Isagenix, Science or Woo?
Options
Replies
-
Christine_72 wrote: »What irks me the most is the exorbitant price isagenix et al charge. They prey on desperate, gullible and naive overweight people. Morals are just thrown out the window. I wouldn't have the conscience to peddle this stuff
I couldn't do it either knowing I am selling snake oil to vulnerable people. Much better ways of making money out there.
Worse than that... They prey on family and close friends... Abuse their relationships, try to guilt them into "supporting", loose most of them before they realize they actually made no money, have crazy inventory left to sell, and are now all alone....
0 -
Expatmommy79 wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »What irks me the most is the exorbitant price isagenix et al charge. They prey on desperate, gullible and naive overweight people. Morals are just thrown out the window. I wouldn't have the conscience to peddle this stuff
I couldn't do it either knowing I am selling snake oil to vulnerable people. Much better ways of making money out there.
Worse than that... They prey on family and close friends... Abuse their relationships, try to guilt them into "supporting", loose most of them before they realize they actually made no money, have crazy inventory left to sell, and are now all alone....
When you are desperate all bets are off.0 -
K thanks for clarifying your original statement and one offer to show some of the things that are out there. (It does appear though that others allow their judgement to be impaired by their bias with respect to network marketing, nonetheless):
Beginning in 2009 at New York Chiropractic College, “proof of concept” of
the Isagenix system began with two independent open-labeled pilot trials.
The principal investigator, Mary Balliet, Ph.D., submitted her research to the
renowned scientific conference Experimental Biology. It would be the first
time that the system would strike interest within the scientific community,
paving the way for further interest and research.
By the time 2010 and 2011 rolled around, the company had sought out
collaborations with several colleges and universities for a variety of research
studies. It was also in 2011 that Isagenix partnered with University of Illinois
at Chicago (UIC), a leading research institution in the field of health sciences,
health promotion, and disease prevention.
The UIC partnership would prove to be particularly fruitful, largely because
of the selection of Krista Varady, Ph.D. as lead investigator. Dr. Varady’s
previous research offered encouraging results from intermittent fasting and
alternate-day fasting regimens for weight loss and cardiovascular health.
Unlike other regimens, however, the Isagenix system was the first to
incorporate both an intermittent fasting (Cleanse Days) and a calorierestricted
regimen together (Shake Days). Dr. Varady noted that she was
excited at the prospect of comparing the system to a heart-healthy diet, the
gold-standard benchmark.
Sure enough, after a 10-week study, subjects on the Isagenix system turned
out to have superior results across all clinical parameters in comparison
to the heart-healthy group. Notably, they lost more weight, more total
body fat, and twice as much visceral fat leading to greater improvement in
cardiovascular risk factors (2,3).
The UIC study was a major milestone for Isagenix. Its findings were reported
in two reputable peer-reviewed journals in 2012, Nutrition Journal and
Nutrition and Metabolism (2,3). In addition, in 2013 the study won the award
for best poster in the Obesity Research Interest Section at the Experimental
Biology conference.
It should have been no surprise that the results of the UIC study would
attract other researchers who had an interest in evaluating Isagenix
products. The company, however, was interested in taking research a step
further—a new challenge for the Isagenix system. “Most companies would
stop there, but not Isagenix,” said Chief Science Officer Suk Cho, Ph.D. “The
question was whether people could maintain their weight loss. We also
wanted to evaluate the detoxification component of the system.”
In collaboration with a new principal investigator, Paul Arciero, Ph.D., at
Skidmore College, and toxicologist Don Patterson at AXYS Analytical
Services, it was time to build on where prior research had left off. A new
study was designed that would evaluate the system on both women and
men, how it would affect arterial flexibility and blood flow (both markers of
cardiovascular health), as well as its impact on basal metabolism.
The study was also the first to evaluate a “cleansing” factor by measuring
the increase in circulating toxins as a result of the Isagenix system—the
essential first step in detoxifying and eliminating harmful compounds from
the body. It would be the first study of its kind to evaluate the influence of
nutritional intervention on an increase in circulating toxins as a result of the
weight loss achieved by a combination of “Cleanse Days” and “Shake Days.”
After an initial 10 weeks, the Isagenix system proved once again to deliver
results consistent with the UIC study. The findings were presented as a
poster at Experimental Biology and as an abstract in The FASEB Journal (4).
At this point, Isagenix gave Dr. Arciero the funding to extend the study with
a 12-month weight maintenance period. The initial subjects were split into
two groups, with half assigned to a dietitian-counseled, heart-healthy diet
and the other half continuing on a maintenance program using Isagenix
products.
After six months, the preliminary results were exciting for Isagenix. The
system was still showing promising results with considerable metabolic and
cardiovascular improvements, along with weight loss and metabolic rate
maintained or improved. Currently underway is a review of the final data of
the Skidmore College study after 12 months of weight maintenance.
Dr. Cho notes that few companies that market nutritional products ever
venture into funding quality research to demonstrate the efficacy of their
products. “We did. We want to show that using our products in the longterm
leads to lasting benefits,” says Dr. Cho.
0 -
Expatmommy79 wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »What irks me the most is the exorbitant price isagenix et al charge. They prey on desperate, gullible and naive overweight people. Morals are just thrown out the window. I wouldn't have the conscience to peddle this stuff
I couldn't do it either knowing I am selling snake oil to vulnerable people. Much better ways of making money out there.
Worse than that... They prey on family and close friends... Abuse their relationships, try to guilt them into "supporting", loose most of them before they realize they actually made no money, have crazy inventory left to sell, and are now all alone....
And the only thing worse than that is when they try to start recruiting you to sell it even if you haven't used the product.
I had a friend who was selling an MLM (not a weight loss product) and she was more interested in recruiting me as a consultant than she was about getting me to purchase a few items. It didn't matter to her that I never tried the product or that I am loyal to another brand, her only concern was to get people under her so she could move up.0 -
Yes, of course. Anybody who doesn't blindly buy into the woo has impaired judgment. Of course. I'm sure that's one of the lines they teach their salespeople.Destiny4_four wrote: »K thanks for clarifying your original statement and one offer to show some of the things that are out there. (It does appear though that others allow their judgement to be impaired by their bias with respect to network marketing, nonetheless):
I didn't even bother quoting or responding to the rest of the post because it's just more regurgitated marketing woo straight from the company.
0 -
Jkal, I agree with you. That's what gives this industry such a bad rap. And unfortunately it is more the norm than the exception these days.0
-
@alex this is starting to sound like an infomercial0
-
Destiny4_four wrote: »K thanks for clarifying your original statement and one offer to show some of the things that are out there. (It does appear though that others allow their judgement to be impaired by their bias with respect to network marketing, nonetheless):
Beginning in 2009 at New York Chiropractic College, “proof of concept” of
the Isagenix system began with two independent open-labeled pilot trials.
The principal investigator, Mary Balliet, Ph.D., submitted her research to the
renowned scientific conference Experimental Biology. It would be the first
time that the system would strike interest within the scientific community,
paving the way for further interest and research.
By the time 2010 and 2011 rolled around, the company had sought out
collaborations with several colleges and universities for a variety of research
studies. It was also in 2011 that Isagenix partnered with University of Illinois
at Chicago (UIC), a leading research institution in the field of health sciences,
health promotion, and disease prevention.
The UIC partnership would prove to be particularly fruitful, largely because
of the selection of Krista Varady, Ph.D. as lead investigator. Dr. Varady’s
previous research offered encouraging results from intermittent fasting and
alternate-day fasting regimens for weight loss and cardiovascular health.
Unlike other regimens, however, the Isagenix system was the first to
incorporate both an intermittent fasting (Cleanse Days) and a calorierestricted
regimen together (Shake Days). Dr. Varady noted that she was
excited at the prospect of comparing the system to a heart-healthy diet, the
gold-standard benchmark.
Sure enough, after a 10-week study, subjects on the Isagenix system turned
out to have superior results across all clinical parameters in comparison
to the heart-healthy group. Notably, they lost more weight, more total
body fat, and twice as much visceral fat leading to greater improvement in
cardiovascular risk factors (2,3).
The UIC study was a major milestone for Isagenix. Its findings were reported
in two reputable peer-reviewed journals in 2012, Nutrition Journal and
Nutrition and Metabolism (2,3). In addition, in 2013 the study won the award
for best poster in the Obesity Research Interest Section at the Experimental
Biology conference.
It should have been no surprise that the results of the UIC study would
attract other researchers who had an interest in evaluating Isagenix
products. The company, however, was interested in taking research a step
further—a new challenge for the Isagenix system. “Most companies would
stop there, but not Isagenix,” said Chief Science Officer Suk Cho, Ph.D. “The
question was whether people could maintain their weight loss. We also
wanted to evaluate the detoxification component of the system.”
In collaboration with a new principal investigator, Paul Arciero, Ph.D., at
Skidmore College, and toxicologist Don Patterson at AXYS Analytical
Services, it was time to build on where prior research had left off. A new
study was designed that would evaluate the system on both women and
men, how it would affect arterial flexibility and blood flow (both markers of
cardiovascular health), as well as its impact on basal metabolism.
The study was also the first to evaluate a “cleansing” factor by measuring
the increase in circulating toxins as a result of the Isagenix system—the
essential first step in detoxifying and eliminating harmful compounds from
the body. It would be the first study of its kind to evaluate the influence of
nutritional intervention on an increase in circulating toxins as a result of the
weight loss achieved by a combination of “Cleanse Days” and “Shake Days.”
After an initial 10 weeks, the Isagenix system proved once again to deliver
results consistent with the UIC study. The findings were presented as a
poster at Experimental Biology and as an abstract in The FASEB Journal (4).
At this point, Isagenix gave Dr. Arciero the funding to extend the study with
a 12-month weight maintenance period. The initial subjects were split into
two groups, with half assigned to a dietitian-counseled, heart-healthy diet
and the other half continuing on a maintenance program using Isagenix
products.
After six months, the preliminary results were exciting for Isagenix. The
system was still showing promising results with considerable metabolic and
cardiovascular improvements, along with weight loss and metabolic rate
maintained or improved. Currently underway is a review of the final data of
the Skidmore College study after 12 months of weight maintenance.
Dr. Cho notes that few companies that market nutritional products ever
venture into funding quality research to demonstrate the efficacy of their
products. “We did. We want to show that using our products in the longterm
leads to lasting benefits,” says Dr. Cho.
Yup, quoted straight off the website. If you read the article, though, it's a study piloted by UIC about IF and the effects of using a liquid substitute as part of a diet.
It's strongly biased though because the same results have been achieved over and over across fields of nutrition for decades by restricting calories. It does not at all demonstrate how Isagenix is unique to assisting in that or back up ANY of their claims about its healing effects.
0 -
K not to bore anyone else, what did you think of the Skidmore study?0
-
It's strongly biased though because the same results have been achieved over and over across fields of nutrition for decades by restricting calories. It does not at all demonstrate how Isagenix is unique to assisting in that or back up ANY of their claims about its healing effects.
Nor does it address the purity of their products or the accuracy of their labeling (i.e., whether or not the products actually even contain what they say it does). Many reputable supplement companies have submitted their products to USP or other independent labs for testing. To my knowledge, none of the MLM companies have, and it's a shame because I'd LOVE to see the results.0 -
Anvil, you do realize that the study collaborated the science and the effectiveness of the Isagenix products. Yes other things can produce the same results, but the science is there which is the answer to the question that was asked.0
-
Has the Skidmore study been published yet? There were no results reported by the government based on their clinical trial submission.0
-
Destiny4_four wrote: »Anvil, you do realize that the study collaborated the science and the effectiveness of the Isagenix products. Yes other things can produce the same results, but the science is there which is the answer to the question that was asked.
The only thing it proved was that IF is effective.
The study was very poorly designed, unfortunately, and despite the claims, it really fails to show anything about Isagenix in and of itself.
0 -
It achieved the results using the Isagenix products (not sure what you mean by IF). Yes the study concluded in '14. results were extremely favorable to Isagenix.0
-
Destiny4_four wrote: »It achieved the results using the Isagenix products (not sure what you mean by IF). Yes the study concluded in '14. results were extremely favorable to Isagenix.
It concluded in March 2015 actually and besides Isagneix fliers, the results aren't readily available on the government trials website. Happen to have the full text?0 -
Destiny4_four wrote: »It achieved the results using the Isagenix products (not sure what you mean by IF). Yes the study concluded in '14. results were extremely favorable to Isagenix.
And IF is Intermittent Fasting, from the title of the study.0 -
Yes which is part of the system when using the Isagenix system. But it was their system using their products that was validated by the study.
The Skidmore study was concluded in '14 and presented in March of '15. Here is a quote from it:
‘‘ Building on previous studies, our research is the first to demonstrate
safe, healthy weight loss and long-term maintenance using the Isagenix
system. In addition, it’s the first to evaluate release of toxins as a result
of a targeted calorie restriction and intermittent fasting nutritional
intervention.
PAUL ARCIERO, Ph.D.
Director of the Human Nutrition and Metabolism Lab and professor in the
Department of Health and Exercise Sciences at Skidmore College
0 -
There are a lot of people who utilize IF as a diet plan. It is far from unique to Isagenix and definitely not developed by it.
I would be willing to bet that just about any IF study I pulled out would show positive results just like Isagenix, but your lack of provision of any decent science or full text article is telling about the product.
I'm out. I truly hope that someday you wake up and realize that it's a scam.0 -
K you saw 2 independent studies concluding that the products work (not only short term but long term as well). That is the "science" behind their products proven. No one has to like their products, but my whole point is that it certainly is not a scam.
I do think we beat it to death, but all the evidence is certainly there/here.
And for the record I am a huge proponent for a healthy eating lifestyle, but I recognize that there is no one size fits all.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 397 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 975 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions