Viewing the message boards in:

Gym Protocol

13

Replies

  • Posts: 571 Member
    back to the original convo... if it bothers you that someone jumped on the machine right next to you in an otherwise uncrowded area... smile at them as you get off your machine and move to another one. Easy Peasy. If they were trying to flirt, you've just let them know, nicely, that you're not interested. If they wanted motivation, you've let them know, nicely, that you're not it. And the smile? That lets them know that you're not being a beotch, you just want your own space. ;)
  • Posts: 2,469 Member
    mbaker566 wrote: »

    in the midst of depression and anxiety, it can hurt "that much."
    it can be terrifying and insurmountable.

    I am truly sorry for you.
  • Posts: 49 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »

    From one introvert to another, I completely understand :flowerforyou:

    Same here.
  • Posts: 810 Member
    annaskiski wrote: »

    It annoyed me because:

    1) I'm a geeky introvert. (I'm an engineer.) I despise anyone trying to talk to me at the gym.
    2) Before starting her treadmill, she took some time bending over pretending to do something with her shoes, but I could feel her eyes on me looking me over.
    3) She looked my controls over after starting her machine.


    1) i don't want to talk to others at the gym either, and i accomplish that by not making eye contact. (if I were an introverted geeky engineer, i' don't know how anyone would know that by looking at me, unless I wore a large label to that effect).
    1a) exception to eye contact is for loud conversationalists. I will wave to catch their eye, put my fingers to my lips, point at them, and then point to my headphones - all to communicate (usually effectively) that I can't hear my headphones because they're talking too loudly. I never actually have to open my mouth.
    2) + 3) It's beyond my imagination to think what possible risk any of this behavior poses. RISK , as in , something that will cause damage.

    You could choose to move to another machine, is the other option I can think of.

    hope you find a solution,.
  • Posts: 49 Member
    So, I've been thinking about this question. I'm an introvert by nature but I will also probably pick the machine next to the only person in the room rather than the opposite side of the room. At the very least, I'd chose one near to the only person in the room. I'm not sure why actually. Maybe there's still a pack mentality deep down in my psyche... I dunno.
  • Posts: 852 Member
    annaskiski wrote: »

    No one is claiming that this was the end of the world. (YOU are the one trying to make a big deal out of my question)

    I just found it annoying, and wondered if I was an oddball.

    Apparently not, as many agree that this is annoying.

    Or I was trying to be funny. Why do you assume I was making a big deal of it when I post a meme? That's about as far away from a big deal as the east is from the west.
  • Posts: 852 Member
    edited November 2018
    kimny72 wrote: »

    We live in a place and period of time where introverts are generally looked down at. But there have been other times/places where introverts were valued and probably will be again. Don't let it get to you. There are lots of us, we just don't realize it because we are all either avoiding each other or pretending to be extroverted in public so we don't get made fun of :blush:

    If you're a reader, check out Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking by Susan Cain.

    I have no problem smiling as I walk by someone or chatting with the cashier at the grocery. But yeah, it would make me uncomfortable if someone took the machine right next to me. Even with the possibility of their being a good reason! It's just my preference, and I'm allowed to have it, just like this other person is allowed to take the machine if they want. My POV is, why should we have to deal with each others noises, smells, etc if we don't have to? It's up to me what I do in reaction to it. The OP didn't seem to really have anything to do with "rights" or suggest it is the worst thing ever, just that it bothered them and wondered if it would've bothered others <shrug>

    FWIW, I'm a situational extrovert. (Edited to change that, I totally messed that up.)


    Say what?

    Years ago, when I was in the Army, I was given the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test. We took it while I was at Ft Gordon for Signal Officer Advanced training. I was an ESTJ with what I called a "flaming E" for full on extrovert.

    They gave us a second copy of the test with different, but just as effective questions and told us to go home, take off the uniform and take the test. I did.

    We got the results back after a few days and as I said, the in-class test was full on E. The at home test also came out ESTJ, but I was just barely an extrovert during the test taken at home.

    Bottom line, I'm sure we all vary in our personalities based on the situation. I might be a full on E in a group, and anyone who has taken a group exercise class with me may have experienced it. But in private, I'm comfortable in my own skin, being alone.

    I can imagine the opposite being the case. In public, someone who is an introvert may be even more introverted than they are at home, more relaxed.

    FWIW
  • Posts: 18,416 Member
    mph323 wrote: »

    TBH, I'm probably the person you had to get away from - my feet slap down pretty heavy and I know I make a lot of noise. Frankly, I just had to get over being self-conscious about it - I run how I run. I've seen other posts where people complain about people running too loudly on the treadmill and when I just started I thought I was being rude (even stopped running a couple of times when someone next to me was running faster so I wouldn't disturb them), but I've realized that there's no actual protocol for how loud you're allowed to be on the treadmill :)
    Don't get me wrong, I know heavy footfalls aren't something that are easy to control, not faulting anyone for that. You've got to run with the right form and cadence for you. I just had to move, though.
  • Posts: 641 Member

    Years ago, when I was in the Army, I was given the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test. We took it while I was at Ft Gordon for Signal Officer Advanced training. I was an ESTJ with what I called a "flaming E" for full on extrovert.

    They gave us a second copy of the test with different, but just as effective questions and told us to go home, take off the uniform and take the test. I did.

    We got the results back after a few days and as I said, the in-class test was full on E. The at home test also came out ESTJ, but I was just barely an extrovert during the test taken at home.

    Bottom line, I'm sure we all vary in our personalities based on the situation. I might be a full on E in a group, and anyone who has taken a group exercise class with me may have experienced it. But in private, I'm comfortable in my own skin, being alone.

    I can imagine the opposite being the case. In public, someone who is an introvert may be even more introverted than they are at home, more relaxed.

    FWIW

    Not to derail the conversation, but you do know that Myers-Briggs is a load of *kitten* right?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NQqSnkI32A
  • Posts: 852 Member
    I believe it was the National Academy of Sciences that found that only the E-I results of these tests had high correlation with other tests.

    I certainly wouldn't expect someone to choose a career based on the results of a test. However, I found it interesting that I was more of an E in a group setting, and closer to the middle when taking the test at home, in my fuzzy bunny slippers instead of combat boots.
    FireOpalCO wrote: »

    Not to derail the conversation, but you do know that Myers-Briggs is a load of *kitten* right?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NQqSnkI32A

  • Posts: 7,865 Member
    FireOpalCO wrote: »

    Not to derail the conversation, but you do know that Myers-Briggs is a load of *kitten* right?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NQqSnkI32A

    Whilst I'd agree that the MBTI is probably the weakest personality instrument available, these tools have their use. Later instruments are based in sounder science, although with all of them their generalisation isn't helpful.

    The value of any of these instruments is the discussion around it. Even as simple as described above, there's a discussion around what factors contribute to the difference in scoring.
  • Posts: 3,563 Member
    lkpducky wrote: »
    Don't get me wrong, I know heavy footfalls aren't something that are easy to control, not faulting anyone for that. You've got to run with the right form and cadence for you. I just had to move, though.

    Yeah, I do get that people can be distracting even when they're just carrying on as usual :)
  • Posts: 1,516 Member
    So, I've been thinking about this question. I'm an introvert by nature but I will also probably pick the machine next to the only person in the room rather than the opposite side of the room. At the very least, I'd chose one near to the only person in the room. I'm not sure why actually. Maybe there's still a pack mentality deep down in my psyche... I dunno.

    I think a lot of people do have that mentality. I'm kind of the opposite, but I've noticed some people just seem to like being close to other people, even strangers. Even in odd situations. Like, there are five stalls in the ladies room at my office. I have observed there is about a 90% chance that the person who comes in after me will pick a stall right next to mine. This happens consistently, regardless of which stall I choose. I don't know if it's a safety in numbers instinct or what.
  • Posts: 7,122 Member
    Treat the treadmills like frikken urinals people....

    Seems to bear repeating at this point.
  • Posts: 12,871 Member

    Seems to bear repeating at this point.

    And for those of us not up on our urinal etiquette? Pretty sure you're not supposed to stare... :tongue:
  • Posts: 28,439 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »

    And for those of us not up on our urinal etiquette? Pretty sure you're not supposed to stare... :tongue:

    If I jump in here, @tacklewasher's gonna call me a guy somehow, right? :laugh:
  • Posts: 49 Member

    I think a lot of people do have that mentality. I'm kind of the opposite, but I've noticed some people just seem to like being close to other people, even strangers. Even in odd situations. Like, there are five stalls in the ladies room at my office. I have observed there is about a 90% chance that the person who comes in after me will pick a stall right next to mine. This happens consistently, regardless of which stall I choose. I don't know if it's a safety in numbers instinct or what.

    That's kind of what I was thinking, a subconscious "safety in numbers" thing. What there is to be afraid of in a public place like a gym? I dunno, but yeah. It's kind of like that.
  • Posts: 810 Member
    I am not at the gym for a social experience, and I'm going out of my way to establish NO EYE CONTACT so that no one mistakes my presence as wanting more than what I'm obviously doing.

    I don't want to talk; I want to do my workout and go home, tyvm.

    I DO look at the bodies of the people who work out at my gym. Pretty much I focus on what the arms and legs are doing.

    I'm watching form (or lack of), effort, consistency, and if they use the provided wipes when done with the equipment.

    I am NOT doing a long penetrating kind of staring thing, not at all, it's a casual looking around that is meant to convey nothing but casual interest if someone sees me doing it.

    It's motivating to see fit bodies - it's my eyeball candy, if you will!

    I will sometimes take a brief glance at an adjacent cardio-equip user's info panel because I'm curious about the pace they are working at.

    Perhaps the OP and others similarly affected by nearby users could benefit with headsets and an audio book to keep their attention close at hand and less distracted by others.
  • Posts: 641 Member

    I think a lot of people do have that mentality. I'm kind of the opposite, but I've noticed some people just seem to like being close to other people, even strangers. Even in odd situations. Like, there are five stalls in the ladies room at my office. I have observed there is about a 90% chance that the person who comes in after me will pick a stall right next to mine. This happens consistently, regardless of which stall I choose. I don't know if it's a safety in numbers instinct or what.

    Well, I'm pretty sure every girl out there at some point has either said "um, do you have toilet paper" or "damn it, do you have a tampon" to the next stall. Maybe it affects our future behavior.
  • Posts: 278 Member
    Totally uncool.
    I work out a home but when I travel for work I use hotel gyms. I always take the wall machine. Sometimes someone breaks urinal code and gets the one next to me. I’m sure they quickly regret it with my huffing, puffing and noises trying to get through intervals :)
  • Posts: 7,122 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »

    And for those of us not up on our urinal etiquette? Pretty sure you're not supposed to stare... :tongue:

    https://brocode.org/a-quick-guide-to-urinal-etiquette/
This discussion has been closed.