Is it wrong to have a cyber GF and a real one as well?
Replies
-
You've taken it too far stealing my ideas sir.tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
Maybe they can be sister wives...
0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
BUT... BUT
0 -
As hilarious as this thread is...
Any person (male or female) that could accept their loved one having an emotional relationship besides the current one makes me question their morals... but hey I'm not your judge or jury so like someone else said do whatever makes you happy cause you are the one that has to deal with the consequences.0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »
You've taken it too far stealing my ideas sir.tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
Maybe they can be sister wives...
Moi. I don't steal....and what are you goin to do about it? You already broke it off with me
0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
BUT... BUT
At least there's the fantasy....right?0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
BUT... BUT
At least there's the fantasy....right?
The fantasy is always better anyway. Because when the real life person shows and looks like Gollum you'll really reconsider your MFP membership.
0 -
tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
BUT... BUT
At least there's the fantasy....right?
The fantasy is always better anyway. Because when the real life person shows and looks like Gollum you'll really reconsider your MFP membership.
LMAO....Too true0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
BUT... BUT
At least there's the fantasy....right?
I guess that's why cyber love doesn't cut it for me : (0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »
You've taken it too far stealing my ideas sir.tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
Maybe they can be sister wives...
Moi. I don't steal....and what are you goin to do about it? You already broke it off with me
Pen a Tell all.
0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
BUT... BUT
At least there's the fantasy....right?
I guess that's why cyber love doesn't cut it for me : (
Talk like that may provoke air travel.......0 -
Depends. Do you have enough hot air to inflate both of them? ;-)0
-
JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
BUT... BUT
At least there's the fantasy....right?
I guess that's why cyber love doesn't cut it for me : (
Talk like that may provoke air travel.......
First class!!
0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
BUT... BUT
At least there's the fantasy....right?
I guess that's why cyber love doesn't cut it for me : (
Talk like that may provoke air travel.......
First class!!
All the way0 -
JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
You've taken it too far stealing my ideas sir.tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
Maybe they can be sister wives...
Moi. I don't steal....and what are you goin to do about it? You already broke it off with me
Pen a Tell all.
K0 -
I volunteer to be henshemi's new cyber gf so he can write his book.0
-
JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
BUT... BUT
At least there's the fantasy....right?
I guess that's why cyber love doesn't cut it for me : (
Talk like that may provoke air travel.......
First class!!
All the way
I can feel the cyber love here!!!
0 -
Lmao0
-
lol0
-
JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?tracyannk28 wrote: »JessicaJS23 wrote: »
lol but then it wouldnt be cyber, right? It would be a long distance relationship. Is it much different then like, match.com without ever meeting the person or is this strictly associated with, like, chatrooms?tracyannk28 wrote: »
I was unaware of the rules.....this is all new to me lol
Wait!! We're not supposed to meet?
Now that would just ruin everything! The whole point of it is that you don't ever have to see each other in person! Otherwise you might as well stick with your real life girlfriend.
BUT... BUT
At least there's the fantasy....right?
I guess that's why cyber love doesn't cut it for me : (
Talk like that may provoke air travel.......
First class!!
All the way
With your assistance I can be mfp's Heidi Fleiss except ya know.. Cute
0 -
I thought cyber gfs might be ok. I even met two of them (yeah, I know that made them un-cyber) based upon what I believed to be smokin' hot "after" pics. Sadly, they turned out to be "before" pics. SUBSTANTIALLY "before". Perfidious wenches. They cannot be trusted anymore than the real gfs. (Or did they just transform into that when I made them un-cyber?) All I know, is that at my age I find myself leaning more and more to running, bourbon and porn.0
-
LiftingRiot wrote: »can someone please explain whats the difference between cyber gf and real gf?
Yes, gladly.
Real gf: slap yo azz silly if you even try to drive a hard bargain
Cyber gf: stick yo floppy disk in that hard drive
0 -
MorningGhost14 wrote: »I thought cyber gfs might be ok. I even met two of them (yeah, I know that made them un-cyber) based upon what I believed to be smokin' hot "after" pics. Sadly, they turned out to be "before" pics. SUBSTANTIALLY "before". Perfidious wenches. They cannot be trusted anymore than the real gfs. (Or did they just transform into that when I made them un-cyber?) All I know, is that at my age I find myself leaning more and more to running, bourbon and porn.
Smart man
0 -
HealthyMe2016 wrote: »go watch the movie "Her"
LOL...I was thinking the same thing...the OS......I watched it last nite, creepy as all hell!!0 -
-
0
-
MorningGhost14 wrote: »I thought cyber gfs might be ok. I even met two of them (yeah, I know that made them un-cyber) based upon what I believed to be smokin' hot "after" pics. Sadly, they turned out to be "before" pics. SUBSTANTIALLY "before". Perfidious wenches. They cannot be trusted anymore than the real gfs. (Or did they just transform into that when I made them un-cyber?) All I know, is that at my age I find myself leaning more and more to running, bourbon and porn.
Lol that's terrible0 -
Why would someone want more than one woman to deal with in real life?
Guys are stupid.0 -
@ThatFatAsianNerd ... shlt... you gotta bring culture into this convo? Wtf? (But a better choice than my Hallmark platitude...)
@henshemi ... I would have been relieved if had just been "terrible".... the worst and most embarrassing part is that after I got torched the first time, I was stupid enough to dive back in a second time....
And if it wasn't for this goddam bourbon, I would have never revealed that shameful time in my life...lol0 -
MorningGhost14 wrote: »@ThatFatAsianNerd ... shlt... you gotta bring culture into this convo? Wtf? (But a better choice than my Hallmark platitude...)
@henshemi ... I would have been relieved if had just been "terrible".... the worst and most embarrassing part is that after I got torched the first time, I was stupid enough to dive back in a second time....
And if it wasn't for this goddam bourbon, I would have never revealed that shameful time in my life...lol
Your story is safe with us.
0 -
And Google apparently0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 430 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions