was that Socrates said about debates and insults?
I dont know...did he say that if you are trying to convince an audience of your point of view and they expressed skepticism of your claims that the best thing to do was not to ask them why they were skeptical and then respectfully respond to their concerns by tailoring your communicative style and points to address their points...no, the best thing to do to convince the audience was to baulk at the criticism and blame the audience for simply not understanding how clearly right you are despite your flawless evidence and perfect delivery?
Is that what he said?
Aaron, are you lecturing me about respect when you were the one to ask me if I wanted cheese with the whining?
Sounds like thee ought to take thine own advice, sir.
I dont know...I'm pretty sure I am taking into account the audience in the way I phrase my response.
Your intent appears to be convincing the audience of your point of view....my intent was to give the audience a bit of a chuckle and cathartic release. Not sure I am the one failing my goals here.
Don't assume on my intent.
You're pretty.
Awww I'm pretty? Thank you!0 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Keto_Vampire wrote: »This is turning into a good old Sean Spicer press conference
People can use their eyes - the articles say exactly what I'm saying. But people want to believe what they want, I guess. This is what the "debate" sounded like on my end:
That's not a fact, you have no sources!
Here are some sources.
Those are from RICH countries!
Here's some sources about the poorer countries.
I don't like your sources!
Here are some other sources.
You conflated the numbers!
I quoted numbers that were stated from these sources.
I don't like those sources either, because politics!
Here's the story from a source from the opposite political spectrum.
I don't like those sources either!
Here are some other sources, straight from the people who study this for world leaders.
Your word choice is off!
I just quoted the words used by the sources.
Woo.
Which I take to mean, they know they've lost the argument and are expressing their displeasure at it. Because you can't say it's false when so many leading health organizations and news outlets are saying the exact same thing.
Geez....you want some cheese to go with all of that whine?
Thank you.
What was that Socrates said about debates and insults?
I dont know...did he say that if you are trying to convince an audience of your point of view and they expressed skepticism of your claims that the best thing to do was not to ask them why they were skeptical and then respectfully respond to their concerns by tailoring your communicative style and points to address their points...no, the best thing to do to convince the audience was to baulk at the criticism and blame the audience for simply not understanding how clearly right you are despite your flawless evidence and perfect delivery?
Is that what he said?
Aaron, are you lecturing me about respect when you were the one to ask me if I wanted cheese with the whining?
Sounds like thee ought to take thine own advice, sir.
I dont know...I'm pretty sure I am taking into account the audience in the way I phrase my response.
Your intent appears to be convincing the audience of your point of view....my intent was to give the audience a bit of a chuckle and cathartic release. Not sure I am the one failing my goals here.
Don't assume on my intent.
You're pretty.
I think he's rather handsome, myself.
Oh, wait, sorry. Thought I was in ChitChat for a sec...
I said it first. He's mine. Beat it toots.3 -
Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Keto_Vampire wrote: »This is turning into a good old Sean Spicer press conference
People can use their eyes - the articles say exactly what I'm saying. But people want to believe what they want, I guess. This is what the "debate" sounded like on my end:
That's not a fact, you have no sources!
Here are some sources.
Those are from RICH countries!
Here's some sources about the poorer countries.
I don't like your sources!
Here are some other sources.
You conflated the numbers!
I quoted numbers that were stated from these sources.
I don't like those sources either, because politics!
Here's the story from a source from the opposite political spectrum.
I don't like those sources either!
Here are some other sources, straight from the people who study this for world leaders.
Your word choice is off!
I just quoted the words used by the sources.
Woo.
Which I take to mean, they know they've lost the argument and are expressing their displeasure at it. Because you can't say it's false when so many leading health organizations and news outlets are saying the exact same thing.
Geez....you want some cheese to go with all of that whine?
Thank you.
What was that Socrates said about debates and insults?
I dont know...did he say that if you are trying to convince an audience of your point of view and they expressed skepticism of your claims that the best thing to do was not to ask them why they were skeptical and then respectfully respond to their concerns by tailoring your communicative style and points to address their points...no, the best thing to do to convince the audience was to baulk at the criticism and blame the audience for simply not understanding how clearly right you are despite your flawless evidence and perfect delivery?
Is that what he said?
Aaron, are you lecturing me about respect when you were the one to ask me if I wanted cheese with the whining?
Sounds like thee ought to take thine own advice, sir.
I dont know...I'm pretty sure I am taking into account the audience in the way I phrase my response.
Your intent appears to be convincing the audience of your point of view....my intent was to give the audience a bit of a chuckle and cathartic release. Not sure I am the one failing my goals here.
Don't assume on my intent.
You're pretty.
Awww I'm pretty? Thank you!
Woo.5 -
IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Aaron_K123 wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »Keto_Vampire wrote: »This is turning into a good old Sean Spicer press conference
People can use their eyes - the articles say exactly what I'm saying. But people want to believe what they want, I guess. This is what the "debate" sounded like on my end:
That's not a fact, you have no sources!
Here are some sources.
Those are from RICH countries!
Here's some sources about the poorer countries.
I don't like your sources!
Here are some other sources.
You conflated the numbers!
I quoted numbers that were stated from these sources.
I don't like those sources either, because politics!
Here's the story from a source from the opposite political spectrum.
I don't like those sources either!
Here are some other sources, straight from the people who study this for world leaders.
Your word choice is off!
I just quoted the words used by the sources.
Woo.
Which I take to mean, they know they've lost the argument and are expressing their displeasure at it. Because you can't say it's false when so many leading health organizations and news outlets are saying the exact same thing.
Geez....you want some cheese to go with all of that whine?
Thank you.
What was that Socrates said about debates and insults?
I dont know...did he say that if you are trying to convince an audience of your point of view and they expressed skepticism of your claims that the best thing to do was not to ask them why they were skeptical and then respectfully respond to their concerns by tailoring your communicative style and points to address their points...no, the best thing to do to convince the audience was to baulk at the criticism and blame the audience for simply not understanding how clearly right you are despite your flawless evidence and perfect delivery?
Is that what he said?
Aaron, are you lecturing me about respect when you were the one to ask me if I wanted cheese with the whining?
Sounds like thee ought to take thine own advice, sir.
I dont know...I'm pretty sure I am taking into account the audience in the way I phrase my response.
Your intent appears to be convincing the audience of your point of view....my intent was to give the audience a bit of a chuckle and cathartic release. Not sure I am the one failing my goals here.
Don't assume on my intent.
You're pretty.
Awww I'm pretty? Thank you!
Woo.
You mean that in the woo-hoo sense, yes?1 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »IHaveMyActTogether wrote: »You mean that in the woo-hoo sense, yes?snickerscharlie wrote: »You are certainly free to take it any way you choose. Doesn't automatically make it so, though.2
-
...Animals are a renewable food source. They reproduce. They also provide renewable food sources on their own, such as chickens/eggs.
I don't see any moral superiority or documented health improvements from a vegan/vegetarian diet. I don't see anything wrong with it if that's what somebody chooses, but "morality" in this sense is a subjective individual decision. Any diet is as "healthy" or "unhealthy" as somebody chooses to make it.
LOL. Animals eat plants, though. Don't you have to feed the animals before you can eat them? It takes a lot of plants to convert energy into animals. You could cut out the middle-man (animals) and just eat the plants yourself for better efficiency. (I'm not a vegetarian, I'm just sayin...in this hypothetical future, if there aren't enough plants to feed the people, why would there be enough plants to feed the animals to feed the people?)1 -
...Animals are a renewable food source. They reproduce. They also provide renewable food sources on their own, such as chickens/eggs.
I don't see any moral superiority or documented health improvements from a vegan/vegetarian diet. I don't see anything wrong with it if that's what somebody chooses, but "morality" in this sense is a subjective individual decision. Any diet is as "healthy" or "unhealthy" as somebody chooses to make it.
LOL. Animals eat plants, though. Don't you have to feed the animals before you can eat them? It takes a lot of plants to convert energy into animals. You could cut out the middle-man (animals) and just eat the plants yourself for better efficiency. (I'm not a vegetarian, I'm just sayin...in this hypothetical future, if there aren't enough plants to feed the people, why would there be enough plants to feed the animals to feed the people?)
I'll have a McKelp Burger, please.
...... but yeah, the logical alternative is to eat lower on the food chain, right?
1 -
...Animals are a renewable food source. They reproduce. They also provide renewable food sources on their own, such as chickens/eggs.
I don't see any moral superiority or documented health improvements from a vegan/vegetarian diet. I don't see anything wrong with it if that's what somebody chooses, but "morality" in this sense is a subjective individual decision. Any diet is as "healthy" or "unhealthy" as somebody chooses to make it.
LOL. Animals eat plants, though. Don't you have to feed the animals before you can eat them? It takes a lot of plants to convert energy into animals. You could cut out the middle-man (animals) and just eat the plants yourself for better efficiency. (I'm not a vegetarian, I'm just sayin...in this hypothetical future, if there aren't enough plants to feed the people, why would there be enough plants to feed the animals to feed the people?)
Don't free-range chickens eat grass, bugs and worms? They can have it. All of it.2 -
Motorsheen wrote: »SurfyPantsAgainAgain wrote: »L1zardQueen wrote: »Insects are the answer.
I don't know if they are the answer but they will definitely be a part of our diet. They already are in some countries. Water is the resource we ought to be concerned about. This resource is priceless and vital to our food supplies.
If we run outta water.... I'm not worried; I'll just drink Lemonade.
No Gatorade, it's full of electrolytes!0 -
Goodness gracious.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/socrates-debate-lost-slander-loser/
I agree that obesity is an emerging issue in Africa, probably tagging along with prosperity and food security.
Check the etymology of quotes. All kinds of words are put in Einstein’s mouth as he is nearly universally believable. It makes sense that Socrates is misquoted too.
Snopes is good.
https://www.etymonline.com
If I see a claim in Wikipedia I also check the quoted sources.
Google scholar is good.
6 -
I'm dead, cause I'm not eating bugs2
-
slimgirljo15 wrote: »I'm dead, cause I'm not eating bugs
Do you like shrimp? Or lobster? Crab?3
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 394 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 943 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions