Recomposition: Maintaining weight while losing fat

1353638404185

Replies

  • llbrixon
    llbrixon Posts: 964 Member
    Following and bumping up
  • ereckless82
    ereckless82 Posts: 85 Member
    Hi everyone. I'm trying to Sort through all of the posts on here to figure his whole recomp thing out. I started with a trainer last week. I'm 5'8.5" and between 169 and 171 currently. I started this whole thing to lose Weight after having my daughter and am down 76 pounds now. I have another 10-15 to go, but I am pretty sure I'm in more need of a recomp. So, here I am.

    I started with a personal trainer last week. I've been doing Jillian Michaels workouts, Bob Harper workouts, kickboxing, spinning, etc. a lot of cardio with weights and body resistance but my trainer said I need to start the weight training. My MFP is currently set to lose 1lb per week. I've always had it set to that. That means it says 1630 calories per day, which I know is too low for a body recomp. I've upped my protein intake a lot, but I am just at a loss for figuring out this whole TDEE thing and amount of protein I really actually need, etc. getting out of the mindset of eating so little in calories and eating more is a huge transition and I'd like some guidance from any of you! Kind of lost. Thank you in advance!
  • bioklutz
    bioklutz Posts: 1,365 Member
    Hi everyone. I'm trying to Sort through all of the posts on here to figure his whole recomp thing out. I started with a trainer last week. I'm 5'8.5" and between 169 and 171 currently. I started this whole thing to lose Weight after having my daughter and am down 76 pounds now. I have another 10-15 to go, but I am pretty sure I'm in more need of a recomp. So, here I am.

    I started with a personal trainer last week. I've been doing Jillian Michaels workouts, Bob Harper workouts, kickboxing, spinning, etc. a lot of cardio with weights and body resistance but my trainer said I need to start the weight training. My MFP is currently set to lose 1lb per week. I've always had it set to that. That means it says 1630 calories per day, which I know is too low for a body recomp. I've upped my protein intake a lot, but I am just at a loss for figuring out this whole TDEE thing and amount of protein I really actually need, etc. getting out of the mindset of eating so little in calories and eating more is a huge transition and I'd like some guidance from any of you! Kind of lost. Thank you in advance!

    You might want to rethink the 1 lb per week deficit. You only have 10-15 pounds to go and it sounds like you are asking a lot from your body with the workouts. Consider changing your goal to 0.5 lbs a week so that you can properly fuel your workouts.

    http://www.sailrabbit.com/bmr/ This is a TDEE calculator (This calculator includes several different methods - you will notice there may be a bit of a difference between them. I would just take an average between the methods - try it out and adjust your calories up or down as needed). Basically TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) is the average daily calorie usage. You would not be adding in your exercise every day. If you spend roughly the same amount of time working out every week it may be more helpful to use than using MFP's method of calculating calories (where you are adding your exercise calories in every day).

    I would eat 0.8-1.0 gr of protein x your body weight. Eat 0.4 gr of fat x your body weight. You can treat protein and fat as minimum goals - it is fine to be over. The rest would go to carbs.
  • lovematthewchristopher
    lovematthewchristopher Posts: 147 Member
    Just here to learn! Very interesting information!
  • sunnybeaches105
    sunnybeaches105 Posts: 2,831 Member
    Interesting. I've been close to maintenance for about two years now, and I've done as much as I think can expect. I'm dieting down now. Here to follow.
  • cnbbnc
    cnbbnc Posts: 1,267 Member
    bioklutz wrote: »
    Hi everyone. I'm trying to Sort through all of the posts on here to figure his whole recomp thing out. I started with a trainer last week. I'm 5'8.5" and between 169 and 171 currently. I started this whole thing to lose Weight after having my daughter and am down 76 pounds now. I have another 10-15 to go, but I am pretty sure I'm in more need of a recomp. So, here I am.

    I started with a personal trainer last week. I've been doing Jillian Michaels workouts, Bob Harper workouts, kickboxing, spinning, etc. a lot of cardio with weights and body resistance but my trainer said I need to start the weight training. My MFP is currently set to lose 1lb per week. I've always had it set to that. That means it says 1630 calories per day, which I know is too low for a body recomp. I've upped my protein intake a lot, but I am just at a loss for figuring out this whole TDEE thing and amount of protein I really actually need, etc. getting out of the mindset of eating so little in calories and eating more is a huge transition and I'd like some guidance from any of you! Kind of lost. Thank you in advance!

    You might want to rethink the 1 lb per week deficit. You only have 10-15 pounds to go and it sounds like you are asking a lot from your body with the workouts. Consider changing your goal to 0.5 lbs a week so that you can properly fuel your workouts.

    http://www.sailrabbit.com/bmr/ This is a TDEE calculator (This calculator includes several different methods - you will notice there may be a bit of a difference between them. I would just take an average between the methods - try it out and adjust your calories up or down as needed). Basically TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) is the average daily calorie usage. You would not be adding in your exercise every day. If you spend roughly the same amount of time working out every week it may be more helpful to use than using MFP's method of calculating calories (where you are adding your exercise calories in every day).

    I would eat 0.8-1.0 gr of protein x your body weight. Eat 0.4 gr of fat x your body weight. You can treat protein and fat as minimum goals - it is fine to be over. The rest would go to carbs.

    Yeah....you could switch to losing .5/wk (which really would be better)....lose the remaining weight slower....while gradually transitioning to maintenance/starting a recomp.

  • ereckless82
    ereckless82 Posts: 85 Member
    cnbbnc wrote: »

    You might want to rethink the 1 lb per week deficit. You only have 10-15 pounds to go and it sounds like you are asking a lot from your body with the workouts. Consider changing your goal to 0.5 lbs a week so that you can properly fuel your workouts.

    http://www.sailrabbit.com/bmr/ This is a TDEE calculator (This calculator includes several different methods - you will notice there may be a bit of a difference between them. I would just take an average between the methods - try it out and adjust your calories up or down as needed). Basically TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) is the average daily calorie usage. You would not be adding in your exercise every day. If you spend roughly the same amount of time working out every week it may be more helpful to use than using MFP's method of calculating calories (where you are adding your exercise calories in every day).

    I would eat 0.8-1.0 gr of protein x your body weight. Eat 0.4 gr of fat x your body weight. You can treat protein and fat as minimum goals - it is fine to be over. The rest would go to carbs.

    Yeah....you could switch to losing .5/wk (which really would be better)....lose the remaining weight slower....while gradually transitioning to maintenance/starting a recomp.

    [/quote]

    Ive been thinking about changing to the .5lbs, which seems much more reasonable. Thanks so much for the advice! I'll start working on figuring this out tomorrow so I might be back with more questions! Although, I am curious. are you always supposed to Eat to your TDEE + exercise calories?
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    cnbbnc wrote: »

    You might want to rethink the 1 lb per week deficit. You only have 10-15 pounds to go and it sounds like you are asking a lot from your body with the workouts. Consider changing your goal to 0.5 lbs a week so that you can properly fuel your workouts.

    http://www.sailrabbit.com/bmr/ This is a TDEE calculator (This calculator includes several different methods - you will notice there may be a bit of a difference between them. I would just take an average between the methods - try it out and adjust your calories up or down as needed). Basically TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) is the average daily calorie usage. You would not be adding in your exercise every day. If you spend roughly the same amount of time working out every week it may be more helpful to use than using MFP's method of calculating calories (where you are adding your exercise calories in every day).

    I would eat 0.8-1.0 gr of protein x your body weight. Eat 0.4 gr of fat x your body weight. You can treat protein and fat as minimum goals - it is fine to be over. The rest would go to carbs.

    Yeah....you could switch to losing .5/wk (which really would be better)....lose the remaining weight slower....while gradually transitioning to maintenance/starting a recomp.

    Ive been thinking about changing to the .5lbs, which seems much more reasonable. Thanks so much for the advice! I'll start working on figuring this out tomorrow so I might be back with more questions! Although, I am curious. are you always supposed to Eat to your TDEE + exercise calories?[/quote]

    NOOOO.

    TDEE by definition (Total Daily Energy Expend) includes exercise - as such you take a deficit from that and then eat back exercise - you'd likely have no deficit.

    The MFP method you were doing though, included NO exercise in that base goal 1630 - which would only be eaten on days of, well, no exercise - so you wouldn't be eating that low very often - if you followed the program correctly.

    But the average weekly TDEE method includes your planned exercise, then you take deficit - and eat that daily.

    It does NOT work well if your workouts are iffy and commonly missed. You'd likely end up with no deficit.

    You'd only eat more if you did a workout not originally included in your weekly estimate.
    Same deal if you miss a planned workout - drop 100 calories that day. If you make it up another day - eat an extra 100.
  • retirehappy
    retirehappy Posts: 4,756 Member
    heybales wrote: »
    NOOOO.

    TDEE by definition (Total Daily Energy Expend) includes exercise - as such you take a deficit from that and then eat back exercise - you'd likely have no deficit.

    The MFP method you were doing though, included NO exercise in that base goal 1630 - which would only be eaten on days of, well, no exercise - so you wouldn't be eating that low very often - if you followed the program correctly.

    But the average weekly TDEE method includes your planned exercise, then you take deficit - and eat that daily.

    It does NOT work well if your workouts are iffy and commonly missed. You'd likely end up with no deficit.

    You'd only eat more if you did a workout not originally included in your weekly estimate.
    Same deal if you miss a planned workout - drop 100 calories that day. If you make it up another day - eat an extra 100.


    Click into heybales' profile, he has a spreadsheet for Just TDEE, it has helped a large number of people, it is free and easy to follow. Just do that and you will be fine.
  • Ashtoretet
    Ashtoretet Posts: 378 Member
    Something I've been wondering about recomping. Is calorie cycling really necessary? What happens if you just eat at maintenance every day?
  • feisty_bucket
    feisty_bucket Posts: 1,047 Member
    edited May 2016
    Ashtoretet wrote: »
    Something I've been wondering about recomping. Is calorie cycling really necessary? What happens if you just eat at maintenance every day?

    Not much happens, you "maintain" ie: stay the same. Recomp's calorie cycling is shrinking the bulk-and-cut cycle down. In the standard method: say someone might bulk up for two months and then cut for two, while hoping to retain as much of the muscle built during the bulk period as possible.

    In a recomp, it's more like a one-day bulk followed by a one-day cut. Or over a few days. Within a week, there may be 1-3 cycles.

    The point of a recomp is to maintain a similar level of bodyfat all the time, while a traditional bulk and cut cycling person will be appreciably fatter more often than not.

    This is an emerging technique and there's not a lot of hard evidence right now. Martin Berkhan is the guru.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    Ashtoretet wrote: »
    Something I've been wondering about recomping. Is calorie cycling really necessary? What happens if you just eat at maintenance every day?

    No not necessary at all. Personal preference - never seen anything that actually tests and quantifies any difference in the two approaches.
    It's similar to the debate about TDEE or eat back exercise calories methods - two different methods to get to the same result.

    Bodily functions such as muscle recovery, repair and growth happen 24x7 and don't stop start on a daily basis.


  • smileymaxine
    smileymaxine Posts: 275 Member
    This is a thing !!
    You wonderful person ! I've been trying to figure out how to keep up my lifting too much of a defect and I have no energy / lose fat ... My weight meh if it went down a few kg then great but could care less.
    Thank you so much for being so informative

    I was getting so so hung up that it took 2 months to lose another 1.6% BF down from 33.3 to 28 but that's taken its time.

    I am sticking to around 150-170gr P 70gr F and 100-120gr C with now adding in one higher carb day

    What is an average BF% loss in a month ?
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    This is a thing !!
    You wonderful person ! I've been trying to figure out how to keep up my lifting too much of a defect and I have no energy / lose fat ... My weight meh if it went down a few kg then great but could care less.
    Thank you so much for being so informative

    I was getting so so hung up that it took 2 months to lose another 1.6% BF down from 33.3 to 28 but that's taken its time.

    I am sticking to around 150-170gr P 70gr F and 100-120gr C with now adding in one higher carb day

    What is an average BF% loss in a month ?

    There is no average, and really no recommendation like that either.
    Because it's really about lbs of fat lost, and depending on how much you got, the %BF could be very different.

    Some will give max lbs as 1% of bodyweight - but obviously that falls apart near goal weight and low BF% - so that probably should be backed off.
    But even there, 1% of bodyweight will be different amount of BF% lost depending on where you are starting from.

    Besides the fact you are very unlikely to be getting accurate enough BF% figure to do any consistent math on - unless really getting DEXA scans frequently.
  • ereckless82
    ereckless82 Posts: 85 Member
    heybales wrote: »
    NOOOO.

    TDEE by definition (Total Daily Energy Expend) includes exercise - as such you take a deficit from that and then eat back exercise - you'd likely have no deficit.

    The MFP method you were doing though, included NO exercise in that base goal 1630 - which would only be eaten on days of, well, no exercise - so you wouldn't be eating that low very often - if you followed the program correctly.

    But the average weekly TDEE method includes your planned exercise, then you take deficit - and eat that daily.

    It does NOT work well if your workouts are iffy and commonly missed. You'd likely end up with no deficit.

    You'd only eat more if you did a workout not originally included in your weekly estimate.
    Same deal if you miss a planned workout - drop 100 calories that day. If you make it up another day - eat an extra 100.


    Click into heybales' profile, he has a spreadsheet for Just TDEE, it has helped a large number of people, it is free and easy to follow. Just do that and you will be fine.

    I tried to go into heybales profile, but it's private!

    I very rarely eat my exercise calories back, even at the 1630, because I just didn't feel like I needed to. I have just recently been feeling like that is not working for me anymore. I took myself from losing 1lb per week to .5lbs per week and it has me at 1880 calories per day now. Feels like a significantly higher amount. I'm still pretty lost on this. I have been trying really hard to eat at my protein goal that mfp gives me, which is around 130 grams. I've been eating beyond that as much as possible. Mindset changing from eating lower calories and fat to more calories and fat is difficult, but I'm making progress!
  • jessiefrancine
    jessiefrancine Posts: 271 Member
    heybales wrote: »
    NOOOO.

    TDEE by definition (Total Daily Energy Expend) includes exercise - as such you take a deficit from that and then eat back exercise - you'd likely have no deficit.

    The MFP method you were doing though, included NO exercise in that base goal 1630 - which would only be eaten on days of, well, no exercise - so you wouldn't be eating that low very often - if you followed the program correctly.

    But the average weekly TDEE method includes your planned exercise, then you take deficit - and eat that daily.

    It does NOT work well if your workouts are iffy and commonly missed. You'd likely end up with no deficit.

    You'd only eat more if you did a workout not originally included in your weekly estimate.
    Same deal if you miss a planned workout - drop 100 calories that day. If you make it up another day - eat an extra 100.


    Click into heybales' profile, he has a spreadsheet for Just TDEE, it has helped a large number of people, it is free and easy to follow. Just do that and you will be fine.

    I tried to go into heybales profile, but it's private!

    I very rarely eat my exercise calories back, even at the 1630, because I just didn't feel like I needed to. I have just recently been feeling like that is not working for me anymore. I took myself from losing 1lb per week to .5lbs per week and it has me at 1880 calories per day now. Feels like a significantly higher amount. I'm still pretty lost on this. I have been trying really hard to eat at my protein goal that mfp gives me, which is around 130 grams. I've been eating beyond that as much as possible. Mindset changing from eating lower calories and fat to more calories and fat is difficult, but I'm making progress!

    I'm able to view his profile without any problems. When you click on his profile name, the popup box gives you three options - send a message (button), ignore (also button) or view profile (by clicking on his hyperlinked profile name or photo). Is that not happening for you?
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    heybales wrote: »
    NOOOO.

    TDEE by definition (Total Daily Energy Expend) includes exercise - as such you take a deficit from that and then eat back exercise - you'd likely have no deficit.

    The MFP method you were doing though, included NO exercise in that base goal 1630 - which would only be eaten on days of, well, no exercise - so you wouldn't be eating that low very often - if you followed the program correctly.

    But the average weekly TDEE method includes your planned exercise, then you take deficit - and eat that daily.

    It does NOT work well if your workouts are iffy and commonly missed. You'd likely end up with no deficit.

    You'd only eat more if you did a workout not originally included in your weekly estimate.
    Same deal if you miss a planned workout - drop 100 calories that day. If you make it up another day - eat an extra 100.


    Click into heybales' profile, he has a spreadsheet for Just TDEE, it has helped a large number of people, it is free and easy to follow. Just do that and you will be fine.

    I tried to go into heybales profile, but it's private!

    I very rarely eat my exercise calories back, even at the 1630, because I just didn't feel like I needed to. I have just recently been feeling like that is not working for me anymore. I took myself from losing 1lb per week to .5lbs per week and it has me at 1880 calories per day now. Feels like a significantly higher amount. I'm still pretty lost on this. I have been trying really hard to eat at my protein goal that mfp gives me, which is around 130 grams. I've been eating beyond that as much as possible. Mindset changing from eating lower calories and fat to more calories and fat is difficult, but I'm making progress!

    It's public to all MFP members - so if you accessed from web browser that didn't have you logged into MFP - yes it would fail.

    If your exercise is such it's not that big of a net gain to the daily calorie burn - that may not be that bad.
    But as you noticed - it made the deficit bigger than your body appears to have liked, and perhaps you noticed it effecting your workouts.
    Well, if you can't get a good workout - what need does the body have to improve anything?

    250 cal not that significant unless you attempt to add the calories all as cauliflower or something like that.
    Good job on progressing, you'll find a place for the calories.
    Shoot - if you were already meeting your nutritional needs - 1 serving of peanut butter almost takes care of all 250 calories.
  • ereckless82
    ereckless82 Posts: 85 Member
    wfc7kuc1ocix.png
    This is all I see. I'm using the app for iPhone!

    Today I burned close to 630 calories and didn't eat back any of those calories. Today was cardio before and after weight training. I usually always burn at least 300-400 calories per workout. Maybe I should eat some of them back now. It's 7PM, so maybe just some peanut butter on bread would do the trick?
  • ekat120
    ekat120 Posts: 407 Member
    I think you have to click on his name on that screen
  • retirehappy
    retirehappy Posts: 4,756 Member
    edited May 2016
    I tried to go into heybales profile, but it's private!

    Try this link to the document:

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G7FgNzPq3v5WMjDtH0n93LXSMRY_hjmzNTMJb3aZSxM/edit?usp=sharing


    Again ,thanks to heybales for all his hard work on those documents he has shared so freely.

  • Ashtoretet
    Ashtoretet Posts: 378 Member
    sijomial wrote: »
    Ashtoretet wrote: »
    Something I've been wondering about recomping. Is calorie cycling really necessary? What happens if you just eat at maintenance every day?

    No not necessary at all. Personal preference - never seen anything that actually tests and quantifies any difference in the two approaches.
    It's similar to the debate about TDEE or eat back exercise calories methods - two different methods to get to the same result.

    Bodily functions such as muscle recovery, repair and growth happen 24x7 and don't stop start on a daily basis.


    Thank you for the reply, your last line is exactly why I was questioning it. I think I'm going to just stick to maintenance for now while upping my protein. If I don't see any results in a few months I'll look into the cycling.
  • Ashtoretet
    Ashtoretet Posts: 378 Member
    sijomial wrote: »
    Ashtoretet wrote: »
    Something I've been wondering about recomping. Is calorie cycling really necessary? What happens if you just eat at maintenance every day?

    No not necessary at all. Personal preference - never seen anything that actually tests and quantifies any difference in the two approaches.
    It's similar to the debate about TDEE or eat back exercise calories methods - two different methods to get to the same result.

    Bodily functions such as muscle recovery, repair and growth happen 24x7 and don't stop start on a daily basis.


    Thank you for the reply, your last line is exactly why I was questioning it. I think I'm going to just stick to maintenance for now while upping my protein. If I don't see any results in a few months I'll look into the cycling.
  • Ashtoretet
    Ashtoretet Posts: 378 Member
    sijomial wrote: »
    Ashtoretet wrote: »
    Something I've been wondering about recomping. Is calorie cycling really necessary? What happens if you just eat at maintenance every day?

    No not necessary at all. Personal preference - never seen anything that actually tests and quantifies any difference in the two approaches.
    It's similar to the debate about TDEE or eat back exercise calories methods - two different methods to get to the same result.

    Bodily functions such as muscle recovery, repair and growth happen 24x7 and don't stop start on a daily basis.


    Thank you for the reply, your last line is exactly why I was questioning it. I think I'm going to just stick to maintenance for now while upping my protein. If I don't see any results in a few months I'll look into the cycling.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    edited May 2016
    This is all I see. I'm using the app for iPhone!

    Today I burned close to 630 calories and didn't eat back any of those calories. Today was cardio before and after weight training. I usually always burn at least 300-400 calories per workout. Maybe I should eat some of them back now. It's 7PM, so maybe just some peanut butter on bread would do the trick?

    You have to call out "heybales" while clicking on the name - pretty sure.

    But - you're about to go look at something that probably won't work through the app anyway - a link that @retirehappy beat me to posting.

    You'll have to use a browser, and if planning on using the iPhone, also the Google Sheets app, and a Google account with Drive to copy it to.

    And yeah, that's back to a huge deficit now (250+630) with amount of weight to lose - and hoping to fuel good workouts or good recovery from an attempted good workout.
    Until you have the ability to compare workouts on current eating plan to workouts on one actually eating enough - you'll have no idea how good the workouts could be.

    Because the feeling of pushing and giving it your all is always subjective.
    But hold your breath and do as many pushups as you can.
    You gave it your all - but think that was a workout for your muscles for strength, or anaerobic endurance?
    Now, perhaps you do need anaerobic endurance for some odd reason and so that's a totally valid training method. But not likely to get much stronger from it until your body can deal with the no breathing problem first, and even then progress will be slow.
    But now breath and do as many as you can, probably feels different.
  • Sumiblue
    Sumiblue Posts: 1,597 Member
    edited May 2016
    You have to wait until midnight, burn a candle and look into a mirror while chanting "Heybales!" :wink:

    But it's a great calculator with a lot more detail. I use Google Sheets to copy & use it.
  • sunflowerhippi
    sunflowerhippi Posts: 1,099 Member
    OOO thanks for the re-share my file was the old format from 2012, wahoo for the new 2014 version. :)
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    OOO thanks for the re-share my file was the old format from 2012, wahoo for the new 2014 version. :)

    Ah - you had the bigger Weight Loss calculator, which actually was updated Jan '14 also.
    I did the Just TDEE one to improve on the rough 5 level tables which don't include higher daily activities, but super simple.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    I should have included above when looking at the spreadsheets, and wanting to get them, the following (since I get requests to share all the time).

    Glance over to red words in upper right as to how to get it.

    I can't share the master copy - or else everyone using it would be updating stats for anyone else using it - and if formula changed, ugh.
    You have to make your own copy.
  • retirehappy
    retirehappy Posts: 4,756 Member
    Bioklutz, I can sure see a difference in those pics. Your back is so much leaner more arms definition. You are Rocking your program.