Is it wrong to have a cyber GF and a real one as well?
Replies
-
BinaryPulsar wrote: »Well sometimes people think they have a cyber girlfriend, but it's actually just a fantasy in their mind (seems to happen). So, in that case it could still be harmful, but more to you because of being caught up in a fantasy instead of enjoying reality, but not necessarily harmful in a serious way. It just depends.
You're a star0 -
I have multiple cyber GFs....maybe I'm mental0
-
LiftingRiot wrote: »Ok. I think I just got a cyber GF. Now I need to find a real one.... Or should it be the other way around? This is getting complicated.
Congrats!!!! The order isn't important
0 -
finny11122 wrote: »BinaryPulsar wrote: »Well sometimes people think they have a cyber girlfriend, but it's actually just a fantasy in their mind (seems to happen). So, in that case it could still be harmful, but more to you because of being caught up in a fantasy instead of enjoying reality, but not necessarily harmful in a serious way. It just depends.
You're a star
With a binary companion of a neutron star.0 -
I get called a hillbilly but I'm not American. Just country
Ha! Ain't nothing wrong wit a newf! One of the best breeds you'll ever meet! I know many....0 -
-
Cyber girlfriend? Magazines used to suffice. Now the fellas need their supplemental smut to be electronically interactive
Hey hey hey now.... Don't get all sexist about it and act like its only guys that need electronically interactive.... We don't mind cheating with cyber GFs but sexism isn't appreciated. Jeeeeezzz some people
0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »
Lmao! Ha! You make me laugh! Thought I was dreaming.....0 -
-
JessicaJS23 wrote: »
Lmao.0 -
Cyber girlfriends cant be a real thing...really?! Like long distance, knowing well never meet relationship. Whats the point of that?!0
-
Cyber girlfriends cant be a real thing...really?! Like long distance, knowing well never meet relationship. Whats the point of that?!
Have you not seen or heard of catfish. Plenty of people have them. On the other end there's usually deceit going on like the other person has a spouse.. Their appearance was a sham or they lied about their male/female parts. It's great.
0 -
LiftingRiot wrote: »Cyber girlfriend? Magazines used to suffice. Now the fellas need their supplemental smut to be electronically interactive
Hey hey hey now.... Don't get all sexist about it and act like its only guys that need electronically interactive.... We don't mind cheating with cyber GFs but sexism isn't appreciated. Jeeeeezzz some people
Well, I knew one 52 year old girl who succumbed to the powerfully magnetic lure of interactive cyber smut when it used to be known as "phone sex on the computer" in its high tech infancy.
But her throbbing, post-menapausal libido and delusions of grandeur were taken down a peg or two when they met in real life. And he had bad breath, rarely shaved or clipped his fingernails, had little to say and didn't pay for her way for restaurant meals. And THEN, after a week of this, he callously ate a Snickers bar at the airport while awaiting the departure of his flight as she sobbed pitifully next to him and asked him why he wasn't responsive to her feelings.
I just told her she probably shouldn't do that again. Or at least not tell everybody at work if she did. I don't know if she took my advice.
I don't know why I read all that but im disappointed in myself for reading it. The only part worth ready was about the snickers.0 -
BinaryPulsar wrote: »finny11122 wrote: »BinaryPulsar wrote: »Well sometimes people think they have a cyber girlfriend, but it's actually just a fantasy in their mind (seems to happen). So, in that case it could still be harmful, but more to you because of being caught up in a fantasy instead of enjoying reality, but not necessarily harmful in a serious way. It just depends.
You're a star
With a binary companion of a neutron star.
I knew you would get the double meaning0 -
LiftingRiot wrote: »Cyber girlfriend? Magazines used to suffice. Now the fellas need their supplemental smut to be electronically interactive
Hey hey hey now.... Don't get all sexist about it and act like its only guys that need electronically interactive.... We don't mind cheating with cyber GFs but sexism isn't appreciated. Jeeeeezzz some people
Well, I knew one 52 year old girl who succumbed to the powerfully magnetic lure of interactive cyber smut when it used to be known as "phone sex on the computer" in its high tech infancy.
But her throbbing, post-menapausal libido and delusions of grandeur were taken down a peg or two when they met in real life. And he had bad breath, rarely shaved or clipped his fingernails, had little to say and didn't pay for her way for restaurant meals. And THEN, after a week of this, he callously ate a Snickers bar at the airport while awaiting the departure of his flight as she sobbed pitifully next to him and asked him why he wasn't responsive to her feelings.
I just told her she probably shouldn't do that again. Or at least not tell everybody at work if she did. I don't know if she took my advice.
I had a cyber romance once. Too bad the catfish show wasn't around because we would have been one of the love story's that turned out to perfect!
0 -
-
-
LiftingRiot wrote: »Cyber girlfriend? Magazines used to suffice. Now the fellas need their supplemental smut to be electronically interactive
Hey hey hey now.... Don't get all sexist about it and act like its only guys that need electronically interactive.... We don't mind cheating with cyber GFs but sexism isn't appreciated. Jeeeeezzz some people
Well, I knew one 52 year old girl who succumbed to the powerfully magnetic lure of interactive cyber smut when it used to be known as "phone sex on the computer" in its high tech infancy.
But her throbbing, post-menapausal libido and delusions of grandeur were taken down a peg or two when they met in real life. And he had bad breath, rarely shaved or clipped his fingernails, had little to say and didn't pay for her way for restaurant meals. And THEN, after a week of this, he callously ate a Snickers bar at the airport while awaiting the departure of his flight as she sobbed pitifully next to him and asked him why he wasn't responsive to her feelings.
I just told her she probably shouldn't do that again. Or at least not tell everybody at work if she did. I don't know if she took my advice.
He still sounds better than the last few real life men I've dated.
0 -
finny11122 wrote: »BinaryPulsar wrote: »finny11122 wrote: »BinaryPulsar wrote: »Well sometimes people think they have a cyber girlfriend, but it's actually just a fantasy in their mind (seems to happen). So, in that case it could still be harmful, but more to you because of being caught up in a fantasy instead of enjoying reality, but not necessarily harmful in a serious way. It just depends.
You're a star
With a binary companion of a neutron star.
I knew you would get the double meaning
:-)0 -
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?0 -
-
JessicaJS23 wrote: »_Captivated_ wrote: »
Hopefully his credit card #'s!!
Us Canadians know our money is no good to Americans.....it's our sexy accents
Agreed!! Love a sexy accent!0 -
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol0 -
Only if you put on your robe and wizard hat.0
-
JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
0 -
tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
Maybe they can be sister wives...0 -
Or trouple.....you know, instead of a couple there's a trouple...it's for real here lol0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 430 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions