Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Why are most mfp users against holistic nutrition?
Options
Replies
-
mrsnattybulking wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »I don't personally drink the poptarts-all-day kool-aid (nor do I believe anyone enjoying any long term success does) Food IS our fuel, it's literally the only way our bodies receive the vitamins and minerals and macros they need to fight disease and thrive. I can't think of a single credible person on this site that would disagree that cake < broccoli in terms of HEALTH, but common sense would have us all strike a balance that allows us the freedom to include foods we love to eat because they taste good, with foods we love to eat because they have health benefits. You don't have to be one way or the other. Persons on either side of this argument are equally obnoxious and I personally like to hang out in the calories have context middle ground.
A diet of nothing but broccoli could possibly more detrimental to your health than a diet of nothing but cake.
In terms of HEALTH, context of the entire diet is important, no single food item.
I guess I gave too much credit by assuming the readers had the common sense to deduce that I wasn't referring to a sole diet of either or but thanks for pointing that out *eyeroll*
Under no other circumstances does "cake < broccoli in terms of HEALTH" make any sense. Because I can assure you that not eating your broccoli but instead having dessert on occasion is not going to impact your health.
on occasion lol. Drink that IIFYM kool aid and have 25% of your daily calories come from cake and cookies and lets compare micro profiles 3 months down the road.
Aaaand there we go.7 -
Because you know, having cake and cookies is like negative numbers, they eradicate all the nutrition from all the other food you eat and don't have any whatsoever. Nope, none.12
-
stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »I don't personally drink the poptarts-all-day kool-aid (nor do I believe anyone enjoying any long term success does) Food IS our fuel, it's literally the only way our bodies receive the vitamins and minerals and macros they need to fight disease and thrive. I can't think of a single credible person on this site that would disagree that cake < broccoli in terms of HEALTH, but common sense would have us all strike a balance that allows us the freedom to include foods we love to eat because they taste good, with foods we love to eat because they have health benefits. You don't have to be one way or the other. Persons on either side of this argument are equally obnoxious and I personally like to hang out in the calories have context middle ground.
A diet of nothing but broccoli could possibly more detrimental to your health than a diet of nothing but cake.
In terms of HEALTH, context of the entire diet is important, no single food item.
I guess I gave too much credit by assuming the readers had the common sense to deduce that I wasn't referring to a sole diet of either or but thanks for pointing that out *eyeroll*
Under no other circumstances does "cake < broccoli in terms of HEALTH" make any sense. Because I can assure you that not eating your broccoli but instead having dessert on occasion is not going to impact your health.
on occasion lol. Drink that IIFYM kool aid and have 25% of your daily calories come from cake and cookies and lets compare micro profiles 3 months down the road.
Aaaand there we go.
BINGO!4 -
I'm confused. How did we get from "dessert on occasion" to "25% of calories from cake and cookies"?
Does drinking the kool-aid make us fall off the wagon from our all-broccoli diet or something?10 -
i will say that I eat probably 20% cake/cookies/junk and my blood work (aside from my known wonky thyroid) is near perfect - my doc can't believe how good my unsupplemented vitamin D level is (she never sees it as high on the normal range as mine is)7
-
mrsnattybulking wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »I don't personally drink the poptarts-all-day kool-aid (nor do I believe anyone enjoying any long term success does) Food IS our fuel, it's literally the only way our bodies receive the vitamins and minerals and macros they need to fight disease and thrive. I can't think of a single credible person on this site that would disagree that cake < broccoli in terms of HEALTH, but common sense would have us all strike a balance that allows us the freedom to include foods we love to eat because they taste good, with foods we love to eat because they have health benefits. You don't have to be one way or the other. Persons on either side of this argument are equally obnoxious and I personally like to hang out in the calories have context middle ground.
A diet of nothing but broccoli could possibly more detrimental to your health than a diet of nothing but cake.
In terms of HEALTH, context of the entire diet is important, no single food item.
I guess I gave too much credit by assuming the readers had the common sense to deduce that I wasn't referring to a sole diet of either or but thanks for pointing that out *eyeroll*
Under no other circumstances does "cake < broccoli in terms of HEALTH" make any sense. Because I can assure you that not eating your broccoli but instead having dessert on occasion is not going to impact your health.
on occasion lol. Drink that IIFYM kool aid and have 25% of your daily calories come from cake and cookies and lets compare micro profiles 3 months down the road.
How did you read "having dessert on occasion" and get to "have 25% of your daily calories come from cake and cookies"? Who is even doing that or recommending that?7 -
janejellyroll wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »I don't personally drink the poptarts-all-day kool-aid (nor do I believe anyone enjoying any long term success does) Food IS our fuel, it's literally the only way our bodies receive the vitamins and minerals and macros they need to fight disease and thrive. I can't think of a single credible person on this site that would disagree that cake < broccoli in terms of HEALTH, but common sense would have us all strike a balance that allows us the freedom to include foods we love to eat because they taste good, with foods we love to eat because they have health benefits. You don't have to be one way or the other. Persons on either side of this argument are equally obnoxious and I personally like to hang out in the calories have context middle ground.
A diet of nothing but broccoli could possibly more detrimental to your health than a diet of nothing but cake.
In terms of HEALTH, context of the entire diet is important, no single food item.
I guess I gave too much credit by assuming the readers had the common sense to deduce that I wasn't referring to a sole diet of either or but thanks for pointing that out *eyeroll*
Under no other circumstances does "cake < broccoli in terms of HEALTH" make any sense. Because I can assure you that not eating your broccoli but instead having dessert on occasion is not going to impact your health.
on occasion lol. Drink that IIFYM kool aid and have 25% of your daily calories come from cake and cookies and lets compare micro profiles 3 months down the road.
How did you read "having dessert on occasion" and get to "have 25% of your daily calories come from cake and cookies"? Who is even doing that or recommending that?
Some people are, but even that is not an issue depending on the other 75% of the diet.4 -
stevencloser wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »mrsnattybulking wrote: »I don't personally drink the poptarts-all-day kool-aid (nor do I believe anyone enjoying any long term success does) Food IS our fuel, it's literally the only way our bodies receive the vitamins and minerals and macros they need to fight disease and thrive. I can't think of a single credible person on this site that would disagree that cake < broccoli in terms of HEALTH, but common sense would have us all strike a balance that allows us the freedom to include foods we love to eat because they taste good, with foods we love to eat because they have health benefits. You don't have to be one way or the other. Persons on either side of this argument are equally obnoxious and I personally like to hang out in the calories have context middle ground.
A diet of nothing but broccoli could possibly more detrimental to your health than a diet of nothing but cake.
In terms of HEALTH, context of the entire diet is important, no single food item.
I guess I gave too much credit by assuming the readers had the common sense to deduce that I wasn't referring to a sole diet of either or but thanks for pointing that out *eyeroll*
Under no other circumstances does "cake < broccoli in terms of HEALTH" make any sense. Because I can assure you that not eating your broccoli but instead having dessert on occasion is not going to impact your health.
on occasion lol. Drink that IIFYM kool aid and have 25% of your daily calories come from cake and cookies and lets compare micro profiles 3 months down the road.
How did you read "having dessert on occasion" and get to "have 25% of your daily calories come from cake and cookies"? Who is even doing that or recommending that?
Some people are, but even that is not an issue depending on the other 75% of the diet.
My typing fingers got ahead of my brain because I now realize that with the donut I had as part of breakfast and the cookie I'm going to have with lunch, cake and cookies *are* about 25% of my calories today and it still all fits.
I'd still say I don't see anyone *recommending* this, it's just something than can happen and nutritional goals can still be met.6 -
I've read through this thread and have only one thing to add to the OP. Does this school have accreditation in your state? Here's a good place to start: https://ope.ed.gov/accreditation/
Accreditation serves two purposes. #1 it lets you know you are plunking down money for an education that is at least going to be accepted. #2 if you get a degree from a school that does not have a proper accreditation your degree will be worthless when you list it applying for a job or for graduate school.8 -
Holistic medicine is fascinating and can be an extremely beneficial adjunct to Western medicine. My problem with holistic medicine is it is often administered recklessly. When administered properly, I think holistic medicine is great. What we take in greatly effects how our body functions. Personally, I take D mannose, cranberries and apple cider vinegar for UTI treatment/prevention. This treatment has to do with preventing bacterial growth through an alkaline environment and flushing the bacteria out. I know to look out for flank pain, fever and such which could be signs of of dangerous complications. On the other hand, I have seen naturalpaths prescribe cranberries without asking about other symptoms beyond a basic UTI....20
-
MichelleLaree13 wrote: »Holistic medicine is fascinating and can be an extremely beneficial adjunct to Western medicine. My problem with holistic medicine is it is often administered recklessly. When administered properly, I think holistic medicine is great. What we take in greatly effects how our body functions. Personally, I take D mannose, cranberries and apple cider vinegar for UTI treatment/prevention. This treatment has to do with preventing bacterial growth through an alkaline environment and flushing the bacteria out. I know to look out for flank pain, fever and such which could be signs of of dangerous complications. On the other hand, I have seen naturalpaths prescribe cranberries without asking about other symptoms beyond a basic UTI....
Except, you can't change your internal environment past what your body regulates. Nor should you.7 -
MichelleLaree13 wrote: »Holistic medicine is fascinating and can be an extremely beneficial adjunct to Western medicine. My problem with holistic medicine is it is often administered recklessly. When administered properly, I think holistic medicine is great. What we take in greatly effects how our body functions. Personally, I take D mannose, cranberries and apple cider vinegar for UTI treatment/prevention. This treatment has to do with preventing bacterial growth through an alkaline environment and flushing the bacteria out. I know to look out for flank pain, fever and such which could be signs of of dangerous complications. On the other hand, I have seen naturalpaths prescribe cranberries without asking about other symptoms beyond a basic UTI....
Actually both Holistic and Western medicine can be done in a way that is awesome or equally awful. Western medicine just is a much younger discipline. Some health care providers seem to be blending the two with some success.19 -
Stick with what you're doing. There are tons of studies out to confirm leaky gut, inflammation caused by wheat, that Round-Up was originally patented as an Antibiotic and ruins your microbiome, etc, etc, etc. You cannot convince people that don't believe in Holistic methods that it works. You can't. They point to sites that are supported or funded by Big Ag or Big Pharma like "Sciencebasedmedicine" or "GMOliteracyproject". Or worse, they point to information written by the EPA (Monsanto) or the FDA (pick whoever you want that's paid someone off).
My wife told me 3 years ago to let her die. She had Fibromyalgia so bad that she could not get out of bed. We kept going to Western docs. No F'ing clue what to do. She kept getting worse and worse. We've never been prescription people. Out of desperation, we went to a Holistic doc. With avoiding gluten/dairy and as much Round-Up as possible (and switching to a WFPB diet), my wife is back to herself. She works out five times a week and holds a job again (she's working today). She's nearly 56 in this picture with me. It's been like reverse aging for her. People can't believe she has teenage grandkids.
There billions of dollars at stake. There is an information war going on right now on the internet. Holistic docs don't have the money to influence people the way that big pharma does. That's why you can't go 10 minutes watching TV without a drug commercial. Statins do more harm than good (there's science of that), no stints don't do much. I can tell you all Fibro Rx's are garbage (except LDN) and cause way more harm than good, Glenn Frye (ex Eagle) died from the side effects of Arthritis drugs. You know what cures arthritis (scientifically proven) -- being Vegan. Yes, Holistic medicine is an inexact science. So is traditional medicine!
I'm also a consultant/recruiter. I own a small recruiting business. One of my specialties is R&D/Science based start-ups. One of the hottest areas right now in immunotherapy is changing the microbiome and identifying new species (mostly aquatic based because we all came from water) of bacteria that drastically change the microbiome and make you better. If anyone on here says this is "wooey", they don't know squat. I see scientific studies on this daily by the PhD's that I'm connected with on Linkedin.
You do you and don't worry about the sheep that believe what Big Pharma wants them to believe. Big Pharma identifies diseases as "marketing opportunities" on their research white papers. That should say enough.38 -
What is a WFPB diet?
White-Farina-Peanut-Butter?
Woo-Fat-Plump-Bread?
Water-Fruit-Pescatarian-Beetlejuice?6 -
MikePfirrman wrote: »Stick with what you're doing. There are tons of studies out to confirm leaky gut, inflammation caused by wheat, that Round-Up was originally patented as an Antibiotic and ruins your microbiome, etc, etc, etc. You cannot convince people that don't believe in Holistic methods that it works. You can't. They point to sites that are supported or funded by Big Ag or Big Pharma like "Sciencebasedmedicine" or "GMOliteracyproject". Or worse, they point to information written by the EPA (Monsanto) or the FDA (pick whoever you want that's paid someone off).
My wife told me 3 years ago to let her die. She had Fibromyalgia so bad that she could not get out of bed. We kept going to Western docs. No F'ing clue what to do. She kept getting worse and worse. We've never been prescription people. Out of desperation, we went to a Holistic doc. With avoiding gluten/dairy and as much Round-Up as possible (and switching to a WFPB diet), my wife is back to herself. She works out five times a week and holds a job again (she's working today). She's nearly 56 in this picture with me. It's been like reverse aging for her. People can't believe she has teenage grandkids.
There billions of dollars at stake. There is an information war going on right now on the internet. Holistic docs don't have the money to influence people the way that big pharma does. That's why you can't go 10 minutes watching TV without a drug commercial. Statins do more harm than good (there's science of that), no stints don't do much. I can tell you all Fibro Rx's are garbage (except LDN) and cause way more harm than good, Glenn Frye (ex Eagle) died from the side effects of Arthritis drugs. You know what cures arthritis (scientifically proven) -- being Vegan. Yes, Holistic medicine is an inexact science. So is traditional medicine!
I'm also a consultant/recruiter. I own a small recruiting business. One of my specialties is R&D/Science based start-ups. One of the hottest areas right now in immunotherapy is changing the microbiome and identifying new species (mostly aquatic based because we all came from water) of bacteria that drastically change the microbiome and make you better. If anyone on here says this is "wooey", they don't know squat. I see scientific studies on this daily by the PhD's that I'm connected with on Linkedin.
You do you and don't worry about the sheep that believe what Big Pharma wants them to believe. Big Pharma identifies diseases as "marketing opportunities" on their research white papers. That should say enough.
Yes, instead of silly sites run by PHDs in relevant fields, rather check some random blog by some soccer mum from Wisconsin.14 -
Blending fact and folklore is Science Fiction, not a cure.
The successful integrations I have seen are complimentary, where conservative treatment is followed, while not dismissing traditional rituals that provide comfort.9 -
MikePfirrman wrote: »Stick with what you're doing. There are tons of studies out to confirm leaky gut, inflammation caused by wheat, that Round-Up was originally patented as an Antibiotic and ruins your microbiome, etc, etc, etc. You cannot convince people that don't believe in Holistic methods that it works. You can't. They point to sites that are supported or funded by Big Ag or Big Pharma like "Sciencebasedmedicine" or "GMOliteracyproject". Or worse, they point to information written by the EPA (Monsanto) or the FDA (pick whoever you want that's paid someone off).
My wife told me 3 years ago to let her die. She had Fibromyalgia so bad that she could not get out of bed. We kept going to Western docs. No F'ing clue what to do. She kept getting worse and worse. We've never been prescription people. Out of desperation, we went to a Holistic doc. With avoiding gluten/dairy and as much Round-Up as possible (and switching to a WFPB diet), my wife is back to herself. She works out five times a week and holds a job again (she's working today). She's nearly 56 in this picture with me. It's been like reverse aging for her. People can't believe she has teenage grandkids.
There billions of dollars at stake. There is an information war going on right now on the internet. Holistic docs don't have the money to influence people the way that big pharma does. That's why you can't go 10 minutes watching TV without a drug commercial. Statins do more harm than good (there's science of that), no stints don't do much. I can tell you all Fibro Rx's are garbage (except LDN) and cause way more harm than good, Glenn Frye (ex Eagle) died from the side effects of Arthritis drugs. You know what cures arthritis (scientifically proven) -- being Vegan. Yes, Holistic medicine is an inexact science. So is traditional medicine!
I'm also a consultant/recruiter. I own a small recruiting business. One of my specialties is R&D/Science based start-ups. One of the hottest areas right now in immunotherapy is changing the microbiome and identifying new species (mostly aquatic based because we all came from water) of bacteria that drastically change the microbiome and make you better. If anyone on here says this is "wooey", they don't know squat. I see scientific studies on this daily by the PhD's that I'm connected with on Linkedin.
You do you and don't worry about the sheep that believe what Big Pharma wants them to believe. Big Pharma identifies diseases as "marketing opportunities" on their research white papers. That should say enough.
11 -
I would love to see this alleged evidence that veganism cures arthritis.10
-
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 390 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 921 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions