YES!!! or NO!!!

I am on a low 'no' diet -- so I only eat 'yes'! When you are on a low-no diet, you force your body to love only yes. After a few days of eating only yes, you lose inches on your waist and hips. You have more energy and you sleep like a baby. Yes doesn't taste as good as no, but a diet of mostly no is definitely not healthy. So, the only answer is YES. There, I rest my case. :bigsmile:

50-50...damn i used that..

can i phone a friend? men this is hard! ummmm ummmm ummm...i sayy....ummmm..i cant decide

your all confusing me..y do ya;s make it so hard.!

Majority rules!

finally.

BTW look where ask the audience got ya..lol

Do your research and find your own answer

http://mind.oxfordjournals.org/content/109/436/781.short

In what does the sense of a sentential connective consist? Like many others, I hold that its sense lies in rules that govern deductions. In the present paper, however, I argue that a classical logician should take the relevant deductions to be arguments involving affirmative or negative answers to yes-or-no questions that contain the connective. An intuitionistic logician will differ in concentrating exclusively upon affirmative answers. I conclude by arguing that a well known intuitionistic criticism of classical logic fails if the answer 'No' is accorded parity with the answer 'Yes'.

So clearly to prevent the failure of logic the answer is "yes"

Do your research and find your own answer

http://mind.oxfordjournals.org/content/109/436/781.short

In what does the sense of a sentential connective consist? Like many others, I hold that its sense lies in rules that govern deductions. In the present paper, however, I argue that a classical logician should take the relevant deductions to be arguments involving affirmative or negative answers to yes-or-no questions that contain the connective. An intuitionistic logician will differ in concentrating exclusively upon affirmative answers. I conclude by arguing that a well known intuitionistic criticism of classical logic fails if the answer 'No' is accorded parity with the answer 'Yes'.

So clearly to prevent the failure of logic the answer is "yes"

I think you win the internet.

I don't care either way .... Just don't take my coffee away! I'm begging you.... :0

Well In the peer review sources of www.wikipedia.org/ The answer was NO!

I have to seriously question your logic if you actually believe that.

Well, YES of course.

I'm a YES girl.

I'm Switzerland!

umh...NO... I like this lol

HMMMMM, trying to decide.......

Well In the peer review sources of www.wikipedia.org/ The answer was NO!

I have to seriously question your logic if you actually believe that.

Logic has no place in this debate!

What's logic again? One of my sisters friends tried it and it works plus I am a MAN!:laugh:

Are you kidding me?!?!? YES! ABSOLUTELY.
No...... wait. Upon further consideration.....

No. Not even.

Although....there was that one time at band camp.......no. no no no no, I must say yes. Clearly I must say yes.


YES.

Do your research and find your own answer

http://mind.oxfordjournals.org/content/109/436/781.short

In what does the sense of a sentential connective consist? Like many others, I hold that its sense lies in rules that govern deductions. In the present paper, however, I argue that a classical logician should take the relevant deductions to be arguments involving affirmative or negative answers to yes-or-no questions that contain the connective. An intuitionistic logician will differ in concentrating exclusively upon affirmative answers. I conclude by arguing that a well known intuitionistic criticism of classical logic fails if the answer 'No' is accorded parity with the answer 'Yes'.

So clearly to prevent the failure of logic the answer is "yes"

This gave me a headache trying to read it. Are you running for President? Sounded like a debate answer.

I will have to go with yes because I didn't eat all my exercise calories back so I ate the no so I didn't go into starvation mode : /

Does YES!!! weigh heavier than NO!!!?

One pound of YES weighs more than one pound of NO.

Duh.
[/quote The correct way to say that is "one pound of YES weighs more than one pound of NO *PER VOLUME*"


So does that mean, that I can eat back my calories?

Clearly the metabolic spikes of several small NOs taken in the course of the day roughly equals the thermic effect of a few large YESs.

I'm fairly certain I read that on Alan Aragon's website.