Clean Eating vs Exercise

13

Replies

  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    kgeyser wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    kgeyser wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    TrainerLB wrote: »
    @solar_cat that's a great point. Although in my experience most people do one or the other (food or exercise) and then don't really get the result they're looking for. You can train your butt off in the gym, but if you go home and eat pizza you may lose weight, but your body will still be, let's say, less toned.

    But I agree with you.

    So you can't be toned and eat pizza?

    Apparently not. Which is weird, because I eat pizza, and I keep seeing the outline of muscles visible under my skin.

    what happens if you eat pizza AND ice cream....will you never see gainz????????????????

    I plan on having both tonight, so I will report back, provided my muscles have not liquified and rendered me unable to type.

    Now, if you eat pizza, ice cream, AND cookies, I hear that your gainz will reverse by 10% per day, and you add 1% body fat per day, until you "clean it up"....
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    kgeyser wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    TrainerLB wrote: »
    @solar_cat that's a great point. Although in my experience most people do one or the other (food or exercise) and then don't really get the result they're looking for. You can train your butt off in the gym, but if you go home and eat pizza you may lose weight, but your body will still be, let's say, less toned.

    But I agree with you.

    So you can't be toned and eat pizza?

    Apparently not. Which is weird, because I eat pizza, and I keep seeing the outline of muscles visible under my skin.

    what happens if you eat pizza AND ice cream....will you never see gainz????????????????
    Don't ask questions you already know the answer to. Rookie.

    it was a rhetorical question ....

    Do you also practice rhetorical lifting???

    Yes...and rhetorical MFP'ing...its a curse and a gift...
  • 999tigger
    999tigger Posts: 5,235 Member
    Am I the only one that finds the term "clean eating" extremely annoying?

    I find it bizarre people get so worked up about it.
  • rsclause
    rsclause Posts: 3,103 Member
    I wont define "clean eating" but I can tell you what my last visit to the grocery store was like. I had twenty items and the only things not from the produce aisle were wine, milk and deodorant.
  • BlueBombers
    BlueBombers Posts: 4,064 Member
    999tigger wrote: »
    Am I the only one that finds the term "clean eating" extremely annoying?

    I find it bizarre people get so worked up about it.

    Probably because there is a thread posted about it 20 times a day.

  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    rsclause wrote: »
    I wont define "clean eating" but I can tell you what my last visit to the grocery store was like. I had twenty items and the only things not from the produce aisle were wine, milk and deodorant.

    so what are you saying?
  • daydreams_of_pretty
    daydreams_of_pretty Posts: 506 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    rsclause wrote: »
    I wont define "clean eating" but I can tell you what my last visit to the grocery store was like. I had twenty items and the only things not from the produce aisle were wine, milk and deodorant.

    so what are you saying?

    That wine is good and we should always include it in our shopping carts. That's what I took from it. B)
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    rsclause wrote: »
    I wont define "clean eating" but I can tell you what my last visit to the grocery store was like. I had twenty items and the only things not from the produce aisle were wine, milk and deodorant.

    so what are you saying?

    That wine is good and we should always include it in our shopping carts. That's what I took from it. B)

    That's the only thing I thought as well :) Except my state sucks so I can't get wine at the grocery store.

  • daydreams_of_pretty
    daydreams_of_pretty Posts: 506 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    rsclause wrote: »
    I wont define "clean eating" but I can tell you what my last visit to the grocery store was like. I had twenty items and the only things not from the produce aisle were wine, milk and deodorant.

    so what are you saying?

    That wine is good and we should always include it in our shopping carts. That's what I took from it. B)

    That's the only thing I thought as well :) Except my state sucks so I can't get wine at the grocery store.

    :open_mouth:
  • This content has been removed.
  • daydreams_of_pretty
    daydreams_of_pretty Posts: 506 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    rsclause wrote: »
    I wont define "clean eating" but I can tell you what my last visit to the grocery store was like. I had twenty items and the only things not from the produce aisle were wine, milk and deodorant.

    so what are you saying?

    That wine is good and we should always include it in our shopping carts. That's what I took from it. B)

    That's the only thing I thought as well :) Except my state sucks so I can't get wine at the grocery store.
    I'm always fascinated when you can get liquor and groceries together. Here we can't.

    I will think of you both the next time I load up my cart. The next ones for you guys, in honor of your struggles against the alcohol-related injustices inflicted upon you. :smirk:
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,021 Member
    Kalikel wrote: »
    You can eat over your maintenance calories and still lose weight if you're exercising.

    Explain...

  • autumnblade75
    autumnblade75 Posts: 1,661 Member
    edited October 2014
    Sorry, nevermind.
  • This content has been removed.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Kalikel wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    I exercise and lose more when I'm exercising.

    I've heard people say that exercising doesn't make you lose weight, too. I don't know where it came from, but whatever. I thank them for the input, but it's dismissed before they're even done talking.

    Semantics, but exercise doesn't make you lose weight but it helps. Being under your maintenance calories makes you lose weight.
    You can eat over your maintenance calories and still lose weight if you're exercising.

    The idea that losing weight is solely about what you eat is just not true. It gets said a lot. I know that. But it isn't true.

    It's the end result. If you use up more than you take in, you will lose weight, even if you take in more than the numbers say you should.

    No you cant. If you are losing weight it is because you are eating at a deficit or losing water weight.

    I think it's just a lack of communication.

    My understanding is that Kalikel is saying that if you exercise you can eat more than your maintenance when sedentary and still lose weight, whereas others are pointing out that no matter what you only lose weight when your intake is less than your actual maintenance given your activity level. Both are true. Exercise means you can eat more than if you don't exercise and still lose (of course).

    I don't think any of this is controversial; I just think people are talking past each other.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    rsclause wrote: »
    I wont define "clean eating" but I can tell you what my last visit to the grocery store was like. I had twenty items and the only things not from the produce aisle were wine, milk and deodorant.

    so what are you saying?

    That wine is good and we should always include it in our shopping carts. That's what I took from it. B)

    That's the only thing I thought as well :) Except my state sucks so I can't get wine at the grocery store.
    I'm always fascinated when you can get liquor and groceries together. Here we can't.

    Yup, it sucks. Can't get 6 point beer here either unless it's from the liquor store.

  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,021 Member
    edited October 2014
    I was just wondering what works best for other people personally?

    IMO,

    1. Exercise... daily. It is the fountain of youth.

    2. Get the majority of your calories from whole, nutrient dense foods. Not only will they provide you with nearly all the nutrition you body requires, they will also help with #3.

    3. Maintain a state of negative energy balance if your goal is to lose fat. There are dozens of diets out there that work because they get you in a calorie deficit (wether they tell you that or not). Pick one that suits you and do it.

    4. Depending on your goals, if you have calories to spare, fill them with whatever you
    fancy.

    5. We have a tendency to oversimplify the complicated science of fat loss and at the same time overcomplicate the practice of it. Don't major in the minor. Relax and try to enjoy the ride.
  • mustgetmuscles1
    mustgetmuscles1 Posts: 3,346 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    I exercise and lose more when I'm exercising.

    I've heard people say that exercising doesn't make you lose weight, too. I don't know where it came from, but whatever. I thank them for the input, but it's dismissed before they're even done talking.

    Semantics, but exercise doesn't make you lose weight but it helps. Being under your maintenance calories makes you lose weight.


    The idea that losing weight is solely about what you eat is just not true. It gets said a lot. I know that. But it isn't true.

    It's the end result. If you use up more than you take in, you will lose weight, even if you take in more than the numbers say you should.

    No you cant. If you are losing weight it is because you are eating at a deficit or losing water weight.

    I think it's just a lack of communication.

    My understanding is that Kalikel is saying that if you exercise you can eat more than your maintenance when sedentary and still lose weight, whereas others are pointing out that no matter what you only lose weight when your intake is less than your actual maintenance given your activity level. Both are true. Exercise means you can eat more than if you don't exercise and still lose (of course).

    I don't think any of this is controversial; I just think people are talking past each other.

    You may be right based on the comment posted after that. You can eat maintenance calories for no exercise activity and then create a deficit with exercise. But the deficit is necessary for weight loss.
    You can eat over your maintenance calories and still lose weight if you're exercising.

    That is not what was said though.
  • jkal1979
    jkal1979 Posts: 1,896 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    rsclause wrote: »
    I wont define "clean eating" but I can tell you what my last visit to the grocery store was like. I had twenty items and the only things not from the produce aisle were wine, milk and deodorant.

    so what are you saying?

    That wine is good and we should always include it in our shopping carts. That's what I took from it. B)

    That's the only thing I thought as well :) Except my state sucks so I can't get wine at the grocery store.

    On occasion the grocery stores here in Michigan will have wine or liquor samples to try out.

  • This content has been removed.
  • Kalikel
    Kalikel Posts: 9,603 Member
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    You can eat over your maintenance calories and still lose weight if you're exercising.

    Explain...
    It doesn't matter how many calories you eat. If you burn off enough, you will still lose weight. Theoretically, you could eat 100,000 calories a day and if you burned 100,010, you'd be losing.

    The idea that weight loss cannot be accomplished with exercise is hogwash. You don't have to eat under some number. You can go over the number and still lose by working it off. Weight loss doesn't happen in a vacuum in the kitchen.

    If people don't agree, that's fine. I'm not here to argue. Someone else will surely show up who did log in to fight, lol. I'm just saying that you can lose weight by exercising, even if you eat over your maintenance number. If you want. If you don't want to rely on exercise, that's cool, too.

    Whatever floats your boat. :)

  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    in to eat over maintenance, weight train, and lose weight.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    edited October 2014
    Kalikel wrote: »
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    You can eat over your maintenance calories and still lose weight if you're exercising.

    Explain...
    It doesn't matter how many calories you eat. If you burn off enough, you will still lose weight. Theoretically, you could eat 100,000 calories a day and if you burned 100,010, you'd be losing.

    The idea that weight loss cannot be accomplished with exercise is hogwash. You don't have to eat under some number. You can go over the number and still lose by working it off. Weight loss doesn't happen in a vacuum in the kitchen.

    If people don't agree, that's fine. I'm not here to argue. Someone else will surely show up who did log in to fight, lol. I'm just saying that you can lose weight by exercising, even if you eat over your maintenance number. If you want. If you don't want to rely on exercise, that's cool, too.

    Whatever floats your boat. :)

    Definitely just a communication error now that you summed up your thoughts. The problem with your side is that exercise plays into your maintenance calories. My maintenance is 3600 calories, this includes exercise. I cannot eat over maintenance and still lose. It's clear that you just didn't know what maintenance calories actually were. Hopefully, you have learned something.

  • emmabanks87
    emmabanks87 Posts: 86 Member
    I think its all about finding the right balance that fits for you. I think both exercise and healthy eating go hand in hand. But I really think healthy eating is more important than exercise. if you think about it, your only exercising for a certain part of the day, whatever you put in your body is what you do all day. (also dont forget your gym is a business and will probably state exercise is more important to get you in lol)

    good luck :)
  • Kalikel
    Kalikel Posts: 9,603 Member
    edited October 2014
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    You can eat over your maintenance calories and still lose weight if you're exercising.

    Explain...
    It doesn't matter how many calories you eat. If you burn off enough, you will still lose weight. Theoretically, you could eat 100,000 calories a day and if you burned 100,010, you'd be losing.

    The idea that weight loss cannot be accomplished with exercise is hogwash. You don't have to eat under some number. You can go over the number and still lose by working it off. Weight loss doesn't happen in a vacuum in the kitchen.

    If people don't agree, that's fine. I'm not here to argue. Someone else will surely show up who did log in to fight, lol. I'm just saying that you can lose weight by exercising, even if you eat over your maintenance number. If you want. If you don't want to rely on exercise, that's cool, too.

    Whatever floats your boat. :)

    Definitely just a communication error now that you summed up your thoughts. The problem with your side is that exercise plays into your maintenance calories. My maintenance is 3600 calories, this includes exercise. I cannot eat over maintenance and still lose. It's clear that you just didn't know what maintenance calories actually were. Hopefully, you have learned something.
    I always assumed from context that maintenance calories were the calories required to maintain your weight. I didn't realize this was a concept that fluctuated with amounts of exercise done.

    I am 100% guilty of not being hip to fitness buzzwords and have, indeed, learned a little.

    What is the definition of "maintenance" as it applies to calories...or "maintenance calories" (if it's one concept with two words, lol)?

    And why can't you eat over your 3600 and just do more exercise and still lose? I'm thinking that's nuts. Where am I wrong?

  • Raynne413
    Raynne413 Posts: 1,527 Member
    Kalikel wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    You can eat over your maintenance calories and still lose weight if you're exercising.

    Explain...
    It doesn't matter how many calories you eat. If you burn off enough, you will still lose weight. Theoretically, you could eat 100,000 calories a day and if you burned 100,010, you'd be losing.

    The idea that weight loss cannot be accomplished with exercise is hogwash. You don't have to eat under some number. You can go over the number and still lose by working it off. Weight loss doesn't happen in a vacuum in the kitchen.

    If people don't agree, that's fine. I'm not here to argue. Someone else will surely show up who did log in to fight, lol. I'm just saying that you can lose weight by exercising, even if you eat over your maintenance number. If you want. If you don't want to rely on exercise, that's cool, too.

    Whatever floats your boat. :)

    Definitely just a communication error now that you summed up your thoughts. The problem with your side is that exercise plays into your maintenance calories. My maintenance is 3600 calories, this includes exercise. I cannot eat over maintenance and still lose. It's clear that you just didn't know what maintenance calories actually were. Hopefully, you have learned something.
    I always assumed from context that maintenance calories were the calories required to maintain your weight. I didn't realize this was a concept that fluctuated with amounts of exercise done.

    I am 100% guilty of not being hip to fitness buzzwords and have, indeed, learned a little.

    What is the definition of "maintenance" as it applies to calories...or "maintenance calories" (if it's one concept with two words, lol)?

    And why can't you eat over your 3600 and just do more exercise and still lose? I'm thinking that's nuts. Where am I wrong?

    Because if you did more exercise, those calories would be added into your maintenance calories. Maintenance calories are basically your TDEE. If you eat the exact same amount of calories you expend (including exercise), you will maintain your weight.

  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    jkal1979 wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    rsclause wrote: »
    I wont define "clean eating" but I can tell you what my last visit to the grocery store was like. I had twenty items and the only things not from the produce aisle were wine, milk and deodorant.

    so what are you saying?

    That wine is good and we should always include it in our shopping carts. That's what I took from it. B)

    That's the only thing I thought as well :) Except my state sucks so I can't get wine at the grocery store.

    On occasion the grocery stores here in Michigan will have wine or liquor samples to try out.

    That's common here (Illinois) too.
  • Kalikel
    Kalikel Posts: 9,603 Member
    Raynne413 wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    You can eat over your maintenance calories and still lose weight if you're exercising.

    Explain...
    It doesn't matter how many calories you eat. If you burn off enough, you will still lose weight. Theoretically, you could eat 100,000 calories a day and if you burned 100,010, you'd be losing.

    The idea that weight loss cannot be accomplished with exercise is hogwash. You don't have to eat under some number. You can go over the number and still lose by working it off. Weight loss doesn't happen in a vacuum in the kitchen.

    If people don't agree, that's fine. I'm not here to argue. Someone else will surely show up who did log in to fight, lol. I'm just saying that you can lose weight by exercising, even if you eat over your maintenance number. If you want. If you don't want to rely on exercise, that's cool, too.

    Whatever floats your boat. :)

    Definitely just a communication error now that you summed up your thoughts. The problem with your side is that exercise plays into your maintenance calories. My maintenance is 3600 calories, this includes exercise. I cannot eat over maintenance and still lose. It's clear that you just didn't know what maintenance calories actually were. Hopefully, you have learned something.
    I always assumed from context that maintenance calories were the calories required to maintain your weight. I didn't realize this was a concept that fluctuated with amounts of exercise done.

    I am 100% guilty of not being hip to fitness buzzwords and have, indeed, learned a little.

    What is the definition of "maintenance" as it applies to calories...or "maintenance calories" (if it's one concept with two words, lol)?

    And why can't you eat over your 3600 and just do more exercise and still lose? I'm thinking that's nuts. Where am I wrong?

    Because if you did more exercise, those calories would be added into your maintenance calories. Maintenance calories are basically your TDEE. If you eat the exact same amount of calories you expend (including exercise), you will maintain your weight.
    So, these maintenance calories are a constantly changing thing? No wonder you can't eat over them.

    I don't know my TDEE or any of that. Since I'd lost forty pounds before I started with MFP, I decided to dance with who brung me and not bother with all that. If what I do stops working, I'll happily give it a go. Not anti-TDEE, just not going that route right now.

    I'm going to withdraw my questions, lol. I don't want to know.

    But thanks! :)
  • Slacker16
    Slacker16 Posts: 1,184 Member
    So clean eating means your only source of protein and dietary fat is milk...

    Not sure if want.
    MrM27 wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    rsclause wrote: »
    I wont define "clean eating" but I can tell you what my last visit to the grocery store was like. I had twenty items and the only things not from the produce aisle were wine, milk and deodorant.
    so what are you saying?
    That wine is good and we should always include it in our shopping carts. That's what I took from it. B)
    That's the only thing I thought as well :) Except my state sucks so I can't get wine at the grocery store.
    I'm always fascinated when you can get liquor and groceries together. Here we can't.
    You got no right to complain, in NY I've even seen beer at the Rite Aid.

    In NJ, you can't purchase alcohol anywhere aside from liquor stores and bars. When I want to get drunk and eat my weight in Doritos, I need to stop in two stores. The struggle is real.
  • MissHolidayGolightly
    MissHolidayGolightly Posts: 857 Member
    edited October 2014
    Kalikel wrote: »
    Raynne413 wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Kalikel wrote: »
    You can eat over your maintenance calories and still lose weight if you're exercising.

    Explain...
    It doesn't matter how many calories you eat. If you burn off enough, you will still lose weight. Theoretically, you could eat 100,000 calories a day and if you burned 100,010, you'd be losing.

    The idea that weight loss cannot be accomplished with exercise is hogwash. You don't have to eat under some number. You can go over the number and still lose by working it off. Weight loss doesn't happen in a vacuum in the kitchen.

    If people don't agree, that's fine. I'm not here to argue. Someone else will surely show up who did log in to fight, lol. I'm just saying that you can lose weight by exercising, even if you eat over your maintenance number. If you want. If you don't want to rely on exercise, that's cool, too.

    Whatever floats your boat. :)

    Definitely just a communication error now that you summed up your thoughts. The problem with your side is that exercise plays into your maintenance calories. My maintenance is 3600 calories, this includes exercise. I cannot eat over maintenance and still lose. It's clear that you just didn't know what maintenance calories actually were. Hopefully, you have learned something.
    I always assumed from context that maintenance calories were the calories required to maintain your weight. I didn't realize this was a concept that fluctuated with amounts of exercise done.

    I am 100% guilty of not being hip to fitness buzzwords and have, indeed, learned a little.

    What is the definition of "maintenance" as it applies to calories...or "maintenance calories" (if it's one concept with two words, lol)?

    And why can't you eat over your 3600 and just do more exercise and still lose? I'm thinking that's nuts. Where am I wrong?

    Because if you did more exercise, those calories would be added into your maintenance calories. Maintenance calories are basically your TDEE. If you eat the exact same amount of calories you expend (including exercise), you will maintain your weight.
    So, these maintenance calories are a constantly changing thing? No wonder you can't eat over them.

    I don't know my TDEE or any of that. Since I'd lost forty pounds before I started with MFP, I decided to dance with who brung me and not bother with all that. If what I do stops working, I'll happily give it a go. Not anti-TDEE, just not going that route right now.

    I'm going to withdraw my questions, lol. I don't want to know.

    But thanks! :)

    Your energy expenditure does fluctuate based on the activities you do each day. A day spent in pajamas binge-watching Netflix will require fewer calories than a day spent rock climbing, for example. TDEE is an average based on your average daily activity. People who use this method eat roughly the same amount every day (or every week on average) because they prefer this method to changing their intake with daily fluctuations in activity.