what are people's thoughts about the paleo diet

1246

Replies

  • I have a friend who has lost fifty pounds so far just by eating Paleo, so I decided to give it a shot. I feel better, have lots more energy, and have lost 16 pounds in three weeks. I am never hungry, so I have no trouble resisting sugar and carbs. There is a lot of research behind living a Paleo lifestyle, and it isn't some fad diet that tells you to only eat one food or drastically restrict your calories. Obviously, processed foods are not good for you. Sugar is not good for you, and excessive carb intake is not good for you. I encourage you to give it a try, and see if you feel better. If you don't, what have you lost? Good luck in your journey to better health!!

    Please provide said research.

    Thanks.
    [ /quote]

    For some of the evidence behind these statements, Read Escape the Diet Trap by Dr John Briffa. He doesn't call his Primal or Paleo, but it's basically the same idea. And, he gives references at the end to back up the science on carbs, refined sugar, etc. Also, the Mark's Daily Apple website isn't necessarily referenced ( I don't know that for sure, I haven't checked yet), but it's a good source of information. There was a good article by Dr Richard Lipman about dieting through the ages that mentions lower carb dieting as early as 1825. Again, I'm not sure if this was referenced though it was a scientific article, so it should be (I read it a few years ago, and it stuck with me). Still, it's an interesting read.

    This sure is a hotly debated topic, and it's unusual that people who are vehemently attacking it and judging those who are successfully losing this way have never tried it?? I mean, I wouldn't necessarily choose to be a vegetarian or a vegan, but I lived that way for several years, so at least I know why it didn't work for me; and just because it wasn't for me, definitely does not give me the right to demand the research to prove it's better, and attack other people's choice.

    The bottom line, with or without the research, I feel better, I am not starving hungry all the time, or thinking about my next meal constantly, the weight is coming off, and I feel really good about the food I am putting in my body...finally! I don't feel a bit deprived or like I'm missing anything; it seems silly now to think about missing factory produced food when I can have the real thing!
  • amoffatt
    amoffatt Posts: 674 Member
    One of my pet peeves is when people say a diet is or is not sustainable. Unless we are talking about a person who is held captive or in some other way has had all decision making re: food removed, or we are talking about a diet that is actually lethal when followed, whether a diet is sustainable is a completely individual thing, influenced by many things including culture, psychology, and physiology.

    I have the same pet peeve plus those who ask me "how did you lose weight/" "You should try this" or "I heard that this NEW diet you count this not that, add this take away that." People know I am not a fan of "diets" and eating plans that make me eliminate, eat their food only, I have to pay for it and especailly not being taught how to properly eat and lose on my own in everyday living. Now, I am doing it and losing weight and its staying off!!
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Listen to the science and don't eat them. Whether they cause you to binge or not, there is plenty of science showing sugar and processed carbs are not healthy.

    Fruit is healthy.

    Why yes, it is.
  • Sublog
    Sublog Posts: 1,296 Member
    All diets work that causes you to eat less calories than your burn.

    I eat ice cream and steak and sugar and lose 150 lbs. Paleo, take that.
  • h0t_m0m
    h0t_m0m Posts: 79 Member
    It all comes down to personal choice and what helps weightloss easier for someone. The food industry and marketing has definitely made it easier for people to choose to overeat. Look at all the convenience foods in the grocery store, all the fast food restaurants, the portion sizes in restaurants, commercials, free samples in the mall, etc.

    But, for any diet to result in weightloss, you have to take in less calories than you burn. That is the simple science. It all comes down to personal choice and willpower.

    "Diets" usually provide a starting point for people looking for help. I for one have done the Belly Fat Cure and Primal. I have now decided that the best thing that works for me and my family is whole foods. Real meats (no hormones, nitrites, nitrates, etc), organic fruits and vegetables, whole grains and unrefined sugars/natural sugars. In the end, no matter what I put in my mouth, in order to see the number go down on the scale, I have to have a calorie deficit.
  • grinch031
    grinch031 Posts: 1,679

    For some of the evidence behind these statements, Read Escape the Diet Trap by Dr John Briffa. He doesn't call his Primal or Paleo, but it's basically the same idea. And, he gives references at the end to back up the science on carbs, refined sugar, etc. Also, the Mark's Daily Apple website isn't necessarily referenced ( I don't know that for sure, I haven't checked yet), but it's a good source of information. There was a good article by Dr Richard Lipman about dieting through the ages that mentions lower carb dieting as early as 1825. Again, I'm not sure if this was referenced though it was a scientific article, so it should be (I read it a few years ago, and it stuck with me). Still, it's an interesting read.

    This sure is a hotly debated topic, and it's unusual that people who are vehemently attacking it and judging those who are successfully losing this way have never tried it?? I mean, I wouldn't necessarily choose to be a vegetarian or a vegan, but I lived that way for several years, so at least I know why it didn't work for me; and just because it wasn't for me, definitely does not give me the right to demand the research to prove it's better, and attack other people's choice.

    The bottom line, with or without the research, I feel better, I am not starving hungry all the time, or thinking about my next meal constantly, the weight is coming off, and I feel really good about the food I am putting in my body...finally! I don't feel a bit deprived or like I'm missing anything; it seems silly now to think about missing factory produced food when I can have the real thing!

    They are attacking it because they need science in order to believe in it. Some people need science, some need observation, and some go by faith alone (ie. religion). I happen to need observation more than science, but its nice when science also supports it. If I can observe that a diet has success for a number of people, then I consider it legit. If the underlying science is lacking or wrong, so be it, the diet still works and one day science will better explain why. If someone tells me a diet works and nobody can attest that it worked for them or was at all sustainable, then I will blow it off.
  • I should add that I'm rarely in calorie deficit, in fact, I'm usually over my limit, and I'm still losing ( I had to stop tracking food because of this,..it was freaking me out!). Not sure why, don't care!!

    Also, with many of these books and Mark Sisson's website, this is not all or nothing. If you are presented with cake, and you want the cake, eat the cake, just don't do it day after day. It's not all that much different to the everything in moderation method, it's just a different approach, and a different angle.

    Seriously, why does cutting out a food group drive so many people crazy?? Do vegetarians get this, as well??
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    People on this board continuously try to say that sugar and refined carbs aren't unhealthy, don't cause obesity, etc.. Yet every time I eat them I end up binging on them and gaining weight. Or if I keep eating them and restrict calories, I'm starving all the time.

    So am I supposed to listen to the "science", or follow the fad diet that actually allows me to lose weight? I'm going to choose the fad diet regardless of what the underlying science is.

    Listen to the science and don't eat them. Whether they cause you to binge or not, there is plenty of science showing sugar and processed carbs are not healthy.

    Yeah but according to the experts here, if I just "eat in moderation" i will create my caloric deficit and lose weight, right?

    Well, yes. But losing weight and eating healthy are not the same subject. There is the oft referred to Twinkie Diet as proof that you can lose weight while eating sugar and processed crap food as long as you have a calorie deficit. But the odds that you'll remain healthy are far better if you eat healthy foods.
  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    I should add that I'm rarely in calorie deficit, in fact, I'm usually over my limit, and I'm still losing ( I had to stop tracking food because of this,..it was freaking me out!). Not sure why, don't care!!

    Are you saying you're consistently eating in a surplus and losing weight? or am i misunderstanding what you wrote?
  • grinch031
    grinch031 Posts: 1,679
    I should add that I'm rarely in calorie deficit, in fact, I'm usually over my limit, and I'm still losing ( I had to stop tracking food because of this,..it was freaking me out!). Not sure why, don't care!!

    You are still in a calorie deficit if you're losing weight, as your tracked numbers are just estimates.
  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    They are attacking it because they need science in order to believe in it. Some people need science, some need observation, and some go by faith alone (ie. religion). I happen to need observation more than science, but its nice when science also supports it. If I can observe that a diet has success for a number of people, then I consider it legit. If the underlying science is lacking or wrong, so be it, the diet still works and one day science will better explain why. If someone tells me a diet works and nobody can attest that it worked for them or was at all sustainable, then I will blow it off.

    The issue with just relying on observations is that people then falsely beleive something works for the wrong reasons. So people lost weight on a diet not because of a caloric deficit but for some magical reason like they ate while hopping on one foot or eliminated grains or cut carbs. The same goes for supplements, people see that someone or a group of people lost weight taking something and beleive that it works, while there are numerous other confounders at play
  • grinch031
    grinch031 Posts: 1,679
    People on this board continuously try to say that sugar and refined carbs aren't unhealthy, don't cause obesity, etc.. Yet every time I eat them I end up binging on them and gaining weight. Or if I keep eating them and restrict calories, I'm starving all the time.

    So am I supposed to listen to the "science", or follow the fad diet that actually allows me to lose weight? I'm going to choose the fad diet regardless of what the underlying science is.

    Listen to the science and don't eat them. Whether they cause you to binge or not, there is plenty of science showing sugar and processed carbs are not healthy.

    Yeah but according to the experts here, if I just "eat in moderation" i will create my caloric deficit and lose weight, right?

    Well, yes. But losing weight and eating healthy are not the same subject. There is the oft referred to Twinkie Diet as proof that you can lose weight while eating sugar and processed crap food as long as you have a calorie deficit. But the odds that you'll remain healthy are far better if you eat healthy foods.

    Or the odds that my deficit will last more than a month are better if I eat healthy foods.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Seriously, why does cutting out a food group drive so many people crazy?? Do vegetarians get this, as well??

    OMG, yes!! Do a search for vegan or vegetarian and you'll find the same sort of arguments. Low-carb is another good one.

    The only thing about any of these restrictive diets that drives me crazy is when people spout nonsense as fact. Meat is not bad. Beans are not bad. Whole grains are not bad. Any of these, and many other foods, may be bad on an individual level, but they are not bad for everyone.

    I once had a paleo enthusiast tell me that legumes were poisonous. Well, since I'm 50, disease free and I've been eating beans for as long as I can remember, I knew this was utter nonsense. That was one of the first paleo threads I'd ever read and I'll admit that for while I thought everyone following the paleo lifestyle might be a bit looney. (I don't think that now)
  • grinch031
    grinch031 Posts: 1,679
    They are attacking it because they need science in order to believe in it. Some people need science, some need observation, and some go by faith alone (ie. religion). I happen to need observation more than science, but its nice when science also supports it. If I can observe that a diet has success for a number of people, then I consider it legit. If the underlying science is lacking or wrong, so be it, the diet still works and one day science will better explain why. If someone tells me a diet works and nobody can attest that it worked for them or was at all sustainable, then I will blow it off.

    The issue with just relying on observations is that people then falsely beleive something works for the wrong reasons. So people lost weight on a diet not because of a caloric deficit but for some magical reason like they ate while hopping on one foot or eliminated grains or cut carbs. The same goes for supplements, people see that someone or a group of people lost weight taking something and beleive that it works, while there are numerous other confounders at play

    But I think it is exaggerated how many people actually believe that some diet works for the magical reasons claimed by the creator of the diet. For instance, if you go to a low-carb message board, most of them actually believe that low-carb diets are effective because they prevent overeating, not because its impossible to get fat eating low-carb. But every time someone even mentions low-carb here, it is assumed they/we all believe the same magic.

    If someone here posts that its impossible to get fat on a low-carb diet, I don't object to correct them on the science. I just hate when people go the other extreme and start bashing the entire diet just because someone is making incorrect statements about the science.
  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    But I think it is exaggerated how many people actually believe that some diet works for the magical reasons claimed by the creator of the diet. For instance, if you go to a low-carb message board, most of them actually believe that low-carb diets are effective because they prevent overeating, not because its impossible to get fat eating low-carb. But every time someone even mentions low-carb here, it is assumed they/we all believe the same magic.

    If someone here posts that its impossible to get fat on a low-carb diet, I don't object to correct them on the science. I just hate when people go the other extreme and start bashing the entire diet just because someone is making incorrect statements about the science.

    And if you pay attention to the same threads, there are lots of people who beleive in the magic. Like oh i went low carb to prevent insulin spikes and now eat lots of protein or yesterday someone was talking about how fructose turns right to fat and is not used by the body at all. There is so much garbage on both sides of the arguments, because you see just as much ignorance and stupidity on the anti low carb side as well
  • QueenHanifa
    QueenHanifa Posts: 180 Member
    bump
  • grinch031
    grinch031 Posts: 1,679
    But I think it is exaggerated how many people actually believe that some diet works for the magical reasons claimed by the creator of the diet. For instance, if you go to a low-carb message board, most of them actually believe that low-carb diets are effective because they prevent overeating, not because its impossible to get fat eating low-carb. But every time someone even mentions low-carb here, it is assumed they/we all believe the same magic.

    If someone here posts that its impossible to get fat on a low-carb diet, I don't object to correct them on the science. I just hate when people go the other extreme and start bashing the entire diet just because someone is making incorrect statements about the science.

    And if you pay attention to the same threads, there are lots of people who beleive in the magic. Like oh i went low carb to prevent insulin spikes and now eat lots of protein or yesterday someone was talking about how fructose turns right to fat and is not used by the body at all. There is so much garbage on both sides of the arguments, because you see just as much ignorance and stupidity on the anti low carb side as well

    I'm not ruling out insulin quite yet. I don't think its the only thing, but I certainly think it matters.

    http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/83/6/1911.full
  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    But I think it is exaggerated how many people actually believe that some diet works for the magical reasons claimed by the creator of the diet. For instance, if you go to a low-carb message board, most of them actually believe that low-carb diets are effective because they prevent overeating, not because its impossible to get fat eating low-carb. But every time someone even mentions low-carb here, it is assumed they/we all believe the same magic.

    If someone here posts that its impossible to get fat on a low-carb diet, I don't object to correct them on the science. I just hate when people go the other extreme and start bashing the entire diet just because someone is making incorrect statements about the science.

    And if you pay attention to the same threads, there are lots of people who beleive in the magic. Like oh i went low carb to prevent insulin spikes and now eat lots of protein or yesterday someone was talking about how fructose turns right to fat and is not used by the body at all. There is so much garbage on both sides of the arguments, because you see just as much ignorance and stupidity on the anti low carb side as well

    I'm not ruling out insulin quite yet. I don't think its the only thing, but I certainly think it matters.

    http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/83/6/1911.full

    I've actually been waiting for someone to bring that study up, my two main issues with it, were a 24hr food diary recall to est a baseline and the use of BIA for bf testing. But this also begs the question, seeing as that was done in '98 why hasn't it been widely marketed for weight loss and why haven't similar products in the same vein been created and marketed for weight loss?
  • MaddameKat
    MaddameKat Posts: 200 Member
    I have been on it a week, i thought about starting it in Jan but balked at the idea of no oatmeal in the morning.

    I don't feel physically any different but i am always am under my cals which i find helpful and i feel metally better that i eat foods that are much better for me. I don't care if people think if its a fad. I feel that for me its is better that where i was... trying to eat clean but sneaking takeout in more often than not as SO would tempt me. so far i have had 2 mini mini brownies and otherwise no slips. I still eat yogurt and cheese as they have no affect on me. either way i am giving it til mid march and then reviewing. I like that fact that even if i mess up my diet will still be clean!

    Edit: I should also say that grains and sugar give me a sexy 9 months preggers bloat look.. without them i look normal ( well fat but not bloated!):laugh:
  • Marll
    Marll Posts: 904 Member
    its trash..like all fad diets.

    we are not cavemen..we have evolved since then..and have different dietary needs

    i'm not on it but i disagree. there are some good things about it. eating foods in their natural state is good. not eating processed foods is good. i may not agree with all of it but i don't think "it's trash"

    But that's not paleo so to speak, that's just eating better quality foods. Paleo actually eliminates other things that are healthy like grains (corn, maize, barley, rice, oats etc) , salt, dairy etc and even legumes! Madness!

    Except that grains are found to be decidedly not healthy based on mounting research. It may still be in its infancy, but we'll see in the coming years that all the wheat, corn, legumes and other other grains are really a detriment to the human body. Rice is one of the few that is decidedly neutral from what I've been reading, neither good nor bad, it just IS.
  • taso42
    taso42 Posts: 8,980 Member
    its trash..like all fad diets.

    we are not cavemen..we have evolved since then..and have different dietary needs

    i'm not on it but i disagree. there are some good things about it. eating foods in their natural state is good. not eating processed foods is good. i may not agree with all of it but i don't think "it's trash"

    But that's not paleo so to speak, that's just eating better quality foods. Paleo actually eliminates other things that are healthy like grains (corn, maize, barley, rice, oats etc) , salt, dairy etc and even legumes! Madness!

    Except that grains are found to be decidedly not healthy based on mounting research. It may still be in its infancy, but we'll see in the coming years that all the wheat, corn, legumes and other other grains are really a detriment to the human body. Rice is one of the few that is decidedly neutral from what I've been reading, neither good nor bad, it just IS.

    and so it goes, ad nauseum
  • Marll
    Marll Posts: 904 Member
    I think for short term to clean out your body of impurities in your diet it's awesome, long term it's expensive, time consuming and you will miss bread. Lifestyle change is much easier.

    I'm not sure how it's more expensive? I've been eating like this more or less for just short of a year and my grocery bill went DOWN by about $150/mo. I don't miss bread at all, though occasionally will make bread with almond flour and other ingredients that are not grain based and be happy. I eat it and don't get the craving for MORE bread.

    And how is a lifestyle change easier? Going this direction is a lifestyle change in itself. Paleo/Primal is more than just food, it's trying to really think about your food sources, making good decisions and buying from local farms whenever possible. Its about getting enough rest and exercise together and trying to reconnect with nature. If I was a vegan saying the same things people would think that I'm a genius.
  • Marll
    Marll Posts: 904 Member
    bump, these threads are always fun to read

    Damn straight, debate is fun :laugh:
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    I think for short term to clean out your body of impurities in your diet it's awesome, long term it's expensive, time consuming and you will miss bread. Lifestyle change is much easier.

    I'm not sure how it's more expensive? I've been eating like this more or less for just short of a year and my grocery bill went DOWN by about $150/mo. I don't miss bread at all, though occasionally will make bread with almond flour and other ingredients that are not grain based and be happy. I eat it and don't get the craving for MORE bread.

    And how is a lifestyle change easier? Going this direction is a lifestyle change in itself. Paleo/Primal is more than just food, it's trying to really think about your food sources, making good decisions and buying from local farms whenever possible. Its about getting enough rest and exercise together and trying to reconnect with nature. If I was a vegan saying the same things people would think that I'm a genius.

    I don't know where you are, but here, local meat is much more expensive than regular supermarket meat. Grass fed butter and other things like that that I have seen people who follow this diet eat are outrageous in price. Vegetables are also more expensive unless I can get them at the Farmer's market when they are available. Last year was a bad year, so it wasn't as easy.

    You don't have to eat paleo to reconsider your food sources. I support local farms for a number of reasons but I don't eat Paleo. I also wonder how sustainable the paleo diet is environmentally. I can do everything you have said and still eat grains from my local farms.
  • Sidesteal
    Sidesteal Posts: 5,510 Member
    based on mounting research

    Can you share any of it?
  • LelliAmi
    LelliAmi Posts: 327 Member
    it sounds gross to me. i think it's important for people to do what's healthy overall, not what helps lose a bit of weight. i'm a vegetarian so i eat lots of whole grains, colourful veggies, fruits and lots of nuts, legumes and soy products. (and contrary to popular belief, soy is not bad for you. it's a real bean from a real plant) i also drink a lot of tea...
  • LelliAmi
    LelliAmi Posts: 327 Member
    "A 2011 ranking by US News & World Report, involving a panel of 22 experts, ranked the Paleo diet lowest of the 20 diets evaluated based on factors including health, weight-loss and ease of following."

    I just found that when i looked up the paleo diet....so I would not recommend it.
  • UponThisRock
    UponThisRock Posts: 4,519 Member
    You don't have to eat paleo to reconsider your food sources. I support local farms for a number of reasons but I don't eat Paleo. I also wonder how sustainable the paleo diet is environmentally. I can do everything you have said and still eat grains from my local farms.

    There are 7 billion people on earth. You're not feeding them all without grains.
  • foxbat2828
    foxbat2828 Posts: 391 Member
    All of this discussion about the paleo diet "frightens and confuses" me.

    Sorry, couldn't resist a Keyrock reference. :bigsmile:
  • skywa
    skywa Posts: 901 Member
    I think its too tough to maintain forever. I mean how on earth are you seriously meant to get enough calcium and iron in from that diet when it pretty much bans legumes and dairy and even grains?

    You're talking of eliminating essential foods for a modern human beings diet to sustain healthy existence and function. You're talking about taking away things and foods people enjoy regularly which never affected their health and weight loss in the past.

    Most people get their iron from red meat, legumes (beans etc) and wholegrains and their calcium from the same sources and dairy. Plus calcium in dairy is known to help reduce the amount of fat absorbed by the body and when working out, you need more iron and calcium to support your blood and bones. Especially choosing low fat dairy options is great.

    We are no longer cavemen, we don't need to devolve to this. We just need to eat less, move more and eat better quality foods in the right proportions.

    It's the same with people doing this low carbs rubbish.

    It's not sustainable or healthy and leaves you feeling wiped out, especially if you work out hard.

    In my eyes, before all these rubbishy fad diets came in force, people managed to lose weight in other ways and you don't need some con of a principle/idea to help you lose weight. You need commitment and discipline and not waste your money on somebody cashing in on your naivety.

    There are culture around the world that don't even have the option to eat such foods, and survive just find. Nomadic people around the world living TODAY live on meat, berrys, and nuts alone and are perfectly healthy.

    Not to mention it takes thousands of years to great noticeable evolutionary changes in adaptability in a species diet. Our species just isn't that old.
This discussion has been closed.