Cardio makes you fat: "Women: Running into Trouble"
Replies
-
I think it's all about moderation... 20 hours of one activity is the problem. If you do a balanced approach (BALANCE people), then you should be fine - some weights, some cardio...
Just because cardio is good, doesn't mean you need to do 20 hours a week and ONLY do that. Just because weights are good, doesn't mean you need to lift for 3 hours a day every day and never do cardio.
but that's my figuring.
^^^ This!
30 minutes cardio daily even if its same activity but alternate intensity and 3-4 lifting days and your good!0 -
I think it's all about moderation... 20 hours of one activity is the problem. If you do a balanced approach (BALANCE people), then you should be fine - some weights, some cardio...
Just because cardio is good, doesn't mean you need to do 20 hours a week and ONLY do that. Just because weights are good, doesn't mean you need to lift for 3 hours a day every day and never do cardio.
but that's my figuring.
^^^ This!
30 minutes cardio daily even if its same activity but alternate intensity and 3-4 lifting days and your good!
Now we're on the same page. 0 -
This is just like all that crap about eating more to lose! Soon you will see people only do lifting no cardio and can barely run to catch a bus with ease! Actually when you think about it cardio was meant to be performed DAILY like walking we may get more efficient at the activity but it doesn't mean its not doing its job either. Its not cardio that makes us fatter its what we feed our bodies that makes it fatter and MFP is to some degree the culprit it ENCOURAGES people to eat their exercise calories. I thought exercise was for fitness, health and wellbeing not to eat more.
Which part of the way MFP sets up your deficit is so difficult for people to comprehend? I wish they'd change it...just so the ignorance will finally END.Personally I think anything in excess is bad. And yes I also agree with weights being the best way to go for fat loss.
Its because for most of the population eating those exercise calories does not work... There seems to be more fear about the bull**** of starvation mode then actually the consistency of your exercise and more worrying about how many calories to eat or not eat.
NOBODY is starving on this site unless they are eating 1200 calories every day and doing a load of exercise.
Excessive eating is bad, excessive exercise is bad, excessive everything is bad... Dang this stuff sucks! Whatever happened to doing what just feels good to you?
0 -
I'm averaging over 50 mpw this year. I'm going to be so fat.
HAHAHAHAHHA hilarious!0 -
I get the feeling you didn't read the article. Everything he says is cited.1. No hypothesis
2 No test subject-S. Notice how I add on the "s."
3. No longevity testing
4. No statistical data
5. Findings have not been replicated elsewhere by different researchers
#thisargumentisinvalid
And I get the feeling you have never taken a grad level research class.
Sure, author cited, but that doesn't mean anything. None of the above points are in the article and if you don't have those, it's crap "research." Read it again. Critically.
Way to be all elitist about going to college.
To the OP I do agree with it. Your body gets used to whatever your desired cardio method is pretty quickly. Running does make you lose weight but you won't only be losing fat and that's where the problem is. Of course if you sat on the couch all your life then started to run you'll see some results. For people who have been running for quite some time and do nothing else though, they usually either get very skinny or stay sort of chubby if they eat the calories back.
Since everyone likes to use athletes as examples, heres a competitive sprinter vs a marathon runner.
0 -
How did the author go from 1 hour a day to 2 hours a day to 20 hours a week? Jessica's thyroid level probably returned to normal because of the drug she was most likely put on, synthyroid, and she's probably had the issue for years and not known.0
-
The article is about losing weight, not about athletes competing. Call BS all you want, cardio has yet to be shown to do anything more than diet alone. For much the same reasons he listed.Have you ever seen a fat marathon runner? (Man or woman that has been doing this for years) I call BS.
I agree but if we only eat say 1500 calories and do no cardio then is that good? I bet a lot of people would be bashing that person to eat more despite they only do lifting and no cardio but yet they are getting results. Eating a ton of calories is not the way to lose body fat, nor is doing cardio so you can eat pizza or treats nor does it elevate metabolic processes. Challenging muscle even in a caloric deficit is what keeps muscle and burns body fat.0 -
It's been my own experience that doing cardio only worked for me for a long time...from the time I was 27 till maybe 37-ish. I didn't over do it like I see A LOT of ppl do...there's no need to do one hour of cardio in the am and then again in the pm. I did roughly 45 mins per day 5-6 days per week. Then 2 years ago I was DRAINED. EXHAUSTED. Still working out but exhausted all the time. I did a lot of Cathe Friedrich step videos, some HIIT, some low impact high intensity and some standard keep your heart rate up but not at max stuff. Some light weights. Realizing my muscles were atrophying too. For someone who is 5'7", 135lbs and you can't really see my thigh muscles? Not good. I was getting sick once per month. Sleeping 12 hrs per night on days off from work. I first thought it was my job, then depression, then maybe chronic fatigue syndrome. So I tried to start doing Cathe Gym Style weight videos maybe twice per week and still cardio 4X per week. Working harder than ever and still getting NOWHERE. Then I start drinking V8 Fusion juice (high in sugar) and 6 months later, still between 135-140 and now I have a belly! And cellulite on my oh-so-perfect abs! I was devastated. Why was I doing all of this when I felt like crap and starting to look like crap? My mom developed hypothyroidism in her 40s, went from being rail thin her whole life to gaining 60 lbs in the same year I lost my 70lbs. So it could very well happen to me. And despite my best efforts at high rep, low weight strength training I was doing NOTHING to gain muscle!
Then I tried ChaLEAN Extreme back in March. Within a couple of weeks my abs were coming back. I just did Day 90 yesterday. I was worried only doing cardio (HIIT) twice per week was gonna make me gain fat or lose endurance. My endurance is better than ever! If you look at my collage of before and progress pics...I was 137 when I started, 136 now but a whole size smaller. Belly be gone! Leg muscles starting to get definition. Energy back. Also back to my norm of 7-8hrs per sleep and way more energy. I've been thanking Shakeology for that since I started Shakeology the same time I started ChaLEAN Extreme, but after reading that article I'm wondering. I did have my thyroid levels checked last yr when one of my monthly sinus infections had me rushed off the school bus in an ambulance b/c of vertigo from fluid trapped in my ears. They were normal in March '11 but I was thinking my thyroid or I was slowing down with age or something. Maybe it was a combo of Shakeology and ditching some of the cardio for more efficient HIIT twice per week along with heavier lifting 3X per week. And I LOVE lifting heavier! So much so I'm starting P90X in a couple of weeks.
It's been my own personal experience that I can buy what this article is saying. I've learned with ChaLEAN there are MORE EFFICIENT and less time consuming ways to train and my results are better than ever! Thanks for sharing!0 -
I always want to know why the people here always take it to the extremes?
There's the Strength Training Only! people and the Cardio Only! people.
So what you can bench 300+ lbs, but can't run to the corner without gasping for breath...
You're still not fit.0 -
Looking at the resources for the research, everything, with the exception of one article, was done in the 1990's or before. Also, after reading the research from the most recent article was dated 2004, the type of exercise was not stated, and the LPL indicator that they were measuring stated that there was no change for women. Also, the exercise was "stressful".
Since there was no change in the LPL level for women, I would think that the heart and circulatory benefits of doing a sensible cardio seems to be the deciding factor.
I really think the key to doing cardio os to find a couple of cardio exercises that you ENJOY! When you are having fun, then instead of feeling like you are stressing your body, you are only having a bit of fun.
I am not a runner! Hate it! Have great admiration for those who can! I love ice skating, the whole gliding, twirling, jumping total engages me! I love dancing too. Shaking and swinging my body to the music is so much fun. When exercise is equated with enjoyable activities, then a different chemical is released in the brain than "stress" hormones.0 -
Bump0
-
I always want to know why the people here always take it to the extremes?
There's the Strength Training Only! people and the Cardio Only! people.
So what you can bench 300+ lbs, but can't run to the corner without gasping for breath...
You're still not fit.
^^THIS^^0 -
I always want to know why the people here always take it to the extremes?
There's the Strength Training Only! people and the Cardio Only! people.
So what you can bench 300+ lbs, but can't run to the corner without gasping for breath...
You're still not fit.
Well guess we need more sex then... Its the only cardio people actually want to do!0 -
I always want to know why the people here always take it to the extremes?
There's the Strength Training Only! people and the Cardio Only! people.
So what you can bench 300+ lbs, but can't run to the corner without gasping for breath...
You're still not fit.
That's the thing...you act like people are taking it to extremes. Show me one person here that said 'don't do cardio!' Sure, there's people who say 'I don't do cardio!'...but they don't recommend not to to others. What HAS been said, and HAS been proven, is cardio is irrelevant in regards to fat loss. That's all...and its very, very true. Is it good for you in other ways? Sure! I hate running, hate most cardio in general. Its taken me years to figure out that I love raquetball (go figure, every gym I've been in has a row of courts along one wall lol). Thankfully...cardio I can enjoy!...something I've been looking for because I KNOW there's other benefits. But I also know its not necessary for my fat loss, because guess what? I've done it without it.0 -
I always want to know why the people here always take it to the extremes?
