Women Should Train Differently Then Men
Options
Replies
-
LiftAllThePizzas wrote: »I just want to know if it's finally been decided whether women should train before men like the title suggests.
no, woman train after men ..that is the natural hierarchy of things and is based on genetics.0 -
lydiakitten wrote: »This thread is a huge trainwreck. Why do 70% of threads here become "battle of the sexes"?
Each individual should train in a way that promotes their personal goals and is compatible with their individual capabilities. Nothing more, nothing less.
because some people on here choose to take things way too seriously, and have no clue how to differentiate sarcasm and joking, from seriousness.
and it appears that some people expect that someone will never misspeak and when they do they should be tarred and feathered, and then quartered...
I've actually been very graciously ignoring your attempts to bait me with your hilarious jokes, if you notice.
(See *that * is sarcasm there, instanced in the use of the words "hilarious" and "jokes")
so you are ignoring me by responding to me? Interesting...
I did not refer to you by name, unless of course you think that "some people" refers to you ...or am I really in your head that much?
I said I ignored your hilarious jokey baiting posts.
You know that I know what you were doing. We've been bound together for all time by that other thread. Certainly for as long as we count here. It's kind of sweet if you think about it
Wait, is this a thing ("We've been bound together for all time by that other thread.”)? Crap, that’s scarier than common-law marriage.
0 -
LMFAO @ page 10. You guys* are killing it.
*by which I mean the colloquial use which includes both sexes.0 -
lydiakitten wrote: »This thread is a huge trainwreck. Why do 70% of threads here become "battle of the sexes"?
Each individual should train in a way that promotes their personal goals and is compatible with their individual capabilities. Nothing more, nothing less.
because some people on here choose to take things way too seriously, and have no clue how to differentiate sarcasm and joking, from seriousness.
and it appears that some people expect that someone will never misspeak and when they do they should be tarred and feathered, and then quartered...
I've actually been very graciously ignoring your attempts to bait me with your hilarious jokes, if you notice.
(See *that * is sarcasm there, instanced in the use of the words "hilarious" and "jokes")
so you are ignoring me by responding to me? Interesting...
I did not refer to you by name, unless of course you think that "some people" refers to you ...or am I really in your head that much?
I said I ignored your hilarious jokey baiting posts.
You know that I know what you were doing. We've been bound together for all time by that other thread. Certainly for as long as we count here. It's kind of sweet if you think about it
Your mouth said no, but your body said yes.
0 -
LiftAllThePizzas wrote: »I just want to know if it's finally been decided whether women should train before men like the title suggests.
All I know is if I have to do that thing you’re doing in your profile picture, yes, I have to train differently than you do. And we’re both men.
0 -
dup0 -
Just wait till the MyFitnessPalimony suit.AllanMisner wrote: »lydiakitten wrote: »This thread is a huge trainwreck. Why do 70% of threads here become "battle of the sexes"?
Each individual should train in a way that promotes their personal goals and is compatible with their individual capabilities. Nothing more, nothing less.
because some people on here choose to take things way too seriously, and have no clue how to differentiate sarcasm and joking, from seriousness.
and it appears that some people expect that someone will never misspeak and when they do they should be tarred and feathered, and then quartered...
I've actually been very graciously ignoring your attempts to bait me with your hilarious jokes, if you notice.
(See *that * is sarcasm there, instanced in the use of the words "hilarious" and "jokes")
so you are ignoring me by responding to me? Interesting...
I did not refer to you by name, unless of course you think that "some people" refers to you ...or am I really in your head that much?
I said I ignored your hilarious jokey baiting posts.
You know that I know what you were doing. We've been bound together for all time by that other thread. Certainly for as long as we count here. It's kind of sweet if you think about it
Wait, is this a thing ("We've been bound together for all time by that other thread.”)? Crap, that’s scarier than common-law marriage.
0 -
lydiakitten wrote: »This thread is a huge trainwreck. Why do 70% of threads here become "battle of the sexes"?
Each individual should train in a way that promotes their personal goals and is compatible with their individual capabilities. Nothing more, nothing less.
because some people on here choose to take things way too seriously, and have no clue how to differentiate sarcasm and joking, from seriousness.
and it appears that some people expect that someone will never misspeak and when they do they should be tarred and feathered, and then quartered...
I've actually been very graciously ignoring your attempts to bait me with your hilarious jokes, if you notice.
(See *that * is sarcasm there, instanced in the use of the words "hilarious" and "jokes")
so you are ignoring me by responding to me? Interesting...
I did not refer to you by name, unless of course you think that "some people" refers to you ...or am I really in your head that much?
I said I ignored your hilarious jokey baiting posts.
You know that I know what you were doing. We've been bound together for all time by that other thread. Certainly for as long as we count here. It's kind of sweet if you think about it
I am glad that you are ignoring me by responding to my posts..
it is kind of like having an MFP puppy that follows me around...cute.
Who could ignore you? That's different from ignoring your hilarious jokey baiting posts. Thank you for saying I'm cute, it's true, I am.0 -
LiftAllThePizzas wrote: »I just want to know if it's finally been decided whether women should train before men like the title suggests.
Surely you know better then to ask that question.0 -
LiftAllThePizzas wrote: »I just want to know if it's finally been decided whether women should train before men like the title suggests.
no, woman train after men ..that is the natural hierarchy of things and is based on genetics.
Whatever happened to ladies first?
Chivalry is dead.0 -
LiftAllThePizzas wrote: »I just want to know if it's finally been decided whether women should train before men like the title suggests.
no, woman train after men ..that is the natural hierarchy of things and is based on genetics.
Not in the South.
0 -
AllanMisner wrote: »LiftAllThePizzas wrote: »I just want to know if it's finally been decided whether women should train before men like the title suggests.
no, woman train after men ..that is the natural hierarchy of things and is based on genetics.
Not in the South.
specifically in the south....
LOLZ
0 -
AllanMisner wrote: »lydiakitten wrote: »This thread is a huge trainwreck. Why do 70% of threads here become "battle of the sexes"?
Each individual should train in a way that promotes their personal goals and is compatible with their individual capabilities. Nothing more, nothing less.
because some people on here choose to take things way too seriously, and have no clue how to differentiate sarcasm and joking, from seriousness.
and it appears that some people expect that someone will never misspeak and when they do they should be tarred and feathered, and then quartered...
I've actually been very graciously ignoring your attempts to bait me with your hilarious jokes, if you notice.
(See *that * is sarcasm there, instanced in the use of the words "hilarious" and "jokes")
so you are ignoring me by responding to me? Interesting...
I did not refer to you by name, unless of course you think that "some people" refers to you ...or am I really in your head that much?
I said I ignored your hilarious jokey baiting posts.
You know that I know what you were doing. We've been bound together for all time by that other thread. Certainly for as long as we count here. It's kind of sweet if you think about it
Wait, is this a thing ("We've been bound together for all time by that other thread.”)? Crap, that’s scarier than common-law marriage.
Yeah, I mean we're all here as long as we're here (and posting). Yeah I agree it's kind of scary O_O0 -
jofjltncb6 wrote: »LiftAllThePizzas wrote: »I just want to know if it's finally been decided whether women should train before men like the title suggests.
Surely you know better then to ask that question.
TWITCH.
And don't call me Shirley! (because I'm not genetically inferior) That was sarc-yeah I can't even keep a straight face.0 -
lydiakitten wrote: »This thread is a huge trainwreck. Why do 70% of threads here become "battle of the sexes"?
Each individual should train in a way that promotes their personal goals and is compatible with their individual capabilities. Nothing more, nothing less.
because some people on here choose to take things way too seriously, and have no clue how to differentiate sarcasm and joking, from seriousness.
and it appears that some people expect that someone will never misspeak and when they do they should be tarred and feathered, and then quartered...
I've actually been very graciously ignoring your attempts to bait me with your hilarious jokes, if you notice.
(See *that * is sarcasm there, instanced in the use of the words "hilarious" and "jokes")
so you are ignoring me by responding to me? Interesting...
I did not refer to you by name, unless of course you think that "some people" refers to you ...or am I really in your head that much?
I said I ignored your hilarious jokey baiting posts.
You know that I know what you were doing. We've been bound together for all time by that other thread. Certainly for as long as we count here. It's kind of sweet if you think about it
I am glad that you are ignoring me by responding to my posts..
it is kind of like having an MFP puppy that follows me around...cute.
Who could ignore you? That's different from ignoring your hilarious jokey baiting posts. Thank you for saying I'm cute, it's true, I am.
because you said you were ignoring me by responding to me..
but its nice to know that I have burrowed that deep into your mind....
how many damsels in distress have you rescued from MFP lately?0 -
AllanMisner wrote: »LiftAllThePizzas wrote: »I just want to know if it's finally been decided whether women should train before men like the title suggests.
no, woman train after men ..that is the natural hierarchy of things and is based on genetics.
Not in the South.
Because we're in Italy. Now if we were in Germany...0 -
MireyGal76 wrote: »Why can't everyone train the way they want to train?
I when I go to the gym, I'm working for MY goals. I'm glad you're at the gym too, don't get me wrong; but you have a different set of goals, so you're working to meet those... don't try to rise (or sink) to my level! Stay at your own!!
Are you advocating for segregation? What, I can't share your goals?
Is it because I'm a woman?
Huh?
HUH???
^ sarc... Never mind.
Well, we could go back to Aristotelian theory and have everyone train together... but naked. Just sayyyyin
nekkid with the shake weights!!!!0 -
So.....................who's lifting heavy today?
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
0 -
LiftAllThePizzas wrote: »I just want to know if it's finally been decided whether women should train before men like the title suggests.
You mean stand before man working out and train kinda "before" or form a single line and be 1st in line before man to train kinda "before"
Now I'm confused. Can I have the answer by end of day today please? Tomorrow I have my bicep curl day. I would like to plan accordingly.0 -
So.....................who's lifting heavy today?
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
I picked up a gallon of milk- but like a goblet squat- because genetically that's how I have to pick things up. 3:1 and all.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 393 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 937 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions