IPA, antidepressants, menopause, and macros, oh my!

shellymichalski01
shellymichalski01 Posts: 4 Member
edited August 2022 in Motivation and Support
I've used MFP intermittently for a long time, with good results when I was younger. Then the accident and four major surgeries later my life is radically different. I used to be an endurance athlete....now I have to come in for a rest just from cutting branches in the yard! In the last 10 years I've gained about 10-15 lbs that simply won't come off (I'm 53 and also on antidepressants). My body dysmorphia is in high gear and I'm dreading the shortening of the days in the fall. My very favorite foods are IPA beer and dark chocolate...and oh I try. I try people, to tell myself that I'll just have a sip, then I fall down that slippery slope. This spring I decided to take charge and intermittent fasted for 14 weeks with a 1500 calorie restriction and lost NOTHING. NOTHING! Then I dipped my toe into a macro diet and to be honest I only put about a month in before traveling for a month to professional meetings killed that. There are no nutritionists in my area who take my health insurance. After this long diatribe, what I'm asking is - how do the rest of you feel about macro diets? Success? I feel powerless and alone.
Tagged:

Replies

  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    All diets are macro diets so would be helpful if you expanded on what your particular macro diet looked/looks like?
    The range of healthy diets is massive and can have wildly different macro composition as long as certain essential nutrients are included.

    My version of calorie counting while keeping an eye on my macros was simply to ensure I met or exceeded a fairly high protein goal (in grams), fat goal looked after itself naturally and carbs made up the majority of my diet within my calorie allowance. Yes it was successful but needed a small adjustment after a period of weeks to get my weekly calorie allowance right.

    My suspicion is that within the noise of dabbling in different named diets and eating styles you simply didn't get your overall calorie intake right. Could be wrong goal, could be inaccurate logging. With a private diary there's not a lot of data to go by if you want help.

    IPA - Oh, yes. I'll drink to that! :drinker:
  • RobynJ156
    RobynJ156 Posts: 1 Member
    I can relate to just about everything in your post, except for maybe the IPA. I'm more of a Negroni, bourbon, and red wine kind of girl. My doctor suggested 35% Protein, 35% Carb, and 30% Fat at 1500 calories originally. When I started losing, we adjusted the calories a bit. When I hit a plateau, I added more protein, as just about all research I've done says that is what women our age need - higher protein and intermitted strength training to build muscle. There are several websites that can help you determine the right about of calories you need to lose weight, based on your level of activity, age, etc. Bottom line, it can be tough to lose weight for women in and post menopause...but not impossible. Have patience - you've got this!!
  • shaconrad1
    shaconrad1 Posts: 1 Member
    You had me at endurance and surgeries, girl! I have always been an athlete, most of my adult life as an 50,75 and 100 mile endurance horse rider. Enter accident one in 2018 and two and three and now four (only one horse related). I've found myself after 9 major ortho surgeries up 50-60 lbs. I used to eat high protein, high fat, low carb, drop 20 in a month, but that doesn't work anymore. My exercise has gone down a ton but still highly active compared to most but now honestly just walking and light weights and farm work is what I can do. I still do ride my horse but the days of 35 mile training rides in 3-4 hours have been lost for while. I'm starting macros today. Never done it. Don't know if it will work, but I know what is not working for me now and have to try something else. You are not alone. BTW-I'm 47, no uterus, antidepressants, also a drinker.
  • April_M_2015
    April_M_2015 Posts: 18 Member
    I wish I had words of advice for the macro diet. These days I am struggling to count calories, struggling to exercise and struggling to care about it, while dreading taking a shower and seeing what I have become. I'm approaching 50, dreading the shorter days, drinking too much IPA and eating too many chips (I too love dark chocolate but chips are my kryptonite). Somehow everything seemed easier 3 years ago.

    I so relate to your situation and sending big hugs your way.
  • JBanx256
    JBanx256 Posts: 1,479 Member
    Gonna hijack this for just a second - have you heard of Beer Drop? It's an AWESOME subscription service; you can tell them which style(s) you do/don't like, and they'll ship you custom assortments accordingly.

    OKAY, now THAT'S out of the way - I'm honestly not sure what you're asking in regards to a "macro diet." I mean, any/all diets are comprised of macros?

    CURRENTLY (in maintenance), I've got my daily calories set to 3467, with macro breakdown of roughly 20%P, 50%C, and 30%F. However, since I'm not training for anything in particular, as long as I hit my protein goal (TBH normally I go well over it, not intentionally, just because that's how I eat), I more or less let the carbs & fats fall where they may.

    When I'm cutting, those all change though. I keep my protein constant, so the percentage of protein compared to my overall calories increases. I also have a "floor" for my fats, as to support hormonal function etc.
  • shellymichalski01
    shellymichalski01 Posts: 4 Member
    OMG it's taken me this long to figure out how to REPLY to comments on my thread. Thank you all for being so supportive! I was using 'If It Fits Your Macros' service to figure out what my daily macros should be given my exercise/age/sex. They suggested 1778 calories per day which I thought was way too high for a 53 year old woman. The macros they suggested were: Protein: 118 grams per day
    Carbs: 142 grams per day (29 - 30 of which should be from fiber)
    Fat: 82 grams per day
    Water: 3 to 4 liters per day in addition to your regular fluid intake (on top of coffee, soda, tea, etc.)

    I still have a really hard time hitting that protein, and am not enjoying the constipation that comes with it. I take metamucil and drink TONS of water per day but still get stopped up.

    Have any of you tried the 'IIFYM' program? For fitness I do daily BeachbodyOnDemand workouts, take walks, ride my bike, work in the yard. I used to swim with the Masters swim team but I got burned out after 6 years and don't even want to look at a pool. My crappy joints prevent any high impact workout and it's SO FRUSTRATING. Honestly it would be so much less work if I could just accept the middle aged weight gain but I can't seem to win in that arena.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,632 Member
    OMG it's taken me this long to figure out how to REPLY to comments on my thread. Thank you all for being so supportive! I was using 'If It Fits Your Macros' service to figure out what my daily macros should be given my exercise/age/sex. They suggested 1778 calories per day which I thought was way too high for a 53 year old woman. The macros they suggested were: Protein: 118 grams per day
    Carbs: 142 grams per day (29 - 30 of which should be from fiber)
    Fat: 82 grams per day
    Water: 3 to 4 liters per day in addition to your regular fluid intake (on top of coffee, soda, tea, etc.)

    I still have a really hard time hitting that protein, and am not enjoying the constipation that comes with it. I take metamucil and drink TONS of water per day but still get stopped up.

    Have any of you tried the 'IIFYM' program? For fitness I do daily BeachbodyOnDemand workouts, take walks, ride my bike, work in the yard. I used to swim with the Masters swim team but I got burned out after 6 years and don't even want to look at a pool. My crappy joints prevent any high impact workout and it's SO FRUSTRATING. Honestly it would be so much less work if I could just accept the middle aged weight gain but I can't seem to win in that arena.

    I don't know if 1778 is too high. I maintain (at 5'5", 120s pounds, age 66, pretty active) on around 2200 calories, so 1778 would be close to a pound a week loss. I lost most of 50+ pounds on 1400-1600 plus all exercise calories (standard MFP method), so usually 1600-2000 calories most days. These days, I target minimum 100g protein, 50g fat, usually exceed those, don't care where carbs end up. I got a bit less than those amounts while losing, on lower calories . . . maybe 90s grams of protein most days?

    Banx up there eats way more calories to maintain than I do at around the same height (but she's statistically unusual), and has a much higher protein target because of body composition and goals, so this stuff is not one size fits all.

    Did you check out that Examine.com protein calculator I suggested, for a comparison value? If you're getting constipated from too much protein (which seems a little odd to me at 118g in the first place?), do you really need that much?

    Why not try the 1778 for 4-6 weeks, see what happens? It's not implausible. Often, I feel like we women have it stuck in our minds that we need to eat 1200 calories or less to lose weight, but it's not necessarily true. Smaller, older, less active women are more likely to fall that low, but that's not all of us, y'know?

    Setting too low a calorie goal makes practical weight loss harder: Can tank energy level (so reduce calorie expenditure), make us lose lean mass, make it harder to stick with our routine long enough to lose meaningful amounts of weight, and more. That would all be counterproductive.

    As an aside, 3-4 liters of water in addition to other fluids sounds like kind of a lot, to me. Hydration needs are pretty individual, depending on activities, climate, and more. If you're drinking enough (all sources) that your urine is pale yellow (not dark), you're probably fine.
  • shellymichalski01
    shellymichalski01 Posts: 4 Member
    Thanks for your input.,,,I'm willing to give the 1178 calories with 118 g protein a try based on your experience!
  • globalhiker
    globalhiker Posts: 1,739 Member
    Hi there...here is what helps me: why not try switching up everything. Sounds like your body is smart and adapted. Try something totally new - like bodycombat class or weightlifting or rollerskating, etc. Try increasing your calories and eating at different times but only when the stomach is growling. Engage in something new that nourishes your spirit and brings you joy. Do a 360.

    I have the type of physiology that is highly adaptive. I can do a ton of exercise and over time, my body adjusts to it so I need less food. Even my average heart rate gets down to 50 which means when I sit, my metabolism is really, really slow. Body thinks it's being efficient. The only times I lost dramatic weight was with switching it up and doing high intensity and muscle building workouts and consuming quality protein within an hour after (like 5 egg whites with salsa).



  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    Hi there...here is what helps me: why not try switching up everything. Sounds like your body is smart and adapted. Try something totally new - like bodycombat class or weightlifting or rollerskating, etc. Try increasing your calories and eating at different times but only when the stomach is growling. Engage in something new that nourishes your spirit and brings you joy. Do a 360.

    I have the type of physiology that is highly adaptive. I can do a ton of exercise and over time, my body adjusts to it so I need less food.Even my average heart rate gets down to 50 which means when I sit, my metabolism is really, really slow. Body thinks it's being efficient. The only times I lost dramatic weight was with switching it up and doing high intensity and muscle building workouts and consuming quality protein within an hour after (like 5 egg whites with salsa).



    No your body can't adjust like that to exercise - it's a common myth.

    Your heart rate being low also isn't an indicator of your metabolism being slow - it's (usually) an indicator of high fitness levels. A better trained heart pumps more blood per beat which if you are using heart rate as a basis for calorie estimates means those estimates are going to be wrong.
    e.g. My RHR used to be over 60 and now it's dropped 20% but that just means it's working better, I'm not burning less calories.

    If you want to get reassurance your metabolism is normal you can get a resting metabolic rate test from breath analysis.

  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,632 Member
    Hi there...here is what helps me: why not try switching up everything. Sounds like your body is smart and adapted. Try something totally new - like bodycombat class or weightlifting or rollerskating, etc. Try increasing your calories and eating at different times but only when the stomach is growling. Engage in something new that nourishes your spirit and brings you joy. Do a 360.

    I have the type of physiology that is highly adaptive. I can do a ton of exercise and over time, my body adjusts to it so I need less food. Even my average heart rate gets down to 50 which means when I sit, my metabolism is really, really slow. Body thinks it's being efficient. The only times I lost dramatic weight was with switching it up and doing high intensity and muscle building workouts and consuming quality protein within an hour after (like 5 egg whites with salsa).



    1. Sijomial is correct. Bodies don't adapt to exercise in that way: Doing X amount of work requires Y energy, because physics. We can get a little more efficient at some activities (waste less effort, so burn fewer calories), and as we get lighter we'll burn fewer calories doing exercises that involve moving our body through space because that's less work in physics terms. These are relatively small effects, in the big picture. Lowered heart rate is a fitness adaptation. The reduction in calorie burn from slightly fewer heartbeats is trivial, especially in a setting where the heart is doing more work per beat (moving higher blood volume).

    2. Switching up a bunch of things randomly just to "shock the body" is no way to learn how one's individual body responds to circumstances and stimuli. It may work, in some sense - possibly just by taking up calendar time until a water weight drop that would've happened anyway - but it's not a great formula for long-term progress. No learning.
  • shellymichalski01
    shellymichalski01 Posts: 4 Member
    I'm limited because of my injuries but this is all good advice. The problem is that I used to be able to just exercise off extra weight, but that's not a reality anymore. I have to buckle down on my diet, and because I'm a drinker that's tough for me.