There's the Strength Training Only! people and the Cardio Only! people.
So what you can bench 300+ lbs, but can't run to the corner without gasping for breath...
You're still not fit.
Well guess we need more sex then... Its the only cardio people actually want to do!
Oh yes...I enjoy that cardio too lol. Just don't have enough opportunity to make it worthwhile as exercise =p.0 -
I always want to know why the people here always take it to the extremes?
There's the Strength Training Only! people and the Cardio Only! people.
So what you can bench 300+ lbs, but can't run to the corner without gasping for breath...
You're still not fit.
Well guess we need more sex then... Its the only cardio people actually want to do!
Oh yes...I enjoy that cardio too lol. Just don't have enough opportunity to make it worthwhile as exercise =p.
Doing your cardio outside of the bed will make you last longer in the bed further increasing your calorie burn through sex!
0 -
I always want to know why the people here always take it to the extremes?
There's the Strength Training Only! people and the Cardio Only! people.
So what you can bench 300+ lbs, but can't run to the corner without gasping for breath...
You're still not fit.
That's the thing...you act like people are taking it to extremes. Show me one person here that said 'don't do cardio!' Sure, there's people who say 'I don't do cardio!'...but they don't recommend not to to others. What HAS been said, and HAS been proven, is cardio is irrelevant in regards to fat loss. That's all...and its very, very true. Is it good for you in other ways? Sure! I hate running, hate most cardio in general. Its taken me years to figure out that I love raquetball (go figure, every gym I've been in has a row of courts along one wall lol). Thankfully...cardio I can enjoy!...something I've been looking for because I KNOW there's other benefits. But I also know its not necessary for my fat loss, because guess what? I've done it without it.
Its all over this site. Don't tell me you don't see it.
I lift and endurance train. I don't preach one side or the other except to point out the fact that most people want to be overall healthier and fit.
So like I said. Maybe you can squat more than me, but I can hold my own in the weight room and outrace you.
So who's fitter?0 -
Definitely makes you fat... You can see all the distance runners in the olympics are WAAAAYYYYY out of control. Must be some really good spandex holding it all in because they look pretty damn fit and trim. In fact the group I run with are all a bunch of fit and trim looking people too. Come to think of it, I lost 70 pounds running (or mabey it's the shorts)
I read an article a couple of weeks ago that Yoga also makes you fat... Love the BS Science!0 -
Running is easy to start. There are programs everywhere online for any distance, it requires no coordination, and it provides an individual the opportunity to join a group or use the time as "alone" time. Sometimes its all an individual knows to do. In the meantime, they're moving and most likely getting the 150 minutes of exercise recommended by ACSM. Maybe they need something that they can do outside to avoid the feeling of judgement.
Unless solicated, lets keep our mouths shut and let them run.
Lets change that title to "Watching TV makes you fat: America's in Trouble".0 -
I think it's odd that some people seem to be pointing to the heavy "back of the pack" marathon (or half marathon) runners as examples of running not helping with weight loss. That makes no sense. No one has any idea how much those fat marathoners weighed BEFORE they started training for that race. They might be 50 lbs down, for all anyone knows. They're hardly a good example of failure to lose weight through cardio, unless you know enough of them personally to actually begin to make that generalization.
So yes, there are "fat marathoners" -- overweight people who participate in HMs and marathons. But geez louise, that in no way even begins to prove the idea that distance running hinders weight loss.
And just to be clear, I think there's a wrong way to do cardio that definitely doesn't lead to the results that are desired ... but that doesn't mean training for a half marathon is going to make me in worse shape than I'm in now. (Especially since my training includes strength training/HIIT.) When I cross the finish line, I will be at least 20 to 30 lbs down as long as I stick to the program and stay within my calorie goals. I will also be better off in physically in almost every measurable way. I have zero doubt of that.0 -
I always want to know why the people here always take it to the extremes?
There's the Strength Training Only! people and the Cardio Only! people.
So what you can bench 300+ lbs, but can't run to the corner without gasping for breath...
You're still not fit.
That's the thing...you act like people are taking it to extremes. Show me one person here that said 'don't do cardio!' Sure, there's people who say 'I don't do cardio!'...but they don't recommend not to to others. What HAS been said, and HAS been proven, is cardio is irrelevant in regards to fat loss. That's all...and its very, very true. Is it good for you in other ways? Sure! I hate running, hate most cardio in general. Its taken me years to figure out that I love raquetball (go figure, every gym I've been in has a row of courts along one wall lol). Thankfully...cardio I can enjoy!...something I've been looking for because I KNOW there's other benefits. But I also know its not necessary for my fat loss, because guess what? I've done it without it.
Its all over this site. Don't tell me you don't see it.
I lift and endurance train. I don't preach one side or the other except to point out the fact that most people want to be overall healthier and fit.
So like I said. Maybe you can squat more than me, but I can hold my own in the weight room and outrace you.
So who's fitter?
I'm sorry, I don't use whether I can run or not as a guage of my fitness (although I'm not saying I disagree with you, it IS a guage of fitness). That's like me saying that me being better at working all day in the 114* Phoenix summer sun, then going to lift after makes me more fit. Is my work active? Yes. Does it involve running? No. Is the fact that I can do it 40-60hrs a week without failing an indicater of my overall fitness?
You bet.
But either way...the one thing I do disagree with is your statement that the majority of people say strength train only. YES they say strength train only for fat loss, but I've yet to see ONE person say there is no benefit to cardio.0 -
Cardio isn't the problem. It's the fork and the mouth that's the problem.0
-
I think it's odd that some people seem to be pointing to the heavy "back of the pack" marathon (or half marathon) runners as examples of running not helping with weight loss. That makes no sense. No one has any idea how much those fat marathoners weighed BEFORE they started training for that race. They might be 50 lbs down, for all anyone knows. They're hardly a good example of failure to lose weight through cardio, unless you know enough of them personally to actually begin to make that generalization.
So yes, there are "fat marathoners" -- overweight people who participate in HMs and marathons. But geez louise, that in no way even begins to prove the idea that distance running hinders weight loss.
And just to be clear, I think there's a wrong way to do cardio that definitely doesn't lead to the results that are desired ... but that doesn't mean training for a half marathon is going to make me in worse shape than I'm in now. (Especially since my training includes strength training/HIIT.) When I cross the finish line, I will be at least 20 to 30 lbs down as long as I stick to the program and stay within my calorie goals. I will also be better off in physically in almost every measurable way. I have zero doubt of that.
All of the comments about fat marathoners that I read were in response to a post asking "Have you ever seen a fat marathoner?" which anyone who has actually gone to a marathon has (seen a fat marathoner). If you only watch them on TV they only show the elite runners, so I can see where the confusion comes from. Sort of. Not really.
And I can tell you from personal experience AND a lot of reading on the subject, that marathon training does not easily make someone lose weight, unless you're starting very overweight/sedentary and any activity would make you lose weight. It's because the calorie deficit hinders your training- it's difficult to do both effectively. You can train only at a small deficit, unless your only race goal is to finish.
FTR I LOVE running and fully support it, but it is only a piece of the fitness puzzle. Strength training is equally important. I'm fully realistic, though, about the limitations of cardio-only programs.0 -
Cardio isn't the problem. It's the fork and the mouth that's the problem.
Ahh, fork-in-mouth disease. I know it well.0 -
consistent cardio training over weeks and months will yield the best results....consistency is Key..!0
-
consistent cardio training over weeks and months will yield the best results....consistency is Key..!
The best results for what?0 -
consistent cardio training over weeks and months will yield the best results....consistency is Key..!
The best results for what?
And as compared to what?0 -
bump0
-
consistent cardio training over weeks and months will yield the best results....consistency is Key..!
I kind of think the opposite is true....Your body adapts to LISS or MISS workouts fairly quickly. I would say consistancy is key for developing base endurance, and then you have to constantly make changes to your program if you want continual improvement- add mileage, build speed, develop stamina, whatever.
But then again the same use it or lose it rule applies, as it does for any conditioning- strength or cardio. So maybe that's what you were getting at?0 -
All of the comments about fat marathoners that I read were in response to a post asking "Have you ever seen a fat marathoner?" which anyone who has actually gone to a marathon has (seen a fat marathoner). If you only watch them on TV they only show the elite runners, so I can see where the confusion comes from. Sort of. Not really.
And I can tell you from personal experience AND a lot of reading on the subject, that marathon training does not easily make someone lose weight, unless you're starting very overweight/sedentary and any activity would make you lose weight. It's because the calorie deficit hinders your training- it's difficult to do both effectively. You can train only at a small deficit, unless your only race goal is to finish.
FTR I LOVE running and fully support it, but it is only a piece of the fitness puzzle. Strength training is equally important. I'm fully realistic, though, about the limitations of cardio-only programs.
Gotcha.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions