Calories in and Calories Out. Is it really that simple?

12346

Replies

  • Posts: 2,395 Member
    Caitwn wrote: »

    Don't forget the part where (A) is flagged, reported, and/or given a warning for hurting someone's feelings.

    There are ways to do (A) respectfully and kindly. And there are ways to do (A) with mockery, ridicule and by demeaning or belittling people. The latter is wholly unnecessary, but some people here think that so long as you're honest, cruelty doesn't matter. That that is tough love.

    And that's such a shame -- because when you attack people, they tend to shut down and not really listen, so it defeats the whole purpose (unless you just get off on being cruel -- which, sadly, I think is the aim for some people on MFP). Then there are others that are kind and respectful, and I think are genuinely appreciated and respected accordingly.

  • Posts: 27,167 Member
    shell1005 wrote: »

    *side eyes* LOL

    I swear that site is a comedy routine to me now. Here are the article across the top:

    1. The Ultimate One Day Detox
    2. How Tilapia is Worse Than Bacon
    3. 7 Best Foods For Rapid Weight Loss
    4. 14 Days To Zero Belly - The Plan
    5. Life Changing Food Swaps

    So much woo. So much derp. And millions of people read that site. They have sold many many books. Blergh.

    I read the Ultimate One Day Detox. I was a little confused but I was pretty sure one of the steps said to stop stressing over the box of cookies I just ate (probably because they suggested I not eat breakfast and go for a walk and drink some spa water) because stress is bad for weight loss.

    So what I got from it so far is eat bacon, not tilapia. And when doing a detox skip breakfast and eat a box of cookies.

    Still not seeing a problem here...
  • Posts: 12 Member
    It is that simple but by also have to pay attention to your macro nutrients. One gram of protine per your body weight. 0.5 g of fat and then the rest as carbs
  • Posts: 27,167 Member
    It is that simple but by also have to pay attention to your macro nutrients. One gram of protine per your body weight. 0.5 g of fat and then the rest as carbs

    Macros are important for body composition. Not for pure weight loss barring any medical condition.

    And people with different goals will have different macro breakdowns. Your protein rec is on the high side of things.
  • Posts: 2,395 Member
    neldabg wrote: »
    Yes. I actually stuck through with weight loss this time, and lo and behold, the weight has melted off faster than ice cream on a cone on a hot summer day. The sooner people realize that they're not "special snowflakes" to the science of CICO, the sooner they'll lose the weight.

    Could we maybe stop all the "special snowflake" name calling? Do people not realize that's an insult?

  • UltimateRBF was warned for this.
    This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 2,395 Member

    And what about your posts where you repeatedly insult the intelligence of other posters?

    How about UltimateRBF, you just once stick to the posts at hand and stop all the flamebaiting and accusations? Comments like these of yours are exactly what starts all the fights. It's not helpful and its against the forum rules. Please respect the rules.
  • Posts: 513 Member
    maidentl wrote: »

    Someone said your friends were ignorant and you said they weren't. But here's your quote. Ignorance isn't always an insult. It just means that someone doesn't have that particular knowledge. That's my point.

    No one told me my friends were ignorant. And I didn't tell anyone else his friends were ignorant. You asked what exactly do I think ignorance is. And Wolfman called me a piece of work.
  • Unknown
    edited September 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 3,203 Member
    faurotann wrote: »

    No one told me my friends were ignorant. And I didn't tell anyone else his friends were ignorant. You asked what exactly do I think ignorance is. And Wolfman called me a piece of work.

    He sure did, right after he said your friends were ignorant and right before you said they aren't. Do you just argue with anything that's said even if it's in direct contradiction to what you just said two minutes ago?
  • This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 513 Member
    maidentl wrote: »

    He sure did, right after he said your friends were ignorant and right before you said they aren't. Do you just argue with anything that's said even if it's in direct contradiction to what you just said two minutes ago?

    No, Wolfman did not say my friends were ignorant. And, no I did not contradict him by saying they weren't.
  • Posts: 4,696 Member
    edited September 2015

    There are ways to do (A) respectfully and kindly. And there are ways to do (A) with mockery, ridicule and by demeaning or belittling people. The latter is wholly unnecessary, but some people here think that so long as you're honest, cruelty doesn't matter. That that is tough love.

    And that's such a shame -- because when you attack people, they tend to shut down and not really listen, so it defeats the whole purpose (unless you just get off on being cruel -- which, sadly, I think is the aim for some people on MFP). Then there are others that are kind and respectful, and I think are genuinely appreciated and respected accordingly.

    It's funny that you - someone who repeatedly demeans and belittles people, and attacks the intelligence of some of this forum's smartest posters - would say something like this.

    This is gold right here.
  • Posts: 3,203 Member
    No, Wolfman did not say my friends were ignorant. And, no I did not contradict him by saying they weren't.

    OK, well I can read. So you're either a troll or have short term memory loss.
    umm...so they're ignorant of what's going on then...that was the whole point...you're a piece of work...just one of many trolls on these boards I suppose
    No, I did not say they were ignorant of what's going on. I said they don't care that a calorie is a unit of energy. That's all I said.

    OK, maybe I lost track of WHOSE friends they are. Maybe they're his friends, maybe that was going to be your "Aha! Gotcha!" moment. All I was trying to say is that ignorance isn't necessarily a bad thing. I don't know why you take such offense to that sentiment.

  • Posts: 5,377 Member

    How about UltimateRBF, you just once stick to the posts at hand and stop all the flamebaiting and accusations? Comments like these of yours are exactly what starts all the fights. It's not helpful and its against the forum rules. Please respect the rules.
    *tu quoque intensifies*
  • Posts: 3,203 Member
    So should we put it to a vote? Is it really that simple? All in favor, say aye.

    Aye.
  • Posts: 6,652 Member
    Aye.
  • Posts: 3,599 Member
    edited September 2015
    maidentl wrote: »

    OK, maybe I lost track of WHOSE friends they are. Maybe they're his friends, maybe that was going to be your "Aha! Gotcha!" moment. All I was trying to say is that ignorance isn't necessarily a bad thing. I don't know why you take such offense to that sentiment.

    Just to clear up this confusion... cwolfman posted that his friends were ignorant to what a calorie really is, and basic nutrition here:
    cwolfman13 wrote: »

    outside of my actual fitness friends, most of my friends have nary an idea of what a calorie actually is...to most it is an arbitrary number on a nutritional label and has very little meaning...and even if they have some inclining of what a calorie actually is, they have no idea how that number applies to them.

    many, if not most people who join this forum are just as ignorant of basic nutrition as anyone in the real world which is why they think they have to do some specific diet or do a cleanse or take some magic pill or whatever...people are generally ignorant of basic nutrition.

    telling someone to eat less and thus reduce their energy intake is a completely valid response.

    And then faurotann said he is underestimating his friends, and then wolf man said no, they don't even understand that a calorie is a unit of energy, and then faurotann replied this:
    faurotann wrote: »
    No, they don't know that it's a unit of energy. And they don't care.

    So agreed with him that they don't know anything about CICO, thus agreeing with him.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 3,599 Member
    Aye
  • Posts: 3,203 Member
    edited September 2015

    Just to clear up this confusion... cwolfman posted that his friends were ignorant to what a calorie really is, and basic nutrition here:
    And then fautann said he is underestimating his friends, and then wolf man said no, they don't even understand that a calorie is a unit of energy, and then fautann replied this:

    So agreed with him that they don't know anything about CICO, thus agreeing with him.

    I am so confused now. LOL But this could have been avoided if it had been explained that I was misunderstanding something rather than pretend no one was discussing ignorance before I came along. My apologies.

    giphy.gif

    ETA: Oh and thanks, @blankiefinder!
  • Posts: 3,599 Member
    maidentl wrote: »

    I am so confused now. LOL But this could have been avoided if it had been explained that I was misunderstanding something rather than pretend no one was discussing ignorance before I came along. My apologies.

    giphy.gif

    Can understand your confusion to due the lack of quoting.
  • Posts: 5,377 Member
    aye-caramba-bart-simpson.jpg
  • This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 27,167 Member
    senecarr wrote: »
    *tu quoque intensifies*

    Wait! I can't find that on Earlnabbey's list.
  • Posts: 27,167 Member
    shell1005 wrote: »

    You should probably buy their book. Plop down 19.95 and you can learn the rest of their secrets to rapid weight loss success!!! Ta Da!

    What a steal!
  • Posts: 5,377 Member

    Wait! I can't find that on Earlnabbey's list.
    It is a more specific type of ad hominem (attacking the person's character, rather than argument).
  • Posts: 340 Member
    To me, the biggest problem with using CICO exclusively (meaning ignoring hunger cues) is that while CI can be measured quite accurately, CO can't. Not only is there the difficulty in calculating how many calories you are burning during a physical activity, there is the effect of that extra exercise or reduced caloric intake on your general activity level. The harder I exercise, the more deeply I rest at other times of the day. How are we ever going to be able to measure fidgeting?

    Bodymedia fit does a pretty good job. Heck even the apple watch isn't too far off. Like any instrument, these things might consistently estimate a little high or a little low but it's the relative expenditure from day to day that you want to adjust up and you can do that with these tools.

    As for measuring CI and CO as a goal, those numbers aren't what matters. It's the value of CI - CO that matters, and that you can easily get with your scale and a trend chart.

    Osric
  • Posts: 340 Member
    And that's such a shame -- because when you attack people, they tend to shut down and not really listen, so it defeats the whole purpose (unless you just get off on being cruel -- which, sadly, I think is the aim for some people on MFP).

    I prefer Hanlon's razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

    Rather than assuming these posters are "getting off" on being cruel, consider that they are probably just bad at communicating effectively. (Stupidity might also explain some of what they're trying to communicate, too.)

    Osric
  • Posts: 2,408 Member
    flippy1234 wrote: »
    If so, then what is all of this other nonsense?

    It's ways to make money off the ill-informed in a multi-billion dollar industry. It's been around for centuries.
This discussion has been closed.