Skip to content
  • Register
    • Viewing the message boards in:

    inappropriate question... but i want to know. so please no judging.. if dont like the question just

    1356

    Replies

    • Posts: 15,532 Member
      Alluminati wrote: »
      I feel nauseous.

      That can happen with long lasting rough sex. Sorta like cardio...

      OP, you may burn a few extra calories. Since you don't like the answers you are getting, you could always experiment and find out for yourself. Calculate your calories, eat them all back, and see what happens to your weight. If you are gaining, or your losses slow down, you are not burning as many calories as you think.

      Due to variations of positions (who's doing most of the work) and efforts, I think it would not be possible calculate accurately. Enjoy it, but I wouldn't count it.
    • Posts: 85 Member
      30 minutes? :open_mouth: I think if you could manage to get a full 30 minutes then you could count it as 30 minutes callisthenics maybe but 30 solid minutes even for the fittest of people would be pushing the limits
    • Posts: 24,208 Member
      smadaris91 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      no lol nothing weird more like the fifty shades of grey

      Poorly written and with a small vocabulary?
    • Posts: 9,003 Member
      Wow. Congrats on getting laid.
    • Posts: 15,532 Member
      EvgeniZyntx wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Poorly written and with a small vocabulary?

      I do tend to judge a guy by the size of his vocabulary :wink:
    • Posts: 34,971 Member
      smadaris91 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      because I want to know how many calories it burns. not if people should log it????

      There isn't going to be one set answer. It'd depend on the intensity and effort. And it obviously wouldn't be the same amount every single time. If you want to know, go see if a scientist is running some sort of study and see if you and your significant other can be monitored as you have sex. Otherwise...just include it as part of your activity.
    • Posts: 63 Member
      TavistockToad wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      But you had sex before you wanted to lose weight, no?

      yes I had sex before I wanted to lose weight but I wasn't watching my calories or adjusting them with CICO. so the burn of the sex would have been irrelevant at that point.
    • Posts: 63 Member
      skinnyinnotime wrote: »
      show previous quotes


      Really? Are you sedentary otherwise?

      no I work out and have a active career
    • Posts: 34,971 Member
      EvgeniZyntx wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Poorly written and with a small vocabulary?

      z205099164.gif
    • Posts: 34,971 Member
      edited July 2015
      smadaris91 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      yes I had sex before I wanted to lose weight but I wasn't watching my calories or adjusting them with CICO. so the burn of the sex would have been irrelevant at that point.

      This is an example of majoring in the minors.
    • Posts: 63 Member
      EvgeniZyntx wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Poorly written and with a small vocabulary?

      haahahahahaha I meant like the not being weird ie fifty shades of grey without getting vulgar
    • Posts: 5,864 Member
      edited July 2015
      Alluminati wrote: »
      I feel nauseous.

      I hear eating gingers

      can help o:)
    • Posts: 35,719 Member
      PikaKnight wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      z205099164.gif

      :laugh:
    • Posts: 41,865 Member
      smadaris91 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      yes I had sex before I wanted to lose weight but I wasn't watching my calories or adjusting them with CICO. so the burn of the sex would have been irrelevant at that point.

      there's a reason that you have an activity level setting...trying to track every little thing is ridiculous and unnecessary and any calorie burn estimate you get for *kitten* is going to pretty much be a stab in the dark anyway.
    • Posts: 34,971 Member
      cwolfman13 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      there's a reason that you have an activity level setting...trying to track every little thing is ridiculous and unnecessary and any calorie burn estimate you get for *kitten* is going to pretty much be a stab in the dark anyway.

      what-you-did-there-i-see-it.thumbnail.jpg
    • Posts: 2,668 Member
      Not sure which thread is better, this one or the mermaids.
    • Posts: 34,971 Member
      BinkyBonk wrote: »
      Not sure which thread is better, this one or the mermaids.

      tumblr_ls3kp2fb9f1r317bvo1_500.gif
    • Posts: 9,532 Member
      There's a mermaid thread...?!
    • Posts: 35,719 Member
      edited July 2015
      BinkyBonk wrote: »
      Not sure which thread is better, this one or the mermaids.

      I know better ones....

      http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/comment/33320455#Comment_33320455
    • Posts: 9,532 Member
      smadaris91 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      because I want to know how many calories it burns. not if people should log it????

      Very few.

      Not even enough for a Snickers bar.
    • Posts: 35,719 Member
      PikaKnight wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      what-you-did-there-i-see-it.thumbnail.jpg

      I wondered if that was intentional....
    • Posts: 5,864 Member
      BinkyBonk wrote: »
      Not sure which thread is better, this one or the mermaids.

      I read the first page of that thread and used my legs to run out lol, you can tell it's the weekend! :D
    • Posts: 34,971 Member
      TavistockToad wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      I wondered if that was intentional....

      It probably wasn't but I still thought it was funny :laugh:
    • Posts: 1,153 Member
      Faithful_Chosen wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      "Keep going, babe! I want icecream tonight!" :joy:


      LMAO!!!! I love it!
    • Posts: 4,301 Member
      edited July 2015
      smadaris91 wrote: »
      it was a discussion that me and my friend where having so I thought I would ask. What we where thinking is that when your having sex, you hold in your core and engage a lot of different muscles? not to mention the different positions I could see it being a good calorie burn. (unless your lazy and just lay there lol) it was on the woman health page saying the different things that burn calories. and I was just wondering others opinions on it.


      It is clear my thoughts and others differs greatly. If 'hold in your core' is on your mind then something is going terribly wrong. As for the burn I wouldn't count it. I mean, how many calories can I burn in 27 seconds?!?
    • Posts: 34,971 Member
      BigLifter10 wrote: »
      show previous quotes


      LMAO!!!! I love it!

      :laugh:
    • Posts: 14,260 Member
      Your activity level setting lets MFP calculate your NEATcalories. From the link:
      Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) is the energy expended for everything we do that is not sleeping, eating or sports-like exercise. It ranges from the energy expended walking to work, typing, performing yard work, undertaking agricultural tasks and fidgeting. Even trivial physical activities increase metabolic rate substantially and it is the cumulative impact of a multitude of exothermic actions that culminate in an individual's daily NEAT. It is, therefore, not surprising that NEAT explains a vast majority of an individual's non-resting energy needs.

      Sex is not sleeping, eating (yeah not even that ), and not sports-like exercise. In summary, sex is NEAT.

    • Posts: 34,971 Member
      _Terrapin_ wrote: »
      show previous quotes


      It is clear my thoughts and others differs greatly. If 'hold in your core' is on your mind then something is going terribly wrong. As for the burn I wouldn't count it. I mean, how many calories can I burn in 27 seconds?!?

      :laugh:

      Maybe that's how they have sex for a few hours. So focused on the calorie goal and making sure their core and other muscles are engaged they don't really get there and just keep going?
    • Posts: 35,719 Member
      jemhh wrote: »
      sex is NEAT.

      Yeah it is!
    • Posts: 4,301 Member
      PikaKnight wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      :laugh:

      Maybe that's how they have sex for a few hours. So focused on the calorie goal and making sure their core and other muscles are engaged they don't really get there and just keep going?
      Well. . . .wow. I can't imagine thinking "Is my gluteal engaged, or is my hip thruster fully expanded" what the hello kitty is wrong with these people. My head hurts.

    This discussion has been closed.

    Welcome!

    It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
    Sign In
    Register

    Quick Links

    Categories